Accounting for critical evidence while being precise and avoiding the strategy selection problem in a parallel constraint satisfaction approach: A reply to Marewski (2010)

Journal of Behavioral Decision Making

Volumn 23, Issue 5, 2010, Pages 468-472

  Glöckner, Andreas ^a   Betsch, Tilmann ^b  

^a MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR RESEARCH ON COLLECTIVE GOODS   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ERFURT   (Germany)

Author keywords

Adaptive toolbox; Automaticity; Coherence shifts; Fast and frugal heuristics; Parallel constraint satisfaction

Indexed keywords

EID: 78649496554     PISSN: 08943257     EISSN: 10990771     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/bdm.688     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Ayal, S., & Hochman, G. (2009). Ignorance or integration: Examining the nature of the cognitive processes underlying choice behavior. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 22, 455-474.
2. Bröder, A. (2000). Assessing the empirical validity of the "Take-the-best" heuristic as a model of human probabilistic inference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26, 1332-1346.
3. Busemeyer, J. R., & Townsend, J. T. (1993). Decision field theory: A dynamic-cognitive approach to decision making in an uncertain environment. Psychological Review, 100, 432-459.
4. DeKay, M. L., Patino-Echeverri, D., & Fischbeck, P. S. (2009). Distortion of probability and outcome information in risky decisions. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 109, 79-92.
5. Dougherty, M. R. P., Franco-Watkins, A. M., & Thomas, R. (2008). Psychological plausibility of the theory of probabilistic mental models and the fast and frugal heuristics. Psychological Review, 115, 199-211.
6. Dougherty, M. R. P., Gettys, C. F., & Ogden, E. E. (1999). MINERVA-DM: A memory processes model for judgments of likelihood. Psychological Review, 106, 180-209.
7. Gigerenzer, G., & Todd, P. M. (1999). Simple heuristics that make us smart. Evolution and cognition. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
8. Glöckner, A., & Betsch, T. (2008a). Modeling option and strategy choices with connectionist networks: Towards an integrative model of automatic and deliberate decision making. Judgment and Decision Making, 3, 215-228.
9. Glöckner, A., & Betsch, T. (2008b). Multiple-reason decision making based on automatic processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 34, 1055-1075.
10. Glöckner, A., Betsch, T., & Schindler, N. (in press) Coherence shifts in probabilistic inference tasks. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making.
11. Glöckner, A., & Herbold, A.-K. (in press) An eye-tracking study on information processing in risky decisions: Evidence for compensatory strategies based on automatic processes. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making.
12. Glöckner, A., & Witteman, C. L. M. 2010 Beyond dual-process models: A categorization of processes underlying intuitive judgment and decision making. Thinking & Reasoning, 16(1), 1-25.
13. Hoffrage, U., & Hertwig, R. (1999). Hindsight bias: A price worth paying for fast and frugal memory. In: G. Gigerenzer, & P. M. Todd (Eds.), Simple heuristics that make us smart (pp. 191-208). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
14. Holyoak, K. J., & Simon, D. (1999). Bidirectional reasoning in decision making by constraint satisfaction. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 128, 3-31.
15. Marewski, J. N.(in press) On the theoretical precision and strategy selection problem of a single-strategy approach: A comment on Glöckner, Betsch, and Schindler (in press). Journal of Behavioral Decision Making.
16. Newell, B. R. (2005). Re-Visions of rationality? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9, 11-15.
17. Payne, J. W., Bettman, J. R., & Johnson, E. J. (1988). Adaptive strategy selection in decision making. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 14, 534-552.
18. Rieskamp, J., & Otto, P. E. (2006). SSL: A theory of how people learn to select strategies. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 135, 207-236.
19. Russo, J. E., Carlson, K. A., Meloy, M. G., & Yong, K. (2008). The goal of consistency as a cause of information distortion. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 137, 456-470.
20. Thagard, P. (1989). Explanatory coherence. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 12, 435-502.