Developing modeling and argument in the elementary grades

Understanding Mathematics and Science Matters

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 29-54

  Lehrer, Richard ^a   Schauble, Leona ^a  

^a VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84908908094     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9781410612618     Document Type: Chapter

References (54)

1. American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1993). Benchmarks for science literacy .New York: Oxford University Press.
2. Bazerman, C. (1988). Shaping written knowledge: The genre and activity of the experimental article in science .Madison:University of Wisconsin Press.
3. Borko, H. ,& Putnam, R. .(1996).Learning to teach.In Calfee, R.C. ,& Berliner, D. C. (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp 673-708)New York: Simon & Schuster.
4. Brown, A.L. (1990). Domain-specific principles affect learning and transfer in children. Cognitive Science, 14, 107-133.
5. Cobb, P., Confrey, J., diSessa, A., Lehrer, R. ,& Schauble, L. (2003). Design experiments in education research. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 9-13.
6. Cobb, P., Gravemeijer, K., Yackel, E., McClain, K. ,& Whitenack, J. (1997). Mathematizing and symbolizing: The emergence of chains of signification in one first-grade classroom. In Kirshner, D. ,& Whitson, J.E. (Eds.), Situated cognition theory: Social, semiotic, and neurological perspectives (pp. 151-233). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
7. diSessa, A., Hammer, D., Sherin, B. ,& Kolpakowski, T. (1991). Inventing graphing: Meta-representational expertise in children. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 10, 117-160.
8. Gamoran, A., Anderson, C.W, Secada, W.G., Williams, T ,& Ashmann, S. (2003). Transforming teaching in math and science: How schools and districts can support changes.New York: Teachers College Press.
9. Giere, R. N .(Ed.).(1992). Minnesota studies in the philosophy of science: Vol. 15. Cognitive models of science .Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
10. Giles, N.D., Steinthorsdottir, O., Fulton, D., Lehrer, R. ,& Schauble, L. (1999, April). The transformation to teaching math for understanding in six elementary classrooms .Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
11. Grosslight, L., Unger, C., Jay, E. ,& Smith, C. (1991). Understanding models and their use in science: Conceptions of middle and high school students and experts. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28, 799-822.
12. Jacobson, C., & Lehrer, R. (2000). Teacher appropriation and student learning of geometry through design. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 31(1), 71-88.
13. Kline, M. (1980).Mathematics: The loss of certainty.Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
14. Lampert, M. (2001).Teaching problems and the problems of teaching.New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
15. Latour B. (1990)Drawing things together. In Lynch, M. ,& Woolgar, S. (Eds.), Representation in scientific practice (pp. 19-68). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
16. Latour, B. ,& Woolgar, S. (1979).Laboratory life: The construction of scientific facts.Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
17. Lehrer, R., Carpenter, S., Schauble, L. ,& Putz, A. (2000). esigning classrooms that support inquiry. In Minstrell, J. ,& Zee, E. (Eds.), Teaching in the inquiry-based science classroom (pp. 80-99). American Association for the Advancement of Science: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
18. Lehrer, R. ,& Chazan, D .(Eds.).(1998). Designing learning environments for developing understanding of geometry and space .Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
19. Curtis, C.L. (2000). Why are some solids perfect? Conjectures and experiments by third graders. Teaching Children Mathematics, 6, 324-329.
20. Lehrer, R., Jacobson, C., Kemeny, V. ,& Strom, D. (1999). Building on children's intuitions to develop mathematical understanding of space. In Fennema, E. ,& Romberg, TA. (Eds.), Mathematics classrooms that promote understanding (pp. 63-87). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
21. Lehrer, R., Jacobson, C. Thoyre, G. Kemeny, V. Danneker, D. Horvath, J. Gance, S., & Koehler, M. (1998)Developing understanding of space and geometry in the primary grades In Gance, S. ,& Koehler, M. (Eds.),(pp. 169-200).Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
22. Lehrer, R., & Reynolds, W. (2003)Mathematical learning. In Gance, S. ,& Miller, G. (Eds.),Handbook of psychology: Vol. 7. Educational psychology(pp. 357-391).New York: Wiley.
23. Lehrer, R., & Pritchard, C. (2003)Symbolizing space into being. In Gravemeijer, K., Lehrer, R., Verschaffel, L., & Oers, B. (Eds.),Symbolizing, modeling, and tool use in mathematics education(pp. 59-86).Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer.
24. Lehrer, R. ,& Romberg, T. (1996). Exploring children's data modeling. Cognition and Instruction, 14, 69-108.
25. Lehrer, R., & Schauble, L. (2000a). Developing model-based reasoning in mathe- matics and science. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 21(1), 39-48.
26. Lehrer, R. ,& Schauble, L. (2000b). Inventing data structures for representational purposes: Elementary grade students' classification models. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 2, 51-74.
27. Lehrer, R., & Schauble, L. (2000c)Modeling in mathematics and science. In Glaser, R. (Ed.),Advances in instructional psychology: Vol. 5. Educational design and cognitive science(pp. 101-159).Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
28. Lehrer, R. ,& Schauble, L. (2002a). Investigating real data in the classroom: Expanding children's understanding of math and science. New York: Teachers College Press.
29. Lehrer, R., & Schauble, L. (2002b)Symbolic communication in mathematics and science: Co-constituting inscription and thought. In Amsel, E.D. & Byrnes, J. (Eds.), The development of symbolic communication (pp. 167-192).Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
30. Lehrer, R., & Schauble, L. (2003)Origins and evolution of model-based reasoning in mathematics and science. In Doerr, H. & Lesh, R. (Eds.), Beyond constructivism: A models and modeling perspective (pp. 59-70).Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
31. Lehrer, R. Schauble, L., Carpenter, S., & Penner, D. (2000)The interrelated development of inscriptions and conceptual understanding. In Cobb, P., Yackel, E. & McClain, K. (Eds.), Symbolizing and communicating in mathematics classrooms: Perspectives on discourse,tools, and instructional design (pp. 325-360).Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
32. Lehrer, R. Schauble, L., & Petrosino, A. (2001)Reconsidering the role of experiment in science education. In Crowley, K., Schunn, C.D. & Okada, T. (Eds.), esigning for science: Implications from everyday, classroom, and professional settings (pp. 251-278).Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
33. Lehrer, R. Schauble, L., Strom, D., & Pligge, M. (2001)Similarity of form and substance: Modeling material kind. In Carver, S.M., & Klahr, D. (Eds.), Cognition and instruction.: Twenty-five years of progress (pp. 39-74).Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
34. Lehrer, R. ,& Shumow, L. (1997). Aligning the construction zones of parents and teachers for mathematics reform. Cognition and Instruction, 15, 41-83.
35. Lehrer, R., Strom, D. ,& Confrey, J. (2002). Grounding metaphors and inscriptional resonance: Children's emerging understanding of mathematical similarity. Cognition and Instruction, 20, 359-398.
36. Lehrer, R., & Lammon, S.J. (2001)Trends, goals, and priorities in mathematics assessment. In Lesh, R. A. & Lammon, S. J. (Eds.), Assessment of authentic performance in school mathematics (pp. 3-62).Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science.
37. National Research Council.1996). National science education standards .Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
38. Wehlage F.M. ,& Wehlage G.C. (1995) Successful school restructuring .Madison: Wisconsin Center for Education Research, University of Wisconsin-Madison.
39. Nitabach E. ,& Lehrer, R. (1996). Developing spatial sense through area measurement. Teaching Children Mathematics, 8, 473-476.
40. Olson, D.R. (1994). The world on paper: The conceptual and cognitive implications of writing and reading .New York: Cambridge University Pr.
41. Penner, D., Giles, G.N., Lehrer, R. ,& Schauble L. (1997). Building functional models: Designing an elbow. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34, 125-143.
42. Penner, D., Lehrer R. ,& Schauble, L. (1998). From physical models to biomechanics: A design-based modeling approach. puma/ of the Learning Sciences, 7, 429-449.
43. Penner E., & Lehrer, R. (2000). The shape of fairness. Teaching Children Mathematics, 7(4), 210-214.
44. Pickering, A. (1995) The mangle of practice: Time, agency, and science .Chicag: University of Chicago Press.
45. Roth, W.M. ,& McGinn, M.K. (1998). Inscriptions: Toward a theory of representing as social practice. Review of Educational Research, 68, 35-59.
46. Rudolph, J.L. ,& Stewart, J. (1998). Evolution and the nature of science: On the historical discord and its implications for education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35, 1069-1089.
47. Schifter, D. ,& Fosnot, C.T. (1993). Reconstructing mathematics education .New York: Teachers College Press.
48. Spillane, J. (2000). Cognition and policy implementation: District policymakers and the reform of mathematics education. Cognition and Instruction, 18, 141-179.
49. Spillane, J.P. ,& Zeuli, J.S. (1999). Reform and teaching: Exploring patterns of practice in the context of national and state mathematics reforms. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 21 1-27.
50. Stewart, I. ,& Golubitsk, M. 1992).Fearful symmetry.London: Penguin.
51. Strom, D., Kemeny, V., Lehrer, R. ,& Forman, E. (2001). Visualizing the emergent structure of children's mathematical argument. Cognitive Science, 25, 733-773.
52. TERC. (1995. Investigations in number, data, and space .Palo Alto, CA: Seymour.
53. Wenger, E. (1998 Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity .Cambridge,England: Cambridge University Press.
54. Wertsch, J.V. (1998).Mind as action.New York: Oxford University Press.