The effect of using an online-based course on the learning of grammar inductively and deductively

ReCALL

Volumn 21, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 319-336

  Abuseileek, Ali Farhan ^a  

^a KING SAUD UNIVERSITY   (Saudi Arabia)

Author keywords

Computer based learning; Deduction; Grammar; Induction; Online learning

Indexed keywords

EID: 77950761313     PISSN: 09583440     EISSN: 14740109     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S095834400999005X     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (46)

1. Abraham, R. (1985) Field independence-dependence and the teaching of grammar. TESOL Quarterly, 19: 689-702.
2. AbuSeileek, A. (2007) Cooperative vs. individual learning of oral skills in a CALL environment. CALL Journal, 20(5): 493-514.
3. AbuSeileek, A. and Rababah, G. (2007) The effect of computer-based grammar instruction on the acquisition of verb tenses in an EFL context. Jalt CALL Journal, 3(12): 1-17.
4. Azar, B. (1992) Fundamentals of English Grammar, 3rd edition. Canada: Prentice Hall.
5. Beauvois, M. (1992) Computer-assisted classroom discussion in the foreign language classroom: Conversation in slow motion. Foreign Language Annals, 25: 455-464.
6. Borg, S. and Burns, A. (2008) Integrating grammar in adult TESOL classrooms. Applied Linguistics, 29: 456-482.
7. Chen, L. (2006) The effect of the use of L1 in a multimedia tutorial on grammar learning: An error analysis of Taiwanese beginning EFL learners' English essays. The Asian EFL Journal Quarterly, 8(2): 76-110.
8. Collentine, J. (2000) Insights into the construction of grammatical knowledge provided user-behavior tracking technologies. Language Learning and Technology, 3(2): 44-57.
9. Corder, S. (1988) Pedagogic grammars. In: Rutherford, W. and Smith, M. (eds.) Grammar and Second Language Teaching. New York: Newbury, 123-145.
10. Decoo, W. (1996) The induction-deduction opposition: Ambiguities and complexities of the didactic reality. IRAL, 34: 95-118.
11. DeKeyser, R. (1995) Learning second language grammar rules: An experiment with a miniature linguistic system. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 17(3): 379-410.
12. Donmall, G. (1996) Making a silk purse out of a sow's ear: a 'language awareness' approach to grammar. In: Shaw, G. and Myles, S. (eds.) German Grammar Teaching in Crisis?. London: Association for Modern German Studies, 46-60.
13. Erlam, R. (2003) The effects of deductive and inductive instruction on the acquisition of direct object pronouns in French as a second language. The Modern Language Journal, 87(2): 242-260.
14. Felix, U. (1999) Exploiting the Web for language teaching: Selected approaches. ReCALL, 11(1): 30-37.
15. Fitze, M. (2006) Discourse and participation in ESL face-to-face written electronic conferences. Language Learning and Technology, 10(1): 67-86.
16. Gollin, J. (1998) Deductive vs. inductive language learning. English Language Teaching Journal, 52: 88-89.
17. Hall, C. (1998) Overcoming the grammar deficit: The role of information technology in teaching German grammar to undergraduates. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 55(1): 41-60.
18. Hata, M. (2003) Literature review: Using computer-mediated communication in second language classrooms. Osaka Keidai Ronshu, 54(3): 115-125.
19. Herron, C. and Tomasello, M. (1992) Acquiring grammatical structures by guided induction. French Review, 65: 708-718.
20. Kelm, O. (1992) The use of synchronous computer networks in second language instruction: A preliminary report. Foreign Language Annals, 25: 441-545.
21. Kern, R. (1995) Restructuring classroom interaction with network computers: Effects on quantity and characteristics of language production. The Modern Language Journal, 79: 457-476.
22. Kitade, K. (2008) The role of offline metalanguage talk in asynchronous computer-mediated communication. Language Learning and Technology, 12(1): 64-84.
23. Lee, L. (2004) Learners' perspectives on networked collaborative interaction with native speakers of Spanish in the US. Language Learning and Technology, 8(1): 83-100.
24. Levy, M. and Kennedy, C. (2004) A task-cycling pedagogy using stimulated reflection and audioconferencing in foreign language learning. Language Learning and Technology, 8(2): 50-69.
25. McEnery, T., Baker, P. and Wilson, A. (1995) A statistical analysis of corpus based computer vs. traditional human teaching methods of part of speech analysis. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 8(2-3): 259-274.
26. McLinden, M., McCall, S., Hinton, D. and Weston, A. (2006) Participation in online problem-based learning: Insights from postgraduate teachers studying through open and distance education. Distance Education, 27(3): 331-353.
27. Nagata, N. (1998) Input vs. output practice in educational software for second language acquisition. Language Learning and Technology, 1(2): 23-40.
28. Norris, J. and Ortega, L. (2000) Effectiveness of L2 instruction: A research synthesis and quantitative meta-analysis. Language Learning, 50: 417-528.
29. Nutta, J. (1998) Is computer-based grammar instruction as effective as teacher-directed grammar instruction for teaching L2 structures? CALICO Journal, 16(1): 49-62.
30. Oliver, R. and McLoughlin, C. (2000) Using networking tools to support online learning. In: Lockwood, F. and Gooley, A. (eds.) Innovation in Open and Distance Learning. London: Kogan Page, 148-159.
31. Richards, J., Platt, J. and Weber, H. (1985) Longman Dictionary of Applied Linguistics. London: Longman.
32. Robinson, P. (1996) Learning simple and complex second language rules under implicit, incidental, rule-search, and instructed conditions. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 18(1): 27-67.
33. Rosa, R. and O'Neil, M. (1999) Explicitness, intake and the issue of awareness. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21: 511-556.
34. Schulze, M. (1999) From the developer to the learner: Describing grammar - learning grammar. ReCALL, 11(1): 117-124.
35. Segers, E. and Verhoeven, L. (2003) Effects of vocabulary training by computer in kindergarten. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 19(4): 557-565.
36. Seliger, H. (1975) Inductive method and deductive method in language teaching: A reexamination. IRAL, 13: 1-18.
37. Shaffer, C. (1989) A comparison of inductive and deductive approaches to teaching foreign languages. The Modern Language Journal, 73: 395-403.
38. Shei, C. (2006) Integrating content learning and ESL writing in a translation commentary writing aid. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 18(1 & 2): 33-48.
39. Sullivan, N. and Pratt, E. (1996) A comparative study of two ESL writing environments: A computer-assisted classroom and a traditional oral classroom. System, 29: 491-501.
40. Szkolne, W. (2005) Approaches to Teaching Grammar. http://www.wsipnet.pl/ kluby/ angielski.html?w5&kto5431&k15431&id54557.
41. Torlakovic, E. and Deugo, D. (2004) Application of a CALL system in the acquisition of adverbs in English. Computer-Assisted Language Learning, 17(2): 203-235.
42. Uden, L. and Beaumont, C. (2006) Technology and Problem-based Learning. London: Information Science.
43. Vanparys, J. and Baten, L. (1999) How to offer real help to grammar learners. ReCALL, 11(1): 125-132.
44. Ware, P. and O'Dowd, R. (2008) Peer feedback on language form in telecollaboration. Language Learning and Technology, 12(1): 43-63.
45. Warschauer, M. (1996) Comparing face-to-face and electronic communication in the second language classroom. CALICO Journal, 13(2): 7-26.
46. Warschauer, M. (2000) On-line learning in second language classrooms: An ethnographic study. In: Warschauer, M. and Kerns, R. (eds.) Network-based Language Teaching: Concepts and Practice. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press, 41-58.