Use of simulation in teaching and learning in health sciences: A systematic review

Journal of Nursing Education

Volumn 49, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 23-28

  Harder, B Nicole ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MANITOBA   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AUDIOVISUAL EQUIPMENT; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; EDUCATIONAL MODEL; EVALUATION; HEALTH PERSONNEL ATTITUDE; HUMAN; MEDICAL EDUCATION; METHODOLOGY; NURSING EDUCATION; PATIENT CARE; REVIEW; SELF CONCEPT; TEACHING; EVALUATION STUDY; PROCEDURES;

ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; COMPUTER-ASSISTED INSTRUCTION; EDUCATION, MEDICAL; EDUCATION, NURSING; EVALUATION STUDIES AS TOPIC; HUMANS; MANIKINS; MODELS, EDUCATIONAL; NURSING EDUCATION RESEARCH; PATIENT CARE TEAM; RESEARCH DESIGN; SELF EFFICACY; TEACHING;

EID: 77951032974     PISSN: 01484834     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3928/01484834-20090828-08     Document Type: Review

References (26)

1. Aldrich, C. (2003). Simulations and the future of learning: An innovative (and perhaps evolutionary) approach to e-learning. San Francisco: Pfeiffer.
2. Alinier, G., Hunt, B., Gordon, R., & Harwood, C. (2006). Effectiveness of intermediate-fidelity simulation training technology in undergraduate nursing education. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 54, 359-369.
3. Alinier, G., Hunt, W.B., & Gordon, R. (2004). Determining the value of simulation in nurse education: Study design and initial results. Nurse Education in Practice, 4, 200-207.
4. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: W.H. Freeman.
5. Bearnson, C.S., & Wiker, K.M. (2005). Human patient simulators: A new face in baccalaureate nursing education at Brigham Young University. Journal of Nursing Education, 44, 421-425.
6. Bradley, P. (2006). The history of simulation in medical education and possible future directions. Medical Education, 40, 254-262.
7. Clark, M. (2006). Evaluating an obstetric trauma scenario. Clinical Simulation in Nursing Education, 2(2), 1-6.
8. Coiffi, J., Purcal, N., & Arundell, F. (2005). A pilot study to investigate the effect of a simulation strategy on the clinical decision making of midwifery students. Journal of Nursing Education, 44, 131-134.
9. Curran, V.R., Aziz, K., O'Young, S., & Bessell, C. (2004). Evaluation of the effect of a computerized training simulator (ANAKIN) on the retention of neonatal resuscitation skills. Teaching and Learning in Medicine, 16, 157-164.
10. Feingold, C.E., Calaluce, M., & Kallen, M.A. (2004). Computerized patient model and simulated clinical experiences: Evaluation with baccalaureate nursing students. Journal of Nursing Education, 43, 156-163.
11. Gaba, D. (2004). The future vision of simulation in health care. Quality and Safety in Health Care, 13, 2-10.
12. Girzadas, D., Clay, L., Caris, J., Rzechula, K., & Harwood, R. (2007). High fidelity simulation can discriminate between novice and experienced residents when assessing competency in patient care. Medical Teacher, 29, 472-476.
13. Henneman, E.A., & Cunningham, H. (2005). Using clinical simulation to teach patient safety in an acute/critical care nursing course. Nurse Educator, 30, 172-177.
14. Hoffmann, R., O'Donnell, J., & Kim, Y. (2007). The effects of human patient simulators on basic knowledge in critical care nursing with undergraduate senior baccalaureate nursing students. Simulation in Healthcare, 2, 110-114.
15. Issenberg, B., McGaghie, W., Petrusa, E., Gordon, D., & Scalese, R. (2005). Features and uses of high-fidelity medical simulations simulations that led to effective learning: A BEME systematic review. Medical Teacher, 27, 10-28.
16. Issenberg, B., & Scalese, R. (2007). Best evidence on high-fidelity simulation: What clinical teachers need to know. The Clinical Teacher, 4, 73-77.
17. Jamison, R., Hovancsek, M., Clochesy, J., & Bolton, F. (2006). A pilot study assessing simulation using two simulation methods for teaching intravenous cannulation. Clinical Simulation in Nursing Education, 2(1), 1-7.
18. Lasater, K. (2007). Clinical judgment development: Using simulation to create an assessment rubric. Journal of Nursing Education, 46, 496-503.
19. Leflore, J., Anderson, M., Michael, J., & Anderson, J. (2007). Modeling versus self-directed simulation with debriefing: Is there a difference? Simulation in Health Care, 2, 47.
20. Owen, H., Mugford, B., Follows, V., & Plummer, J.L. (2006). Comparison of three simulation-based training methods for management of medical emergencies. Resuscitation, 71, 204-211.
21. Pardue, K., Tagliareni, M., Valiga, T., Davison-Price, M., & Orehowsky, S. (2005). Substantive innovation in nursing education: Shifting the emphasis from content coverage to student learning. Nursing Education Perspectives, 26, 55-57.
22. Scherer, Y.K., Bruce, S.A., & Runkawatt, V. (2007). A comparison of clinical simulation and case study presentation on nurse practitioner students' knowledge and confidence in managing cardiac event. International Journal of Nursing Education Scholarship, 4, Article 22.
23. Schwid, H.A., Rooke, G.A., Michalowski, P., & Ross, B.K. (2001). Screen-based anesthesia simulation with debriefing improves performance in a mannequin-based anesthesia simulator. Teaching and Learning in Medicine, 13, 92-96.
24. Shinn, M. (2006). External, not internal challenges to interdisciplinary research. American Journal of Community Psychology, 38, 27-29.
25. Voll, S. (2007). Utilizing computer-based simulators and standardized patients for nurse practitioner students instruction of pelvic examination. Simulation in Healthcare, 2, 72.
26. Wayne, D.B., Butter, J., Siddall, V.J., Fudala, M.J., Lindquist, L.A., Feinglass, J., et al. (2005). Simulation-based training of internal medicine residents in advanced cardiac life support protocols: A randomized trial. Teaching and Learning in Medicine, 17, 210-216.