System thinking skills at the elementary school level

Journal of Research in Science Teaching

Volumn 47, Issue 5, 2010, Pages 540-563

  Assaraf, Orit Ben Zvi ^a   Orion, Nir ^b  

^a BEN GURION UNIVERSITY OF THE NEGEV   (Israel)

^b WEIZMANN INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE   (Israel)

Author keywords

Earth sciences; Environmental education; System approach; System thinking

Indexed keywords

BASIC SYSTEMS; COMPLEX SYSTEMS; DIRECT CONTACT; DIRECT INTERACTIONS; EARTH SYSTEMS; ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS; ENVIRONMENTAL EDUCATION; HIGH ORDER THINKING SKILLS; HYDROLOGICAL SYSTEM; INQUIRY-BASED LEARNING; KNOWLEDGE INTEGRATION; LEARNING ENVIRONMENTS; SMALL SCALE; SMALL TOWNS; THINKING SKILLS; WATER CYCLE;

COMPLEXATION; CURRICULA; EARTH SCIENCES;

STUDENTS;

EID: 77951605082     PISSN: 00224308     EISSN: 10982736     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/tea.20351     Document Type: Article

References (66)

1. Bannister, S. (1998). Concept maps and annotated drawings: A comparative study of two assessment tools. Primary Science Review, 51, 3-5.
2. Bencze, L., Bowen, G.M., & Alsop, S. (2006). Teachers' tendencies to promote student-led science projects: Associations with their views about science. Science Education, 90, 400-419.
3. Ben-Zvi Assaraf, O., & Orion, N. (2005). Development of system thinking skills in the context of Earth System education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42, 518-560.
4. Bezzi, A. (1999). What is this thing called geoscience? Epistemological dimensions elicited with the repertory grid and their implications for scientific literacy. Science Education, 83, 675-700.
5. Booth Sweeny, L. (2000). Bathtub dynamics: Initial results of a systems thinking inventory. Web mail: http://web.mit.edu/jsterman/www/bathtub.pdf.
6. Booth Sweeney, L., & Sterman, J.D. (2007). Thinking about systems: Student and teacher conceptions of natural and social systems. System Dynamics Review, 23, 285-312.
7. Bradshaw, J.M., Ford, K.M., Adams-Webber, J.R., & Boose, J.H. (1993). Beyond the repertory grid: New approaches to constructivist knowledge acquisition tool development. International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 8,287-333.
8. Brown, B.A., & Ryoo, K. (2008). Teaching science as a language: A "Content-First" approach to science teaching. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45(5), 529-553.
9. Chapman, O.L. (2000). Learning science involves language, experience, and modeling. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 21, 97-108.
10. Creswell, J.W. (1998). Qualitative inquiry and research design-choosing among five traditions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
11. Cuevas, P., Lee, O., Hart, J., & Deaktor, R. (2005). Improving science inquiry with elementary students of diverse backgrounds. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42, 337-357.
12. Denzin N.K. & Lincoln Y.S. (Eds.), (1994). Entering the field of qualitative research. In: Handbook of Qualitative Research (p. 643). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
13. DeWitt, J., & Osborne, J. (2007). Supporting teachers on science focused school trips: Towards an integrated framework of theory and practice. International Journal of Science Education, 29, 685-710.
14. Dillon, J., Rickinson, M., Teamey, K., Morris, M., Choi, M.Y., Sanders, D., & Benefield, P. (2006). The value of outdoor learning: Evidence from research in the UK and elsewhere. School Science Review, 87(320), 107-113.
15. Dove, J.E., Everett, L.A., & Preece, P.F.W. (1999). Exploring a hydrological concept through children's drawings. International Journal of Science Education, 21, 485-497.
16. Draper, F. (1993). A proposed sequence for developing system thinking in a grades 4-12 curriculum. System Dynamic Review, 9, 207-214.
17. Eberbach, C., & Crowley, K. (2009). From Everyday to scientific observation: How children learn to observe the biologist's world. Review of Educational Research, 79, 39-68.
18. English, L.D. (2006). Introducing young children to complex systems through modeling. In: P. Grootenboer, R. Zevenbergen, & M. Chinnappan (Eds.), Identities, cultures, and learning spaces (pp. 195-202). Adelaide: Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia.
19. Fetherstonhaugh, A.R. (1994). Using the repertory grid to probe student 1s ideas about energy. Research in Science and Technological Education, 12, 117-127.
20. Fetherstonhaugh, A., & Bezzi, A. (1992). Public knowledge and private understanding: Do they match? An example with the water cycle. Paper presented at the 29th International Geological Congress, Kyoto, Japan, August-September 1992.
21. Forrester, J.W. (2007). System dynamics - A personal view of the first fifty years. System Dynamics Review, 23, 345-358.
22. Fontana, A., & Frey, J.H. (1998). Interviewing: The art of science. In: N.K. Denzin & Y.S. Lincon (Eds.), Collecting and interpreting qualitative materials. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
23. Frank, M. (2000). Engineering systems thinking and systems thinking. Systems Engineering, 3, 63-168.
24. Goldstone, R.L., & Wilensky, U. (2008). Promoting transfer complex systems principles. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 17, 465-516.
25. Hapgood, S., Magnusson, S.J., & Palincsar, A.S. (2004). Teacher, text, and experience: A case of young children's scientific inquiry. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13, 455-505.
26. Hmelo-Silver, C.E., & Azevedo, R.A. (2006). Understanding complex systems: Some core challenges. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 15, 53-61.
27. Hmelo-Silver, C.E., & Pfeffer, M.G. (2004). Comparing expert and novice understanding of a complex system from the perspective of structures, behaviors, and functions. Cognitive Science, 28, 127-138.
28. Hmelo-Silver, C.E., Marathe, S., & Liu, L. (2007). Fish swim, rocks sit, and lungs breathe: Expert-novice understanding of complex systems. The journal of The Learning Science, 16, 307-331.
29. Hovardas, T.K., & Korfiatis, J. (2006). Word Associations as a tool for assessing conceptual change in science education. Learning Instruction, 16(5), 416-432.
30. Jacobson, M.J., & Wilensky, U. (2006). Complex systems in education: Scientific and educational importance and implications for the learning sciences. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 15(1), 11-34.
31. Kali, Y., Orion, N., & Eylon, B. (2003). The effect of knowledge integration activities on students' perception of the earth's crust as a cyclic system. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40, 545-565.
32. Kelly, G. (1955). The psychology of personal constructs, Vol. I. New York: W.W. Norton and Co., Inc.
33. Kim, D.H. (1999). Introduction to system thinking. In: System Thinking Tools and Applications. ASA: Pegasus Communications, Inc.
34. Latta, G.F., & Swigger, K. (1992). Validation of the repertory grid for use in modeling knowledge. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 43, 115-129.
35. Lehrer, R., & Schauble, L. (2005). Developing modeling and argument in elementary grades. In: T.A. Romberg, T.P. Carpenter, & F. Dremock (Eds.), Understanding mathematics and science matters (pp 29-53). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
36. Lesh, R. (2006). Modeling students modeling abilities: The teaching and learning of complex systems in education. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 15, 45-52.
37. Lincoln, Y.S., & Guba, E.G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry (416 p) Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
38. Liu, L., & Hmelo-Silver, C.E. (2009). Promoting complex systems learning through the use of conceptual representations in hypermedia. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46, 1023-1040.
39. Mandinach, E.B. (1989). Model-building and the use of computer simulation of dynamic systems. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 5, 221-243.
40. Miles, M.B., & Huberman, M. (1994). An Expanded Sourcebook: Qualitative Data Analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
41. Mullis, I.V.S., Martin, M.O., Gonzalez, E.J., & Kennedy, A.M. (2003). PIRLS 2001 International Report: IEA's Study of Reading Literacy Achievement in Primary Schools. Chestnut Hill, MA: Boston College.
42. Nicholls, G. (2005). New lecturers' constructions of learning, teaching and research in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 30, 611-625.
43. Orion, N. (1993). A model for the development and implementation of field trips as an integral part of the science curriculum. School Science and Mathematics, 93, 325-331.
44. Orion, N. (2002). An Earth Systems curriculum development model. In: V.J. Mayer (Ed.), Global Science Literacy (pp. 159-168). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
45. Orion, N., & Basis, T. (2008). Characterization of High School Students' System Thinking Skills in the Context of Earth Systems. Presented in the 2008 NARST Annual Meeting. March, 2008. Baltimore, U.S.A.
46. Orion, N., & Ault, C. (2007). Learning earth sciences. In: S. Abell & N. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Science Teaching and Learning (pp. 653-688). USA: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
47. Ossimitz, G., (2000) Teaching system dynamics and systems thinking in Austria and Germany. Proceedings of the 18th International Conference of the System Dynamics Society, Bergen, Norway.
48. Patton, M.Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
49. Prain, V. (2006). Learning from writing in secondary science: Some theoretical and practical implications. International Journal of Science Education, 28(2 & 3), 179-201.
50. Reiss, M., & Tunnicliffe, S. (2001). Students' understandings of human organs and organ systems. Research Science Education 31, 383-399.
51. Rennie, L.J., & Jarvis, T. (1995). Children's choice of drawings to communicate their ideas about technology. Research in Science Education, 25, 239-252.
52. Resnick, L.B. (1987). Education and learning to think. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
53. Rivard, L.P., & Straw, S.B. (2000). The effect of talk and writing on learning science: An exploratory study. Science Education, 84, 566-593.
54. Sabelli, N.H. (2006). Complexity, technology, science, and education. The Journal of the learning sciences, 15, 5-9.
55. Sheehy, N.P., Wylie, J.W., Mcguinness, C., & Orchard, G. (2000). How children solve environmental problems: Using computer simulations to investigate system thinking. Environmental Education Research, 6, 109-126.
56. Siegel, S., & Castelan, N.J. (1988). Nonparametric statistics for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill Inc.
57. Steed, M. (1992). Stella, a simulation construction kit: Cognitive processes and educational implications. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science, 11, 39-52.
58. Ullmer, E.J. (1986). Work design in organizations: Comparing the organizational elements models and the ideal system approach. Educational Technology, 26(4), 12-18.
59. Verhoeff, R.P., Waarlo, A.J., & Boersma, K.T. (2008). Systems modeling and the development of coherent understanding of cell biology. International Journal of Science Education, 30, 543-568.
60. Wagner, W., Valencia, J., & Elejabarrieta, F. (1996). Relevance, discourse and the hot stable core of social representation-A Structural Analysis of Word Association. British Journal of Social Psychology, 35, 331-351. (Pubitemid 126418072)
61. Wellington, J., & Osborne, J. (2001). Language and literacy in science education. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
62. White, R., & Gunstone, R. (1992). Probing understanding. London: Palmer Press.
63. Wilensky, U., & Resnick, M. (1999). Thinking in levels: A dynamic systems approach to making sense of the world. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 8, 3-19.
64. Yore, L.D., & Treagust, D.F. (2006). Current realities and future possibilities: Language and science literacy-empowering research and informing instruction. International Journal of Science Education, 28, 291-314.
65. Zohar, A. (2000). Inquiry learning as higher order thinking: Overcoming cognitive obstacles. In: J. Minstrell & E.H. Van Zee (Eds.), Inquiring into inquiry learning and teaching in science (pp. 405-424). Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science.
66. Zohar, A., & Dori, Y.J. (2003). Higher order thinking skills and low achieving students: Are they mutually exclusive? Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12, 145-182.