Combining entrepreneurial and scientific performance in academia: Towards a compounded and reciprocal Matthew-effect?

Research Policy

Volumn 33, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 425-441

  Van Looy, Bart ^a   Ranga, Marina ^a,b   Callaert, Julie ^a   Debackere, Koenraad ^a,c   Zimmermann, Edwin ^c  

^a Katholieke Universiteit Leuven   (Belgium)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SUSSEX   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF LEUVEN   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Innovation systems; Knowledge interactions; University industry relations

Indexed keywords

INDUSTRIAL ECONOMICS; INDUSTRIAL RESEARCH; PATENTS AND INVENTIONS; PUBLIC POLICY; RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT MANAGEMENT;

INNOVATION SYSTEMS; KNOWLEDGE INTERACTIONS; UNIVERSITY-INDUSTRY RELATIONS;

INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS;

EID: 1842731334     PISSN: 00487333     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2003.09.004     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. ACE (American Council on Education), 2001. Report examining Challenges facing Research Collaborations between Industry and Universities. Report ACE Division of Government & Public Affairs, http://www.acenet.edu/news/ press_release/2001/06june/bhef.release.html.
2. Blumenthal D., Campbell E.G., Causino N. Participation of life-science faculty in research relationships with industry. New England Journal of Medicine. 335:1996;1734-1739.
3. Branscomb, L.M., Kodama, F., Florida, R., 1999. Industrializing Knowledge: University-Industry Linkages in Japan and the United States. MIT Press, London.
4. Brooks, H., Randazzese, L.P., 1999. University-industry relations: the next four years and beyond. In: Branscomb, L.M., Keller, J.H. (Eds.), Investing in Innovation: Creating an Innovation Policy that Works. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 361-399.
5. Cohen L.R., Noll R.G. Privatising public research. Scientific American. 271:1994;72-77.
6. Cordis, 2001. Getting more innovation from public research. Study report CORDIS, innovation policy studies, http://www.cordis.lu/innovation-policy/ studies/2001/transfer01.htm.
7. Dasgupta, P., David, P.A., 1987. Information disclosure and the economics of science and technology. In: Feiwel, G.R. (Ed.), Arrow and the Ascent of Modern Economic Theory. NY University Press, New York, pp. 519-542.
8. Dasgupta P., David P.A. Toward a new economics of science. Research Policy. 23:1994;487-521.
9. David, P.A., Foray, D., Steinmueller, W.E., 1997. The research network and the new economics of science: from metaphors to organizational behaviour. In: Gambardella, A., Malerba, F. (Eds.), The Organisation of Innovative Activities in Europe. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
10. Debackere K. Managing academic R&D as a business at KU Leuven: context, structure and processes. R&D Management. 30:2000;323-329.
11. Dosi, G., 2000. Innovation, Organization and Economic Dynamics. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK.
12. Drazen, J., Curfman, G., 2002. Financial associations of authors. The New England Journal of Medicine 346, 1901-1902, http://content.nejm.org/cgi/ content/full/346/24/1901.
13. Etzkowitz, H., 1990. The second academic revolution: the role of the research university in economic development. In: Cozzens, S.E., Healy, P., Rip, A., Ziman, J. (Eds.), The Research System in Transition. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.
14. Etzkowitz H. Technology centers and industrial policy: the emergence of the interventionist state in the USA. Science and Public Policy. 21:1994;79-87.
15. Etzkowitz H. The norms of entrepreneurial science: cognitive effects of the new university-industry linkage. Research Policy. 27:1998;823.
16. Etzkowitz H., Gulbrandsen M. Public entrepreneur: the trajectory of the United States science, technology and industrial policy. Science and Public Policy. 26:1999;53-62.
17. Etzkowitz H., Kemelgor C. The role of research centers in the collectivization of academic science. Minerva. 36:1998;271-288.
18. Etzkowitz H., Leydesdorff L. Introduction to special issue on science policy dimensions of the Triple Helix of university-industry-government relations. Science and Public Policy. 24:1997;2-5.
19. Etzkowitz H., Leydesdorff L. The endless transition: a 'Triple Helix' of university-industry-government relations. Minerva. 36:1998;203-208.
20. Etzkowitz H., Leydesdorff L. The dynamics of innovation: from national systems and 'mode 2' to a Triple Helix of university-industry-government relations. Research Policy. 29:2000;109-123.
21. Etzkowitz, H., Webster, A., Healey, P., 1998. Capitalizing Knowledge: New Intersections of Industry and Academia. State University of New York Press, Albany.
22. European Innovation Scoreboard, 2002. Cordis Focus, December 2002.
23. Florida, R., Cohen, W.M., 1999. Engine or infrastructure? The university role in economic development. In: Branscomb, L.M., Kodama, F., Florida, R. (Eds.), Industrializing Knowledge: University-Industry Linkages in Japan and the United States. MIT Press, London, pp. 589-610.
24. Freeman, C., 1987. Technology Policy and Economic Performance. Pinter, London.
25. Freeman C. The economics of technical change. Cambridge Journal of Economics. 18:1994;463-514.
26. Fusfeld H.I. Industrial research - where it's been, where it's going. Research Technology Management. 38:1995;52-56.
27. Geuna, A., 1999. The changing rationale for university research funding: are there negative unintended consequences? SPRU Electronic Working Paper Series, Paper 33. Sussex University, Falmer, Brighton.
28. Gibbons M. Science's new social contract with society. Nature. 402:1999;81-84.
29. Godin B. Research and the practice of publication in industries. Research Policy. 25:1996;587-606.
30. Hane, G., 1999. Comparing university-industry linkages in the United States and Japan. In: Branscomb, L.M., Kodama, F., Florida, R. (Eds.), Industrializing Knowledge: University-Industry Linkages in Japan and the United States. MIT Press, London, pp. 20-61.
31. Hicks, D., Hamilton, K., 1999. Does university-industry collaboration adversely affect university research? Issues in Science and Technology Online, Real Numbers.
32. Kelch R.P. Maintaining the public trust in clinical research. The New England Journal of Medicine. 346:2002;285-287.
33. Kodama, F., Branscomb, L.M., 1999. University research as an engine for growth: how realistic is the vision? In: Branscomb, L.M., Kodama, F., Florida, R. (Eds.), Industrializing Knowledge: University-Industry Linkages in Japan and the United States. MIT Press, London, pp. 3-19.
34. Latour, B., Woolgar, S., 1979. Laboratory Life: The Construction of Scientific Facts. Princeton University Press, West-Sussex.
35. Leydesdorff L., Etzkowitz H. Emergence of a Triple Helix of university-industry-government relations. Science and Public Policy. 23:1996;279-286.
36. Leydesdorff L., Etzkowitz H. Triple Helix of innovation: introduction. Science and Public Policy. 25:1998;358-364.
37. Leydesdorff, L., Etzkowitz, H., 2003. Can 'the public' be considered as a Fourth Helix in university-industry-government relations? Report of the Triple Helix Conference. Science and Public Policy, http://users.fmg.uva.nl/ lleydesdorff/th4/spp.htm .
38. Lundvall, B.-Å. (Ed.), 1992. National Systems of Innovation. Pinter, London.
39. Martin, B.R., 2001. The changing social contract for science and the evolution of the university. In: Geuna, A., Salter, A.J., Steinmueller, W.E., Hoffman, Y.E. (Eds.), Science and Innovation: Rethinking the Rationales for Funding and Governance. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK.
40. Martin, B.R., 2002. The changing social contract for science and the evolution of knowledge production. Paper prepared for the SPRU Conference on Rethinking Science Policy, Analytical Frameworks for Evidence-Based Policy, 21-23 March, SPRU, University of Sussex, Brighton, UK.
41. Merton R.K. The Matthew effect in science. the reward and communication systems of science considered. Science. 159:1968a;56-63.
42. Merton, R.K., 1968b. The normative structure of science. In: Merton, R.K. (Ed.), The Sociology of Science, Chapter 13, pp. 267-278.
43. Merton R.K. The Matthew effect in science. II. Cumulative advantage and the symbolism of intellectual property. ISIS. 79:1988;606-623.
44. Mitroff I. Norms and counter-norms in a select group of Apollo moon scientists. American Sociological Review. 39:1974;579-595.
45. Mowery, D.C., Nelson, R.R., 1999. Sources of Industrial Leadership. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
46. Mowery D.C., Nelson R.R., Sampat B.N. The growth of patenting and licensing by US universities: an assessment of the effects of the Bayh-Dole Act of 1980. Research Policy. 30:2000;99-119.
47. Mulkay M. The mediating role of the scientific elite. Social Studies of Science. 6:1976;445-470.
48. Nelson, R. (Ed.), 1993. National Innovation Systems. Oxford University Press, New York.
49. Nelson, R., Rosenberg, N., 1993. Technical innovation and national systems. In: Nelson, R.R. (Ed.), National Innovation Systems. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 3-21.
50. Noble, D., 1977. America by Design: Science, Technology and the Rise of Corporate Capitalism. Oxford University Press, New York.
51. OECD, 1999. University Research in Transition, OECD STI-Report. OECD Publications, France.
52. Packer K., Webster A. Patenting culture in science: reinventing the scientific wheel of credibility. Science, Technology and Human Values. 21:1996;427-453.
53. Pavitt, K., 1997. Academic research, technical change and government policy. In: Krige, J., Pestre, D. (Eds.), Science in the Twentieth Century. Harwood Academic Publishers, Amsterdam, pp. 143-158.
54. Porter, M., 1995. The Competitive Advantage of Nations. Free Press, New York.
55. Slaughter, S., Leslie, L., 1997. Academic Capitalism: Politics, Policies and the Entrepreneurial University. John Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.
56. Steinmueller, W.E., 1994. Basic research and industrial innovation. In: Dodgson, M., Rothwell, R. (Eds.), The Handbook of Industrial Innovation. Edward Elgar, Aldershot, pp. 54-66.
57. Van Looy B., Callaert J., Debackere K., Verbeek A. Patent related indicators for assessing knowledge-generating institutions: towards a contextualised approach. The Journal of Technology Transfer. 28:2003;53-61.
58. Van Looy, B., Debackere, K., Andries, P., 2003b. Stimulating regional development through knowledge driven entrepreneurship. In: Steyaert, C., Hjörth, D. (Eds.), New Movements in Entrepreneurship. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK.
59. Vavakova B. The new social contract between governments, universities and society: has the old one failed? Minerva. 36:1998;209-228.