Government centrality to university-industry interactions: University research centers and the industry involvement of academic researchers

Research Policy

Volumn 38, Issue 10, 2009, Pages 1505-1516

  Boardman, P Craig ^a  

^a OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Institutional theory; Research collaboration; Resource based view; University research centers; University industry interactions

Indexed keywords

INSTITUTIONAL THEORY; RESEARCH COLLABORATION; RESOURCE-BASED VIEW; UNIVERSITY RESEARCH CENTERS; UNIVERSITY-INDUSTRY INTERACTIONS;

INDUSTRY; PRIVATIZATION; SOCIETIES AND INSTITUTIONS;

RESEARCH;

EID: 70350576591     PISSN: 00487333     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2009.09.008     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Aldrich H.E. Technology and organizational structure: a reexamination of the findings of the Aston Group. Administrative Science Quarterly 17 (1971) 26-43
2. Argyris C. The Applicability of Organizational Sociology (1972), Cambridge University Press, London
3. Barney J. Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management 17 1 (1991) 99-120
4. Bhattacharya S., and Arora P. Industrial linkages in Indian universities: what they reveal and what they imply. Scientometrics 70 2 (2007) 277-300
5. Bercovitz, J., Feldman, M., 2003. Technology transfer and the academic department: who participates and why? Paper presentation at the DRUID Summer Conference, Copenhagen, Denmark.
6. Block, F., Miller, M.R., 2008. Where do innovations come from? Transformations in the U.S. national innovation system, 1970-2006. Retrieved January 2009 from http://www.itif.org/index.php?s=policy_issues&c=Science-and-R38D-Policy.
7. Boardman C., and Bozeman B. Role strain in university research centers. The Journal of Higher Education 78 4 (2007) 430-463
8. Boardman C., and Corley E. University research centers and the composition of research collaborations. Research Policy 37 (2008) 900-913
9. Boardman C., and Ponomariov B. Reward systems and NSF university research centers: the impact of tenure on university scientists' valuation of applied and commercially-relevant research. The Journal of Higher Education 78 1 (2007) 51-70
10. Box S., and Cotgrove S. Scientific identity, occupational selection and role strain. British Journal of Sociology 17 (1966) 20-28
11. Bozeman B. Technology transfer and public policy: a review of research and theory. Research Policy 29 (2000) 627-655
12. Bozeman, B., Boardman C., 2003. Managing the New Multipurpose, Multidiscipline University Research Center: Institutional Innovation in the Academic Community. Washington, D.C.: IBM Endowment for the Business of Government, http://www.businessofgovernment.org/pdfs/Bozeman_Boardman_report.pdf.
13. Bozeman B., and Boardman C. The NSF Engineering Research Centers and the University-Industry Research Revolution. The Journal of Technology Transfer 29 3-4 (2004) 365-375
14. Bozeman B., and Corley E. Scientists' collaboration strategies: implications for scientific and technical human capital. Research Policy 33 (2004) 599-616
15. Bozeman B., Dietz J., and Gaughan M. Scientific and technical human capital: an alternative model for research evaluation. International Journal of Technology Management 22 7/8 (2001) 636-655
16. Bozeman B., and Gaughan M. Impacts of grants and contracts on academic researchers' interactions with industry. Research Policy 36 (2007) 694-707
17. Bozeman B., and Rogers J. A churn model of scientific knowledge value: internet researchers as a knowledge value collective. Research Policy 31 5 (2001) 769-794
18. Carnegie Foundation, 2005. 2005 Carnegie Classifications Initial Release. Viewed online (http://www.carnegieclassification-preview.org/pdf/cc2005.pdf) on April 24, 2006.
19. Clark B.R. Creating Entrepreneurial Universities: Organisational Pathways of Transformation (1998), Pergamon/Elsevier Science, Oxford
20. Corley E., and Gaughan M. Scientists' participation in university research centers: what are the gender differences?. Journal of Technology Transfer 30 4 (2005) 371-381
21. Davenport S. Panic and panacea: brain drain and science and technology human capital policy. Research Policy 33 4 (2004) 617-630
22. Dietz J.S., and Bozeman B. Academic careers, patents, and productivity: industry experience as scientific and technical human capital. Research Policy 34 3 (2005) 349-367
23. Dillman D.A. Mail and Internet surveys-The tailored design method (2000), John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York
24. DiMaggio P.J., and Powell W.W. The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis (1991), University of Chicago, Chicago
25. Etzkowitz H. The norms of entrepreneurial science: cognitive effects of the new university-industry linkages. Research Policy 27 2 (1998) 109-123
26. Etzkowitz H., and Leydesdorff L. The endless transition: a "triple helix" of university-industry-government relations. Minerva 36 (1998) 203-208
27. Etzkowitz H., and Leydesdorff L. The dynamics of innovation: from National Systems and "Mode 2" to a Triple Helix of university-industry- government relations. Research Policy 29 2 (2000) 109-123
28. Feller I., Ailes C.P., and Roessner J.D. Impacts of research universities on technological innovation in industry: evidence from engineering research centers. Research Policy 31 (2002) 457-474
29. Florida R. The role of the university: leveraging talent, not technology. Issues in Science and Technology 15 4 (1999) 67-73
30. Gaughan M., and Robin S. National science training policy and early scientific careers in France and the United States. Research Policy 33 4 (2004) 569-581
31. Geiger R.L. Organized research units: their role in the development of university research. The Journal of Higher Education 61 1 (1990) 1-19
32. Grant R.M. Prospering in dynamically-competitive environments: organizational capability as knowledge integration. Organization Science 7 4 (1996) 375-387
33. Gray D., Lindblad M., and Rudolph J. Industry-university research centers: a multivariate analysis of member retention. The Journal of Technology Transfer 26 3 (2001) 247-254
34. Hall R.H., and Tolbert P.S. Organizations: Structures, Processes and Outcomes. 9th edn. (2005), Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey
35. Ikenberry S.O., and Friedman R.C. Beyond Academic Departments (1972), Jossey-Bass, London
36. Lal B., Boardman P.C., Deshmukh-Towery N., and Link J. Designing the Future Generation of NSF Engineering Research Centers: Insights from Worldwide Practice (2007), Science and Technology Policy Institute, Washington, D.C.
37. Lee S., and Bozeman B. The effects of scientific collaboration on productivity. Social Studies of Science 35 5 (2005) 673-702
38. Lin M., and Bozeman B. Researchers' industry experience and productivity in university-industry research centers: a 'scientific and technical human capital' explanation. Journal of Technology Transfer 31 2 (2006) 269-290
39. Long J.S., and McGinnis R. Organizational context and scientific productivity. American Sociological Review 46 (1981) 422-442
40. Melin G. Pragmatism and self-organization-research collaboration on the individual level. Research Policy 29 1 (2000) 31-40
41. Merton R. The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations (1973), University of Chicago Press, Chicago
42. Mowery D.C., and Ziedonis A.A. Academic patent quality and quantity before and after the Bayh-Dole act in the United States. Research Policy 31 3 (2002) 399-418
43. National Academy of Sciences. Rising Above the Gathering Storm: Energizing and Employing America for a Brighter Economic Future (2007), National Academies Press, Washington, D.C.
44. Owen-Smith J. From separate systems to a hybrid order: accumulative advantage across public and private science at research one universities. Research Policy 32 6 (2003) 1081-1104
45. Payne A.A., and Silow A. Does federal research funding increase university research output?. Advances in Economic Analysis & Policy 3 (2003) 1-24
46. Ponomariov B. Effects of university characteristics on scientists' interactions with the private sector: an exploratory assessment. Journal of Technology Transfer 33 5 (2008) 1573-7047
47. Rusclo K.P. The changing context of academic science: university-industry relations in biotechnology and the public policy implications. Policy Studies Review 4 2 (1984) 259-275
48. Sampat B.N., and Nelson R.R. The emergence and standardization of university technology transfer offices: a case study of institutional change. In: Paul Ingram, and Brian Silverman (Eds). The New Institutionalism in Strategic Management vol. 19 (2002), JAI Press
49. Santoro M.D., and Chakrabarti A.K. Firm size and technology centrality in industry-university interactions. Research Policy 31 (2002) 1163-1180
50. Schartinger D., Rammer C., Fischer M.M., and Frohlich J. Knowledge interactions between universities and industry in Austria: sectoral patterns and determinants. Research Policy 31 (2002) 303-328
51. Slaughter S., and Rhoades G. Academic Capitalism and the New Economy (2004), Johns Hopkins University Press
52. Slaughter S., Campbell T., Folleman M.H., and Morgan E. The 'traffic' in graduate students: graduate students as tokens of exchange between academe and industry. Science Technology and Human Values 27 2 (2002) 282-313
53. Stahler G.J., and Tash W.R. Centers and institutes in the research university: issues, problems, and prospects. The Journal of Higher Education 65 5 (1994) 540-554
54. Tijssen R.J.W. Universities and industrially relevant science: towards measurement models and indicators of entrepreneurial orientation. Research Policy 35 (2006) 1569-1585
55. Turk-Bicakci L., and Brint S. University-industry collaboration: patterns of growth for low- and middle-level performers. Higher Education 49 1-2 (2005) 61-89
56. Van Rijnsoever F.J., Hessels L.K., and Vandeberg R.L.J. A resource-based view on the interactions of university researchers. Research Policy 37 (2008) 1255-1266
57. Youtie J., Libaers D., and Bozeman B. Institutionalization of university research centers: the case of the National Cooperative Program in Infertility Research. Technovation 26 9 (2006) 1055-1063
58. Zajkowski M.E. Institutional structure and the Australian research director: a qualitative study. Journal of Higher Education 25 2 (2003) 203-212