Interpersonal motor coordination From human-human to human-robot interactions

Interaction Studies

Volumn 10, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 479-504

  Marin, Ludovic ^a   Issartel, Johann ^a,b   Chaminade, Thierry ^c  

^a UNIV MONTPELLIER   (France)

^b DUBLIN CITY UNIVERSITY   (Ireland)

^c Mediterranean Institute for Cognitive Neuroscience   (France)

Author keywords

Anthropomorphism; Interpersonal interaction; Motor coordination; Motor interference; Motor resonance; Social robotics

Indexed keywords

EID: 72649086969     PISSN: 15720373     EISSN: 15720381     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1075/is.10.3.09mar     Document Type: Article

References (78)

1. Atkeson, C.G., Hale, J.G., Pollick, F., Riley, M., Kotosaka, S., Schaal, S., Shibata, T., Tevatia, G., Ude, A., Vijayakumar, S., & Kawato, M. (2000). Using humanoid robots to study human behavior. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 15, 46-56.
2. Bachour, K., Kaplan, F., & Dillenbourg, P. (2008). Reflect : An Interactive Table for Regulating Face-to-Face Collaborative Learning. In Lecture Notes in Computer Sciences, Times of Convergence. Technologies Across Learning Contexts, 5192, 39-48. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer.
3. Bartneck, C., Croft, E., Kulic, D., & Zoghbi, S. (2009). Measurement instruments for the anthropomorphism, animacy, likeability, perceived intelligence, and perceived safety of robots. International Journal of Social Robotics, 1(1), 71-81.
4. Bavelas, J.B., Black, A., Lemery, C.R., & Mullett, J. (1986). "I show how you feel": Motor mimicry as a communicative act. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 322-329.
5. Bernieri, F.J., & Rosenthal, R. (1991). Interpersonal coordination: Behavior matching and interactional synchrony. In R.S. Feldman & B. Rime (Eds.), Fundamentals of nonverbal behavior. Studies in emotion & social interaction (pp. 401-432). New York: Cambridge University Press.
6. Brass, M., Bekkering, H., Wohlschlager, A., & Prinz, W. (2000). Compatibility between observed and executed finger movements: comparing symbolic, spatial, and imitative cues. Brain and Cognition, 44(2), 124-143.
7. Brass M., & Heyes, C. (2005). Imitation: is cognitive neuroscience solving the correspondence problem? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9(10), 489-495.
8. Buccino, G., Binkofski, F., Fink, G.R., Fadiga, L., Fogassi, L., Gallese, V., Seitz, R.J., Zilles, K., Rizzolatti, G., & Freund, H.J. (2001). Action observation activates premotor and parietal areas in a somatotopic manner: an fMRI study. European Journal of Neuroscience, 13 (2), 400-404.
9. Cacioppo, J.T., Bush, L.K., & Tassinary, L.G. (1992). Microexpressive facial actions as a function of affective stimuli: Replication and extension. Psychological Science, 18, 515-526.
10. Chaminade, T. (2008). Social Resonance: a Theoretical Framework and Benchmarks to Evaluate the Social Competence of Humanoid Robots. In Catherina R. Burghart & Aaron Steinfeld (Eds.), Proceedings of Metrics for Human-Robot Interaction, a Workshop at ACM/IEEE HRI 2008 (Amsterdam, Netherlands), Technical Report 471 School of Computer Science (pp. 37-44), University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield: UK.
11. Chaminade, T., & Decety, J. (2001). A common framework for perception and action: neuroimaging evidence. Behavioral and Brain Science, 24(5), 879-882.
12. Chaminade, T., Franklin, D., Oztop, E., & Cheng, G. (2005). Motor interference between Humans and Humanoid Robots: Effect of Biological and Artificial Motion. Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Development and Learning, Osaka, Japan.
13. Chaminade, T., & Hodgins, J.K. (2006). Artificial agents in social cognitive sciences. Interaction Studies, 7(3), 347-353.
14. Chaminade, T., Hodgins, J.K., & Kawato, M. (2007). Anthropomorphism influences perception of computer-animated charactersA actions. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 2(3), 206-216.
15. Chaminade, T., Oztop, E., Cheng, G., & Kawato, M. (2008). From self-observation to imitation: visuomotor association on a robotic hand. Brain Research Bulletin, 75(6), 775-784.
16. Chartrand, T.L., & Bargh, J.A. (1999). The chameleon effect: the perception-behavior link and social interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76(6), 893-910.
17. Condon, W.S. (1982). Cultural microrhythms. In M.E. Davis (Ed.), Interaction rhythms: Periodicity in communicative behavior (pp. 53-77). New York: Human Sciences Press.
18. Courtine, G., & Schieppati, M. (2003). Human walking along a curved path. I. Body trajectory, segment orientation and the effect of vision. European Journal of Neuroscience, 18, 177-190.
19. Decety, J., & Chaminade, T. (2003). When the self represents the other: A new cognitive neuroscience view on psychological identification. Consciousness and Cognition, 12 (4), 577-596.
20. DiSalvo, C., Gemperle, F., Forlizzi, J., & Kiesler, S. (2002). All robots are not created equal: the design and perception of humanoid robot heads. Proceedings of the conference on Designing interactive systems: processes, practices, methods, and techniques, http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/778712.778756.
21. Feldman, R. (2007). Parent-infant synchrony and the construction of shared timing; physiological precursors, developmental outcomes, and risk conditions. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 48, 329-354.
22. Flandrin, P. (1988). Separability, Positivity and Minimum Uncertainty in Time-Frequency Energy Distributions. Journal of Mathematical Physics, 39, 4016-4040.
23. Gallese, V. (2003). The manifold nature of interpersonal relations: the quest for a common mechanism. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London: B Biological Sciences, 358(1431), 517-528.
24. Gallese, V., Fadiga, L., Fogassi, L., & Rizzolatti, G. (1996). Action recognition in the premotor cortex. Brain, 119(2), 593-609.
25. Hale, J.G., & Pollick, F.E. (2005). "Sticky Hands": learning and generalization for cooperative physical interactions with a humanoid robot. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part C: Applications and Reviews, 35(4), 512-521.
26. Hanson, D. (2005). Expanding the Aesthetics Possibilities for Humanlike Robots. In: Proceedings IEEE Humanoid Robotics Conference, special session on the Uncanny Valley, Tsukuba, Japan.
27. Heyes, C. (2001). Causes and consequences of imitation. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 5(6), 253-261.
28. Hirai, H., & Miyazaki, F. (2006). Dynamic coordination between robots: the self-organized timing selection in a juggling-like ball passing task. IEEE Transaction on Systems, Man and Cybernetics - PART B. 36, 738-754.
29. Iacoboni, M., Woods, R.P., Brass, M., Bekkering, H., Mazziotta, J.C., & Rizzolatti, G. (1999). Cortical mechanisms of human imitation. Science, 286(5449), 2526-2528.
30. Issartel, J., Marin, L., Bardainne, T., Gaillot, P., & Cadopi, M. (2005). A New Method for Studying Non-Stationary Signals in Human Movement: The Cross-Wavelet Transform. In H. Heft & L. Marsh (Eds.), Studies in Perception and Action XIII (pp. 207-210). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
31. Issartel, J., Marin, L., Gaillot, P., Bardainne, T., & Cadopi, M. (2006). A Practical Guide on Time-frequency Analysis to Study Human Motor Behavior: The Contribution of Wavelet Transform. Journal of Motor Behavior, 38, 139-159.
32. Issartel, J., Marin, L., & Cadopi, M. (2007). Unintended interpersonal co-ordination: "can we march to the beat of our own drum?" Neuroscience Letters, 411, 174-179.
33. James, W. (1890). Principles of Psychology. New York: Holt.
34. Kelso, J.A.S. (1995). Dynamic patterns. The self-organization of brain and behavior. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
35. Kendon, A. (1970). Movement coordination in social interaction: Some examples. Acta Psychologica, 32, 1-25.
36. Kiesler, S., & Hinds, P. (2004). Introduction to this special issue on human-robot interaction. Human-Computer Interaction, 19, 1-8.
37. Kilner, J.M., Paulignan, Y., & Blakemore, S.J. (2003). An interference effect of observed biological movement on action. Current Biology, 13(6), 522-525.
38. Kohler, E., Keysers, C., Umilt, M.A., Fogassi, L., Gallese, V., & Rizzolatti, G. (2002). Hearing sounds, understanding actions: action representation in mirror neurons. Science, 297(5582), 846-848.
39. Kozima, H., & Yano, H. (2001). A robot that learns to communicate with human caregivers. In Proceedings of the First International Workshop on Epigenetic Robotics: Modeling Cognitive Development in Robotic Systems. Lund University Cognitive Studies, 85, Lund: Sweden.
40. LaFrance, M. (1979). Nonverbal synchrony and rapport: Analysis by the cross-lag panel technique. Social Psychology Quarterly, 42, 66-70.
41. LaFrance, M., & Broadbent, M. (1976). Group rapport: Posture sharing as a nonverbal indicator. Group and Organization Studies, 1, 328-333.
42. Lakin, J.L., & Chartrand, T.L. (2003). Using nonconscious behavioral mimicry to create affiliation and rapport. Psychological Science, 14, 334-339.
43. MacDorman, K.F., & Ishiguro, H. (2006). The uncanny advantage of using androids in cognitive and social science research. Interaction Studies, 7(3), 297-337.
44. MacDorman, K.F. (2006). Subjective ratings of robot video clips for human likeness, familiarity, and eeriness: An exploration of the uncanny valley. In Proceedings of ICCS/CogSci-2006 Long Symposium: Toward Social Mechanisms of Android Science. Vancouver, Canada.
45. Minato, T., Shimada, M., Ishiguro, H., & Itakura, S. (2004). Development of an android robot for studying human-robot interaction. In B. Orchard, C. Yang, & M. Ali (Eds.), Innovations in Applied Artificial Intelligence (pp. 424-434). Berlin: Springer.
46. Mori, M. (1970). The valley of eeriness (japanese). Energy, 7(4), 33-35.
47. Miyazaki, F., Matsushima, M., & Takeuchi, M. (2006). Learning to dynamically manipulate: a table tennis robot controls a ball and rallies with a human being. Advances in Robot Control, 317-341.
48. Nadel, J., Revel, A., Andry, P., & Gaussier, P. (2004). Toward communication: First imitations in infants, low-functioning children with autism and robots. Interaction studies, 5(1), 45-74.
49. Neda, Z., Ravasz, E., Brechet, Y., Vicsek, T., & Barabasi, A.-L. (2000). The sound of many hands clapping. Nature, 403, 849-850.
50. Newman-Norlund, R.D.D., van Schie, H.T.T., van Zuijlen, A.M.J.M., & Bekkering, H. (2007). The mirror neuron system is more active during complementary compared with imitative action. Nature Neuroscience, 10, 817-818
51. Oztop, E., Franklin, D., Chaminade, T., & Gordon, C. (2005). Human-humanoid interaction: is a humanoid robot perceived as a human? International Journal of Humanoid Robotics, 2(4), 537-559.
52. Pikovsky, A., Rosenblum, M., & Kurths, J. (2001). Synchronization: A universal concept in nonlinear sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
53. Press, C., Bird, G., Flach, R., & Heyes, C. (2005). Robotic movement elicits automatic imitation. Cognitive Brain Research, 25(3), 632-640.
54. Press, C., Gillmeister, H., & Heyes, C. (2006). Bottom-up, not top-down, modulation of imitation by human and robotic models. European Journal of Neuroscience, 24 (8), 2415-2419.
55. Richardson, M.J., Marsh, K.L., & Schmidt, R.C. (2005). Effects of visual and verbal information on unintentional interpersonal coordination. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 31, 62-79.
56. Rizzolatti, G., & Craighero, L. (2004). The mirror-neuron system. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 27, 169-192.
57. Rizzolatti, G., Fadiga, L., Gallese, V., & Fogassi, L. (1996). Premotor cortex and the recognition of motor actions. Cognitive Brain Research, 3(2), 131-141. (Pubitemid 26094162)
58. Scassellati, B. (2001). Foundations for a theory of mind for a humanoid robot. B. Doctoral dissertation, MIT, Department of Electronic Engineering and Computer Sciences.
59. Schaal, S. (1999). Is imitation learning the route to humanoid robots? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 3(6), 233-242.
60. Scheflen, A.E. (1964). The significance of posture in communication systems. Psychiatry, 27, 316-331.
61. Schmidt, R.C., Carello, C., & Turvey, M.T. (1990). Phase transition and critical fluctuations in the visual coordination of rhythmic movements between people. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16, 227-247.
62. Schmidt, R.C., Fitzpatrick, P.A., Bienvenu, M., & Amazeen, P.G. (1998). A comparison of intra- and interpersonal interlimb coordination: Coordination breakdowns and coupling strength. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 884-900.
63. Schmidt, R.C., & OBrien, B. (1997). Evaluating the dynamics of unintended interpersonal coordination. Ecological Psychology, 9, 189-206.
64. Schmidt, R.C., OBrien, B., & Sysko, R. (1999). Self-organization of between-persons cooperative tasks and possible applications to sport. International Journal of Sport Psychology, 30, 558-579.
65. Schmidt, R.C., & Richardson, M.J. (2008). Dynamics of interpersonal coordination. A. Fuchs & V. Jirsa (Eds.), Coordination: Neural, Behavioural and Social Dynamics (pp. 281-307). Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.
66. Schmidt, R.C., Richardson, M.J., Arsenault, C., & Galantucci, B. (2007). Visual tracking and entrainment to an environmental rhythm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 33, 860-870.
67. Sebanz, N., Bekkering, H., & Knoblich, G. (2006). Joint action: bodies and minds moving together. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10, 70-76.
68. Semin, G.R. (2007). Grounding communication: Synchrony. In A. Kruglanski & E.T. Higgins (Eds.), Social Psychology: Handbook of Basic Principles 2nd Edition (pp. 630-649). New York: Guilford Publications.
69. Strogatz, S.H., Abrams, D.M., McRobie, A., Eckhardt, B., & Ott, E. (2005). Theoretical mechanics: Crowd synchrony on the Millennium Bridge. Nature, 438, 43-44.
70. Tanaka, F., Cicourel, A., & Movellan, J.R. (2007). Socialization between toddlers and robots at an early childhood education center. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104(46), 17954-17958.
71. Tomasello, M. (1998). Uniquely primate, uniquely human. Developmental Science, 1, 1-30.
72. Umilta, M.A., Kohler, E., Gallese, V., Fogassi, L., Fadiga, L., Keysers, C., & Rizzolatti, G. (2001). I know what you are doing. a neurophysiological study. Neuron, 31 (1), 155-165.
73. Van Ulzen, N.R., Lamoth, C.J., Daffertshofer, A., Semin, G.R., & Beek, P.J. (2008). Characteristics of instructed and uninstructed interpersonal coordination while walking side-by-side. Neuroscience Letters, 432, 88-93.
74. Varlet, M., Marin, L., Lagarde, J., & Bardy, B.G. (in press). Postural synchronization in interpersonal visually coupled situation. International Journal of Sport Psychology, Special Issue.
75. Von Holst, E. (1973). The collected papers of Eric von Holst: Vol.1. The behavioral physiology of animal and man (R. Martin, Ed. & Trans.). Coral Gables, FL: University of Miami Press. (Original work published 1939).
76. Wada, K., & Shibata, T. (2007). Social Effects of Robot Therapy in a Care House - Change of Social Network of the Residents for Two Months. In Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), 1250-1255, Roma, Italy.
77. Wiltermuth, S.S., & Heath, C. (2009). Synchrony and cooperation. Psychological Science, 20, 1-5.
78. Zhang, T., Zhu, B., Lee, L., Kaber, D., & Edward P. (2008). Service robot anthropomorphism and interface design for emotion in human-robot interaction. In Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Automation Science and Engineering (CASE), 674-679, Arlington, VA, U.S.A.