Chk1 prevents abnormal mitosis of S-phase HeLa cells containing DNA damage

Chinese Science Bulletin

Volumn 54, Issue 22, 2009, Pages 4205-4213

  Li, XiaoFang ^a   Ward, Tarsha ^b   Yao, XueBiao ^a,b   Wu, JiaRui ^a,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY OF CHINA   (China)

^b MOREHOUSE SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c INSTITUTE OF BIOCHEMISTRY AND CELL BIOLOGY   (China)

Author keywords

Cell cycle; Chk1; DNA damage checkpoint; DNA replication checkpoint; Methyl methanesulfnate

Indexed keywords

EID: 74549201604     PISSN: 10016538     EISSN: 18619541     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11434-009-0633-1     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Hartwell L, Weinert T. Checkpoints: Controls that ensure the order of cell cycle events. Science, 1989, 246: 629-634.
2. Wu J R. Checkpoint: the quality control of cell cycle (in Chinese). Chem Life, 1999, 19: 199-202.
3. Sancar A, Lindsey-Boltz L A, Unsal-Kaçmaz K, et al. Molecular mechanisms of mammalian DNA repair and the DNA damage checkpoints. Annu Rev Biochem, 2004, 73: 39-85.
4. Branzei D, Foiani M. Regulation of DNA repair throughout the cell cycle. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol, 2008, 9: 297-308.
5. Reinhardt H C, Yaffe M B. Kinases that control the cell cycle in response to DNA damage: Chk1, Chk2, and MK2. Curr Opin Cell Biol, 2009, 21: 245-255.
6. Ahn J Y, Schwarz J K, Piwnica-Worms H, et al. Threonine 68 phosphorylation by ataxia telangiectasia mutated is required for efficient activation of Chk2 in response to ionizing radiation. Cancer Res, 2000, 60: 5934-5936.
7. Liu S, Bekker-Jensen S, Mailand N, et al. Claspin operates downstream of TopBP1 to direct ATR signaling towards Chk1 activation. Mol Cell Biol, 2006, 26: 6056-6064.
8. Reinhardt H C, Aslanian A S, Lees J A, et al. p53-Deficient cells rely on ATM- and ATR-mediated checkpoint signaling through the p38MAPK/MK2 pathway for survival after DNA damage. Cancer Cell, 2007, 11: 175-189.
9. Boddy M N, Furnari B, Mondesert Q, et al. Replication checkpoint enforced by kinases Cds1 and Chk1. Science, 1998, 280: 909-912.
10. Demidova A R, Aau M Y, Zhuang L, et al. Dual regulation of Cdc25A by Chk1 and p53-ATF3 in DNA replication checkpoint control. J Biol Chem, 2009, 284: 4132-4139.
11. Ren Y, Wu J R. Differential activation of intra-S-phase checkpoint in response to tripchlorolide and its effects on DNA replication. Cell Res, 2004, 14: 227-233.
12. Yee C, Krishnan-Hewlett I, Baker C C, et al. Presence and expression of human papillomavirus sequences in human cervical carcinoma cell lines. Am J Pathol, 1985, 119: 361-366.
13. Kessis T D, Slebos R J, Nelson W G, et al. Human papillomavirus 16 E6 expression disrupts the p53-mediated cellular response to DNA damage. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 1993, 90: 3988-3992.
14. Grallert B, Boye E. The multiple facets of the intra-S checkpoint. Cell Cycle, 2008, 7: 2315-2320.
15. Kim E M, Burke D J. DNA damage activates the SAC in an ATM/ATR-dependent manner, independently of the kinetochore. PLoS Genet, 2008, 4: e1000015.
16. Nikiforov A, Svetlova M, Solovjeva L, et al. DNA damage-induced accumulation of Rad18 protein at stalled replication forks in mammalian cells involves upstream protein phosphorylation. Biochem Biophys Res Commun, 2004, 323: 831-837.
17. Yao X, Abrieu A, Zheng Y, et al. CENP-E forms a link between attachment of spindle microtubules to kinetochores and the mitotic checkpoint. Nat Cell Biol, 2000, 2: 484-491.
18. Zhao B, Bower M J, McDevitt P J, et al. Structural basis for Chk1 inhibition by UCN-01. J Biol Chem, 2002, 277: 46609-46615.
19. Chang P, Stearns T. δ-Tubulin and e{open}-tubulin: Two new human centrosomal tubulins reveal new aspects of centrosome structure and function. Nat Cell Biol, 2000, 2: 30-35.
20. Sun Q Y, Schatten H. Role of NuMA in vertebrate cells: Review of an intriguing multifunctional protein. Front Biosci, 2006, 11: 1137-1146.
21. Nurse P. Universal control mechanism regulating onset of M-phase. Nature, 1990, 344: 503-508.
22. Xiao Z, Xue J, Gu W Z, et al. Cyclin B1 is an efficacy-predicting biomarker for Chk1 inhibitors. Biomarkers, 2008 13: 579-596.
23. Barlow J H, Rothstein R. Rad52 recruitment is DNA replication independent and regulated by Cdc28 and the Mec1 kinase. EMBO J, 2009, 28: 1121-1130.
24. Friedel A M, Pike B L, Gasser S M. ATR/Mec1: Coordinating fork stability and repair. Curr Opin Cell Biol, 2009, 21: 237-244.
25. Yang X H, Zou L. Dual functions of DNA replication forks in checkpoint signaling and PCNA ubiquitination. Cell Cycle, 2009, 8: 191-194.
26. Cui B, Johnson S P, Bullock N, et al. Bifunctional DNA alkylator 1, 3-bis(2-chloroethyl)-1-nitrosourea activates the ATR-Chk1 pathway independently of the mismatch repair pathway. Mol Pharmacol, 2009, 75: 1356-1363.
27. Scorah J, McGowan C H. Claspin and Chk1 regulate replication fork stability by different mechanisms. Cell Cycle, 2009, 8: 1036-1043.
28. Stokes M P, van Hatten R, Lindsay H D, et al. DNA replication is required for the checkpoint response to damaged DNA in Xenopus egg extracts. J Cell Biol, 2002, 158: 863-872.
29. Kumar S, Huberman J A. Checkpoint-dependent regulation of origin firing and replication fork movement in response to DNA damage in fission yeast. Mol Cell Biol, 2009, 29: 602-611.
30. de la Torre-Ruiz M, Lowndes N F. The Saccharomyces cerevisiae DNA damage checkpoint is required for efficient repair of double strand breaks by non-homologous end joining. FEBS Lett, 2000, 467: 311-315.
31. Wilsker D, Petermann E, Helleday T, et al. Essential function of Chk1 can be uncoupled from DNA damage checkpoint and replication control. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2008, 105: 20752-20757.
32. Seiler J A, Conti C, Syed A, et al. The intra-S-phase checkpoint affects both DNA replication initiation and elongation: single-cell and DNA fiber analyses. Mol Cell Biol, 2007, 27: 5806-5818.