Enabling teachers to develop pedagogically sound and technically executable learning designs

Distance Education

Volumn 30, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 259-276

  Miao, Yongwu ^a   van der Klink, Marcel ^a   Boon, Jo ^a   Sloep, Peter ^a   Koper, Rob ^a  

^a OPEN UNIVERSITY OF THE NETHERLANDS   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

activity theory; domain specific modeling; IMS LD; IMS QTI; learning design; peer assessment modeling language

Indexed keywords

EID: 70449371422     PISSN: 01587919     EISSN: 14750198     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01587910903023223     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Agostinho, S. 2008. “ Learning design representations to document, model and share teaching practice ”. In Handbook of research on learning design and learning objects: Issues, applications and technologies, Edited by: Lockyer, L., Bennett, S., Agostinho, S. and Harper, B. Vol. 1, 1 – 19. Hershey, PA: Information Science Reference.
2. Agostinho, S., Harper, B., Oliver, R., Hedberg, J. and Wills, S. 2008. “ A visual learning design representation to facilitate dissemination and reuse of innovative pedagogical strategies in university teaching ”. In Handbook of visual languages for instructional design: Theories and practices, Edited by: Botturi, L. and Stubbs, T. Hershey, PA: Information Science Reference.
3. Bennett, S., Agostinho, S., Lockyer, L., Harper, B. and Lukasiak, J. 2006. Supporting university teachers create pedagogically sound learning environments using learning designs and learning objects. International Journal on WWW/Internet, 4(1): 16 – 26.
4. Botturi, L. 2006. E2ML: A visual language for the design of instruction. Educational Technology, Research and Development, 54(3): 265 – 293.
5. Boud, D. 2000. Sustainable assessment. Rethinking assessment for the learning society. Studies in Continuing Education, 22(2): 151 – 167.
6. Boud, D., Cohen, R. and Sampson, J. 1999. Peer learning and assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 24(4): 413 – 426.
7. Dalziel, J. Implementing learning design: The Learning Activity Management System (LAMS). . Proceedings of the 20th Annual Conference of the Australasian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education (ASCILITE). Edited by: Crisp, G., Thiele, D., Scholten, I., Barker, S. and Baron, J. pp. 593 – 596. Retrieved September 15, 2008, from http://www.ascilite.org.au/conferences/adelaide03/program/conf_prog_index.htm
8. de Volder, M., Slootmaker, A., Kurvers, H., Rutjens, M., van der Baaren, J.Bitter, M. 2007. Espace: A student peer‐feedback tool enhances educational quality of assignments without overburdening faculty or adding administrative costs. Educause Quarterly, 30(3): 63 – 66.
9. DSM Forum. (n.d.) Retrieved September 15, 2008, from http://www.dsmforum.org/
10. Engeström, Y. 1987. Learning by expanding: An activity‐theoretical approach to developmental research, Helsinki,, Finland: Orienta‐Konsultit.
11. Engeström, Y., Miettinen, R. and Punamäki, R.L. 1998. Perspectives on activity theory, New York: Cambridge University Press.
12. Falconer, I. and Littlejohn, A. 2008. “ Representing models of practice ”. In Handbook of research on learning design and learning objects: Issues, applications and technologies, Edited by: Lockyer, L., Bennett, S., Agostinho, S. and Harper, B. Vol. 1, 20 – 40. Hershey, PA: Information Science Reference.
13. Fastré, G., van der Klink, M., Sluijsmans, D. and van Merriënboer, J. Support in self‐assessment in secondary vocational education. International perspectives in the learning sciences: Cre8ting a learning world. Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference of the Learning Sciences, Part 3. Edited by: Kanselaar, G., Jonker, V., Kirschner, P.A. and Prins, F.J. pp. 29 – 30. Urtrecht,, the Netherlands: International Society of the Learning Sciences.
14. IMS Global Learning Consortium. 2003. Learning design specification Retrieved September 15, 2008, from http://www.imsglobal.org/learningdesign/index.cfm
15. IMS Global Learning Consortium. 2006. IMS question and test interoperability specification, version 2.1 Retrieved April 14, 2009, from http://www.imsglobal.org/question/index.html
16. Joosten‐ten Brinke, D., van Bruggen, J., Hermans, H., Burgers, J., Giesbers, B.Koper, R. 2007. Modeling assessment for re‐use of traditional and new types of assessment. Computers in Human Behavior, 23(6): 2721 – 2741.
17. Koper, E.J.R. 2001. Modelling units of study from a pedagogical perspective: The pedagogical meta‐model behind EML, Heerlen: Open University of the Netherlands.
18. Koper, E.J.R. and Bennett, S. 2008. “ Learning design: Concepts ”. In Handbook on information technologies for education and training, Edited by: Adelsberger, H.H., Kinshuk, P., Pawlowski, J.M. and Sampson, D. 135 – 154. Heidelberg,, Germany: Springer‐Verlag.
19. Koper, E.J.R. and Olivier, B. 2004. Representing the learning design of units of learning. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 7(3): 97 – 111.
20. Kuutti, K. 1991. “ Activity theory and its applications to information systems research and development ”. In Information systems research: Contemporary approaches and emergent traditions, Edited by: Nissen, H.‐E., Klein, H.K. and Hirschheim, R. 529 – 550. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.
21. Kuutti, K. 1996. “ Activity theory as a potential framework for human–computer interaction research ”. In Context and consciousness: Activity theory and human–computer interaction, Edited by: Nardi, B.A. 17 – 44. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
22. Leont'ev, A.N. 1978. Activity, consciousness, and personality, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall. Retrieved April 15, 2009, from http://www.marxists.org/archive/leontev/works/1978/index.htm
23. Leont'ev, A.N. 1981. Problems of the development of mind, Edited by: Kopylova, M. Moscow: Progress Press. (Original work published 1947.)
24. Liu, Z., Lin, S. and Yuan, S. Experiencing NetPeas: Another way of learning. Web intelligence: Proceedings of the First Asia‐Pacific Conference on Web Intelligence. Edited by: Zhong, N., Yao, Y., Liu, J. and Ohsuga, S. pp. 584 – 588. Berlin: Springer‐Verlag. Lecture Notes in Computer Science Series
25. Miao, Y. and Koper, R. An efficient and flexible technical approach to develop and deliver online peer assessment. Computer‐supported collaborative learning: Mice, minds, and society. Proceedings of the Seventh International Computer Supported Collaborative Learning Conference (CSCL 2007). Edited by: Chinn, C.A., Erkens, G. and Puntambekar, S. pp. 502 – 511. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
26. Oliver, R. July 2006. “ Learning designs for ICT‐based learning settings ”. In ASCILITE Newsletter July, Retrieved September 15, 2008, from http://www.ascilite.org.au/index.php/Newsletter
27. Oliver, R. and Littlejohn, A. Discovering and describing accessible and reusable practitioner‐focused learning. Proceedings of Theme 1 of the JISC Online Conference: Innovating e‐Learning 2006. Edited by: Minshull, G. and Mole, J. pp. 30 – 33. Retrieved September 15, 2008, from http://www.jisc.ac.uk/elp_conference06.html
28. Sitthiworachart, J. and Joy, M. Web‐based peer assessment in learning computer programming. Proceedings of the 3rd IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies. Edited by: Devedzic, V., Spector, J., Sampson, D. and Kinshuk. pp. 180 – 184. Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Computer Society Press.
29. Sluijsmans, D. 2002. Student involvement in assessment: The training of peer assessment skills, Heerlen,, the Netherlands: Open Universiteit Nederland. Unpublished doctoral dissertation
30. Somervell, H. 1993. Issues in assessment, enterprise and higher education: The case for self‐, peer and collaborative assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 18: 221 – 233.
31. Topping, K.J. 1998. Peer assessment between students in colleges and universities. Review of Educational Research, 68(3): 249 – 276.
32. Verpoorten, D., Poumay, M. and Leclercq, D. The 8 learning events model: A pedagogic conceptual tool supporting diversification of learning methods. Proceedings of International Workshop in Learning Networks for Lifelong Competence Development, TENCompetence Conference. Edited by: Koper, R. and Stefanov, K. pp. 48 – 53. Retrieved September 30, 2008, from http://dspace.learningnetworks.org
33. Vygotsky, L.S. 1978. Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
34. Waters, S.H. and Gibbons, A.S. 2004. Design languages, notation systems, and instructional technology: A case study. Educational Technology, Research and Development, 52(2): 57 – 68.