Combining qualitative evaluation and social network analysis for the study of classroom social interactions

Computers and Education

Volumn 41, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 353-368

  Martinez A ^a   Dimitriadis, Y ^a   Rubia, B ^a   Gomez E ^a   De la Fuente, P ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VALLADOLID   (Spain)

Author keywords

Cooperative collaborative learning; Evaluation methodologies; Learning communities; Post secondary education

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SUPPORTED COOPERATIVE WORK; DATA REDUCTION; LEARNING SYSTEMS; TEACHING;

COLLABORATIVE LEARNING;

SOCIAL ASPECTS;

EID: 17144441991     PISSN: 03601315     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.compedu.2003.06.001     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (18)

1. Applet, W. (1999). WWW based collaboration with the BSCW system. In Proceedings of SOFSEM'99, Springer Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Vol. 1725, pp. 66-78). Milovy.
2. Borgatti S., Everett M., Freeman L. UCINET 5.0 version 1.00. 1999;Analytic Technologies, Natick.
3. Chin, G., Rosson, M., & Carroll, J. (1997). Participatory analysis: shared development of requirements from scenarios. In Proceedings of Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI'97 Conference (pp. 162-197). New York: ACM.
4. Cho H., Stefanone M., Gay G. Social information sharing in a CSCL community. Stahl G. Proceedings of CSCL 2002, Boulder, CO. 2002;43-50 Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ.
5. Dimitriadis, Y., Martínez, A., Rubia, B., & Gallego, M. (2001). Cooperative learning in computer architecture: an educational project and its telematic support. In Proceedings of the Conference of Frontiers in Education, FIE 2001, Reno, NE, USA.
6. V3L Extensible Markup Language (XML). (2000). Available: http://www.w3.org/XML/ ).
7. Frechtling J., Sharp L. User-friendly handbook for mixed method evaluations. 1997;Directorate for Education and Human Resources Division of Research, Evaluation and Communication NSF.
8. Gómez, E., Dimitriadis, Y., Rubia, B., & Martínez, A. (2002). Quest, a telematic tool for automatic management of student questionnaires in educational research. In Proceedings of TIEC 2002, Barcelona.
9. Guribye F., Wasson B. The ethnography of distributed collaborative learning. Stahl G. Proceedings of CSCL 2002, Boulder, CO. 2002;637-638 Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ.
10. Martínez, A. (2003). A method and a model for the computational support to evaluation in CSCl. PhD, Department of Computer Science, University of Valladolid, Valladolid.
11. Martínez A., de la Fuente P., Dimitriadis Y. Towards an XML-based representation of collaborative interaction. Watson B., Ludvigsen S., Hoppe U. Proceedings of the International Conference on Computer Support for Collaborative Learning 2003, Bergen. 2003;379-384 Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.
12. Neale D., Carroll J. Multi-faceted evaluation of complex, distributed activities. Hoadley C. Computer support for collaborative learning (CSCL'99) Stanford, CA. 1999;425-433 Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Stanford, Mahwah, NJ.
13. Nurmela K., Lehtinen E., Palonen T. Evaluating CSCL log files by Social Network Analysis. Hoadley C. Computer Support for Collaborative Learning (CSCL'99) Stanford, CA. 1999;434-442 Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ.
14. Osuna, C., & Dimitriadis, Y. (1999). A framework for the development of educational collaborative applications based on social constructivism. In Proceedings of CRIWG '99 (pp. 71-80). Cancún: IEEE Computer Society Press.
15. QSR. NUD*IST. Software for qualitative data analysis. 1997;Scolari, Thousand Oaks, CA, USA.
16. Stake R. The art of case study research. 1995;SAGE, Thousand Oaks, CA.
17. Wasserman S., Faust K. Social network analysis: methods and applications. 1994;Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
18. Wilson B., Myers K. Situated cognition in theoretical and practical context. Jonassen D., Land S. Theoretical foundations of learning environments. 2000;57-88 Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ.