A follow-up investigation of "teaching presence" in the suny learning network

Journal of Asynchronous Learning Network

Volumn 7, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 61-80

  Shea, Peter J ^a,b,c   Pickett, Alexandra M ^a,b   Pelz, William E ^a,b,d,e,f,g  

^a STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

^b STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

^c MERLOT Project   (United States)

^d Herkimer County Community College   (United States)

^e Hum and Social Science Division

^f Herkimer County Community College   (United States)

^g SUNY Learning Network   (United States)

Author keywords

Assessment centered; Cognitive presence; Community; Faculty satisfaction; Knowledge centered; Learning centered; Learning effectiveness; Models; Online learning; Principles of good practice; Social presence; Student satisfaction; Teaching presence

Indexed keywords

EID: 3042678047     PISSN: 19395256     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (13)

1. Shea, P., Fredericksen, E., Pickett, A., and Pelz, W. A Preliminary Investigation of Teaching Presence in the SUNY Learning Network, Elements of Quality Online Education: Practice and Direction, Volume 4 in the Sloan-C series. Needham, MA: Sloan-C, 2003.
2. Bransford, J., Brown, A., Cocking, R., Donovan, M., and Pellegrino, J. W. How People Learn, National Academy Press, 2000
3. Chickering, A. W., and Gamson, A. F. Seven Principles for Good Practice in Undergraduate Education. Racine, WI: The Johnson Foundation, Inc/Wingspread, 1987
4. Anderson, T., Rourke, L., Garrison, D. R., and Archer W. Assessing Teaching Presence in a Computer Conferencing Context. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 5(2) (September 2001).
5. Shea, P., Fredericksen, E., Pickett, A., and Pelz, W. Measures of Learning Effectiveness in the SUNY Learning Network, Online Education: Learning Effectiveness, Faculty Satisfaction, and Cost Effectiveness, Needham, MA: SCOLE, 2001.
6. Shea, P., Pelz, W., Fredericksen, E., and Pickett, A. Online Teaching as a Catalyst for Classroom-based Instructional Transformation, Elements of Quality Online Education, Needham, MA: SCOLE, 2002.
7. Shea, P., Swan, K., Fredericksen, E., and Pickett, A. Student Satisfaction and Reported Learning in the SUNY Learning Network, Elements of Quality Online Education, Needham, MA: Sloan-C, 2002.
8. Kuh, G. The National Survey of Student Engagement: Conceptual Framework and Overview of Psychometric Properties 2001. http://www.indiana.edu/~nsse/ acrobat/framework-2001.pdf
9. Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T, and Archer, W. Critical Inquiry in a Text Based Environment: Computer Conferencing in Higher Education. The Internet and Higher Education, 2(2-3): 1-19, 2000.
10. Rourke, L., Anderson, T., Garrison, D. R., and Archer, W. Assessing Social Presence in Asynchronous Text-based Computer Conferencing. Journal of Distance Education, 2001. http://cade.athabascau.ca/vol14.2/rourke_et_al.html
11. Sheehan, K. Email Survey Response Rates: A Review. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 6(2), 2001.
12. Twigg, C. Expanding Access to Learning: The Role of Virtual Universities. Troy, NY: Center for Academic Transformation, 2003.
13. Johnson, D., Johnson, R., and Stanne, M. Methods of Cooperative Learning: What Can We Prove Works? Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Cooperative Learning Center, 2001.