Team creativity in web site design: An empirical test of a systemic model

Creativity Research Journal

Volumn 22, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 98-107

  Curşeu, Petru Lucian ^a  

^a TILBURG UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77951051425     PISSN: 10400419     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10400410903579635     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Amabile, T. M. (1990). Within you, without you: The social psychology of creativity, and beyond. In M. A. Runco & R. S. Albert (Eds.) Theories of creativity (pp. 61-91). Newbury Park, CA:Sage.
2. Bharadwaj, S., & Menon, A. (2000). Making innovation happen in organizations: Individual creativity mechanisms, organizational creativity mechanisms or both. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 17, 424-434.
3. Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136-162). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
4. Brophy, D. R. (2006). A comparison of individual and group efforts to creatively solve contrasting types of problems. Creativity Research Journal, 18, 293-315.
5. Cacioppo, J. T., & Petty, R. E. (1982). The need for cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 116-131.
6. Cacioppo, J. T., Petty, R. E., Feinstein, J. A., & Jarvis, W. B. G. (1996). Dispositional differences in cognitive motivation: The life times of individuals varying in need for cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 119, 197-253.
7. Carnevale, P. J., & Probst, T. M. (1998). Social values and social conflict in creative problem solving and categorization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1300-1309.
8. Chen, M. (2006). Understanding the benefits and detriments of conflict on team creativity process. Creativity and Innovation Management, 15,105-116.
9. Cooper, R. B., & Jayatilaka, B. (2006). Group creativity: The effects of extrinsic, intrinsic and obligation motivations. Creativity Research Journal, 18, 153-172.
10. Curşeu, P. L. (2003). Formal group decision-making. A social cognitive approach. Cluj-Napoca, Romania: ASCR Press.
11. Curşeu, P. L., Schruijer, S. G. L., & Boro̧, S. (2007). The effects of groups' variety and disparity on groups' cognitive complexity. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research and Practice, 11, 187-206.
12. Curşeu, P. L. (2006). Emergent states in virtual teams. A complex adaptive systems perspective. Journal of Information Technology, 21,249-261.
13. Curşeu, P. L., & Schruijer, S. G. L. (2008). The effects of framing on intergroup negotiation. Group Decision and Negotiation, 17, 347-362.
14. Curşeu, P. L., Schalk, R., & Schruijer, S. G. L. (in press). The use of cognitive mapping in eliciting and evaluating group cognitions. Journal of Applied Social Psychology.
15. Dahlin, K. B., Weingart, L. R., & Hinds, P. J. (2005). Team diversity and information use. Academy of Management Journal, 48, 1107-1123.
16. De Dreu, C. K. W., & Weingart, L. R. (2003). Task versus relationship conflict, team performance, and team member satisfaction: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 741-749.
17. Eby, L. T., Meade, A. W., Parisi, A. G., & Douthitt, S. S. (1999). The development of an individual level groupwork expectations measure and the application of a within-group agreement statistic to assess shared expectations for groupwork. Organizational Research Methods, 2, 366-394.
18. Fink, C. F. (1968). Some conceptual difficulties in the theory of social conflict. Conflict Resolution, 12, 412-460.
19. Harrison, D. A., & Klein, K. J. (2007). What's the difference? Diversity constructs as separation, variety, or disparity in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 32, 1199-1228.
20. Hoegl, M. M., & Gemuenden, H. G. (2001). Teamwork quality and the success of innovative projects: A theoretical concept and empirical evidence. Organizational Science, 6, 373-393.
21. Ilgen, D. R., Hollenbeck, J. R., Johnson, M., & Jundt, D. (2005). Teams in organizations: From input-process-output models to IMOI models. Annual Review of Psychology, 56, 517-543.
22. James, L. R., Demaree, R. R. G., & Wolf, G. (1984). Estimating within-groups interrater reliability with and without response bias. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69, 85-98.
23. Jehn, K. A. (1995). A multimethod examination examination of the benefits and detriments of intragroup conflict. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40, 256-282.
24. Jehn, K. A., Northcraft, G. B., & Neale, M. A. (1999). Why differences make a difference: A field study of diversity, conflict, and performance in work groups. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44,741-763.
25. Kirkman, B. L., Tesluk, P. E., & Rosen, B. (2001). Assessing the incremental validity of team consensus ratings over aggregation of individual-level data in predicting team effectiveness. Personnel Psychology, 54, 645-667.
26. Kurtzberg, T. R. (2005). Feeling creative, being creative: An empirical study of diversity and creativity in teams. Creativity Research Journal, 17, 51-65.
27. Kurtzberg, T. R., & Amabile, T. M. (2001). From Guilford to creative synergy: Opening the black box of team-level creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 13, 285-294.
28. Malhorta, A., Majchrzak, A., Carman, R., & Lott, V. (2001). Radical innovation without collocation: A case study at Boeing- Rocketdyne. MIS Quarterly, 25, 229-249.
29. Marks, M. A., Mathieu, J. E., & Zaccaro, S. J. (2001). A temporally based framework and taxonomy of team processes. Academy of Management Review, 26, 356-376.
30. Mathieu, J., Heffner, T. S., Goodwin, G. F., & Cannon-Bowers, J. A. (2000). The influence of shared mental models on team processes and performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 273-283.
31. Mathieu, J., Maynard, M. T., Rapp, T., & Gilson, L. (2008). Team effectiveness 1997-2007: A review of recent advancements and a glimpse into the future. Journal of Management, 34, 410-476.
32. Pirola-Merlo, A., & Mann, L. (2004). The relationship between individual creativity and team creativity: Aggregating across people and time. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25, 235-257.
33. Richard, M. O., & Chandra, R. (2005). A model of consumer Web navigational behaviour. Conceptual development and application. Journal of Business Research, 58, 1019-1029.
34. Richard, M. O. (2005). Modeling the impact of Internet atmospherics on surfer behavior. Journal of Business Research, 58, 1632-1642.
35. Rosen, D. E., & Purinton, E. (2004). Web site design: Viewing the wed as a cognitive landscape. Journal of Business Research, 57, 787-794.
36. Schruijer, S. G. L., & Mostert, I. (1997). Creativity and sex composition: An experimental illustration. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 6, 175-182.
37. Shalley, C. E., & Gilson, L. L. (2004). What leaders need to know: A review of social and contextual factors that can foster or hinder creativity. Leadership Quarterly, 15, 33-53.
38. Simons, T. L., & Peterson, S. R. (2000). Task conflict and relationship conflict in top management teams: The pivotal role of intragroup trust. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 102-111.
39. Song, J., & Zahedi, F. M. (2005). A theoretical approach to Web design in e-commerce: A belief reinforcement model. Management Science, 15, 1219-1235.
40. Sternberg, R. J. (2006). The nature of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 18, 87-98.
41. Taggar, S. (2002). Individual creativity and group ability to utilize individual creative resources: A multilevel model. Academy of Management Journal, 45, 315-330.
42. Teachman, J. (1980). Analysis of population diversity. Sociological Methods and Research, 5, 341-362.
43. Van Knippenberg, D., De Dreu, C. K. W., & Homan, A. C. (2004). Work group diversity and group performance: An integrative model and research agenda. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 1008-1022.
44. West, M. A. (2002). Sparkling fountains or stagnant ponds: An integrative model of team creativity and innovation implementation in work groups. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 51(3), 355-422.
45. West, M. A., & Anderson, N. R. (1996). Innovation in top management teams. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, 680-693.
46. Widman, K. F., & Thomson, J. S. (2003). On specifying the null model for incremental fit indices in structural equation modeling. Psycho- logical Methods, 8, 16-37.
47. Wood, W. (1987). Meta-analytic review of sex differences in group performance. Psychological Bulletin, 102, 53-71.