Comparing atomistic simulation data with the NMR experiment: How much can NOEs actually tell us?

Proteins: Structure, Function and Genetics

Volumn 63, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 210-218

  Zagrovic, Bojan ^a   Van Gunsteren, Wilfred F ^a  

^a ETH ZURICH   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Molecular dynamics simulations; NOE upper bounds; Predicting NMR observables

Indexed keywords

LYSOZYME; NUCLEIC ACID; POLYPEPTIDE; PROTEIN;

ARTICLE; ATOM; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE; NUCLEAR OVERHAUSER EFFECT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN DENATURATION; PROTEIN DETERMINATION; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; SIMULATION;

ANIMALS; CHICKENS; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CRYSTALLOGRAPHY, X-RAY; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MAGNETIC RESONANCE SPECTROSCOPY; MICROFILAMENT PROTEINS; MODELS, CHEMICAL; MODELS, MOLECULAR; MODELS, STATISTICAL; MURAMIDASE; PEPTIDES; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN DENATURATION; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEINS; PROTEOMICS; TEMPERATURE;

EID: 33645033314     PISSN: 08873585     EISSN: 10970134     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/prot.20872     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Jardetzky O, Roberts GC. NMR in molecular biology. New York: Academic Press; 1981.
2. Wuethrich K. NMR of proteins and nucleic acids: New York: John Wiley & Sons; 1986.
3. Cavanagh J, Fairbrother WJ, Palmer AG, Skelton NJ. Protein NMR spectroscopy. New York: Academic Press; 1996.
4. Levy RM, Dobson CM, Karplus M. Dipolar NMR relaxation of nonprotonated aromatic carbons in proteins. Structural and dynamical effects. Biophys J 1982;39(1):107-113.
5. van Gunsteren WF, Berendsen HJ, Geurtsen RG, Zwinderman HH. A molecular dynamics computer simulation of an eight-base-pair DNA fragment in aqueous solution: comparison with experimental two-dimensional NMR data. Ann NY Acad Sci 1986;482:287-303.
6. Smith LJ, Mark AE, Dobson CM, van Gunsteren WF. Comparison of MD simulations and NMR experiments for hen lysozyme. Analysis of local fluctuations, cooperative motions, and global changes. Biochemistry 1995;34(34):10918-10931.
7. Smith PE, van Schaik RC, Szyperski T, Wuthrich K, van Gunsteren WF. Internal mobility of the basic pancreatic trypsin inhibitor in solution: a comparison of NMR spin relaxation measurements and molecular dynamics simulations. J Mol Biol 1995;246(2):356-365.
8. Daura X, Antes I, van Gunsteren WF, Thiel W, Mark AE. The effect of motional averaging on the calculation of NMR-derived structural properties. Proteins 1999;36(4):542-555.
9. Schneider TR, Brunger AT, Nilges M. Influence of internal dynamics on accuracy of protein NMR structures: derivation of realistic model distance data from a long molecular dynamics trajectory. J Mol Biol 1999;285(2):727-740.
10. Stocker U, Spiegel K, van Gunsteren WF. On the similarity of properties in solution or in the crystalline state: a molecular dynamics study of hen lysozyme. J Biomol NMR 2000;18(1):1-12.
11. Stocker U, van Gunsteren WF. Molecular dynamics simulation of hen egg white lysozyme: a test of the GROMOS96 force field against nuclear magnetic resonance data. Proteins 2000;40(1):145-153.
12. Wong KB, Clarke J, Bond CJ, et al. Towards a complete description of the structural and dynamic properties of the denatured state of barnase and the role of residual structure in folding. J Mol Biol 2000;296(5):1257-1282.
13. Pfeiffer S, Fushman D, Cowburn D. Simulated and NMR-derived backbone dynamics of a protein with significant flexibility: a comparison of spectral densities for the betaARK1 PH domain. J Am Chem Soc 2001;123(13):3021-3036.
14. Case DA. Molecular dynamics and NMR spin relaxation in proteins. Ace Chem Res 2002;35(6):325-331.
15. Wu X, Wang S, Brooks BR. Direct observation of the folding and unfolding of a beta-hairpin in explicit water through computer simulation. J Am Chem Soc 2002;124(19):5282-5283.
16. Fersht AR, Daggett V. Protein folding and unfolding at atomic resolution. Cell 2002;108(4):573-582.
17. Bruschweiler R. New approaches to the dynamic interpretation and prediction of NMR relaxation data from proteins. Curr Opin Struct Biol 2003;13(2):175-183.
18. Zhou R. Free energy landscape of protein folding in water: explicit vs. implicit solvent. Proteins 2003;53(2):148-161.
19. Soares TA, Daura X, Oostenbrink C, Smith LJ, van Gunsteren WF. Validation of the GROMOS force-field parameter set 45A3 against nuclear magnetic resonance data of hen egg lysozyme. J Biomol NMR 2004;30(4):407-422.
20. Lindorff-Larsen K, Best RB, Depristo MA, Dobson CM, Vendruscolo M. Simultaneous determination of protein structure and dynamics. Nature 2005;433(7022):128-132.
21. Oostenbrink C, Soares TA, van der Vegt NF, van Gunsteren WF. Validation of the 53A6 GROMOS force field. Eur Biophys J 2005;34(4):273-284.
22. Withka JM, Swaminathan S, Srinivasan J, Beveridge DL, Bolton PH. Toward a dynamical structure of DNA: comparison of theoretical and experimental NOE intensities. Science 1992;255(5044):597-599.
23. Keepers JW, James TL. A theoretical study of distance determinations from NMR. Two-dimensional nuclear Overhauser effect spectra. J Magn Reson 1984;57:404-426.
24. Boelens R, Koning TMG, Kaptein R. Determination of biomolecular structures from proton-proton NOEs using a relaxation matrix approach. J Mol Struct 1988;173:299-311.
25. Tropp J. Dipolar relaxation and nuclear Overhauser effects in nonrigid molecules: the effect of fluctuating internuclear distances. J Chem Phys 1980;72:6035-6043.
26. Burgi R, Pitera J, van Gunsteren WF. Assessing the effect of conformational averaging on the measured values of observables. J Biomol NMR 2001;19(4):305-320.
27. de Vlieg J, Boelens R, Scheek RM, Kaptein R, van Gunsteren WF. Restrained molecular dynamics procedure for protein tertiary structure determination from NMR data: a Lac represser headpiece structure based on information on J-coupling and from presence and absence of NOE's. Isr J Chem 1986;27:181-188.
28. Wilcox GR, Fogh RH, Norton RS. Refined structure in solution of the sea anemone neurotoxin ShI. J Biol Chem 1993;268(33):24707-24719.
29. Doreleijers JF, Raves ML, Rullmann T, Kaptein R. Completeness of NOEs in protein structure: a statistical analysis of NMR. J Biomol NMR 1999;14(2):123-132.
30. Gronwald W, Kirchhofer R, Gorier A, et al. RFAC, a program for automated NMR R-factor estimation. J Biomol NMR 2000;17(2):137-151.
31. Grishaev A, Llinas M. CLOUDS, a protocol for deriving a molecular proton density via NMR. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2002;99(10):6707-6712.
32. McKnight CJ, Matsudaira PT, Kim PS. NMR structure of the 35-residue villin headpiece subdomain. Nat Struct Biol 1997;4(3):180-184.
33. Duan Y, Kollman PA. Pathways to a protein folding intermediate observed in a 1-microsecond simulation in aqueous solution. Science 1998;282(5389):740- 744.
34. Zagrovic B, Snow CD, Shirts MR, Pande VS. Simulation of folding of a small alpha-helical protein in atomistic detail using worldwide-distributed computing. J Mol Biol 2002;323(5):927-937.
35. Schwalbe H, Grimshaw SB, Spencer A, et al. A refined solution structure of hen lysozyme determined using residual dipolar coupling data. Protein Sci 2001;10(4):677-688.
36. Zagrovic B, Sorin EJ, Pande V. Beta-hairpin folding simulations in atomistic detail using an implicit solvent model. J Mol Biol 2001;313(1):151-169.
37. Snow CD, Nguyen H, Pande VS, Gruebele M. Absolute comparison of simulated and experimental protein-folding dynamics. Nature 2002;420(6911):102-106.
38. Qiu D, Shenkin PS, Hollinger FP, Still WC. The GB/SA continuum model for solvation. A fast analytical method for the calculation of approximate Born radii. J Phys Chem 1997(101):3005-3014.
39. Andersen HC. Rattle: a "velocity" version of the Shake algorithm for molecular dynamics calculations. J Comp Phys 1983;52:24-34.
40. Jorgensen WL, Tirado-Rives J. The OPLS potential functions for proteins: energy minimizations for crystals of cyclic peptides and crambin. J Am Chem Soc 1988;110:1666-1671.
41. Oostenbrink C, Villa A, Mark AE, van Gunsteren WF. A biomolecular force field based on the free enthalpy of hydration and solvation: the GROMOS force-field parameter sets 53A5 and 53A6. J Comp Chem 2004;25(13):1656-1676.
42. van Gunsteren WF, Billeter SR, Eising AA, et al. Biomolecular simulation: the GROMOS96 manual and user guide. Zurich: Biomos; 1996.
43. Berendsen HJC, Postma JP, van Gunsteren WF, DiNola A, Haak JR. Molecular dynamics with coupling to an external bath. J Chem Phys 1984;81:3684-3690.
44. Ryckaert JTP, Ciccotti G, Berendsen HJC. Numerical-integration of Cartesian equations of motion of a system with constraints: molecular dynamics of n-alkanes. J Comp Phys 1977;23:327-341.
45. Kabsch W, Sander C. Dictionary of protein secondary structure: pattern recognition of hydrogen-bonded and geometrical features. Biopolymers 1983;22(12):2577-2637.
46. Berman HM, Westbrook J, Feng Z, et al. The Protein Data Bank. Nucleic Acids Res 2000;28(1):235-242.
47. Constantine KL, Madrid M, Banyai L, Trexler M, Patthy L, Llinas M. Refined solution structure and ligand-binding properties of PDC-109 domain b. A collagen-binding type II domain. J Mol Biol 1992;223(1):281-298.
48. Fletcher CM, Jones DNM, Diamond R, Neuhaus D. Treatment of NOE constraints involving equivalent or nonstereoassigned protons in calculations of biomacromolecular structures. J Biomol NMR 1996;8:292-310.
49. Roberts GC. NMR of macromolecules: a practical approach. Oxford: IRL Press; 1993.
50. Eaton WA, Munoz V, Hagen SJ, et al. Fast kinetics and mechanisms in protein folding. Annu Rev Biophys Biomol Struct 2000;29:327-359.
51. Kubelka J, Hofrichter J, Eaton WA. The protein folding 'speed limit.' Curr Opin Struct Biol 2004;14(1):76-88.
52. Kubelka J, Eaton WA, Hofrichter J. Experimental tests of villin subdomain folding simulations. J Mol Biol 2003;329(4):625-630.
53. Zagrovic B, Snow C, Khaliq S, Shirts M, Pande V. Native-like mean structure in the unfolded ensemble of small proteins. J Mol Biol 2002;323(1):153-164.
54. Summers MF, South TL, Kim B, Hare DR. High-resolution structure of an HIV zinc fingerlike domain via a new NMR-based distance geometry approach. Biochemistry 1990;29(2):329-340.
55. Feenstra KA, Peter C, Scheek RM, van Gunsteren WF, Mark AE. A comparison of methods for calculating NMR cross-relaxation rates (NOESY and ROESY intensities) in small peptides. J Biomol NMR 2002;23(3):181-194.
56. Peter C, Daura X, van Gunsteren WF. Calculation of NMR-relaxation parameters for flexible molecules from molecular dynamics simulations. J Biomol NMR 2001;20(4):297-310.