Modeling academic education processes by dynamic storyboarding

Educational Technology and Society

Volumn 12, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 307-333

  Sakurai, Yoshitaka ^a   Dohi, Shinichi ^a   Tsuruta, Setsuo ^a   Knauf, Rainer ^b  

^a TOKYO DENKI UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b ILMENAU UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Dynamic learning need reflection system; Knowledge engineering; Learning processes; Process modeling; Storyboarding

Indexed keywords

EID: 77649309551     PISSN: 11763647     EISSN: 14364522     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Boeck, R. (2007). Ein Data Mining Verfahren zur Pfadbewertung in Storyboards [English: A data mining approach for path evaluation in storyboards], Diploma thesis, Germany: Ilmenau University of Technology, Faculty of Computer Science and Automation.
2. Bransford, J.D., Brown, A.L., & Cocking, R.R. (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school, Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.
3. Chang, W.C., Lin, H.W., Shih, T.K., & Yang, H.C. (2005). SCORM learning sequence modeling with Petri nets in cooperative learning. Learning Technology, 7 (1), 28-33.
4. Damasio, A. (1999). The feeling of what happens: Body and emotion in the making of consciousness, Orlando, FL: Harcourt.
5. Davis, B., Sumara, D., & Luce-Kapler, R. (2000). Engaging minds: Learning and teaching in a complex world, Philadelphia, PA: Lawrence Erlbaum.
6. Dohi, S., & Nakamura, S. (2003). The development of the dynamic syllabus for school of information environment. In Benkiran, A. (Eds.), Proceedings of 4th International Conference on Information Technology Based Higher Education and Training (pp.505-510), Calgary, AB: ACTA Press.
7. Dohi, S., Nakamura, S., Sakurai, Y., Tsuruta, S., & Knauf, R. (2006a). Dynamic learning need reflection system for academic education and its applicability to intelligent agents. In Kinshuk, Koper, R., Kommers, P., Kirschner, P., Sampson, D.G., & Didderen, W. (Eds.) Proceedings of the 6th IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies, (pp.459-463), Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Computer Society.
8. Dohi, S., Sakurai, Y., Tsuruta, S., & Knauf, R. (2006b). Managing academic education through dynamic storyboarding. In Reeves, T. & Yamashita, S. (Eds.), Proceedings of World Conference on e-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education 2006 (pp.1611-1619), Chesapeake, VA: AACE.
9. Duesel, H. (2007). Konzeption und Realisierung von Methoden der formalen Verifikation von Storyboards [English: Conceptual design of methods for formal storyboard verification], Diploma Thesis, Germany: Ilmenau University of Technology, Faculty of Economic Sciences.
10. Feyer, T., Kao, O., Schewe, K.-D., & Thalheim, B. (2000). Design of data-intensive web-based information services. In Li, Q., Ozsuyoglu, Z.M., Wagner, R., Kambayashi, Y., & Zhang, Y. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Web Information Systems Engineering (pp.462-467), Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Computer Society.
11. Feyer, T., Schewe, K.-D., & Thalheim, B. (1998). Conceptual modeling and development of information services. In Ling, T. & Ram, S. (Eds.), Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 1507, 7-20.
12. Feyer, T., & Thalheim, B. (1999). E/R based scenario modeling for rapid prototyping of web information services. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 1727, 253-263.
13. Flechsig, K.-H. (1996). Kleines Handbuch didaktischer Modelle (German) [English: Little handbook of didactic models], Eichenzell: Neuland.
14. Forsha, H.I. (1994). Show me: The complete guide to storyboarding and problem solving, Milwaukee, Wisconsin: American Society for Quality Press.
15. th Ed.), Belmont CA: Wedsworth/Thomson Learning.
16. IMS Global Learning Consortium (2003). IMS Learning Design Version 1.0 Final Specification, Retrieved February 1, 2009, from http://www.imsglobal.org/learningdesign/.
17. Jank, W., & Meyer, H. (2002). Didaktische Modelle (German) [English: Didactic Model], Berlin: Cornelsen Scriptor.
18. th international symposium on Information and communication technologies (pp.20-25), Dublin, Ireland: Trinity College.
19. Jantke, K.P., Knauf, R., & Gonzalez, A.J. (2006). Storyboarding for playful learning. In Reeves, T. & Yamashita, S. (Eds.), Proceedings of World Conference on e-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education 2006 (pp.3174-3182). Chesapeake, VA: AACE.
20. Kaschek, R., Matthews, C., Schewe, K.-D., & Wallace, C. (2003a). Analyzing web information systems with the Abstraction Layer Model and SiteLang. In Lethbridge, N. (Ed.), Proceedings of the 14th Australasian Conference on Information Systems, Perth, WA, Australia: Edith Cowan University.
21. Kaschek, R., Schewe, K.-D., Thalheim, B., & Zhang, L. (2003b). Integrating context in conceptual modeling for web information systems. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 3095, 77-88.
22. Knauf, R., & Jantke, K.P. (2006). Storyboarding: An AI technology to represent, process, evaluate, and refine didactic knowledge. In Jantke, K.P. & Kreuzberger, G. (Eds.), Proceedings of the First Core-to-Core Workshop (pp.170-179), Dagstuhl Castle, Germany: TU Ilmenau.
23. th IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies, (pp.788-792), Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Computer Society.
24. Hermans, H.J.H., Koper, E.J.R., Loeffen, A., Manderveld, J.M., & Rusman, M. (2000). Reference Manual for Edubox-EML/XML binding 1.0/1.0 (Beta version), Heerlen: Open University of the Netherlands, Retrieved March 15, 2009, from http://dspace.ou.nl/bitstream/1820/81/5/EML1.0-ReferenceManual.pdf.
25. Lin, J., Ho, C., Orlowska, M.E., & Sadiq, W. (2002). Using workflow technology to manage flexible e-learning services. Educational Technology and Society, 5 (4), 1-10.
26. Meissner, H. (2003). Ein multimediales Lehr- und Lernsystem über die Erstellung von Drehbüchern für multimediale Lehr- und Lernsysteme (German) [English: A multimedia teaching and learning over the building by scenarios per multimedia teaching and learning], In Hambach, S., Urban, B. (Eds.), Proceedings of 4. IuK-Tage Mecklenburg-Vorpommern (pp.18-20), Stuttgart: IRB.
27. rd Ed.), San Francisco, CA: Pfeiffer.
28. Sauerstein, G. (2006). Formale Modellierung und daduktive Interpretation von Storyboards. Modellierung eines komplexen Prozessmodells (German) [English: Formal modelling and deductive interpretation of story boards: Modelling of a complex process model], seminar paper, Germany: University of Ilmenau, Faculty of Computer Science and Automation.
29. Schewe, K.-D., & Thalheim, B. (2004). The co-design approach to WIS development in e-business and e-learning applications. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 3306, 181-189.
30. Schulmeister, R. (2003). Lernplattformen fuer das virtuelle Lernen: Evaluation und Didaktik (German) [English: Learning platforms for virtual learning: Evaluation and didactics], Munich, Wien: Oldenbourg.
31. Sykes, E.R., & Franek, F. (2003). A prototype for an intelligent tutoring system for students learning to program in Java. In Uskov, V. (Ed.), Proceedings of the IASTED International Conference on Computers and Advanced Technology in Education (pp.78-83), Calgary, AB: ACTA Press.
32. Thalheim, B., & Dusterhoft, A. (2001). SiteLang: Conceptual Modeling of Internet Sites. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 2224, 179-192.
33. Walker, M.H., & Eaton, N. (2004). Microsoft Office Visio 2003 Inside Out, Redmond, Wa: Microsoft Press.
34. Xu, G. (2006). Ein Vererbungskonzept für Storyboards (German) [English: An inheritance concept for storyboards], Project Work, Germany: Ilmenau University of Technology, Faculty of Computer Science and Automation.