Toward better refinement of comparative models: Predicting loops in inexact environments

Proteins: Structure, Function and Genetics

Volumn 72, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 959-971

  Sellers, Benjamin D ^a   Zhu, Kai ^b   Zhao, Suwen ^b   Friesner, Richard A ^b   Jacobson, Matthew P ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b Och Spine at New York Presbyterian Hospitals   (United States)

Author keywords

Comparative; Force field; Homology; Loop prediction; Modeling; Molecular mechanics; Refinement

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ALGORITHM; ANALYTIC METHOD; ARTICLE; CRYSTAL STRUCTURE; ERROR; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; SAMPLING;

ALGORITHMS; CRYSTALLOGRAPHY, X-RAY; DATABASES, PROTEIN; MODELS, MOLECULAR; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, SECONDARY; PROTEINS; THERMODYNAMICS;

EID: 47349128896     PISSN: 08873585     EISSN: 10970134     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/prot.21990     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Baker D, Sali A. protein structure prediction and structural genomics. Science 2001;294:93-96.
2. Vitkup D, Melamud E, Moult J, Sander C. Completeness in structural genomics. Nat Struct Biol 2001;8:559-566.
3. Available at http://www.nysgrc.org/.
4. Moult J. A decade of CASP: progress, bottlenecks and prognosis in protein structure prediction. Curr Opin Struct Biol 2005;15:285-289.
5. Moult J, Fidelis K, Rost B, Hubbard T, Tramontano A. CASP introduction: critical assessment of methods of protein structure prediction (CASP) - round 6. Proteins 2005;61:3-7.
6. Tress M, Ezkurdia I, Graña O, López G, Valencia A. Assessment of predictions submitted for the CASP6 comparative modeling category. Proteins 2005;61:27-45.
7. Fiser A, Do RK, Sali A. Modeling of loops in protein structures. Protein Sci 2000;9:1753-1773.
8. Qian B, Ortiz A, Baker D. Improvement of comparative model accuracy by free-energy optimization along principal components of natural structural variation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2004;101:15346-15351.
9. Mönnigmann M, Floudas CA. Protein loop structure prediction with flexible stem geometries. Proteins 2005;61:748-762.
10. Misura K, Baker D. Progress and challenges in high-resolution refinement of protein structure models. Proteins 2005;59:15-29.
11. Misura K, Chivian D, Rohl C, Kim D, Baker D. Physically realistic homology models built with ROSETTA can be more accurate than their templates. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2006;103:5361-5366.
12. Chen J, Brooks C. Can molecular dynamics simulations provide high-resolution refinement of protein structure? Proteins 2007;67:922-930. 13. Fan H, Mark AE. Refinement of homology-based protein structures by molecular dynamics simulation techniques. Protein Sci 2004;13:211-220.
13. Moult J, James MNG. An algorithm for determining the conformation of polypeptide segments in proteins by systematic search. Proteins 1986;1:146-163.
14. Bruccoleri RE, Karplus M. Prediction of the folding of short polypeptide segments by uniform conformational sampling. Biopolymers 1986;26:137-168.
15. van Vlijmen HWT, Karplus M. PDB-based protein loop prediction: parameters for selection and methods for optimization. J Mol Biol 1997;267:975-1001.
16. Deane CM, Blundell DL. CODA: a combined algorithm for predicting the structurally variable regions of protein models. Protein Sci 2001;10:599-612.
17. Groban E, Narayanan A, Jacobson MP. Conformational changes in protein loops and helices induced by post-translational phosphorylation. PLoS Comput Biol 2006;2:e32.
18. Jacobson MP, Pincus DL, Rapp CS, Day TJF, Honig B, Shaw DE, Friesner RA. A hierarchical approach to all-atom loop prediction. Proteins 2004;55:351-367.
19. Zhu K, Pincus D, Zhao S, Friesner RA. Long loop prediction using the protein local optimization program. Proteins 2006;65:438-452.
20. Jorgensen WL, Maxwell DS, TiradoRives J. Development and testing of the OPLS all-atom force field on conformational energetics and properties of organic liquids. J Am Chem Soc 1996;118:11225-11236.
21. Kaminski GA, Friesner RA, Tirado-Rives J, Jorgensen WL. Evaluation and reparametrization of the OPLS-AA force field for proteins via comparison with accurate quantum chemical calculations on peptides. J Phys Chem B 2001;105:517-529.
22. Jacobson MP, Kaminski GA, Friesner RA, Rapp CS. Force field validation using protein side chain prediction. J Phys Chem B 2002;105:11673-11680.
23. Ghosh A, Rapp CS, Friesner RA. Generalized born model based on a surface integral formulation. J Phys Chem B 1998;102:10983-10990.
24. Gallicchio E, Zhang LY, Levy RM. The SGB/NP hydration free energy model based on the surface generalized Born solvent reaction field and novel nonpolar hydration free energy estimator. J Comput Chem 2002;23:517-529.
25. Xiang ZX, Honig B. Extending the accuracy limits of prediction for side-chain conformations. J Mol Biol 2001;311:421-430.
26. Eldridge M, Murray C, Auton T, Paolini G, Mee R, Empirical scoring functions. I. The development of a fast empirical scoring function to estimate the binding affinity of ligands in receptor complexes. J Comput Aided Mol Des 1997;11:425-445.
27. Zhu K, Shirts MR, Friesner RA. Improved methods for side chain and loop predictions via the protein local optimization program: variable dielectric model for implicitly improving the treatment of polarization effects. J Chem Theory Comput 2007;3:2108-2119.
28. Pettersen EF, Goddard TD, Huang CC, Couch GS, Greenblatt DM, Meng EC, Ferrin TE. UCSF Chimera - a visualization system for exploratory research and analysis. J Comput Chem 2004;25:1605-1612.
29. Available at http://predictioncenter.org/casp7/.
30. Altschul SF, Gish W, Miller W, Myers EW, Lipman DJ. Basic local alignment search tool. J Mol Biol 1990;215:403-410.
31. Kenyon V, Chorny I, Carvajal W, Holman T, Jacobson MP. Novel human lipoxygenase inhibitors discovered using virtual screening with homology models. J Med Chem 2006;49:1356-1363.
32. Petrey D, Xiang X, Tang CL, Xie L, Gimpelev M, Mitors T, Soto CS, Goldsmith-Fischman S, Kernytsky A, Schlessinger A, Koh IYY, Alexov E, Honig B. Using multiple structure alignments, fast model building, and energetic analysis in fold recognition and homology modeling. Proteins 2003;53:430-435.
33. Jacobson MP, Friesner RA, Xiang Z, Honig B. On the role of the crystal environment in determining protein side-chain conformations. J Mol Biol 2002;320:597-608.
34. Zhou R, Berne BJ. Can a continuum solvent model reproduce the free energy landscape of a β-hairpin folding in water? Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2002;99:12777-12782.
35. Levin EJ, Kondrashov DA, Wesenberg GE, Phillips GN, Jr. Ensemble refinement of protein crystal structures: validation and application. Structure 2007;15:1040-1052.