Classification of hydro-meteorological conditions and multiple artificial neural networks for streamflow forecasting

Hydrology and Earth System Sciences

Volumn 13, Issue 9, 2009, Pages 1555-1566

  Toth, E ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BOLOGNA   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORK; FLOW PATTERN; HYDROGRAPH; HYDROMETEOROLOGY; PARAMETERIZATION; RAINFALL-RUNOFF MODELING; STREAMFLOW;

EID: 72049104241     PISSN: 10275606     EISSN: 16077938     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5194/hess-13-1555-2009     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Abrahart, R. J. and See, L.: Comparing neural network and autoregressive moving average techniques for the provision of continuous river flow forecasts in two contrasting catchments, Hydrol. Process., 14(11), 2157-2172, 2000.
2. Abrahart, R. J. and See, L.: Multi-model data fusion for river flow forecasting: an evaluation of six alternative methods based on two contrasting catchments, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 6, 655-670, 2002, http://www.hydrol-earth- syst-sci.net/6/655/2002/.
3. Anctil, F., Perrin, Ch., and Andreassian V.: Impact of the length of observed records on the performance of ANN and of conceptual parsimonious rainfall-runoff forecasting models, Environ. Modell. Softw., 19, 357-368, 2004.
4. ASCE Task Committee on Application of Artificial Neural Networks in Hydrology: Artificial neural networks in hydrology. I: preliminary concepts, J. Hydrol. Eng., 5, 115-123, 2000a.
5. ASCE Task Committee on Application of Artificial Neural Networks in Hydrology: Artificial neural networks in hydrology II: hydrologic applications, J. Hydrol. Eng. 5, 124-137. 2000b.
6. Astel, A., Tsakovski, S., Barbieri, P., and Simeonov, V.: Comparison of self-organizing maps classification approach with cluster and principal components analysis for large environmental data sets, Water Res., 41(19), 4566-4578, 2007.
7. Bowden, G. J., Dandy G. C., and Maier, H. R.: Input determination for neural network models in water resources applications. Part 1-background and methodology, J. Hydrol., 301, 75-92, 2005
8. Cameron, D., Kneale, P., and See, L.: An evaluation of a traditional and a neural net modelling approach to flood forecasting for an upland catchment, Hydrol. Process., 16, 1033-1046, 2002.
9. Campolo, M., Andreussi, P., and Soldati, A.: River flood forecasting with neural network model,Water Resour. Res., 35(4), 1191-1197, 1999.
10. Corzo, G. A. and Solomatine, D. P.: Baseflow separation techniques for modular artificial neural networks modelling in flow forecasting, Hydrolog. Sci. J., 52(3), 491-507, 2007.
11. Coulibaly, P., Bob́ee, B., and Anctil, F.: Improving extreme hydrologic events forecasting using a new criterion for artificial neural network selection, Hydrol. Process., 15, 1533-1536, 2001.
12. Dawson, C. W. and Wilby, R.: An artificial neural network approach to rainfall-runoff modeling, Hydrolog. Sci. J., 43(1), 47-65, 1998.
13. de Vos, N. J. and Rientjes, T. H. M.: Multi-objective performance comparison of an artificial neural network and a conceptual rainfall-runoff model, Hydrolog. Sci. J., 52(3), 397-413, doi:10.1623/hysj.52.3.397, 2007. (Pubitemid 46851530)
14. de Vos, N. J. and Rientjes, T. H. M.: Multiobjective training of artificial neural networks for rainfall-runoff modeling, Water Resour. Res., 44, W08434, doi:10.1029/2007WR006734, 2008.
15. Fernando, T. M. K. G., Maier, H. R., and Dandy, G. C.: Selection of input variables for data driven models: An average shifted histogram partial mutual information estimator approach, J. Hydrol., 367, 165-176, 2009.
16. Foody, G.: Applications of the self-organising feature map neural network in community data analysis, Ecol. Model., 120, 97-107, 1999.
17. Foresee, F. D. and Hagan, M. T.: Gauss-Newton approximation to Bayesian learning, IEEE IJCNN, New York, 3, 1930-1935, 1997.
18. Furundzic, D.: Application example of neural networks for time series analysis: rainfall-runoff modelling, Signal Process., 64, 383-396, 1998.
19. Georgakakos, K. P., Seo, D., Gupta, H., Schaake, J., and Butts, M. B.: Towards the characterization of streamflow simulation uncertainty through multimodel ensembles, J. Hydrol., 298, 222-241, 2004.
20. Gopakumar R., Takara, K., and James E. J.: Hydrologic Data Exploration and River Flow Forecasting of a Humid Tropical River Basin Using Artificial Neural Networks, Water Resour. Manag., 21(11), 1915-1940, 2007.
21. Gupta, H. V., Sorooshian, S., and Yapo, P. O.: Toward improved calibration of hydrologic models: Multiple and noncommensurable measures of information,Water Resour. Res., 34, 751-764, 1998.
22. Hagan, M. T. and Menhaj, M.: Training feedforward networks with the Marquardt algorithm, IEEET. Neural Networ., 5(6), 989-993, 1994.
23. Hsu, A. L. and Halgamuge, S. K.: An unsupervised hierarchical dynamic selforganizing approach to cancer class discovery and marker gene identification in microarray data (supplementary information on "Dynamic SOM with hexagonal structure for data mining"), Bioinformatics, 19(16), 2131-2140, 2003.
24. Hsu, K., Gupta, H. V., Gao, X., Sorooshian, S., and Imam, B.: Selforganizing linear output map (SOLO): An artificial neural network suitable for hydrologic modeling and analysis, Water Resour. Res., 38(12), 1302, doi:10.1029/2001WR000795, 2002.
25. Jain, A., Sudheer, K. P., and Srinivasulu, S.: Identification of physical processes inherent in artificial neural network rainfall runoff models, Hydrol. Process., 18, 571-581, 2004.
26. Jain, A. and Srinivasulu, S.: Integrated approach to model decomposed flow hydrograph using artificial neural network and conceptual techniques, J. Hydrol., 317, 291-306, 2006.
27. Kalteh, A. M., Hjorth, P., and Berndtsson, R.: Review of the selforganizing map (SOM) approach in water resources: Analysis, modelling and application, Environ. Modell. Softw. 23, 835-845, 2008.
28. Khan, M. S. and Coulibaly, P.: Bayesian neural network for rainfall-runoff modeling, Water Resour. Res., 42(7), W07409, doi:10.1029/2005WR003971, 2006. (Pubitemid 44300476)
29. Kohonen, T.: Self-organized formation of topologically correct feature maps, Biol. Cybern., 43, 59-69, 1982.
30. Kohonen, T.: Self-Organizing Maps (third edn.), Springer, Berlin, Germany, 2001.
31. Legates, D.R. and McCabe, G.J.: Evaluating the use of 'goodnessof- fit' measures in hydrologic and hydroclimatic model validation, Water Resour. Res., 35, 233-241, 1999.
32. Madsen, H.: Automatic calibration of a conceptual rainfall-runoff model using multiple objectives, J. Hydrol., 235, 267-288, 2000.
33. Maier, H. and Dandy, G.: Neural networks for the prediction and forecasting of water resources variables: A review of modeling issues and applications, Environ. Modell. Softw., 15(1), 101-104, 2000.
34. Mangiameli, P., Chen, S. K., and West, D.: A comparison of SOM neural network and hierarchical clustering methods, Eur. J. Oper. Res., 93, 402-417, 1996.
35. Minns, A. W. and Hall, M. J.: Artificial neural networks as rainfall runoff models, Hydrolog. Sci. J., 41, 399-417, 1996.
36. Moradkhani, H., Hsu, K., Gupta, H. V., and Sorooshian, S: Improved streamflow forecasting using self-organizing radial basis function artificial neural networks, J. Hydrol., 295, 246-262, 2004.
37. Parasuraman, K. and Elshorbagy, A.: Cluster-based hydrologic prediction using genetic-algorithm trained neural networks, J. Hydrol. Eng., 12(1), 52-62, 2007.
38. Shamseldin, A. Y., Nasr, A. E., and O'Connor, K. M.: Comparison of different forms of the Multi-layer Feed-Forward Neural Network method used for river flow forecasting, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 6, 671-684, 2002, http://www.hydrol-earth-syst-sci.net/6/671/2002/.
39. Shamseldin, A. Y., O'Connor, K. M., and Liang, G. C.,: Methods for combining the outputs of different rainfall-runoff rodels, J. Hydrol., 197, 203-229, 1997.
40. Shamseldin, A. Y., O'Connor, K. M., and Nasr, A. E.: A comparative study of three neural network forecast combination methods for simulated river flows of different rainfall-runoff models, Hydrolog. Sci. J., 52(5), 896-916, 2007.
41. natural phenomena, Neural Networks, 19, 215-224, 2006.
42. Shirazi, J. and Menhaj, M. B.: A SOM Based 2500-Isolated-Farsi- Word Speech Recognizer, in: ICANN 2005, LNCS 3696, edited by: Duch, W., Kacprzyk, J., Oja, E., and Zadrony, S., Springer- Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, 589-595, 2005.
43. Solomatine, D. P. and Siek, M. B.: Modular learning models in forecasting
44. Solomatine, D. P. and Dulal, K. N.: Model trees as an alternative to neural networks in rainfall-runoff modelling, Hydrolog. Sci. J., 48(3), 399-411, 2003.
45. Srivastav, R. K., Sudheer, K. P., and Chaubey, I.: A simplified approach to quantifying predictive and parametric uncertainty in artificial neural network hydrologic models, Water Resour. Res., 23(10), W10407, doi:10.1029/2006WR005352, 2007. (Pubitemid 350210156)
46. Tang, Y., Reed, P., and Wagener, T.: How effective and efficient are multiobjective evolutionary algorithms at hydrologic model calibration?, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 10, 289-307, 2006, http://www.hydrol-earth-syst-sci.net/10/ 289/2006/.
47. Toth, E. and Brath, A.: Multistep ahead streamflow forecasting: Role of calibration data in conceptual and neural network modeling, Water Resour. Res., 43, W11405, doi:10.1029/2006WR005383, 2007.
48. Van der Voort, M., Dougherty, M., and Watson, S.: Combining Kohonen maps with ARIMA time series models to forecast traffic flow, Transport. Res., C4(5), 307-318, 1996.
49. Vrugt, J. A., Gupta, H. V., Bastidas, L. A., Bouten, W., and Sorooshian, S.: Effective and efficient algorithm for multiobjective optimization of hydrologic models, Water Resour. Res., 39, 1-19, 2003.
50. Wang, W., Gelder, P., Vrijling, J. K., and Ma, J.: Forecasting daily streamflow using hybrid ANN models, J. Hydrol., 324(1), 383-399, 2006.
51. Wheater, H. S., Jakeman, A. J., and Beven, K. J.: Progress and directions in rainfall-runoff modelling, in: Modelling change in environmental systems, edited by: Jakeman, A. J., Beck, M. B., and McAleer, M. J., Wiley, Chichester, 101-132, 1993.
52. World Meteorological Organization: Simulated real-time intercomparison of hydrological models, WMO Publications, Geneva, Swiss, 1992.
53. Young, P. C.: Advances in real-time flood forecasting, Philos. T. R. Soc. Lond., 360, 1433-1450, 2002.
54. Zhang, B. and Govindaraju, S.: Prediction of Watershed Runoff using Bayesian Concepts and Modular Neural Networks, Water Resour. Res., 36(3), 753-762, 2000.