Artificial agents in social cognitive sciences

Interaction Studies

Volumn 7, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 347-353

  Chaminade, Thierry ^a   Hodgins, Jessica K ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b Carnegie Mellon University   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 72649086006     PISSN: 15720373     EISSN: 15720381     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1075/is.7.3.07cha     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Blakemore, S. J., &Decety, J. (2001). From the perception of action to the understanding of intention. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 2(8), 561-567.
2. Buccino, G., Binkofski, F., Fink, G. R., Fadiga, L., Fogassi, L., Gallese, V., et al. (2001). Action observation activates premotor and parietal areas in a somatotopic manner: an fMRI study. European Journal of Neuroscience, 13(2), 400-404.
3. Chaminade, T., Franklin, D., Oztop, E., &Cheng, G. (2005). Motor interference between Humans and Humanoid Robots: Effect of Biological and Artifical Motion. Paper presented at the International Conference on Development and Learning, Osaka.
4. Chaminade, T., Meary, D., Orliaguet, J. P., &Decety, J. (2001). Is perceptual anticipation a motor simulation? A PET study. Neuroreport, 12(17), 3669-3674.
5. Chartrand, T. L., &Bargh, J. A. (1999). The chameleon effect: the perception-behavior link and social interaction. J Pers Soc Psychol, 76(6), 893-910.
6. Decety, J., &Chaminade, T. (2003). When the self represents the other: A new cognitive neuroscience view on psychological identification. Consciousness and Cognition, 12(4), 577-596.
7. Edwards, M. G., Humphreys, G. W., &Castiello, U. (2003). Motor facilitation following action observation: A behavioural study in prehensile action. Brain and Cognition, 53(3), 495-502.
8. Gallese, V., Keysers, C., &Rizzolatti, G. (2004). A unifying view of the basis of social cognition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8(9), 396-403.
9. Heyes, C. (2001). Causes and consequences of imitation. Trends Cogn Sci, 5(6), 253-261.
10. Keysers, C., &Perrett, D. I. (2004). Demystifying social cognition: a Hebbian perspective. Trends Cogn Sci, 8(11), 501-507.
11. Kilner, J. M., Paulignan, Y., &Blakemore, S. J. (2003). An interference effect of observed biological movement on action. Current Biology, 13(6), 522-525.
12. MacDorman, K. F., &Ishiguro, H. (2006). The uncanny advantage of using androids in cognitive and social science research. Interaction Studies, 7(3).
13. Mori, M. (1970). The valley of eeriness (japanese). Energy, 7(4), 33-35.
14. Oztop, E., Chaminade, T., Cheng, G., &Kawato, M. (2005). Imitation bootstrapping: Experiments on a Robotic Hand. Paper presented at the Humanoids, Tokyo.
15. Oztop, E., Franklin, D., Chaminade, T., &Gordon, C. (2005). Human-humanoid interaction: is a humanoid robot perceived as a human. Internation Journal of Humanoid Robotics, 2(4), 537-559.
16. Rizzolatti, G., &Craighero, L. (2004). The mirror-neuron system. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 27, 169-192.
17. Rizzolatti, G., Fadiga, L., Gallese, V., &Fogassi, L. (1996). Premotor cortex and the recognition of motor actions. Cognitive Brain Research, 3(2), 131-141.
18. Rizzolatti, G., Fogassi, L., &Gallese, V. (2001). Neurophysiological mechanisms underlying the understanding and imitation of action. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 2(9), 661-670.
19. Sagi, A., &Hoffman, M. L. (1976). Empathic Distress in the Newborn. Developmental Psychology, 12(2), 175-176.
20. Saygin, A. P., Wilson, S. M., Hagler, D. J., Jr., Bates, E., &Sereno, M. I. (2004). Point-light biological motion perception activates human premotor cortex. J Neurosci, 24(27), 6181-6188.
21. van der Meer, A. L., van der Weel, F. R., &Lee, D. N. (1995). The functional significance of arm movements in neonates. Science, 267(5198), 693-695.