Best evidence on high-fidelity simulation: What clinical teachers need to know

Clinical Teacher

Volumn 4, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 73-77

  Issenberg, S Barry ^a   Scalese, Ross J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI MILLER SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLINICAL COMPETENCE; CLINICAL EDUCATION; CLINICAL PRACTICE; CURRICULUM; DATA BASE; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; EXPERIENTIAL LEARNING; FACE VALIDITY; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; LEARNING ENVIRONMENT; LEARNING STYLE; MEDICAL STUDENT; PATIENT CARE; PROBLEM SOLVING; PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE; RESPONSIBILITY; REVIEW; SELF EVALUATION; SIMULATION; STANDARDIZATION;

EID: 34249722085     PISSN: 17434971     EISSN: 1743498X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1743-498X.2007.00161.x     Document Type: Review

References (5)

1. Bristol Medical Simulation Centre. Worldwide simulation sites. http://www.bris.ac.uk/Depts/BMSC/ (accessed 24 January 2007).
2. Issenberg SB, McGaghie WC, Petrusa ER, Lee Gordon D, Scalese RJ. Features and uses of high-fidelity medical simulations that lead to effective learning: A BEME systematic review. Med Teach 2005; 27(1): 10-28.
3. Ericsson KA. Deliberate practice and the acquisition and maintenance of expert performance in medicine and related domains. Acad Med 2004; 79(10, Suppl.): S70-S81.
4. Ziv A, Wolpe PR, Small SD, Glick S. Simulation-based medical education: an ethical imperative. Acad Med 2003; 78(8): 783-788.
5. Gallagher AG, Satava RM. Virtual reality as a metric for the assessment of laparoscopic psychomotor skills. Learning curves and reliability measures. Surg Endosc 2002; 16(12): 1746-1752. Learning curves and reliability measures