An efficient and flexible technical approach to develop and deliver online peer assessment

Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning Conference, CSCL

Volumn 8, Issue PART 2, 2007, Pages 502-511

  Miao, Yongwu ^a   Koper, Rob ^a  

^a OPEN UNIVERSITY OF THE NETHERLANDS   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

MAMMALS; SOFTWARE DESIGN;

COLLABORATIVE LEARNING; E-LEARNING STANDARDS; FOCUS AREAS; PEER ASSESSMENT; SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT APPROACH;

E-LEARNING;

EID: 54249144593     PISSN: 15734552     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.3115/1599600.1599693     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (36)

1. Almond, R. G., L. Steinberg, et al. (2001). A sample assessment using the four process framework. CSE Report 543. Center for study of evaluation. Los Angeles, University of California.
2. APIS. (2004). Retrieved Oct. 20, 2006, from http://www.elearning.ac.uk/ resources/1apisoverview.
3. Brindley, C. and S. Scoffield (1998). "Peer assessment in undergraduate programmes." Teaching in higher education 3 (1): 79-89.
4. Dillenbourg, P. (2002). Over-scripting CSCL: The risks of blending collaborative learning with instructional design. Three worlds of CSCL. Can we support CSCL. In P. A. Kirschner (Eds.), Heerlen, Open Universiteit Nederland: 61-91.
5. Falchikov, N. (2001). Learning Together: Peer tutoring in higher education. London, Routledge Falmer.
6. Falchikov, N. (2002). "Unpacking? Peer Assessment?. Assessment: Case Studies, Experience & Practice from Higher Education. In P. Schwartz and G. Webb. (Eds.), London, Kogan Page.
7. Freeman, M. (1995). "Peer assessment by groups of group work." Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 20: 289-300.
8. Freeman, M. and J. McKenzie (2002). "Implementing and evaluating SPARK, a confidential web-based template for self and peer assessment of student teamwork: benefits of evaluating across different subjects". British Journal of Educational Technology 33(5): 553-572.
9. Gehringer, E. F. (2001). Electronic peer review and peer grading in computer-science courses. In Proceedings of the 32rd SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, 139-143, Charlotte, North Carolina.
10. IMSLD. (2003). "IMS Learning Design Specification." Retrieved September 15th, 2006, from http://www.imsglobal.org/learningdesign/index.cfm.
11. IMSQTI. (2006). "IMS Question and Test Interoperability Specification, Version 2.1." Retrieved September 15th, 2006, from http://www.imsglobal.org/question/index.html.
12. Kane, L.-. and E. E. Lawler III (1978). "Methods of peer assessment." Psychological Bulletin 85: 555-586.
13. Keppell, M., E. Au, et al. (2006). "Peer learning and learning-oriented assessment in technology-enhanced environments." Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 31(4): 453-464.
14. Kollar, I., F. Fischer, et al. (2005). Internal and external collaboration scripts in webbased science learning at schools. In: Proceedings of Computer Supported Collaborative Learning (CSCL2005): The Next 10 Years, 331-340, Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
15. Koper, E. J. R. (2001). "Modelling units of study from a pedagogical perspective: The pedagogical meta-model behind EML". Document prepared for the IMS Learning Design Working Group. Heerlen: Open Universiteit Nederland.
16. Koper, R. and B. Olivier (2004). "Representing the Learning Design of Units of Learning." Journal of Educational Technology & Society 7(3): 97-111.
17. Miao, Y. (2005). CoSMoS: Facilitating Learning Designers to Author Units of Learning Using IMS LD. In: Towards Sustainable and Scalable Educational Innovations Informed by the Learning Sciences, Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Computers in Education, 275-282, Singapore, IOS Press.
18. Miao, Y., K. Hoeksema, et al. (2005). CSCL Scripts: Modelling features and potential use. in: Proceedings of Computer Supported Collaborative Learning (CSCL2005): The Next 10 Years, 423-432, Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
19. Ngu, A. H. H., J. Shepherd, et al. (1995). "Engineering the 'Peers' system: the development of a computer-assisted approach to peer assessment." Research and Development in Higher Education 18: 582-587.
20. O'Donnell, A. M. and D. F. Dansereau (1992). Scripted cooperation in student dyads: A method for analyzing and enhancing academic learning and performance. Interaction in cooperative groups: The theoretical anatomy of group learning. R. Hertz-Lazarowitz and N. Miller. (Eds), 120-141, London: Cambridge University Press.
21. Orsmond, P. (2004). Self- and Peer-Assessment: Guidance on Practice in the Biosciences. In e. a. Maw. (Eds), Teaching Bioscience Enhancing Learning.
22. Pellegrino, J. W., N. Chudowsky, et al. (2001). Knowing what students know: the science and design of educational assessment. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
23. Pope, N. (2001). "An examination of the use of peer rating for formative assessment in the context of the theory of consumption values." Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 26(3): 235-246.
24. Rada, R., S. Acquah, et al. (1993). "Collaborative learning and the MUCH System." Computers and Education 20: 225-233.
25. Rushton, C., P. Ramsey, et al. (1993). "Peer assessment in a collaborative hypermedia environment: A case-study." Journal of Computer-Based Instruction 20: 75-80.
26. SLeD. (2004). "Service Based Learning Design System." from Website of the Service Based Learning Design System project: http://sled.open.ac.uk.
27. Sluijsmans, D. M. A., S. Brand-Gruwel, et al. (2004). "Training teachers in peer-assessment skills: effects on performance and perceptions." Innovations in Education & Teaching International 41(1): 60 - 79.
28. Somervell, H. (1993). "Issues in assessment, enterprise and higher education: the case for self-, peer and collaborative assessment." Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 18: 221-233.
29. TENCompetence. (2006). "TENCompetence Project Website." Retrieved November, 2006, from http://www.partners.tencompetence.org/.
30. Topping, K. J. (1998). "Peer assessment between students in colleges and universities." Review of Educational Research 68: 249-276.
31. Topping, K. J., E. F. Smith, et al. (2000). "Formative peer assessment of academic writing between postgraduate students." Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 25(2): 150-169.
32. Vogten, H. and H. Martens. (2004). "CopperCore." Retrieved 15 july, 2004, from http://www.coppercore.org.
33. Vogten, H., H. Martens, et al. (2006). CopperCore Service Integration - Integrating IMS Learning Design and IMS Question and Test Interoperability. In Proceedings of The 6th IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies, Kerkrade, The Netherlands, IEEE Computer Society.
34. Weaver, W. and H. W. Cotrell (1986). "Peer evaluation: a case study." Innovative Higher Education 11: 25-39.
35. Weinberger, A., F. Fischer, et al. (2004). Knowledge convergence in computer-mediated learning environments: Effects of collaboration scripts. Proceeddings of the 85th Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association (AERA), San Diego, CA, USA.
36. Weinberger, A., K. Stegmann, et al. (2005). Computer-supported collaborative learning in higher education: Scripts for argumentative knowledge construction in distributed groups. In: Proceedings of Computer Supported Collaborative Learning (CSCL2005): The Next 10 Years!, 717-726, Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.