Beyond production: Learners' perceptions about interactional processes

International Journal of Educational Research

Volumn 37, Issue 3-4, 2002, Pages 379-394

  Mackey, Alison ^a  

^a GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Interaction; Learners' perspectives; Perceptions; Production; Qualitative

Indexed keywords

EID: 23844517458     PISSN: 08830355     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0883-0355(03)00011-9     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Donato, R. (1994). Collective scaffolding in second language learning. In J. Lantolf, & G. Appel (Eds.), Vygotskian approaches to second language research (pp. 33-56). Norwood, NJ: Abex.
2. Dörnyci, Z., & Kormos, J. (2000). The role of the individual and social variables in oral task performance. Language Teaching Research, 4, 275-300.
3. Dörnyei, Z., & Kormos, J. (2002). Motivational determinants of the quality and quantity of student performance in communicative language tasks. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Association of Applied Linguistics, Salt Lake City, UT.
4. Ellis, R. (1999). Learning a second language through interaction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
5. Ellis, R., Tanaka, Y., & Yamazaki, A. (1994). Classroom interaction, comprehension, and the acquisition of L2 word meanings. Language Learning, 44, 449-491.
6. Gass, S. (1988). Integrating research areas: A framework for second language studies. Applied Linguistics, 9, 198-217.
7. Gass, S. (1991). Grammar instruction, selective attention and learning process. In R. Phillipson, E. Kellerman, L. Selinker, M. S. Smith, & M. Swain (Eds.), Foreign/second language pedagogy research (pp. 134-141). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
8. Gass, S. (1997). Input, interaction, and the second language learner. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
9. Gass, S., & Mackey, A. (2000). Stimulated recall methodology in second language research. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
10. Gass, S., & Varonis, E. (1994). Input, interaction, and second language production. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 16, 283-302.
11. Krashen, S. (1981). Second language acquisition and second language learning. Oxford: Pergamon.
12. Lantolf, J. (2000). Sociocultural theory and second language learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
13. Leeman, J. (2003). Recasts and L2 development: Beyond negative evidence. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 25, 37-63.
14. Long, M. (1996). The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In W. C. Ritchie, & T. K. Bhatia (Eds.), Handbook of language acquisition, volume 2: Second language acquisition (pp. 413-468). New York: Academic Press.
15. Mackey, A. (1999). Input, interaction, and second language development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21, 557-587.
16. Mackey, A. (2000). Interactional feedback on L2 morphosyntax: Learners' perceptions and developmental outcomes. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Association of Applied Linguistics, Vancouver, BC.
17. Mackey, A., Gass, S., & McDonough, K. (2000). How do learners perceive interactional feedback? Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 22, 471-497.
18. Mackey, A., Oliver, R., & Leeman, J. (2003). Interactional input and the incorporation of feedback: An exploration of NS-NNS and NNS-NNS adult and child dyads. Language Learning, 53, 35-66.
19. Mackey, A., Philp, J., Egi, T., Fujii, A., & Tatsumi, T. (2002). Individual differences in working memory, noticing of interactional feedback and L2 development. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Individual differences and instructed language learning (pp. 181-209). Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
20. Nicholas, H., Lightbown, P., & Spada, N. (2001). Recasts as feedback to language learners. Language Learning, 51, 719-758.
21. Philp, J. (2003). Constraints on 'noticing the gap': Non-native speakers' noticing of recasts in NS-NNS interaction. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 25, 99-126.
22. Pica, T. (1994). Research on negotiation: What does it reveal about second-language learning conditions, processes, and outcomes? Language Learning, 44, 493-527.
23. Robinson, P. (1995). Review article: Attention, memory and the 'noticing' hypothesis. Language Learning, 45, 283-331.
24. Schmidt, R., & Frota, S. (1986). Developing basic conversational ability in a second language: a case study of an adult learner of Portuguese. In R. Day (Ed.), "Talking to Learn": Conversation in second language acquisition (pp. 237-326). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
25. Schulz, R. (2001). Cultural differences in student and teacher perceptions concerning the role of grammar instruction and corrective feedback, USA - Colombia. Modern Language Journal, 85, 244-258.
26. Silver, R. E. (2000). Input, output, and negotiation: Conditions for second language development. In B. Swierzbin, F. Morris, M. E. Anderson, C. A. Klee, & E. Tarone (Eds.), Social and cognitive factors in second language acquisition: Selected proceedings of the 1999 second language research forum (pp. 345-371). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
27. Swain, M. (1985). Communicative competence: Some roles of comprehensible input and comprehensible output in its development. In S. Gass, & C. Madden (Eds.), Input in second language acquisition (pp. 235-253). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
28. Swain, M. (1993). The output hypothesis: Just speaking and writing aren't enough. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 50, 158-164.
29. Swain, M. (1995). Three functions of output in second language learning. In G. Cook, & B. Seidlhofer (Eds.), Principle and practice in applied linguistics: Studies in honour of H.G. Widdowson (pp. 125-144). Oxford: Oxford University Press.