Representing the learning design of units of learning

Educational Technology and Society

Volumn 7, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 97-111

  Koper, Rob ^a   Olivier, Bill ^b  

^a OPEN UNIVERSITY OF THE NETHERLANDS   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BOLTON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Educational Modelling; Learning Design; Learning Objects; Open Specifications Standards

Indexed keywords

EID: 4644351378     PISSN: 14364522     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (40)

1. ADL (2003). SCORM, Retrieved July 19, 2004 from http://www.adlnet.org/.
2. Bransford, J., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (2000). How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, and School (expanded edition), Washington: National Academy Press.
3. Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989) Situated Cognition and the Culture of Learning. Educational Researcher, 18 (1), 32-42.
4. Brouns, F. (2003). Editing IMS Learning Design. OTEC TD Report, Heerlen: Open Universiteit Nederland, Retrieved July 19, 2004 from http:// learningnetworks.org/forums/attachment.php?s=&postid=220.
5. CopperCore (2004). Open Source IMS Learning Design Engine (software), Retrieved July 19, 2004 from http://sourceforge.net/projects/coppercore.
6. DC (2003). Dublin Core Metadata Website, Retrieved July 19, 2004 from http://dublincore.org.
7. DOCB (2003). DOCBOOK Website, Retrieved July 19, 2004 from http://www.docbook.org.
8. Doorten, M., Giesbers, B., Janssen, J., Daniëls, J, & Koper, E. J. R. (in press). Transforming existing content into reusable 'LOs'. In R. McGreal (Ed.), Accessible education using learning objects, London: RoutledgeFalmer.
9. Duffy, Th. M., & Cunningham, D. J. (1996). Constructivism: implications for the design and delivery of instruction. In D.H. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of Research for Educational Communications and Technology (pp. 170-198), New York: Macmillan.
10. Duncan, C. (2003). Granularisation. In A. Littlejohn (Ed.), Reusing Online Resources: A Sustainable Approach to eLearning (pp. 12-19), London: Kogan Page.
11. EML (2000). Educational Modelling Language Website, Retrieved July 19, 2004 from http://eml.ou.nl.
12. ERIC (2003). ASK ERIC Lesson Plans Website, Retrieved July 19, 2004 from http://www.eduref.org/Virtual/Lessons/index.shtml.
13. Gagné, R. M., & Briggs, L. J. (1979). Principles of instructional design (2e Ed.), Fort Worth , TX : HBJ College Publishers.
14. Greeno, J. G., Collins, A. M., & Resnick, L. B. (1996). Cognition and Learning. In D. C. Berliner & R. C. Calfee (Eds.), Handbook of Educational Psychology 9pp. 15-46), New York: Simon & Schuster Macmillan.
15. Hermans, H., Manderveld, J. M., & Vogten, H. (2004). Educational modelling language. In W. Jochems, J. van Merriënboer, & R. Koper (Eds.), Integrated E-learning (pp. 80-99), London: RoutledgeFalmer.
16. van den Hooff, B., Elving, W., Meeuwsen, J. M., & Dumoulin, C. (2003). Knowledge Sharing in Knowledge Communities. In M. Huysman, E. Wenger & V. Wulf (Eds.), Communities and Technologies (pp. 119-142), Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
17. Howell, S. L., Williams, P. B., & Lindsay, N. K. (2003). Thirty-two Trends Affecting Distance Education: An Informed Foundation for Strategic Planning, Retrieved July 19, 2004 from http://www.westga.edu/~distance/ojdla/ fall63/howell63.html.
18. IMSLD (2003). IMS Learning Design. Information Model, Best Practice and Implementation Guide, Binding document, Schemas, Retrieved July 19, 2004 from http://www.imsglobal.org/learningdesign/index.cfm.
19. IMSLIP (2003). IMS Learner Information Package. Information Model, Best Practice and Implementation Guide, Binding document, Schemas, Retrieved July 19, 2004 from http://www.imsglobal.org/profiles/index.cfm.
20. IMSLOM (2003). IMS-LOM Metadata. Binding document, Schemas, Retrieved July 19, 2004 from http://www.imsglobal.org/metadata/index.cfm.
21. IMSQTI (2003). IMS Question and Test Interoperability. Information Model, Best Practice and Implementation Guide, Binding document, Schemas, Retrieved July 19, 2004 from http://www.imsglobal.org/question/index.cfm.
22. Koper, E. J. R., & Manderveld, J. M. (in press). Modelling reusable, interoperable, rich and personalised units of learning. British Journal of Educational Technology.
23. Koper, E. J. R. (2001). Modelling Units of Study from a Pedagogical Perspective: the pedagogical metamodel behind EML, Heerlen: Open Universiteit Nederland, Retrieved July 19, 2004 from http://eml.ou.nl/introduction/docs/ped- metamodel.pdf.
24. Koper, E. J. R. (2003). Combining re-usable learning resources and services to pedagogical purposeful units of learning. In A. Littlejohn (Ed.), Reusing Online Resources: A Sustainable Approach to eLearning (pp. 46-59), London: Kogan Page.
25. Koper, R., & van Es, R. (in press). Modeling units of learning from a pedagogical perspective. In R. McGreal (Ed.), Online education using learning objects, London: RoutledgeFalmer.
26. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: legitimate peripheral participation, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
27. Merrill, M. D. (1994). Instructional Design Theory, Englewood Cliffs: Educational Technology Publications.
28. Merrill, M.D. (2003). First Principles of Instruction, Retrieved July 19, 2004 from http://www1.moe.edu.sg/itopia/download/abstracts/Applying%20First Principles of Instruction to Technology-Based Education.pdf.
29. Olivier, W., & Liber, O. (2003). Learning Technology Interoperability Standards. In A. Littlejohn (Ed.), Reusing Online Resources: A Sustainable Approach to eLearning (pp. 146-155), London: Kogan Page.
30. Paas, F, & Firssova, O. (2004). Usability evaluation of integrated e-learning. In W. Jochems, J. van Merriënboer, & R. Koper (Eds), Integrated E-learning (pp. 112-125), London: RoutledgeFalmer.
31. Park, J. (2003). Topic Maps, the Semantic Web and Education. In J. Park (Ed.), XML Topic Maps: Creating and Using Topic Maps for the Web (pp. 507-529), Boston: Addison-Wesley.
32. Pedagogical Patterns Project (2003). Retrieved July 19, 2004 from http://www.pedagogicalpatterns.org/.
33. Reigeluth, C. M. (1999). What is Instructional-Design Theory and How is it Changing? In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional-Design Theories and Models: a New Paradigm of Instructional Theory (Vol. II) (pp. 5-29), Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.
34. Reigeluth, C. M. (1983). Instructional design theories and models: an overview of their current status, Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
35. Retallick, J., Cocklin, B., & Coombe, K. (1999). Learning Communities in Education, London: Routledge.
36. nd Ed.), Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill, Prentice Hall.
37. Ryder, M. (2003) Instructional Design Models, Retrieved July 19, 2004 from http://carbon.cudenver.edu/~mryder/itc_data/idmodels.html#prescriptive.
38. Van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (1997). Training Complex Cognitive Skills: a four component instructional design model for technical training, Englewood Cliffs: Educational Technology Publications.
39. Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning and Identity, New York: Cambridge University Press.
40. Wiley, D. (2002). The Instructional Use of Learning Objects, Retrieved July 19, 2004 from http://www.reusability.org/read/.