A model for monitoring and evaluating CSCL

Monitoring and Assessment in Online Collaborative Environments: Emergent Computational Technologies for E-Learning Support

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 149-170

  Persico, Donatella ^a   Pozzi, Francesca ^a   Sarti, Luigi ^a  

^a Istituto Tecnologie Didattiche   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 70450282717     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-60566-786-7.ch009     Document Type: Chapter

References (44)

1. Alvino, S., & Persico, D. (2008). The relationship between assessment and evaluation in CSCL. In A. Cartelli & M. Palma (Eds.), Encyclopaedia of information and communication technology, vol. II (pp. 698-703). Hershey, PA: Information Science Reference.
2. Anderson, T., Rourke, L., Garrison, D. R., & Archer, W. (2001). Assessing teaching presence in a computer conferencing context. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 5(2). Retrieved from http://www.aln.org/alnweb/journal/jaln-vol5issue2v2.htm
3. Aviv, R., Erlich, Z., Ravid, G., & Geva, A. (2003). Network analysis of knowledge construction in asynchronous learning networks. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 7(3), 1-23.
4. Caballé, S., Daradoumis, T., & Xhafa, F. (2007). A generic platform for the systematic construction of knowledge-based collaborative learning applications. In C. Pahl (Ed.), Architecture solutions for e-learning systems (pp. 219-242). Hershey, PA: Idea Group Publishing.
5. Chi, M. T. H. (1997). Quantifying qualitative analyses of verbal data: A practical guide. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 6(3), 271-315.doi:10.1207/s15327809jls0603_1
6. Daradoumis, T., Martínez-Monés, A., & Xhafa, F. (2006). A layered framework for evaluating online collaborative learning interactions. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 64(7), 622-635. doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2006.02.001
7. de Bruyn, L. (2004). Monitoring online communication: Can the development of convergence and social presence indicate an interactive learning environment. Distance Education, 25(1), 67-81. doi:10.1080/0158791042000212468
8. Delfino, M., & Persico, D. (2007). Online or faceto-face? Experimenting with different techniques in teacher training. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 23, 351-365. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2729.2007.00220.x
9. Dillenbourg, P. 1999. Ed Collaborative learning: Cognitive and computational approaches. New York: Pergamon.
10. EduTools. (2008). CMS: Product list. Retrieved December 10, 2008, from http://landonline.edu-tools.info/item_list.jsp?pj=4
11. Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (1999). Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 2(2-3), 87-105. doi:10.1016/S1096-7516(00)00016-6
12. st century. A framework for research and practice. New York: Routledge Falmer.
13. Garrison, R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2001). Critical thinking, cognitive presence, and computer conferencing in distance education. American Journal of Distance Education, 15(1), 3-21.
14. Hara, N., Bonk, C. J., & Angeli, C. (2000). Content analysis of online discussion in an applied educational psychology course. Instructional Science, 28, 115-152.doi:10.1023/A:1003764722829
15. Hartnell-Young, E. (2005). Teachers' new roles in school-based communities of practice. Paper presented at the AARE Conference, Melbourne, Australia. Retrieved from http://www.aare.edu.au/04pap/har04257.pdf
16. Henri, F. (1992). Computer conferencing and content analysis. In A. R. Kaye (Ed.), Collaborative learning through computer conferencing: The Najaden papers (pp. 115-136). New York: Springer.
17. Kanuka, H., & Anderson, T. (1999). Using constructivism in technology-mediated learning: Constructing order out of the chaos in the literature. Radical Pedagogy, 1(2). Retrieved from http://radicalpedagogy.icaap.org/content/issue1_2/02kanuka1_2.html
18. Lally, V., & De Laat, M. (2002). Cracking the code: Learning to collaborate and collaborating to learn in a networked environment. In G. Stahl (Ed.), Computer support for collaborative learning: Foundations for a CSCL community, Proceedings of the CSCL 2002, Boulder, Colorado, USA (pp. 160-168).
19. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
20. Lipponen, L., Rahikainen, M., Lallilmo, J., & Hakkarainen, K. (2003). Patterns of participation and discourse in elementary students' computersupported collaborative learning. Learning and Instruction, 13, 487-509. doi:10.1016/S0959-4752(02)00042-7
21. Lombard, M., Snyder-Dich, J., & Bracken, C. C. (2002). Content analysis in mass communication. Assessment and reporting of intercoder reliability. Human Communication Research, 28(4), 587-604.doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.2002.tb00826.x
22. Martinez, A., Dimitriadis, Y., Rubia, B., Gomez, E., & De La Fuente, P. (2003). Combining qualitative evaluation and social network analysis for the study of classroom social interactions. Computers & Education, 41(4), 353-368.doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2003.06.001
23. McKlin, T., Harmon, S. W., Evans, W., & Jone, M. G. (2001). Cognitive presence in Web-based learning: A content analysis of students' online discussions. American Journal of Distance Education, 15(1), 7-23.
24. Meyer, K. A. (2003). Face-to-face versus threaded discussions: The role of time and higher-order thinking. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 7(3), 55-65.
25. Murphy, E. (2004). Recognizing and promoting collaboration in an online asynchronous discussion. British Journal of Educational Technology, 35(4), 421-431. doi:10.1111/j.0007-1013.2004.00401.x
26. Oriogun, P. K., Ravenscroft, A., & Cook, J. (2005). Validating an approach to examining cognitive engagement within online groups. American Journal of Distance Education, 19(4), 197-214.doi:10.1207/s15389286ajde1904_2
27. Pawan, F., Paulus, T., Yalcin, S., & Chang, C. F. (2003). Online learning: Patterns of engagement and interaction among in-service teachers. Language Learning & Technology, 7(3), 119-140.
28. Persico, D., Pozzi, F., & Sarti, L. (2008). Fostering collaboration in CSCL. In A. Cartelli & M. Palma (Eds.), Encyclopaedia of information communication technology (pp. 335-340). Hershey, PA: Idea Group Reference.
29. Persico, D., Pozzi, F., & Sarti, L. (2009). Design patterns for monitoring and evaluating CSCL processes. Computers in Human Behaviour.
30. Phillips, J. J. (1998). The return-on-investment (ROI) process: Issues and trends. Educational Technology, 38(4), 7-14.
31. Pozzi, F., Manca, S., Persico, D., & Sarti, L. (2007). A general framework for tracking and analysing learning processes in computer-supported collaborative learning environments. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 44(2), 169-179. doi:10.1080/14703290701240929
32. Reffay, C., & Chanier, T. (2003). How social network analysis can help to measure cohesion in collaborative distance-learning. In B. Wasson, S. Ludvigsen, & U. Hoppe (Eds.), Designing for change in networked learning environments. Proceedings of the international conference on computer support for collaborative learning 2003 (pp. 343-352). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
33. Rourke, L., Anderson, T., Garrison, D. R., & Archer, W. (2001). Methodological issues in the content analysis of computer conference transcripts. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 12, 8-22.
34. Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (1994). Computer support for knowledge-building communities. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 3(3), 265-283.doi:10.1207/s15327809jls0303_3
35. Schlager, M., & Fusco, J. (2004). Teacher professional development, technology, and communities of practice: Are we putting the cart before the horse? In S. Barab, R. Kling, & J. Gray (Eds.), Designing for virtual communities in the service of learning. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Retrieved from http://tappedin.org/tappedin/web/papers/2004/SchlagerFuscoTPD.pdf
36. Schrire, S. (2006). Knowledge building in asynchronous discussion groups: Going beyond quantitative analysis. Computers & Education, 46, 49-70. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2005.04.006
37. Shea, P., Pickett, A., & Pelt, W. (2003). A follow-up investigation of teaching presence in the SUNY learning network. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 7(2).
38. Thorpe, M. (1993). Evaluating open and distance learning. Harlow, UK: Longman.
39. Trentin, G. (2000). The quality-interactivity relationship in distance education. Educational Technology, 40(1), 17-27.
40. Triggs, P., & John, P. (2004). From transaction to transformation: Information and communication technology, professional development and the formation of communities of practice. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 20(6), 426-439. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2729.2004.00101.x
41. Vanderbilt (The Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt). (1991). Some thoughts about constructivism and instructional design. Educational Technology, 31(10), 16-18.
42. Wang, M. (2004), Correlational analysis of student visibility and performance in online learning. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 8(4). Retrieved from http://www.sloan-c.org/publications/jaln/v8n4/pdf/v8n4_wang.pdf
43. Wegerif, R. (1998). The social dimension of asynchronous learning networks. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 2, 34-49.
44. Weinberger, A., & Fischer, F. (2006). A framework to analyze argumentative knowledge construction in computer-supported collaborative learning. Computers & Education, 46, 71-95.doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2005.04.003