The third mission and the entrepreneurial university model

Universities and Strategic Knowledge Creation: Specialization and Performance in Europe

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 112-143

  Gulbrandsen, Magnus ^a   Slipersæter, Stig ^a  

^a NORDIC INSTITUTE FOR STUDIES IN INNOVATION   (Norway)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77949337525     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (58)

1. Arnold, E., S. Kuhlman and B. van der Meulen (2001), A Singular Council: Evaluation of the Research Council of Norway, Brighton: Technopolis.
2. Balconi, M., S. Breschi and F. Lissoni (2004), 'Networks of inventors and the role of academia: an exploration of Italian patent data', Research Policy, 33 (1), 127-45.
3. Baldini, N., R. Grimaldi and M. Sobrero (2006), 'Institutional changes and the commercialization of academic knowledge: a study of Italian universities' patenting activities between 1965 and 2002', Research Policy, 35 (4), 518-32.
4. Baldini, N., R. Grimaldi and M. Sobrero (2007), 'To patent or not to patent? A survey of Italian inventors on motivations, incentives and obstacles to university patenting', Scientometrics, 70 (2), 333-54.
5. Benner, M. and U. Sandström (2000), 'Institutionalizing the triple helix: research funding and norms in the academic system', Research Policy, 29, 291-301.
6. Bok, D. (2003), Universities in the Marketplace: The Commercialization of Higher Education, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
7. Bonaccorsi, A., C. Daraio and B. Lepori (2005), 'Indicators for the analysis of higher education systems: some methodological reflections, PRIME workshop: 'S&T indicators for policy analysis: needs, status and new developments', Lisbon, 22-23 September.
8. Clark, B.R. (1998), Creating Entrepreneurial Universities: Organizational Pathways of Transformation, New York: Pergamon.
9. Clark, B.R. (2004), Sustaining Change in Universities: Continuities in Case Studies and Concepts, Maidenhead: Society for Research into Higher Education & Open University Press.
10. Cohen, W.M. and D.A. Levinthal (1990), 'Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and innovation', Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, 128-52.
11. Coupé, T. (2003), 'Science is golden: academic R&D and university patents', Journal of Technology Transfer, 28, 31-46.
12. Etzkowitz, H. (1996), 'Conflicts of interest and commitment in academic science in the United States', Minerva, 34, 259-77.
13. Etzkowitz, H. (1998), 'The norms of entrepreneurial science: cognitive effects of the new university-industry linkages', Research Policy, 27, 823-33.
14. Etzkowitz, H. (2003), 'Research groups as "quasi-firms": the invention of the entrepreneurial university', Research Policy, 32, 109-21.
15. Etzkowitz, H. and L. Leydesdorff (2000), 'The dynamics of innovation: from national systems and "Mode 2" to a triple helix of university-industry-government relations', Research Policy, 29, 109-23.
16. Etzkowitz, H., E. Schuler and M. Gulbrandsen (2000), 'The evolution of the entrepreneurial university', in M. Jacob and T. Hellström (eds), The Future of Knowledge Production in the Academy, Maidenhead: Society for Research into Higher Education & Open University Press, pp. 40-60.
17. Fairweather, J.S. (1988), 'Entrepreneurship and higher education: lessons for colleges, universities and industry', ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report No. 6, Washington, DC: Association for the Study of Higher Education.
18. Florida, R. and W.M. Cohen (1999), 'Engine or infrastructure? The university role in economic development', in L.M. Branscomb, F.Kodama and R. Florida (eds), Industrializing Knowledge: University-Industry Linkages in Japan and the United States, Cambridge, MA and London: MIT Press, pp. 589-610.
19. Geuna, A. (2001), 'The changing rationale for European university research funding: are there negative unintended consequences?', Journal of Economic Issues, 35, 607-32.
20. Geuna, A. and L. Nesta (2003), 'University patenting and its effects on academic research', SPRU Electronic Working Paper Series No. 99, SPRU - Science and Technology Policy Research, University of Sussex, Brighton.
21. Gibbons, M., C. Limoges, H. Nowotny, S. Schwartzman, P. Scott and M. Trow (1994), The New Production of Knowledge: The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies, London: Sage.
22. Godin, B. (1998), 'Writing performative history: the New New Atlantis?', Social Studies of Science, 28, 465-83.
23. Godin, B. and Y. Gingras (1998), 'The place of universities in the system of knowledge production', Research Policy, 29, 273-8.
24. Godin, B. and Y. Gingras (2000), 'Impact of collaborative research on academic science', Science and Public Policy, 27, 65-73.
25. Gulbrandsen, M. (2005), ' "But Peter's in it for the money" - the liminality of entrepreneurial scientists', VEST Journal for Science and Technology Studies, 18, 49-75.
26. Gulbrandsen, M. and L. Langfeldt (2004), 'In search of "Mode 2": the nature of knowledge production in Norway', Minerva, 42, 237-50.
27. Gulbrandsen, M. and J.-C. Smeby (2005), 'Industry funding and university professors' research performance', Research Policy, 34, 932-50.
28. Hellström, T. (2003), 'Governing the virtual academic commons', Research Policy, 32, 391-401.
29. Henderson, R., A.B. Jaffe and M. Trajtenberg (1998), 'Universities as a source of commercial technology: a detailed analysis of university patenting, 1965-1988', Review of Economics and Statistics, 80 (1), 119-27.
30. Henrekson, M. and N. Rosenberg (2001), 'Designing efficient institutions for science-based entrepreneurship: lessons from the US and Sweden', Journal of Technology Transfer, 26, 207-31.
31. Iversen, E., A. Klitkou and M. Gulbrandsen (2007), 'A baseline for the impact of academic patenting legislation in Norway', Scientometrics, 70 (2), 393-414.
32. Kleinman, D.L. and S.P. Vallas (2001), 'Science, capitalism, and the rise of the "knowledge worker": the changing structure of knowledge production in the United States', Theory and Society, 30, 451-92.
33. Lundvall, B.-Å. (ed.) (1992), National Systems of Innovation, London: Pinter.
34. Martin, B.R. (2003), 'The changing social contract for science and the evolution of the university', in A. Geuna, A.J. Salter and W.E. Steinmueller (eds), Science and Innovation: Rethinking the Rationales for Funding and Governance, Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, MA, USA: Edward Elgar, pp. 7-29.
35. Martin, B.R. and H. Etzkowitz (2000), 'The origin and evolution of the university species', VEST Journal for Science and Technology Studies, 13, 9-34.
36. Merton, R.K. (1968), 'The Matthew effect in science', Science, 159, 56-63.
37. Merton, R.K. (1988), 'The Matthew effect in science II: Cumulative advantage and the symbolism of intellectual property', ISIS, 79, 606-23.
38. Meyer, M. (2003a), 'Academic entrepreneurs or entrepreneurial academics? Research-based ventures and public support mechanisms', R&D Management, 33 (2), 107-15.
39. Meyer, M. (2003b), 'Academic patents as an indicator of useful research? A new approach to measure academic inventiveness', Research Evaluation, 12 (1), 17-27.
40. Mowery, D.C., R.R. Nelson, B.N. Sampat and A.A. Ziedonis (2004), Ivory Tower and Industrial Innovation: University-Industry Technology Transfer before and after the Bayh-Dole Act, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
41. Mowery, D.C. and B.N. Sampat (2005), 'Universities in national innovation systems', in J. Fagerberg, D.C. Mowery and R.R. Nelson (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Innovation, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 209-39.
42. Mowery, D.C. and A.A. Ziedonis (2002), 'Academic patent quality and quantity before and after the Bayh-Dole Act in the United States', Research Policy, 31, 399-418.
43. Mustar, P. (1998), 'Partnerships, configurations and dynamics in the creation and development of SMEs by researchers', Industry and Higher Education, 12, 217-21.
44. Nelson, R.R. (ed.) (1993), National Innovation Systems: A Comparative Analysis, Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.
45. Nelson, R.R. (2001), 'Observations on the post-Bayh-Dole rise of patenting at American universities', Journal of Technology Transfer, 26, 13-19.
46. Nowotny, H., P. Scott and M. Gibbons (2001), Re-thinking Science: Knowledge and the Public in an Age of Uncertainty, Cambridge: Polity Press.
47. Nowotny, H., P. Scott and M. Gibbons (2003), 'Mode 2 revisited: the new production of knowledge', Minerva, 41, 179-94.
48. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) (2003), Turning Science into Business: Patenting and Licensing at Public Research Organizations, DSTI/STP(2003)/22.
49. Rosenberg, N. and R.R. Nelson (1994), 'American universities and technical advance in industry', Research Policy, 23, 323-48.
50. Schmoch, U. (2004), 'The technological output of scientific institutions', in H.F. Moed, W. Glänzel and U. Schmoch (eds), Handbook of Quantitative Science and Technology Research: The Use of Publication and Patent Statistics in Studies of S&T Systems, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 717-31.
51. Siegel, D.S., D. Waldman and A. Link (2003), 'Assessing the impact of organizational practices on the relative productivity of university technology transfer offices: an exploratory study', Research Policy, 32 (1), 27-48.
52. Slaughter, S. and L.L. Leslie (1997), Academic Capitalism, Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
53. Slaughter, S. and G. Rhoades (1996), 'The emergence of a competitiveness research and development policy coalition and the commercialization of academic science and technology', Science, Technology and Human Values, 21, 303-39.
54. Slipersæter, S., B. Lepori, B. Jongbloed and C. Salerno (2005), 'Collecting Institutional Level Data from European Higher Education Institutions: Evidence from CHINC countries', Institute for Prospective Technological Studies of the Joint Research Centre (IPTS), Seville.
55. Stokes, D.E. (1997), Pasteur's Quadrant: Basic Science and Technological Innovation, Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
56. Van Looy, B., M. Ranga, J. Callaert, K. Debackere and E. Zimmermann (2004), 'Combining entrepreneurial and scientific performance in academia: towards a compounded and reciprocal Matthew-effect?', Research Policy, 33, 425-41.
57. Vavakova, B. (1998), 'The new social contract between governments, universities and society: has the old one failed?', Minerva, 36, 209-28.
58. Zucker, L.B., M.R. Darby and M.B. Brewer (1998), 'Intellectual human capital and the birth of US biotechnology enterprises', American Economic Review, 88, 290-306.