Modeling didactic knowledge by storyboarding

Journal of Educational Computing Research

Volumn 42, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 355-383

  Knauf, Rainer ^a   Sakurai, Yoshitaka ^b   Tsuruta, Setsuo ^b   Jantke, Klaus ^c  

^a ILMENAU UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Germany)

^b TOKYO DENKI UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^c FRAUNHOFER IDMT   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77952627478     PISSN: 07356331     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2190/EC.42.4.a     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Agostinho, S. (2006). The use of a visual learning design representation to document and communicate teaching ideas. In L. Markauskaite, P. Goodyear, & P. Raimann (Eds.), Proceedings of the 23rd annual conference of the Australasian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education: Who's learning? Whose technology? (Vol. 1, pp. 3-8). Sydney: Sydney University Press.
2. Agostinho, S., Oliver, R., Harper, B., Hedberg, H., & Wills, S. (2002). A tool to evaluate the potential for an ICT-based learning design to foster "high quality learning." In A. Williamson, C. Gunn, A. Young, & T. Clear (Eds.), Winds of change in the sea of learning. Proceedings of the 19th annual Conference of the Australasian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education (pp. 29-38). Auckland, NZ: UNITEC Institute of Technology.
3. Australian University Teaching Committee. (2009). Retrieved from http://www.learningdesigns.uow.edu.au/
4. Balaji, V., Arora, A., Jain, A., Goyal, G., Dubey, G., & Singh, S. (2005). SCORM learning sequence modeling with petri nets in cooperative learning. Learning Technology, 7 (1), Special Issue on SCORM 2004 Sequencing & Navigation, ISSN 1438-0625.
5. Boeck, R., Knauf, R., Sakurai, Y., & Tsuruta, S. (2008). Methods for path evaluation in dynamic storyboards. Proceedings of the 8th IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies 2008 , ISBN 978-0-7695-3167-0, 614-616.
6. Booch, G., Rumbaugh, J., & Jacobson, I. (1999). The unified modeling language user guide . Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
7. 2ML-A visual language for the design of instruction. Educational Technologies Research & Development, 54 (3), 265-293.
8. Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school . Washington, DC: National Academic Press.
9. Briggs, R. M., Gagne, L. J., & Wager, W. W. (1992). Principles of instructional design . Belmont, CA: Thomson Learning.
10. Caeiro-Rodríguez, M., Marcelino, M. J., Llamas-Nistal, M., Anido-Rifón, L., & Mendes, A. J. (2007). Supporting the modeling of flexible educational units PoEML: A separation of concerns approach. Journal of Universal Computer Science, 13 (7), 980-990.
11. Chiang, F.-K., & Chung, S. (2006). A case study on an experienced elementary teacher's teaching strategies and teaching reflection in mathematical classroom. In C. Crawford et al. (Eds.), Proceedings of Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education International Conference 2006 , Chesapeake, VA: AACE, pp. 3697-3703.
12. Damasio, A. (1999). The feeling of what happens: Body and emotion in the making of consciousness . New York: Harcourt.
13. Davis, B., Sumara, D., & Luce-Kapler, R. (2000). Learning and teaching in a complex world . Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
14. Derntl, M. (2005). Patterns for person-centered e-learning . Ph.D. thesis, Faculty of Computer Science, University of Vienna, Austria.
15. Dohi, S., Nakamura, Y., Sakurai, Y., Tsuruta, S., & Knauf, R. (2006). Dynamic learning need reflection system for academic education and its applicability to intelligent agents. Proceedings of the 6th IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT 2006) , ISBN 0-7695-2632-2, Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Computer Society, pp. 459-463.
16. Dohi, S., Sakurai, Y., Tsuruta, S., & Knauf, R. (2006). Managing academic education through dynamic storyboarding. Proceedings of the World Conference on e-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education 2006 (E-Learn 2006) , Chesapeake, VA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), ISBN: 1-880094-60-6, pp. 1611-1619.
17. Felder, R. M., & Silverman, L. K. (1988). Learning and teaching styles in engineering education. Engineering Education, 78 (7), 674-681.
18. Feyer, T., & Thalheim, B. (1999). E/R based scenario modelling for rapid prototyping of web information services. P.P.-S. Chen (Ed.), Advances in Conceptual Modeling , Vol. 1727 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science (LNCS) , Berlin: Springer, pp. 253-263.
19. Flechsig, K.-H. (1996). Kleines Handbuch didaktischer Modelle (German), Neuland.
20. Forsha, H. I. (1994). The complete guide to storyboarding and problem solving . Milwaukee, WI: ASQ Quality Press.
21. Gardner, H. (1993). Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences . New York: Basic Books.
22. Gibbons, A. S., & Brewer, E. K. (2005). Elementary principles of design languages and design notation systems for instructional design. In J. M. Spector, C. Ohrazda, A. van Schaak, & A. Wiley (Eds.), Innovations to instructional technology: Essays in honor of M. David Merrill (pp. 111-129). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
23. Goodyear, P. (2005). Educational design and networked learning: Patterns, pattern languages and design practice. Australian Journal of Educational Technology, 21 (1), 82-101.
24. Hung, J.-L., & Crooks, M. (2009). Examining online learning patterns with data mining techniques in peer-moderated and teacher-moderated courses. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 40 (2), 183-210.
25. IMS Global Learning Consortium. (2009). Retrieved from http://www.imsglobal.org/learningdesign/
26. Inaba, A., & Mizoguchi, R. (2004). Learning design palette: An ontology-aware authoring system for learning design. Proceedings of International Conference on Computers in Education in Education (ICCE2004), Retrieved from http://www.ei.sanken.osakau.ac.jp/pub/ina/ina-icce04.pdf
27. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE). (2002). Retrieved from http://ltsc.ieee.org/wg12/files/LOM-1484-12-1-vl-Final-Draft.pdf
28. Jantke, K. P., & Knauf, R. (2005). Didactic design though storyboarding: Standard concepts for standard tools. Proceedings of the 4th International Symposium on Information and Communication Technologies, Workshop on Dissemination of e-Learning Technologies and Applications . New York: ACM Press, ISBN 0-9544145-6-X, pp. 20-25.
29. Jochems, W. M. G., van Merriënboer, J. J. G., & Koper, R. (2003). Integrated e-learning: Implications for pedagogy, technology and organization . London: Routledge Farmer.
30. Knauf, R., Boeck, R., Sakurai, Y., Dohi, S., & Tsuruta, S. (2007). Using storyboarding and data mining to estimate success chances of curricula. Proceedings of the IADIS International Conference on Cognition and Exploratory Learning in Digital Age (CELDA 2007) , IADIS Press, ISBN 978-972-8924-48-5, pp. 235-242.
31. Knauf, R., Boeck, R., Sakurai, Y., & Tsuruta, S. (2008). A priori evaluation and refinement of curricula by data mining over storyboards. Proceedings of 21th International Florida Artificial Intelligence Research Society Conference 2008 (FLAIRS-2008) , Menlo Park, CA: AAAI Press, ISBN 978-1-57735-365-2, pp. 335-340.
32. Knauf, R., Sakurai, Y., & Tsuruta, S. (2007). Toward making didactics a subject of knowledge engineering. The 7th IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT 2007), Las Alamitos, CA: IEEE Computer Society, ISBN 0-7695-2916-X, pp. 788-792.
33. Knauf, R., Sakurai, Y., Tsuruta, S. Takada, K., & Dohi, S. (2009). Personalized curriculum composition by learner profile driven data mining. Proceedings of the 2009 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (SMC 2009) , ISBN 978-1-4244-2794-9, 99, pp. 2137-2142.
34. Koper, R. (2002). Educational modeling language: Adding instructional design to existing specifications . Technical Report, Educational Expertise Technology Centre, Open University of the Netherlands.
35. Laforcade, P. (2005). Towards UML-based educational modeling language. Proceedings of the 5th IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT'05) , pp. 855-859.
36. Learning Activity Management System. (2009). Retrieved from http://www.lamsinternational.com/
37. Lin, J., Ho, C., Sadiq, W., & Orlowska, W. E. (2002). Using workflow technology to manage flexible e-learning services. Educational Technology and Society, 5 (4).
38. Liu, Y. (2007). A comparative study of learning styles between online and traditional students. Journal of Educational and Computing Research, 37 (1), 41-63.
39. McAndrew, P., Goodyear, P., & Dalziel, J. (2006). Patterns, designs, and activities: unifying descriptions of learning structures. International Journal of Learning Technology, 2 (2/3), 216-242.
40. Nodenot, T., Laforcade, P., Marquesuzaá, C., & Sallaberry, C. (2003). Knowledge modeling of co-operative learning situations: Towards a ML profile. Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education (AIED 2003) , Sydney, Australia: International AI-ED Society, pp. 219-227.
41. Pedagogical Patterns. (2009). Retrieved from http://www. pedagogicalpatterns.org/
42. Rodríguez-Artacho, M., & Verdejo Maíllo, M. F. (2004). Modeling educational content: The cognitive approach of the PALO language. Educational Technology & Society, 7 (3), 124-137.
43. Rothwell, W. J., & Kazanas, H. C. (2004). Mastering the instructional design process: A systematic approach (3rd ed.). San Francisco, CA: Pfeiffer.
44. Sakurai, Y., Dohi, S., Tsuruta, S., & Knauf, R. (2009). Modeling academic education processes by dynamic storyboarding. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 12 , International Forum of Educational Technology & Society (IFETS), ISSN 1436-4522 (online) and 1176-3647 (print), pp. 307-333.
45. Schewe, K.-D., & Thalheim, B. (2005). The co-design approach to web information systems development. International Journal of Web Information Systems, 1 (1), 5-14.
46. Sykes, E. R., & Franek, F. (2003). A prototype for an intelligent tutoring system for students learning to program in Java. Proceedings of the IASTED International Conference on Computers and Advanced Technology in Education , Rhodes, Greece, pp. 78-83.
47. Waters, S. H., & Gibbons, A. S. (2004). Design languages, notation systems, and industrial technology: A case study. Educational Technology, Research and Development, 52 (2), 57-68.