Negotiated interaction in the L2 classroom

Language Teaching

Volumn 42, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 109-130

  Eckerth, Johannes ^a  

^a KING'S COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 72449125890     PISSN: 02614448     EISSN: 14753049     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0261444808005442     Document Type: Article

References (116)

1. Adams, R. (2003). L2 output, noticing, and reformulations: Implications for IL development. Language Teaching Research 7.3, 347-376.
2. Adams, R. (2007). Do second language learners benefit from interacting with each other? In A. Mackey (ed.), Conversational interaction in second language acquisition.Oxford: Oxford University Press, 29-51.
3. Allwright, D. & K. Bailey (1991). Focus on the language classroom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
4. Aston,G. (1986).Trouble-shooting in interaction with learners:The more themerrier? Applied Linguistics 7.2, 128-143.
5. Breen, M. (1987). Learner contributions to task design. In C. Candlin & D. Murphy (eds.), Language learning tasks. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall International, 23-46.
6. Brock, C. (1986). The effect of referential questions on ESL classroom discourse. TESOL Quarterly 20.1, 47-58.
7. Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
8. Brumfit, C. & R. Mitchell (1990). The language classroom as a focus of research. In C. Brumfit & R. Mitchell (eds.), Research in the language classroom. London: Modern English Publications, 3-15.
9. Bygate, M., P. Skehan &M. Swain (eds.) (2001). Researching pedagogic tasks: Second language learning, teaching and testing. London: Longman.
10. Carpenter, H., K. Jeon, D. MacGregor & A. Mackey (2006). Learners' interpretation of recasts. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 28.2, 209-236.
11. Chaudron, C. (1988). Second language classrooms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
12. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd edn.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
13. Coughlan, P. & P. Duff (1994). Same task, different activities: Analysis of SLA task from an activity theory perspective. In J. Lantolf & G. Appel (eds.), Vygotskian approaches to second language research. Norwood, NJ: Ablex, 173-193.
14. DeKeyser, R. (2003). Implicit and explicit learning. In Doughty & Long (eds.), 313-348.
15. Doughty, C. (2003). Instructed SLA: Conditions, compensation and enhancement. In Doughty & Long (eds.), 256-310.
16. Doughty, C. (2004). Effects of instruction on learning a second language: A critique of instructed SLA research. In B. VanPatten, J. Williams, S. Rott, S. & M. Overstreet (eds.), Form-meaning connections in second language acquisition. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 181-202.
17. Doughty, C. & M. Long (eds.) (2003). The handbook of second language acquisition. Oxford: Blackwell.
18. Doughty, C. & T. Pica (1986). 'Information gap' tasks: Do they facilitate second language acquisition? TESOL Quarterly 20.2, 305-325.
19. Eckerth, J. (2006). Three theses on the pedagogical relevance of second language acquisition research. Dil Dergisi Turkish Language Journal 130.1, 18-36.
20. Eckerth, J. (2008a). Investigating consciousness-raising tasks: Pedagogically-targeted and non-targeted learning gains. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 18.2, 119-145.
21. Eckerth, J. (2008b). Task-based language learning and teaching ? old wine in new bottles? In Eckerth & Siekmann (eds.), 13-46.
22. Eckerth, J. (2008c). Task-based learner-learner interaction: Investigating learning opportunities, learning processes, and learning outcomes. In Eckerth & Siekmann (eds.), 89-118.
23. Eckerth, J. & S. Siekmann (eds.) (2008). Research on task-based language learning and teaching: Theoretical, methodological and pedagogical perspectives. New York: Peter Lang.
24. Edge, J. & K. Richards (1998). May I see your warrants, please? Justifying outcomes in qualitative research. Applied Linguistics 19.3, 334-356.
25. Edwards, C. & J. Willis (eds.) (2005). Teachers exploring tasks in English language teaching. Houndmills: Palgrave MacMillan.
26. Egi, T. (2004). Verbal reports, noticing, and SLA research. Language Awareness 13.4, 243-264.
27. Ellis, N. & D. Larsen-Freeman (2006). Language emergence: Implications for Applied Linguistics. Applied Linguistics 27.4, 558-589.
28. Ellis, R. (1994). A theory of instructed second language acquisition. In N. Ellis (ed.), Implicit and explicit learning of languages. London: Academic Press, 79-114.
29. Ellis, R. (1997). SLA research and language teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
30. Ellis, R. (2003). Task-based language learning and teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
31. Ellis, R. (ed.) (2005). Planning and task performance in a second language. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
32. Ewald, J. (2004). A classroom forum on small group work: L2 learners see, and change, themselves. Language Awareness 13.3, 163-179.
33. Faerch, C. & G. Kasper (1986). The role of comprehension in second-language learning. Applied Linguistics 7.3, 184-199.
34. Firth, A. (1996). The discursive accomplishment of normality. On 'Lingua Franca' English and conversation analysis. Journal of Pragmatics 26.2, 237-260.
35. Firth, A. & J.Wagner (1997).On discourse, communication, and (some) fundamental concepts in SLA. The Modern Language Journal 81.3, 285-300.
36. Foster, P. (1998). A classroom perspective on the negotiation of meaning. Applied Linguistics 19.1, 1-23.
37. Foster, P., A. Tonkyn & G. Wigglesworth (2000). Measuring spoken language: A unit for all reasons. Applied Linguistics 21.3, 354-375.
38. Frantzen, D. (2003). Factors affecting how second language Spanish students derive meaning from context. The Modern Language Journal 87.2, 168-199.
39. Garćia Mayo,M. (ed.) (2007). Investigating tasks in formal language learning.Clevedon: MultilingualMatters.
40. Gass, S. (1997). Input, interaction, and the second language learner. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
41. Gass, S. (2003). Input and interaction. In Doughty & Long (eds.), 224-255.
42. Gass, S. & A. Mackey (2006). Input, interaction and output: An overview. AILA Review 19, 3-17.
43. Gass, S. & A. Mackey (2007). Input, interaction and output in second language acquisition. In B. VanPatten & J.Williams (eds.), Theories of second language acquisition. Mahwah,NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 175-199.
44. Gass, S., A. Mackey & L. Ross-Feldman (2005). Task-based interactions in classroom and laboratory settings. Language Learning 55.4, 575-611.
45. Gass, S. & C. Madden (eds.) (1985). Input in second language acquisition. Rowley,MA: NewburyHouse.
46. Gourlay, L. (2005). Directions and indirect action: Learner adaptation of a classroom task. ELT Journal 59.3, 209-216.
47. Harris, K. (2005). Same activity, different focus. Focus on Basics 8.1, 7-10.
48. Hatch, E. (1978). Discourse analysis and second language acquisition. In E. Hatch (ed.), Second language acquisition. Rowley, MA: Newbury House, 401-435.
49. Hauser, E. (2005). Coding 'corrective recasts': The maintenance of meaning and more fundamental problems. Applied Linguistics 26.3, 293-316.
50. Hawkins, B. (1985). Is an 'appropriate response' always so appropriate? In Gass & Madden (eds.), 162-178.
51. Hulstijn, J. (1997). Second language acquisition research in the laboratory: Possibilities and limitations. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 19.2, 131-143.
52. Hymes, D. (1972). Models of the interaction of language and social life. In J. Gumperz & D. Hymes (eds.), Directions in sociolinguistics:The ethnography of communication.NewYork:Holt,Rinehardt&Winston, 35-71.
53. Krashen, S. (1981). Second language acquisition and second language learning. Oxford: Pergamon.
54. Kumaravadivelu, B. (1991). Language-learning tasks: Teacher intention and learner interpretation. ELT Journal 45.2, 98-107.
55. Lantolf, J. & S. Thorne (2006). Sociocultural theory and the genesis of second language development. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
56. Leaver, B. & J. Willis (eds.) (2004) Task-based instruction in foreign language education. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press
57. Lee, J. (2000). Tasks and communication in language classrooms. Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill.
58. Lindgren, E. (2002). The effect of stimulated recall on 14-year-olds' L1 Swedish and EFL writing and revision. Language Teaching Research 6.3, 267-268.
59. Loewen, S. (2002). The occurrence and effectiveness of incidental focus on form in meaning-focused ESL lessons. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Auckland.
60. Loewen, S. (2005). Incidental focus on form and second language learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 27.3, 361-386.
61. Loewen, S. & J. Philip (2006). Recasts in the adult English L2 classroom: Characteristics, explicitness, and effectiveness. The Modern Language Journal 90.4, 536-556.
62. Long, M. (1983). Native-speaker/non-native speaker conversation and the negotiation of comprehensible input. Applied Linguistics 4.2, 126-141.
63. Long, M. (1985). Input and second language acquisition theory. In Gass & Madden (eds.), 377-393.
64. Long, M. (1988). Instructed interlanguage development. In L. Beebe (ed.), Issues in second language acquisition: Multiple perspectives. Rowley, MA: Newbury House, 115-141.
65. Long, M. (1996). The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In W. Ritchie & T. Bhatia (eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition. San Diego, CA: Academic Press, 413-468.
66. Long, M. (2007). Recasts: The story so far. In M. Long (ed.), Problems in SLA. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 75-116.
67. Long, M. (forthcoming)). Task-based language teaching. Oxford: Blackwell.
68. Long, M. & G. Crookes (1987). Intervention points in second language classroom processes. In B. Das (ed.), Patterns of classroom interaction. Singapore: SEAMEO Regional Language Centre, 137-152.
69. Long,M. & P. Porter (1985). Group work, interlanguage talk, and second language acquisition. TESOL Quarterly 19.2, 207-228.
70. Mackey,A. (2002). Beyond production: Learners' perceptions about interactional processes. International Journal of Educational Research 37.3/4, 379-394.
71. Mackey, A. (2006). Epilogue. From introspections, brain scans, and memory tests to the role of social context: Advancing research on interaction and learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 28.2, 369-379.
72. Mackey, A. (2007). Interaction as practice. In R. DeKeyser (ed.), Practice in a second language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 85-110.
73. Mondada, L. & S. Pekarek Doehler (2004). Second language acquisition as situated practice: Task accomplishment in the French second language classroom. The Modern Language Journal 88.4, 501-518.
74. Müller-Hartmann, A. & M. Schocker-von Ditfurth (eds.) (2004). Task-based language learning and teaching. Tübingen: Narr.
75. Nabei, T. & M. Swain (2002). Learner awareness of recasts in classroom interaction: A case study of an adult EFL student's second language learning. Language Awareness 11.1, 43-63.
76. Nakahama,Y., A.Tyler&L. van Lier (2001).Negotiation of meaning in conversational and information gap activities: A comparative discourse analysis. TESOL Quarterly 35.3, 377-405.
77. Nicholas, H., P. Lightbown & N. Spada (2001). Recasts as feedback to language learners. Language Learning 51.4, 719-758.
78. Nitta, R. & S. Gardner (2005). Consciousness-raising and practice in ELT coursebooks. ELT Journal 59.1, 3-13.
79. Nunan, D. (2004). Task-based language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
80. Oliver, R. (2000). Age differences in negotiation and feedback in classroom and pairwork. Language Learning 50.1, 119-151.
81. Pica, T. (1987). Second language acquisition, social interaction, and the classroom. Applied Linguistics 8.1, 3-21.
82. Pica, T. (1991). Classroom interaction, participation, and negotiation: Redefining relationships. System 19.4, 437-452.
83. Pica, T. (1994). Research on negotiation: What does it reveal about learning conditions, processes, outcomes? Language Learning 44.3, 493-527.
84. Pica, T. (1998). Second language learning through interaction: Multiple perspectives. In V. Regan (ed.), Contemporary approaches to second language acquisition in social context. Dublin: University College Dublin Press, 9-31.
85. Pica, T. (2005). Classroom learning, teaching, and research: A task-based perspective. The Modern Language Journal 89.3, 339-352.
86. Pica, T. & C. Doughty (1985). The role of group work in classroom second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 7.2, 233-248.
87. Pica, T. & C. Doughty (1987). The impact of interaction on comprehension. TESOL Quarterly 21.4, 737-758.
88. Pica,T., L. Holliday,N. Lewis,D. Berducci&J.Newman (1991). Language learning through interaction: What role does gender play? Studies in Second Language Acquisition 13.3, 343-376.
89. Pica, T., L. Holliday, N. Lewis & L. Morgenthaler (1989). Comprehensible output as an outcome of linguistic demands on the learner. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 11.1, 63-90.
90. Pica, T., R.Kanagy & J. Falodun (1993). Choosing and using communication tools for second language instruction. In G. Crookes & S. Gass (eds.), Tasks and language learning: Integrating theory and practice. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters, 9-34.
91. Pica, T., H. Kang & S. Sauro (2006). Information gap tasks: Their multiple roles and contributions to interaction research methodology. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 28.2, 301-338
92. Pica, T., F. Lincoln-Porter, D. Paninios & J. Linnell (1996). Language learners' interaction: How does it address the input, output and feedback needs of L2 learners? TESOL Quarterly 30.1, 59-84.
93. Polio, C., S. Gass & L. Chapin (2006). Using stimulated recall to investigate native speaker perceptions in native-nonnative speaker interaction. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 28.2, 237-267.
94. Roebuck, R. (2000). Subjects speak out: How learners position themselves in a psycholinguistic task. In J. Lantolf (ed.), Sociocultural theory and second language learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 79-95.
95. Roehr, K. (2006). Metalinguistic knowledge in L2 performance: A verbal protocol analysis. Language Awareness 15.3, 180-198.
96. Samuda, V. & M. Bygate (2008) Tasks in second language learning. Houndsmill: Palgrave Macmillan.
97. Seedhouse, P. (2004). The interactional architecture of the language classroom: A conversation analysis perspective. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
98. Seedhouse, P. (2005): 'Task' as a research construct. Language Learning 55.3, 533-570.
99. Skehan, P. (1998). A cognitive approach to language learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
100. Skehan, P. & P. Foster (1999). The influence of task structure and processing conditions on narrative retellings. Language Learning 49.1, 93-120.
101. Slimani-Rolls, A. (2005). Rethinking task-based language learning: What we can learn from the learners. Language Teaching Research 9.2, 195-218.
102. Swain, M. (1985). Communicative competence: Some roles of comprehensible input and comprehensible output in its development. In Gass & Madden (eds.), 235-253.
103. Swain, M. (1995). Three functions of output in second language learning. In G. Cook & B. Seidlhofer (eds.), Principle & practice in applied linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 125-144.
104. Swain, M. (2005). The output hypothesis: Theory and research. In E. Hinkel (ed.), Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 471-483.
105. Swain, M. & S. Lapkin (1995). Problems in output and the cognitive processes they generate: A step towards second language learning. Applied Linguistics 16.3, 371-391.
106. Swain, M. & S. Lapkin (1998). Interaction and second language learning: Two adolescent French immersion students working together. The Modern Language Journal 82.3, 320-337.
107. Swain, M. & S. Lapkin (2001). Focus on form through collaborative dialogue: Exploring task effects. In Bygate et al. (eds.), 99-118.
108. Swain, M. & S. Lapkin (2002). Talking it through: Two French immersion learners' responses to reformulation. International Journal of Educational Research 37.3/4, 285-304.
109. Swan, M. (2005). Legislation by hypothesis: The case of task-based instruction. Applied Linguistics 26.3, 376-401.
110. Tavakoli, P. (forthcoming). Investigating task difficulty: Learners' and teachers' perceptions. International Journal of Applied Linguistics.
111. Van den Branden, K. (ed.) (2006). Task-based language education: From theory to practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
112. Van Den Branden, K., K. van Gorp & M. Verhelst (eds.) (2007). Tasks in action: Task-based language education from a classroom-based perspective. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
113. Watanabe, Y. & M. Swain (2007). Effects of proficiency differences and patterns of pair interaction on second language learning: Collaborative dialogue between adult ESL learners. Language Teaching Research 11.2, 121-142.
114. Wertsch, J. (1998). Mind as action. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
115. Williams, J. (2001). The effectiveness of spontaneous attention to form. System 29.3, 325-340.
116. Yule, G. (1997). Referential communication tasks. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.