Universities and industrially relevant science: Towards measurement models and indicators of entrepreneurial orientation

Research Policy

Volumn 35, Issue 10, 2006, Pages 1569-1585

  Tijssen, Robert J W ^a  

^a LEIDEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Knowledge spillovers; Research performance indicators; Stage model; University entrepreneurial orientation; University industry linkages

Indexed keywords

INDUSTRIAL MANAGEMENT; KNOWLEDGE ENGINEERING; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; PUBLIC POLICY; RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT MANAGEMENT;

KNOWLEDGE SPILLOVERS; RESEARCH PERFORMANCE INDICATORS; STAGE MODEL; UNIVERSITY ENTREPRENEURIAL ORIENTATION; UNIVERSITY-INDUSTRY LINKAGES;

SOCIETIES AND INSTITUTIONS;

EID: 33751210641     PISSN: 00487333     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2006.09.025     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Adams J.D. Fundamental stocks of knowledge and productivity growth. Journal of Political Economy 98 (1990) 673-702
2. Bercovitz J.M., Feldman I.F., and Burton R. Organizational structure as determinants of academic patent and licensing behavior: an exploratory study of Duke John Hopkins and Penn State Universities. The Journal of Technology Transfer 26 (1990) 21-35
3. Branscomb L.M., Kodama F., and Florida R. Industrializing Knowledge: University-Industry Linkages in Japan and the United States (1999), MIT Press, London, UK
4. Cesaroni F., Conti G., Piccalunga A., and Moscara P. Technology Transfer Offices (TTO) in Italian universities: what do they do and how they do it. Paper presented at the Fifth Triple Helix Conference. Turin, Italy (2005) 18-21
5. Chiesa V., and Piccaluga A. Exploitation and diffusion of public research: the case of academic spin-off companies in Italy. R&D Management 30 (2000) 329-339
6. Clark B.R. Creating Entrepreneurial Universities: Organisational Pathways of Transformation (1998), Pergamon/Elsevier Science, Oxford
7. Clark B.R. Sustaining Change in Universities: Continuities in Case Studies and Concepts (2004), Open University Press, Berkshire, England
8. Clarysse B., and Moray N. A process study of entrepreneurial team formation: the case of a research-based spin-off. Journal of Business Venturing 19 (2004) 55-79
9. Dasgupta P., and David P. Toward a new economics of science. Research Policy 23 (1994) 487-521
10. Etzkowitz H. The norms of entrepreneurial science: cognitive effects of the new university-industry linkage. Research Policy 27 (1998) 823-833
11. Etzkowitz H. MIT and the Rise of Entrepreneurial Science (2002), Routledge Press, London, UK
12. Etzkowitz H. Research groups as 'quasi-firms': the invention of the entrepreneurial university. Research Policy 32 (2003) 109-121
13. European Commission, 2004. Technology Transfer Institutions in Europe: An Overview 2004. Report by inno AG, Logotech-Innovation and Development and Angle Technology Limited for EC/DG Enterprise.
14. Feldman M., Feller I., Bercovitz J., and Burton R. Equity and the technology transfer strategies of American research universities. Management Science 48 (2002) 105-121
15. Glassman A.M., Moore R.W., Rossy G.L., Neupert K., Napier N.K., Jones D.E., and Harvey M. Academic entrepreneurship-views on balancing the Acropolis and the Agora. Journal of Management Inquiry 12 (2003) 353-374
16. Godin B. Research and the practice of publication in industries. Research Policy 25 (1996) 587-606
17. Goldfarb B., and Henrekson M. Bottom-up versus top-down policies towards the commercialization of university intellectual property. Research Policy 32 (2003) 639-658
18. Jaffe A. Real effects of academic research. American Economic Review 79 (1989) 957-970
19. Klofsten M., and Jones-Evans D. Comparing academic entrepreneurship in Europe-the case of Sweden and Ireland. Small Business Economics 14 (2000) 299-309
20. Lee Y.S. Technology transfer and the research university: a search for the boundaries of the university-industry collaboration. Research Policy 25 (1996) 843-863
21. Lehrer M., and Asakawa K. Pushing scientists into the marketplace: promoting science entrepreneurship. California Management Review 46 (2004) 55-76
22. Link A., Scott J., and Siegel D. The economics of intellectual property at universities. International Journal of Industrial Organization 21 (2003) 1217-1225
23. Lockett A., Siegel D., Wright M., and Ensley M. The creation of spin-off firms at public research institutions: managerial and policy implications. Research Policy 34 (2005) 981-993
24. Meyer M. Academic entrepreneurs or entrepreneurial academics? Research-based ventures and public support mechanism. R&D Management 33 (2003) 107-115
25. Molas-Gallart, J., Salter, A., Patel, P., Scott, A., Duran, X., 2002. Measuring Third Stream activities. SPRU report to the Russell Group of Universities, University of Sussex.
26. Mowery D., and Ziedonis A. Academic patent quality and quantity before and after the Bayh-Dole act in the United States. Research Policy 31 3 (2002) 399-419
27. Narin F., Hamilton K.S., and Olivastro D. The increasing linkage between US technology and public science. Research Policy 26 (1997) 317-330
28. Nature (editorial). Is the university-industrial complex out of control?. Nature 409 (2001) 119
29. Ndonzuau F.N., Pirnay F., and Surlemont B. A stage model of academic spin-off creation. Technovation 22 (2002) 281-289
30. Noyons, E.C.M., Buter, R.K., Van Raan, A.F.J., Schmoch, U., Heinze, T., Hinze, S., Rangnow, R., 2003. Mapping excellence in science and technology across Europe-Life Science: Nanoscience and nanotechnology. CWTS/FhG-ISI reports for the European Commission/DG Research.
31. OECD. Benchmarking Industry-Science Relationships (2002), Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development, Paris
32. Polt, W., Benchmarking industry science relations: the role of framework conditions. Final report prepared for EC/DG Enterprise.
33. Powers J.B. R&D funding sources and university technology transfer: what is stimulating universities to be more entrepreneurial?. Research in Higher Education 45 (2004) 1-23
34. Powers J.B., and McDougall P.P. University start-up formation and technology licensing with firms that go public: a resource-based view of academic entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing 20 (2005) 291-311
35. Rosenberg N. Why do firms do basic research with their own money?. Research Policy 19 (1990) 165-174
36. Siegel D., Waldman D., and Link A. Assessing the impact of organizational practices on the productivity of university technology transfer offices: an exploratory study. Research Policy 32 (2003) 27-48
37. Tijssen R.J.W., Buter R.K., and Van Leeuwen Th.N. Technological relevance of science: validation and analysis of citation linkages between patents and research papers. Scientometrics 47 (2000) 389-412
38. Tijssen R.J.W. Global and domestic utilization of industrial relevant science: patent citation analysis of science/technology interactions and knowledge spill-overs. Research Policy 30 (2001) 35-54
39. Tijssen R.J.W. Is the commercialisation of scientific research affecting the production of public knowledge? Global trends in the output of corporate research articles. Research Policy 33 (2004) 709-733
40. Tijssen R.J.W. Measuring and evaluating science-technology interactions: towards international statistics. In: Moed H., Glänzel W., and Schmoch U. (Eds). Handbook of Quantitative Science and Technology Research: The Use of Publication and Patent Statistics in Studies on S&T Systems (2004), Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht 695-716
41. Tijssen R.J.W., and Van Leeuwen T.N. Measuring impacts of academic science on industrial research: a citation-based approach. Scientometrics 66 (2006) 55-69
42. Tijssen, R.J.W., Van Looy, B., 2005. European science in industrial relevant research areas: development of an indicator-based bibliometric methodology for performance analyses of countries and research organizations. Summary report for the European Commission (DG Research) produced by the Centre for Science and Technology Studies, Leiden (CWTS) and International Centre for Studies in Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management, Leuven (INCENTIM).
43. Van Looy B., Callaert J., Debackere K., and Verbeek A. Patent related indicators for assessing knowledge-generation institutions: towards a contextualised approach. The Journal of Technology Transfer 28 (2003) 53-61
44. Van Looy B., Ranga M., Callaert J., Debackere K., and Zimmermann E. Combining entrepreneurial and scientific performance in academia: towards a compounded and reciprocal Matthew-effect. Research Policy 33 (2004) 425-441