Modeling assessment for re-use of traditional and new types of assessment

Computers in Human Behavior

Volumn 23, Issue 6, 2007, Pages 2721-2741

  Joosten ten Brinke, Desirée ^a   van Bruggen, Jan ^a   Hermans, Henry ^a   Burgers, Jan ^a   Giesbers, Bas ^a   Koper, Rob ^a   Latour, Ignace ^b  

^a OPEN UNIVERSITY OF THE NETHERLANDS   (Netherlands)

^b Cito group   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Assessment; Design; Exchange; Model

Indexed keywords

E-LEARNING; INFORMATION RETRIEVAL; KNOWLEDGE ACQUISITION; LEARNING SYSTEMS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; USER INTERFACES;

EXCHANGE INITIATIVES; PEER ASSESSMENT;

COMPUTER AIDED INSTRUCTION;

EID: 34249942866     PISSN: 07475632     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2006.08.009     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Almond, R. G., Steinberg, L., & Mislevy, R. J. (2001). A sample assessment using the four-process framework. CSE Report 543. Center for study of evaluation, University of California, Los Angeles. Retrieved November 15, 2005 from http://www.cse.ucla.edu/cresst/reports/tech543.pdf.
2. Almond, R. G., Steinberg, L., & Mislevy, R. J. (2003). A four-process architecture for assessment delivery, with connections to assessment design. CSE Report 616. Center for study of evaluation, University of California, Los Angeles.
3. Baartman, L. K. J., Bastiaens, T. J., & Kirschner, P. A. (2004). Requirements for Competency Assessment Programmes. Paper presented at the Onderwijs Research Dagen, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
4. Beshears, F. M. (2003). Open Standards and Open Source Development Strategies for e-Learning. Presentation for IS224 Strategic Computing and Communications Technology 10/2/2003, Educational Technology Services, UC Berkeley. Retrieved October 11, 2004 from http://ist-socrates.berkeley.edu/fmb/events/sakai-2004-01-12/IS224-2003-10-02.ppt.
5. Biggs J.B. Teaching for quality learning at university (1999), Society for Research in Higher Education & Open University Press, Buckingham
6. Birenbaum M. Assessment 2000: towards a pluralistic approach to assessment. In: Birenbaum M., and Dochy F.J.R.C. (Eds). Alternatives in assessment of achievements, learning processes and prior knowledge (1996), Kluwer Academic Publications 3-29
7. Boud D. Enhancing learning through self-assessment (1995), Kogan Page, London
8. Cizek G.J. Learning, achievement, and assessment: constructs at a crossroads. In: Phye G.D. (Ed). Handbook of classroom assessment: Learning, achievement, and adjustment (1997), Academic Press, San Diego 1-32
9. Dochy F., Segers M., and Sluijsmans D.M.A. The use of self-, peer-, and co-assessment in higher education: a review. Studies in Higher Education 24 (1999) 331-350
10. Epstein J., and Klinkenberg W.D. From Eliza to Internet: a brief history of computerized assessment. Computers in Human Behavior 17 (2001) 295-314
11. Gorissen, P. (2003). Quickscan QTI, De Digitale Universiteit, Utrecht Retrieved November 15, 2005 from http://www.digiuni.nl/digiuni//download/35303.del.306.pdf..
12. Hermans, H., Berg, van den, B., Vogten, H., Brouns, F., & Verhooren, M. (2002). Modelling test-interactions. Educational Technology Expertise Centre (OTEC). Open University of the Netherlands.
13. Hermans H., Manderveld J.M., and Vogten H. Educational modelling language. In: Jochems W., van Merriënboer J., and Koper R. (Eds). Integrated E-learning (2003), Kogan Page, London
14. IMS ePortfolio (2005). IMS ePortfolio Specification. Version 1.0. Final Specification. IMS Global Learning Consortium, Inc. Retrieved November 15, 2005 from http://www.imsglobal.org/ep/index.html.
15. IMS LD (2003). IMS Learning Design Specification. Version 1.0. Final Specification. IMS Global Learning Consortium, Inc. Retrieved March 22, 2005 from http://www.imsglobal.org/content/learningdesign/.
16. IMSLIP (2005). IMS Learner Information Package. Version 1.01. Final Specification IMS Global Learning Consortium Inc. Retrieved November 15, 2005 from http://www.imsglobal.org/profiles/.
17. IMS Question & Test Interoperability (2006). IMS Question & Test Interoperability. Version 2.1. Public Draft Specification. IMS Global Learning Consortium, Inc. Retrieved May 2, 2006 from http://www.imsglobal.org/question/index.cfm.
18. IMS Rubric (2005). IMS Rubric Specification. Version 1.0. Final Specification. IMS Global Learning Consortium, Inc. Retrieved November15, 2005 from http://www.imsglobal.org/ep/epv1p0pd/imsrubric_specv1p0pd.html.
19. Joosten-ten Brinke D., Gorissen P., and Latour I. Integrating assessment into e-learning courses. In: Koper E.J.R. (Ed). Learning design: A handbook on modelling and delivering networked education and training (2005), Springer-Verlag 185-202
20. Koper, E. J. R. (2001). Modelling units of study from a pedagogical perspective: the pedagogical meta model behind EML. Available from http://eml.ou.nl/introduction/docs/ped-metamodel.pdf.
21. Koper E.J.R., and van Es R. Modeling units of learning from a pedagogical perspective. In: McGreal R. (Ed). Online education using learning objects (open and flexible learning) (2004), RoutledgeFalmer, Canada
22. Miller, P. (June 2000). Interoperability. What is it and Why should I want it? Ariadne, 24. Retrieved March 10, 2004 from http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue24/interoperability/.
23. Mislevy, R., Steinberg, L. S., Breyer, F. J., Almond R. G., & Johnson, L. (1999). Making sense of data from complex assessments. Retrieved November 15, 2005 from http://www.education.umd.edu/edms/mislevy/papers/makingsense.pdf.
24. In: Pellegrino J.W., Chudowsky N., and Glaser R. (Eds). Knowing what students know: The science and design of educational assessment (2001), National Academy Press, Washington, DC
25. Sluijsmans D.M.A., Brand-Gruwel S., van Merriënboer J.J.G., and Martens R.L. Training teachers in peer-assessment skills: effects on performance and perceptions. Innovations in Education & Teaching International 41 1 (2004) 60-79
26. Stiggins R.J. Het ontwerpen en ontwikkelen van performance-assessment toetsen. [Design and development of performance assessments]. In: Kessels J.W.M., and Smit C.A. (Eds). Opleiders in organisaties/Capita Selecta (1992), Kluwer, Deventer 75-91 (afl. 10)
27. Van Zutven G., Polderdijk M., and De Volder M. Handboek Toetsplanontwikkeling in competentiegericht onderwijs. [Handbook assessment development in competency-based education] (2004), Digitale Universiteit, Utrecht
28. Warmer J., and Kleppe A. Praktisch UML. second ed. [Practical UML] (2001), Addison Wesley Longman Nederland BV, Amsterdam (Original work published 1999)
29. Williamson, D. M., Bauer, M., Mislevy, R. J., & Behrens, J. T. (2003). An ECD approach to designing for reusability in innovative assessment, unpublished work. Retrieved September 29, 2003, from http://www.ets.org/research/dload/aera03-williamson.pdf.