Explicitness in pedagogical interventions: Input, practice, and feedback

Mind and Context in Adult Second Language Acquisition: Methods, Theory, and Practice

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 234-263

  Sanz, Cristina ^a   Morgan Short, Kara ^a  

^a GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Explicit and implicit feedback; Explicit and implicit knowledge; Explicit and implicit processing; Manipulated input; Metalinguistic information; Pedagogical intervention; Practice

Indexed keywords

EID: 77950158138     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (74)

1. Doughty, C. & Long, M. H. (Eds.). (2003). The handbook of second language acquisition. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
2. Ellis, N. C. (Ed.). (1994). Implicit and explicit learning of languages. New York: Academic Press.
3. Norris, J. M., & Ortega, L. (2000). Effectiveness of L2 instruction: A research synthesis and quantitative meta- Analysis. Language Learning, 50(3), 417-528.
4. Alanen, R. (1995). Input enhancement and rule presentation in second language acquisition. In R. Schmidt (Ed.), Attention and awareness in foreign language learning (pp. 259-302). Honolulu, HI: University of Hawai'i at Manoa, Second Language Teaching and Curriculum Center.
5. Anderson, J. R. (1983). The architecture of cognition. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
6. Anderson, J. R. (1992). Automaticity and the ACT* theory. American Journal of Psychology, 105(2), 165-180.
7. Anderson, J. R. (1993). Rules of the mind. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
8. Benati, A. (2004). The effects of structured input activities and explicit information on the acquisition of the Italian future tense. In B. Van Patten (Ed.), Processing instruction: Theory, research, and commentary (pp. 187-206). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
9. Carroll, S., & Swain, M. (1993). Explicit and implicit negative feedback: An empirical study of the learning of linguistic generalizations. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 15, 357-386.
10. de Graaff, R. (1997). The eXperanto experiment: Effects of explicit instruction on second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19, 249- 276.
11. De Keyser, R. (1993). The effect of error correction on L2 grammar knowledge and oral proficiency. The Modern Language Journal, 77, 501-514.
12. De Keyser, R. (1995). Learning second language grammar rules: An experiment with a miniature linguistic system. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 17, 379-410.
13. De Keyser, R. (1997). Beyond explicit rule learning: Automatizing second language morphosyntax. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19, 195-221.
14. De Keyser, R. (2003). Implicit and explicit learning. In C. Doughty & M. H. Long (Eds.), The handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 313-347). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
15. De Keyser, R., Salaberry, R., Robinson, P., & Harrington, M. (2002). What gets processed in processing instruction? A commentary on Bill Van Patten's Processing Instruction: An Update. Language Learning, 52(4), 805-823.
16. Doughty, C. (2003). Instructed SLA: Constraints, compensation, and enhancement. In C. Doughty & M. H. Long (Eds.), The handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 256-310). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
17. Doughty, C. (2004). Commentary: When PI is focus on form it is very, very good, but when it is focus on forms. In B. VanPatten (Ed.), Processing instruction: Theory, research, and commentary (pp. 257-270). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
18. Doughty, C., & Long, M. H. (Eds.). (2003). The handbook of second language acquisition. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
19. Doughty, C., & Williams, J. (Eds.). (1998). Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
20. Dulany, D., Carlson, R., & Dewey, G. (1984). A case of syntactical learning and judgment: How conscious and how abstract? Journal of Experimental Psychology, 113, 541-555.
21. Dulany, D., Carlson, R., & Dewey, G. (1985). On consciousness in syntactic learning and judgment: A reply to Reber, Allen, and Regan. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 144, 25-32.
22. Ellis, N. C. (1993). Rule and instances in foreign language learning: Interactions of explicit and implicit knowledge. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 5, 289-318.
23. Ellis, N. C., & Laporte, N. (1997). Contexts of acquisition: Effects of formal instruction and naturalistic exposure on second language acquisition. In A. de Groot & J. Kroll (Eds.), Tutorials in bilingualism: Psycholinguistic perspectives (pp. 53-83). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
24. Gass, S. M., Svetics, I., & Lemelin, S. (2003). Differential effects of attention. Language Learning, 53(3), 497-545.
25. Gass, S. M., & Varonis, E. M. (1994). Input, interaction, and second language production. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 16, 283-302.
26. Hulstjin, J., & de Graaff, R. (1994). Under what conditions does explicit knowledge of a second language facilitate the acquisition of implicit knowledge? A research proposal. AILA Review, 11, 97-112.
27. Izumi, S. (2002). Output, input enhancement, and the noticing hypothesis: An experimental study on ESL relativization. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24, 541-577.
28. Izumi, S., & Bigelow, M. (2000). Does output promote noticing and second language acquisition? TESOL Quarterly, 34, 239-278.
29. Jourdenais, R., Ota, M., Stauffer, S., Boyson, B., & Doughty, C. (1995). Does textual enhancement promote noticing? A think aloud protocol analysis. In R. Schmidt (Ed.), Attention and awareness in foreign language learning (pp. 183-216). Honolulu, HI: University of Hawai'i at Manoa, Second Language Teaching and Curriculum Center.
30. Knowlton, B. M., & Squire, L. R. (1994). The information acquired during artificial grammar learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 20, 79-91.
31. Knowlton, B. M., & Squire, L. R. (1996). Artificial grammar learning depends on implicit acquisition of both abstract and exemplar-specific information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 22, 169-181.
32. Krashen, S. D. (1985). The input hypothesis: Issues and implications. London: Longman.
33. Leeman, J. (2003). Recasts and second language development: Beyond negative evidence. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 25, 37-63.
34. Long, M. H., & Robinson, P. (1998). Focus on form: Theory, research, and practice. In C. Doughty & J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp. 15-41). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
35. Loschky, L., & Bley-Vroman, R. (1993). Grammar and task-based learning. In G. Crookes & S. Gass (Eds.), Tasks and language learning: Integrating theory and practice (pp. 123-167). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
36. MacWhinney, B. (1997). Implicit and explicit processes: Commentary. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19(2), 277-284.
37. McDonald, J. L. (1989). The acquisition of cue-category mappings. In B. MacWhinney & E. Bates (Eds.), The crosslinguistic study of language processing (pp. 375- 396). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
38. Morgan-Short, K., & Bowden, H. W. (in press). Processing instruction and meaningful output-based instruction: Effects on linguistic development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition.
39. Nagata, N. (1993). Intelligent computer feedback for second language instruction. The Modern Language Journal, 77(3), 330-339.
40. Nagata, N., & Swisher, M. V. (1995). A study of consciousness-raising by computer: The effect of metalinguistic feedback on SLA. Foreign Language Annals, 28, 336- 347.
41. Norris, J. M., & Ortega, L. (2000). Effectiveness of L2 instruction: A research synthesis and quantitative meta- Analysis. Language Learning, 50(3), 417-528.
42. Ortega, L., & Long, M. H. (1997). The effects of models and recasts on the acquisition of object topicalization and adverb placement in L2 Spanish. Spanish Applied Linguistics (SAL), 1, 65-86.
43. Paradis, M. (1994). Neurolinguistic aspects of implicit and explicit memory: Implications for bilingualism and SLA. In N. C. Ellis (Ed.), Implicit and explicit learning of languages (pp. 393-419). New York: Academic Press.
44. Pica, T. (1983). Adult acquisition of English as a second language under different conditions of exposure. Language Learning, 33, 465-497.
45. Reber, A. (1967). Implicit learning of artificial grammars. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 77, 317-327.
46. Reber, A. (1976). Implicit learning of synthetic languages: The role of instructional set. Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Learning and Memory, 2, 88-94.
47. Reber, A. (1989). Implicit learning and tacit knowledge. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 118, 219-235.
48. Reber, A. (1993). Implicit learning and tacit knowledge: An essay on the cognitive unconscious. London: Clarendon Press.
49. Robinson, P. (1996). Learning simple and complex second language rules under implicit, incidental, rule-search and instructed conditions. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 18, 27-68.
50. Robinson, P. (1997). Generalizability and automaticity of second language learning under implicit, incidental, enhanced, and instructed conditions. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19, 223-247.
51. Robinson, P. (2002). Effect of individual differences in intelligence, aptitude and working memory on adult incidental SLA. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Individual differences and instructed language learning (pp. 211-266). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
52. Rosa, E. M. (1999). A cognitive approach to task-based research: Explicitness, awareness and L2 development. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Georgetown University, Washington, DC.
53. Rosa, E. M., & Leow, R. P. (2004a). Awareness, different learning conditions, and L2 development. Applied Psycholinguistics, 25, 269-292.
54. Rosa, E. M., & Leow, R. P. (2004b). Computerized task-based exposure, explicitness, type of feedback, and Spanish L2 development. The Modern Language Journal, 88(2), 192-216.
55. Rosa, E. M., & O'Neill, M. (1999). Explicitness, intake, and the issue of awareness: Another piece to the puzzle. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21, 511-556.
56. Sanz, C. (1999). What form to focus on? Linguistics, language awareness, and the education of L2 teachers. In J. F. Lee & A. Valdman (Eds.), Meaning and form: Multiple perspectives (pp. 3-23). Boston: Heinle & Heinle.
57. Sanz, C. (2004). Computer delivered implicit vs. explicit feedback in processing instruction. In B. Van Patten (Ed.), Processing instruction: Theory, research, and commentary (pp. 241-255). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
58. Sanz, C., & Morgan-Short, K. (2004). Positive evidence versus explicit rule presentation and explicit negative feedback: A computer- Assisted study. Language Learning, 54(1), 35-78.
59. Schmidt, R. (2001). Attention. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 3-32). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
60. Scott, V. M. (1989). An empirical study of explicit and implicit teaching strategies in French. The Modern Language Journal, 73(1), 14-22.
61. Scott, V. M. (1990). Explicit and implicit grammar teaching strategies: New empirical data. The French Review, 63(5), 779-789.
62. Segalowitz, N. (2003). Automaticity and second languages. In C. Doughty & M. H. Long (Eds.), The handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 256-310). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
63. Servan-Schreiber, E., & Anderson, J. R. (1990). Learning artificial grammars with competitive chunking. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 16, 592-608.
64. Spada, N. (1997). Form-focused instruction and second language acquisition: A review of classroom and laboratory research. Language Teaching, 29, 1-15.
65. Swain, M. (1995). Three functions of output in second language learning. In G. Cook & B. Seidlhofer (Eds.), Principles and practice in applied linguistics: Studies in honour of H. Widdowson (pp. 125-144). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
66. Swain, M. (1998). Focus on form in classroom through conscious reflection. In C. Doughty & J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp. 64-81). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
67. Tomasello, M., & Herron, C. (1988). Down the garden path: Inducing and correcting overgeneralization errors in the foreign language classroom. Applied Psycholinguistics, 9, 237-246.
68. Trahey, M., & White, L. (1993). Positive evidence and preemption in the second language classroom. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 16, 183-203.
69. Van Patten, B. (1994). Evaluating the role of consciousness in second language acquisition: Terms, linguistic features & research methodology. AILA Review, 11, 27-36.
70. Van Patten, B. (2002). Processing instruction: An update. Language Learning, 52(4), 755-803.
71. Van Patten, B. (2004). Processing instruction: Theory, research, and commentary. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
72. Van Patten, B., & Oikkenon, S. (1996). Explanation versus structured input in processing instruction. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 18, 495-510.
73. Winitz, H. (1996). Grammaticality judgment as a function of explicit and implicit instruction in Spanish. The Modern Language Journal, 80(1), 32-46.
74. Wong, W. (2004). Processing instruction in French: The roles of explicit information and structured input. In B. Van Patten (Ed.), Processing instruction: Theory, research, and commentary (pp. 187-206). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.