Beyond dual-process models: A categorisation of processes underlying intuitive judgement and decision making

Thinking and Reasoning

Volumn 16, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 1-25

  Glöckner, Andreas ^a   Witteman, Cilia ^b  

^a MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR RESEARCH ON COLLECTIVE GOODS   (Germany)

^b RADBOUD UNIVERSITY NIJMEGEN   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Automaticity; Decision making; Evidence accumulation; Intuition; Learning; Parallel constraint satisfaction

Indexed keywords

EID: 77449097649     PISSN: 13546783     EISSN: 14640708     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13546780903395748     Document Type: Article

References (128)

1. Acker, F. (2008). New findings on unconscious versus conscious thought in decision making: Additional empirical data and meta-analysis. Judgment and Decision Making, 3, 292-303.
2. Bargh, J. A. (1996). Automaticity in social psychology. In E. T. Higgins & A. W. Kruglanski (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (pp. 169-183). New York: Guilford Press.
3. Bargh, J. A., & Chartrand, T. L. (1999). The unbearable automaticity of being. American Psychologist, 54, 462-479.
4. Beach, L. R., & Mitchell, T. R. (1978). A contingency model for the selection of decision strategies. Academy of Management Review, 3, 439-449.
5. Beach, L. R., & Mitchell, T. R. (1987). Image theory: Principles, goals, and plans in decision making. Acta Psychologica, 66, 201-220.
6. Bechara, A., Damasio, H., Tranel, D., & Damasio, A. R. (1997). Deciding advantageously before knowing the advantageous strategy. Science, 275(5304), 1293-1294.
7. Betsch, T. (2008). The nature of intuition and its neglect in research on judgment and decision making. In H. Plessner, C. Betsch, & T. Betsch (Eds.), Intuition in judgement and decision making (pp. 3-22). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.
8. Betsch, T., Brinkmann, B. J., Fiedler, K., & Breining, K. (1999). When prior knowledge overrules new evidence: Adaptive use of decision strategies and the role of behavioural routines. Swiss Journal of Psychology, 58, 151-160.
9. Betsch, T., & Haberstroh, S. (2005). Current research on routine decision making: Advances and prospects. In T. Betsch & S. Haberstroh (Eds.), The routines of decision making (pp. 359-376). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.
10. Betsch, T., Haberstroh, S., Glockner, A., Haar, T., & Fiedler, K. (2001a). The effects of routine strength on adaptation and information search in recurrent decision making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 84, 23-53.
11. Betsch, T., Haberstroh, S., & Hohle, C. (2002). Explaining routinized decision making: A review of theories and models. Theory & Psychology, 12, 453-488.
12. Betsch, T., Haberstroh, S., Molter, B., & Glockner, A. (2004). Oops, I did it again-relapse errors in routinized decision making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 93, 62-74.
13. Betsch, T., Plessner, H., Schwieren, C., & Gutig, R. (2001b). I like it but I don't know why: A value-account approach to implicit attitude formation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 242-253.
14. Bos, M. W., Dijksterhuis, A., & van Baaren, R. B. (2008). On the goal-dependency of unconscious thought. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 1114-1120.
15. Bruner, J. S., & Goodman, C. C. (1947). Value and need as organizing factors in perception. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 42, 33-44.
16. Brunswik, E. (1955). Representative design and the probability theory in a functional psychology. Psychological Review, 62, 193-217.
17. Busemeyer, J. R., & Johnson, J. G. (2004). Computational models of decision making. In D. J. Koehler & N. Harvey (Eds.), Blackwell handbook of judgement and decision making (pp. 133-154). Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.
18. Busemeyer, J. R., & Townsend, J. T. (1993). Decision field theory: A dynamic-cognitive approach to decision making in an uncertain environment. Psychological Review, 100, 432-459.
19. Camerer, C. F., & Johnson, E. J. (1991). The process-performance paradox in expert judgment: How can experts know so much and predict so badly? In K. A. Ericsson & J. Smith (Eds.), Toward a general theory of expertise: Prospects and limits (pp. 195-217). New York: Cambridge University Press.
20. Chen, S., & Chaiken, S. (1999). The heuristic-systematic model in its broader context. In S. Chaiken & Y. Trope (Eds.), Dual-process theories in social psychology (pp. 73-96). New York: Guilford Press.
21. Clore, G. L., Gasper, K., & Garvin, E. (2001). Affect as information. In J. P. Forgas (Ed.), Handbook of affect and social cognition (pp. 121-144). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.
22. Damasio, A. R. (1994). Descartes' error: Emotion, reason, and the human brain. New York: Putnam Publishing.
23. De Neys, W., & Glumicic, T. (2008). Conflict monitoring in dual process theories of thinking. Cognition, 106, 1248-1299.
24. De Neys, W., Schaeken, W., & d'Ydewalle, G. (2005). Working memory and counterexample retrieval for causal conditionals. Thinking & Reasoning, 11, 123-150.
25. De Neys, W., Vartanian, O., & Goel, V. (2008). Smarter than we think: When our brains detect that we are biased. Psychological Science, 19, 483-489.
26. De Vries, M., Holland, R. W., & Witteman, C. L. M. (2008). In the winning mood: Affect in the Iowa gambling task. Judgment and Decision Making, 3, 42-50.
27. Dienes, Z. (2008). Subjective measures of unconscious knowledge. Progress in Brain Research, 168,49-64.
28. Dienes, Z., & Scott, R. (2005). Measuring unconscious knowledge: Distinguishing structural knowledge and judgement knowledge. Psychological Research, 69, 338-351.
29. Dijksterhuis, A., Bos, M. W., Nordgren, L. F., & van Baaren, R. B. (2006). On making the right choice: The deliberation-without-attention effect. Science, 311(5763), 1005-1007.
30. Doherty, M. E., & Kurz, E. M. (1996). Social judgement theory. Thinking & Reasoning, 2, 109-140.
31. Dougherty, M. R. P., Gettys, C. F., & Ogden, E. E. (1999). MINERVA-DM: A memory processes model for judgements of likelihood. Psychological Review, 106, 180-209.
32. Dunn, B. D., Dalgleish, T., & Lawrence, A. D. (2006). The somatic marker hypothesis: A critical evaluation. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 30, 239-271.
33. Epstein, S. (1990). Cognitive-experiential self-theory. In L. A. Pervin (Ed.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (pp. 165-192). New York: Guilford Press.
34. Evans, J. S. B. T. (2007). On the resolution of conflict in dual process theories of reasoning. Thinking & Reasoning, 13, 321-339.
35. Evans, J. S. B. T. (2008). Dual-processing accounts of reasoning, judgement, and social cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 255-278.
36. Evans, J. St. B. T. (2009). How many dual-process theories do we need? One, two, or many? In J. St. B. T. Evans & K. Frankisch (Eds.), In two minds: Dual processes and beyond (pp. 33-54). New York: Oxford University Press.
37. Fiedler, K. (2000). Beware of samples! A cognitive-ecological sampling approach to judgement biases. Psychological Review, 107, 659-676.
38. Fiedler, K. (2008). The ultimate sampling dilemma in experience-based decision making. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 34, 186-203.
39. Finucane, M. L., Alhakami, A., Slovic, P., & Johnson, S. M. (2000). The affect heuristic in judgements of risks and benefits. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 13, 1-17.
40. Fishburn, P. C. (1974). Lexicographic orders, utilities, and decision rules: A survey. Management Science, 20, 1442-1472.
41. Franssens, S., & De Neys, W. (2009). The effortless nature of conflict detection during thinking. Thinking & Reasoning, 15, 105-128.
42. Gigerenzer, G., & Todd, P. M. (1999). Simple heuristics that make us smart. Evolution and cognition. New York: Oxford University Press.
43. Gilovich, T., Griffin, D., & Kahneman, D. (2002). Heuristics and biases: The psychology of intuitive judgement. New York: Cambridge University Press.
44. Glockner, A. (2008). Does intuition beat fast and frugal heuristics? A systematic empirical analysis. In H. Plessner, C. Betsch, & T. Betsch (Eds.), Intuition in judgment and decision making (pp. 309-325). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.
45. Glockner, A. (2009). Investigating intuitive and deliberate processes statistically: The multiple- measure maximum likelihood strategy classification method. Judgment and Decision Making, 4, 186-199.
46. Glockner, A., & Betsch, T. (2008a). Multiple-reason decision making based on automatic processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 34, 1055-1075.
47. Glockner, A., & Betsch, T. (2008b). Do people make decisions under risk based on ignorance? An empirical test of the priority heuristic against cumulative prospect theory. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 107, 75-95.
48. Glockner, A., & Betsch, T. (2008c). Modeling option and strategy choices with connectionist networks: Towards an integrative model of automatic and deliberate decision making. Judgemnt and Decision Making, 3, 215-228.
49. Glockner, A., & Betsch, T. (in press). Accounting for critical evidence while being precise and avoiding the strategy selection problem in a parallel constraint satisfaction approach - A reply to Marewski (in press). Journal of Behavioral Decision Making.
50. Glockner, A., & Herbold, A-K. (in press). An eye-tracking study on information processing in risky decisions: Evidence for compensatory strategies based on automatic processes. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making.
51. Glockner, A., & Hochman, G. (2009). The interplay of experience-based affective and probabilistic cues in decision making: Arousal increases when experience and additional cues are inconsistent. Manuscript submitted for publication.
52. Glockner, A., & Witteman, C. L. M. (Eds.). (2009). Foundations for tracing intuition: Challenges and methods. Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
53. Gonzalez-Vallejo, C., Lassiter, G. D., Bellezza, F. S., & Lindberg, M. J. (2008). Save angels perhaps: A critical examination of unconscious thought theory and the deliberation- without-attention effect. Review of General Psychology, 12, 282-296.
54. Guthrie, C., Rachlinski, J. J., & Wistrich, A. J. (2007). Blinking on the bench: How judges decide cases. Cornell Law Review, 93, 1-44.
55. Haidt, J. (2001). The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgement. Psychological Review, 108, 814-834.
56. Hammond, K. R., Hamm, R. M., Grassia, J., & Pearson, T. (1987). Direct comparison of the efficacy of intuitive and analytical cognition in expert judgement. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, & Cybernetics, 17, 753-770.
57. Hasher, L., & Zacks, R. T. (1979). Automatic and effortful processes in memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 108, 356-388.
58. Herbig, B., & Glockner, A. (2009). Experts and decision making: First steps towards a unifying theory of decision making in novices, intermediates and experts. [MPI Collective Goods Preprint, No. 2009/2.] Retrieved from http://ssrn.com/abstract=1337449
59. Hintzman, D. L. (1988). Judgements of frequency and recognition memory in a multiple-trace memory model. Psychological Review, 95, 528-551.
60. Hintzman, D. L. (1990). Human learning and memory: Connections and dissociations. Annual Reviews of Psychology, 41, 109-139.
61. Hogarth, R. M. (2001). Educating intuition. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
62. Holyoak, K. J., & Simon, D. (1999). Bidirectional reasoning in decision making by constraint satisfaction. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 128, 3-31.
63. Holyoak, K. J., & Spellman, B. A. (1993). Thinking. Annual Review of Psychology, 44, 265-315.
64. Horstmann, N., Ahlgrimm, A., & Glockner, A. (2009). How distinct are intuition and deliberation? An eye-tracking analysis of instruction-induced decision modes. Judgement and Decision Making, 4, 335-354.
65. Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1983). Mental models: Towards a cognitive science of language, inference, and consciousness. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
66. Kahneman, D. (2003). A perspective on judgement and choice: Mapping bounded rationality. American Psychologist, 58, 697-720.
67. Kahneman, D., & Frederick, S. (2002). Representativeness revisited: Attribute substitution in intuitive judgement. In T. Gilovich, D. Griffin, & D. Kahneman (Eds.), Heuristics and biases: The psychology of intuitive judgement (pp. 49-81). New York: Cambridge University Press.
68. Kahneman, D., Slovic, P., & Tversky, A. (Eds.). (1982). Judgement under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
69. Klein, G. A. (1993). A recognition-primed decision (RPD) model of rapid decision making. In G. A. Klein, J. Orasanu, R. Calderwood, & C. E. Zsambok (Eds.), Decision making in action: Models and methods (pp. 138-147). Westport, CT: Ablex Publishing.
70. Klein, G. A. (2003). Intuition at work. New York: Doubleday.
71. Kruglanski, A. W., Chun, W. Y., Erb, H. P., Pierro, A., Mannetti, L., & Spiegel, S. (2003). A parametric unimodel of human judgment: Integrating dual-process frameworks in social cognition from a single-mode perspective. In J. P. Forgas, K. D. Williams, & W. von Hippel (Eds.), Social judgements: Implicit and explicit processes (pp. 137-161). New York: Cambridge University Press.
72. Kruglanski, A. W., & Orehek, E. (2007). Partitioning the domain of social inference: Dual mode and systems models and their alternatives. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 291-316.
73. Kruglanski, A. W., & Thompson, E. P. (1999). Persuasion by a single route: A view from the unimodel. Psychological Inquiry, 10, 83-109.
74. Lerouge, D. (2009). Evaluating the benefits of distraction on product evaluations: The mind-set effect. Journal of Consumer Research, 36, 367-379.
75. Luce, R. D. (2000). Utility of gains and losses: measurement-theoretical and experimental approaches. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.
76. Luce, R. D., & Raiffa, H. (1957). Games and decisions: Introduction and critical survey. New York: Wiley.
77. Maia, T. V., & McClelland, J. L. (2004). A re-examination of the evidence for the somatic marker hypothesis: What participants really know in the Iowa gambling task. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 101, 16075-16080.
78. McClelland, J. L., & Rumelhart, D. E. (1981). An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: I. An account of basic findings. Psychological Review, 88, 375-407.
79. Mitchell, T. R., & Beach, L. R. (1990). "...Do I love thee? Let me count...": Toward an understanding of intuitive and automatic decision making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 47, 1-20.
80. Montgomery, H. (1989). From cognition to action: The search for dominance in decision making. In H. Montgomery & O. Svenson (Eds.), Process and structure in human decision making (pp. 23-49). Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons.
81. Newell, B. R. (2005). Re-Visions of rationality? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9(1), 11-15.
82. Newell, B. R., Wong, K. Y., Cheung, S. C. H., & Rakow, T. (2009). Think, blink or sleep on it? The impact of modes of thought on complex decision making. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62, 707-732.
83. Payne, J. W., Bettman, J. R., & Johnson, E. J. (1988). Adaptive strategy selection in decision making. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 14, 534-552.
84. Perruchet, P., & Pacteau, C. (1990). Synthetic grammar learning: Implicit rule abstraction or explicit fragmentary knowledge? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 119, 264-275.
85. Petty, R., & Cacioppo, J. (1986). Communication and persuasion: Central and peripheral routes to attitude change. New York: Springer.
86. Pleyers, G., Corneille, O., Luminet, O., & Yzerbyt, V. (2007). Aware and (dis)liking: Item-based analyses reveal that valence acquisition via evaluative conditioning emerges only when there is contingency awareness. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 33, 130-144.
87. Pfister, H-R., & Bohm, G. (2008). The multiplicity of emotions: A framework of emotional functions in decision making. Judgment and Decision Making, 3, 5-17.
88. Plessner, H., & Czenna, S. (2008). The benefits of intuition. In H. Plessner, C. Betsch, & T. Betsch (Eds.), Intuition in judgement and decision making (pp. 251-265). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.
89. Ratcliff, R. (1978). A theory of memory retrieval. Psychological Review, 85, 59-108.
90. Ratcliff, R., & McKoon, G. (2008). The diffusion decision model: Theory and data for two- choice decision tasks. Neural Computation, 20, 873-922.
91. Read, S. J., & Miller, L. C. (1998). On the dynamic construction of meaning: An interactive activation and competition model of social perception. In S. J. Read & L. C. Miller (Eds.), Connectionist models of social reasoning and social behavior (pp. 27-68). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.
92. Read, S. J., Vanman, E. J., & Miller, L. C. (1997). Connectionism, parallel constraint satisfaction processes, and Gestalt principles: (Re)introducing cognitive dynamics to social psychology. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 1, 26-53.
93. Reber, A. S. (1993). Implicit learning and tacit knowledge: An essay on the cognitive unconscious. New York: Oxford University Press.
94. Rumelhart, D. E., & McClelland, J. L. (1982). An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: II. The contextual enhancement effect and some tests and extensions of the model. Psychological Review, 89, 60-94.
95. Sadler-Smith, E. (2008). Inside intuition. New York: Routledge.
96. Savage, L. J. (1954). The foundations of statistics (2nd ed.). New York: Dover.
97. Schneider, W., & Shiffrin, R. M. (1977). Controlled and automatic human information processing: I. Detection, search, and attention. Psychological Review, 84, 1-66.
98. Scott, R. B., & Dienes, Z. (2008). The conscious, the unconscious, and familiarity. Journal of Experimental Psychology:Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 34, 1264-1288.
99. Shanks, D. R., & St. John, M. F. (1994). Characteristics of dissociable human learning systems. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 17, 367-447.
100. Shanteau, J. (1988). Psychological characteristics and strategies of expert decision makers. Acta Psychologica, 68(1-3), 203-215.
101. Shanteau, J., & Stewart, T. R. (1992). Why study expert decision making? Some historical perspectives and comments. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 53, 95-106.
102. Shiffrin, R. M., & Schneider, W. (1977). Controlled and automatic human information processing: II. Perceptual learning, automatic attending and a general theory. Psychological Review, 84, 127-190.
103. Simon, H. A. (1955). A behavioural model of rational choice. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 69, 99-118.
104. Skinner, B. F. (1938). The behavior of organisms. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
105. Sloman, S. A. (2002). Two systems of reasoning. In T. Gilovich, D. Griffin, & D. Kahneman (Eds.), Heuristics and biases: The psychology of intuitive judgment (pp. 379-396). New York: Cambridge University Press.
106. Slovic, P., Finucane, M., Peters, E., & MacGregor, D. G. (2002). The affect heuristic. In T. Gilovich, D. Griffin, & D. Kahneman (Eds.), Heuristics and biases: The psychology of intuitive judgment (pp. 397-420). New York: Cambridge University Press.
107. Smith, E. R. & Collins, E. C. (2009). Dual process-models: A social psychological perspective. In J. St. B. T. Evans & K. Frankisch (Eds.), In two minds: Dual processes and beyond (pp. 197-216). New York: Oxford University Press.
108. Stanovich, K. E. (2004). The robot's rebellion: Finding meaning in the age of Darwin. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
109. Stanovich, K. E. (2009). Distinguishing the reflective, algorithmic, and autonomous minds: Is it time for a tri-process theory? In J. St. B. T. Evans & K. Frankisch (Eds.), In two minds: Dual processes and beyond (pp. 89-108). New York: Oxford University Press.
110. Strack, F., & Deutsch, R. (2004). Reflective and impulsive determinants of social behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8, 220-247.
111. Svenson, O. (1992). Differentiation and consolidation theory of human decision making: A frame of reference for the study of pre- and post-decision processes. Acta Psychologica, 80, 143-168.
112. Thagard, P. (1989). Explanatory coherence. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 12, 435-502.
113. Thagard, P., & Millgram, E. (1995). Inference to the best plan: A coherence theory of decision. In A.Ram&D.B.Leake(Eds.),Goal-drivenlearning (pp.439-454).Cambridge,MA:MITPress.
114. Thomas, R. P., Dougherty, M. R., Sprenger, A. M., & Harbison, J. I. (2008). Diagnostic hypothesis generation and human judgement. Psychological Review, 115, 155-185.
115. Thorsteinson, T. J., & Withrow, S. (2009). Does unconscious thought outperform conscious thought on complex decisions? A further examination. Judgement and Decision Making, 4, 235-247.
116. Unkelbach, C., Fiedler, K., & Freytag, P. (2007). Information repetition in evaluative judgements: Easy to monitor, hard to control. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 103, 37-52.
117. von Neumann, J., & Morgenstern, O. (1944). Theory of games and economic behavior (1st ed.). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
118. Walther, E. (2002). Guilty by mere association: Evaluative conditioning and the spreading attitude effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 919-934.
119. Walther, E., & Grigoriadis, S. (2004). Why sad people like shoes better: The influence of mood on the evaluative conditioning of consumer attitudes. Psychology & Marketing, 21, 755-773.
120. Weber, E. U., & Johnson, E. J. (2009). Mindful judgement and decision making. Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 54-85.
121. Wertheimer, M. (1938a). Gestalt theory. In W. D. Ellis (Ed.), A source book of Gestalt psychology (pp. 1-11). London: Kegan Paul, Trench, Trubner & Company.
122. Wertheimer, M. (1938b). Laws of organization in perceptual forms. In W. D. Ellis (Ed.), A source book of Gestalt psychology (pp. 71-88). London: Kegan Paul, Trench, Trubner & Company.
123. Wilson, T. D. (2002). Strangers to ourselves: Discovering the adaptive unconscious. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
124. Wilson, T. D., & Schooler, J. W. (1991). Thinking too much: Introspection can reduce the quality of preferences and decisions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 181-192.
125. Yates, J. F., & Tschirhart, M. D. (2006). Decision-making expertise. In K. A. Ericsson, N. Charness, P. J. Feltovich, & R. R. Hoffman (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance (pp. 421-438). New York: Cambridge University Press.
126. Zacks, R. T., Hasher, L., & Sanft, H. (1982). Automatic encoding of event frequency: Further findings. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 8, 106-116.
127. Zajonc, R. B. (1968). Attitudinal effects of mere exposure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 9, 1-27.
128. Zajonc, R. B. (1980). Feeling and thinking: Preferences need no inferences. American Psychologist, 35, 151-175.