Current research on routine decision making: Advances and prospects

The Routines of Decision Making

Volumn , Issue , 2014, Pages 359-376

  Betsch, Tilmann ^a   Haberstroh, Susanne ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ERFURT   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84920829353     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9781410611826     Document Type: Chapter

References (22)

1. Aarts, H., & Dijksterhuis, A. (2000). Habits as knowledge structures: Automaticity in goal-directed behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 53-63.
2. Barron, G., & Erev, I. (2003). Small feedback-based decisions and their limited correspondence to description-based decisions. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 16, 215-233.
3. Beach, L. R., & Mitchell, T. R. (1978). A contingency model for the selection of decision strategies. Academy Management Review, 3, 439-449.
4. Bentler, P. M., & Speckart, G. (1979). Models of attitude-behavior relations. Psychological Review, 86, 452-464.
5. Betsch, T., Haberstroh, S., Glöckner, A., Haar, T., & Fiedler, K. (2001). The effects of routine strength on adaptation and information search in recurrent decision making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 84, 23-53.
6. Betsch, T., Haberstroh, S., & Höhle, C. (2002). Explaining routinized decision making—a review of theories and models. Theory and Psychology, 12, 453-488.
7. Busemeyer, J. R., & Townsend, J. T. (1993). Decision field theory: A dynamic-cognitive approach to decision making in an uncertain environment. Psychological Review, 100, 432-459.
8. Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1974). Attitudes towards objects as predictors of single and multiple behavioral criteria. Psychological Review, 81, 59-74.
9. Goldstein, D. G., & Gigerenzer, G. (2002). Models of ecological rationality: The recognition heuristic. Psychological Review, 109, 75-90.
10. Gollwitzer, P. M. (1999). Implementation intentions: Strong effects of simple plans. American Psychologist, 54, 493-503.
11. Kahneman, D., Slovic, P., & Tversky, A. (Eds.). (1982). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
12. Klein, G. A. (1989). Recognition-primed decisions. Advances in Man-Machine System Research, 5, 47-92.
13. Klein, G. A. (1999). Sources of power. How people make decisions. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
14. Nisbett, R., & Ross, L. (1980). Human inference: Strategies and shortcomings of social judgment. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
15. Payne, J. W., Bettman, J. R., & Johnson, E. J. (1993). The adaptive decision maker. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
16. Salas, E., & Klein, G. (Eds.). (2001). Linking expertise and naturalistic decision making. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
17. Slovic, P., Finucane, M., Peters, E., & MacGregor, D. G. (2003). The affect heuristic. In T. Gilovich, D. Griffin, & D. Kahneman (Eds.), Intuitive judgment: Heuristics and biases (pp.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
18. Srull, T. K., & Wyer, R. S., Jr. (1989). Person memory and judgment. Psychological Review, 96, 58-83.
19. Verplanken, B., & Aarts, H. (1999). Habit, attitude, and planned behavior: Is habit an empty construct or an interesting case of goal-directed automaticity? In W. Stroebe & M. Hewstone (Eds.), European review of social psychology (Vol. 10, pp. 101-134). Chichester: Wiley.
20. Verplanken, B., Aarts, H., & van Knippenberg, A. (1997). Habit, information acquisition, and the process of making travel mode choice. European Journal of Social Psychology, 27, 539-560.
21. Yates, J. F. (2001). “Outsider”: Impressions of naturalistic decision making. In E. Salas & G. Klein (Eds.), Linking expertise and naturalistic decision making (pp. 9-33). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
22. Zajonc, R. B. (1968). Attitudinal effects of mere exposure. Journal ofPersonality and Social Psychology, 9(2).