Acceptability and educational impact of a peer feedback model for significant event analysis

Medical Education

Volumn 42, Issue 12, 2008, Pages 1210-1217

  McKay, John ^a,b   Shepherd, Annabel ^a   Bowie, Paul ^a   Lough, Murray ^a  

^a NHS EDUCATION FOR SCOTLAND   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GLASGOW   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Education, medical, graduate *methods; Family practice *education; Feedback; Peer group; Personal satisfaction; Scotland

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; EXPERIENCE; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; HUMAN; INTERVIEW; LEARNING; MEDICAL EDUCATION; NORMAL HUMAN; PEER GROUP; PHYSICIAN; ROLE PLAYING; TRAINING; WORK;

CLINICAL COMPETENCE; EDUCATION, MEDICAL, GRADUATE; FAMILY PRACTICE; HUMANS; MODELS, EDUCATIONAL; PEER GROUP; PHYSICIANS, FAMILY; SCOTLAND;

EID: 56649107773     PISSN: 03080110     EISSN: 13652923     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2008.03235.x     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. McKay J, Bowie P, Lough JRM. Evaluating significant event analyses: implementing change is a measure of success. Education for Primary Care 2003 14 : 34 8.
2. General Medical Council. Good Medical Practice. London : GMC 2005.
3. McKay J, Bowie P, Lough JRM. Variation in the ability of general medical practitioners to apply two methods of clinical audit: a 5-year study of assessment by peer review. J Eval Clin Pract 2006 12 : 622 9.
4. McKay J, Murphy D, Bowie P, Schmuck M-L, Lough M, Eva KW. Development and testing of an assessment instrument for the formative peer review of significant event analyses. Qual Saf Health Care 2007 16 : 150 3.
5. Campbell LM, Howie JGR, Murray TS. The use of videotaped consultations in the assessment of general practice trainees. Br J Gen Pract 1995 43 : 430 4.
6. Lough JRM, McKay J, Murray TS. Audit and summative assessment: a criterion-referenced marking schedule. Br J Gen Pract 1995 45 : 607 9.
7. Bowie P, McKay J, Dalgetty E, Lough JRM. A qualitative study of why general practitioners may participate in significant event analysis and educational peer assessment. Qual Saf Health Care 2005 14 : 185 9.
8. Sykes A, McKay J, Bowie P, Lough JRM, Murray TS. Significant event analysis [Letter]. Educ Gen Pract 2003 14 (3 377 9.
9. McKay J, Pope L, Bowie P, Lough JRM. External feedback in general practice: a focus group study of trained peer reviewers of significant event analyses. J Eval in Clin Pract (in press).
10. Donaldson L. Good Doctors, Safer Patients. A Report by the Chief Medical Officer. London : Stationery Office 2006 : 198.
11. Hewson MG, Little ML. Giving feedback in medical education: verification of recommended techniques. J Gen Intern Med 1998 13 (2 111 6.
12. Department of Health. New GMS Contract 2006/7. London : Stationery Office 2006.
13. Grol R, Lawrence M. A model for peer review and audit. In : Grol R, Lawrence M, eds. Quality Improvement by Peer Review. Oxford : Oxford University Press 1995 34 8.
14. Helfer R. Peer evaluation: its potential usefulness in medical education. Br J Med Educ 1972 6 (4 224 31.
15. Scottish Executive, NHS Education for Scotland, RCGP (Scotland) and BMA (Scotland). GP Appraisal: a Brief Guide. Edinburgh : Scottish Executive 2003.
16. Bradley CP. Turning anecdotes into data - the critical incident technique. Fam Pract 1992 9 (1 98 103.
17. van de Ridder JMM, Stokking KM, McGaghie WC, ten Cate OTJ. What is feedback in clinical education Med Educ 2008 42 (2 189 97.
18. Ringsted C, Henriksen AH, Skaarup AM, van der Vleuten CPM. Educational impact of in-training assessment (ITA) in postgraduate medical education. A qualitative study of an ITA programme in actual practice. Med Educ 2004 38 : 767 77.
19. National Patient Safety Agency. Seven Steps to Patient Safety for Primary Care. London : NPSA 2005.
20. Nicol DJ, McFarlane-Dick D. Formative assessment and self-regulated learning: a model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Stud Higher Educ 2006 31 : 199 218.
21. Driessen E, van Tartwijk J, Dornan T. The self-critical doctor: helping students become more reflective. BMJ 2008 336 : 827 30.
22. Sargeant J, Mann K, Ferrier S. Exploring family physicians' reactions to multisource feedback: perceptions of credibility and usefulness. Med Educ 2005 39 : 497 504.
23. Davis DA, Mazmanian PE, Fordis M, Van Harrison R, Thorpe KE, Perrier L. Accuracy of physician self-assessment compared with observed measures of competence. JAMA 2006 9 : 1094 102.