University-industry collaboration: Patterns of growth for low- and middle-level performers

Higher Education

Volumn 49, Issue 1-2, 2005, Pages 61-89

  Turk Bicakci, Lori ^a   Brint, Steven ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Industry expenditures; Licensing activity; University industry collaboration

Indexed keywords

EID: 17544369607     PISSN: 00181560     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10734-004-2914-6     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Association of University Technology Managers (2000). AUTM Survey 2000. Washington, DC: AUTM.
2. Cooper, T. and Novitch, M. (1992). 'The research needs of industry: Working with academia and the federal government,' in Porter, R. J. and Malone, T. E. (eds.), Biomedical Research. Collaboration and Conflict of Interest. Baltimore MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press, pp. 187-198.
3. Cote, L. S. and Cote, M. K. (1993). 'Economic development activity among land-grant institutions,' Journal of Higher Education 64, 55-74.
4. Croissant, J. and Restivo, S. (2001), 'Introduction,' in Croissant, J. and Restivo, S. (eds.), Degrees of Compromise. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press, pp. xii-xix.
5. Dustira, A. (1992). 'The funding of basic and clinical biomedical research: The research needs of industry: Working with academia and the federal government,' in Porter, R. J. and Malone, T. E. (eds.), Biomedical Research: Collaboration and Conflict of Interest. Baltimore MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press, pp. 33-56.
6. Etzkowitz, H. and Stevens, A. (1998). 'Inching toward industrial policy: The university's role in government initiatives to assist small, innovative companies in the United States,' in Etzkowitz, H., Webster, A. and Healey, P. (eds.), Capitalizing Knowledge: New Intersections of Industry and Academia. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press, pp. 215-38.
7. Fairweather, J. S. (1988). Entrepreneurship and Higher Education. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report, no. 6. Association for the Study of Higher Education, Washington, DC: ASHE.
8. Feller, I. (1997). 'Technology Transfer from Universities,' in Smart, J. C. (ed.), Handbook of Theory and Research, vol. XII. New York: Agathon Press, pp. 1-42.
9. Geiger, R. L. (1993). Research and Relevant Knowledge. New York: Oxford University Press.
10. Geiger, R. (2004). Knowledge and Money: Universities and the Paradox of the Market-place. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
11. Gill, J. (2002). Generalized Linear Models: A Unified Approach. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publishers. Sage University Paper Series on Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences, 07-134.
12. Goldberger, M. L., Maher, B. A. and Flattau, P. E. (eds.), (1995). Research-Doctorate Programs in the United States. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
13. Graff, G., Herman, A. and Zilberman, D. (2002). 'University research and offices of technology transfer,' California Management Review 45. 88-115.
14. Hackett, E. (2001). 'Organizational perspectives on university-industry research relations,' in Croissant, J. and Restivo, S. (eds.), Degrees of Compromise. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press, pp. 1-19.
15. Hox, J. J. (2002). Multilevel Analysis: Techniques and Applications. Mahway, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
16. Leydesdorff, L. and Etzkowitz, H. (1997). 'A triple helix of university-industry Government Relations,' in Etzkowitz, H. and Leydesdorff, L. (eds.), Universities and the Global Knowledge Economy: A Triple Helix of University-Industry-Government Relations. Washington: Pinter Press, pp. 155-62.
17. Louis, K. S. and Anderson, M. (1998). 'The changing context of science and university-industry relations,' in Etzkowitz, H., Webster, A. and Healey, P. (eds.), Capitalizing Knowledge. New Intersections of Industry and Academia. Albany, NY: State University of New Yark Press, pp. 70-93.
18. Malone, T. E. (1992). 'The moral imperative for biomedical research,' in Porter, R. J. and Malone, T. E. (eds.), Biomedical Research: Collaboration and Conflict of Interest. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press, pp. 3-32.
19. Mansfield, E. (1995). 'Academic research underlying industrial innovations: Sources, characteristics, and financing,' The Review of Economics and Statistics 54, 55-65.
20. Milken Institute. (1999). 'America's High Technology Economy,' (http://www.milkeninstitute.org.)
21. National Center for Education Statistics (2000). Integrated Post-Secondary Education Statistics. Washington, DC: NCES.
22. National Science Board (2002). Science and Engineering Indicators 2002. Washington, DC: National Science Foundation.
23. Nevins, A. (1962). The State Universities and Democracy. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.
24. Owen-Smith, J. (2001). 'New arenas for university competition: Accumulative advantage in academic patenting,' in Croissant, J. and Restivo, S. (eds.), Degrees of Compromise. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press, pp. 24-51.
25. Ppwell, W. W. and Owen-Smith, J. (1998). 'Universities and the market for intellectual property in the life sciences,' Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 17, 253-277.
26. Powell, W. W. and Owen-Smith, J. (2002). 'The new world of knowledge production in the life sciences,' in Brint, S. (ed.), 'The Future of the City of Intellect. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, pp. 107-130.
27. Rhoades, G. and Slaughter, S. (1991). 'Professors, administrators, and patents: The negotiation of technology transfer,' Sociology of Education 64, 65-77.
28. Slaughter, S. (1990). The Higher Learning and High Technology: The Dynamics of Higher Education Policy Formation. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
29. Slaughter, S. (1993). 'Beyond basic science: Research university presidents' narratives of science policy,' Science, Technology and Human Values 18, 278-302.
30. Slaughter, S. and Leslie, L. L. (1997). Academic Capitalism: Politics, Policies and the Entrepreneurial University. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
31. Slaughter, S. and Rhoades, G. (1996). 'The emergence of a competitiveness research and development policy coalition and the commercialization of academic science,' Science, Technology, and Human Values 21, 303-339.
32. Tolbert, P. (1985). 'Institutional environments and resource dependence: Sources of administrative structure in institutions of higher education,' Administrative Sciences Quarterly 30, 1-13.
33. Tornquist, K. M. and Kallsen, L. A. (1994). 'Out of the ivory tower: Characteristics of institutions meeting the research needs of industry,' Journal of Higher Education 65, 523-539.
34. Waugaman, P. G. and Porter, R. J. (1992). 'Mechanisms of interaction between industry and the academic medical center,' in Porter, R. J. and Malone, T. E. (eds.), Biomedical Research. Collaboration and Conflict of Interest. Baltimore MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press, pp. 93-118.
35. Webster, A. (1998). 'Strategic research alliances: Testing the collaborative limits,' in Etzkowitz, H., Webster, A. and Healey, P. (eds.). Capitalizing Knowledge: New Intersections of Industry and Academia. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press, pp. 22-44.
36. Webster, A. and Packer, K. (1997). 'When worlds collide: Patents in public sector research', in Etzkowitz, H. and Leydesdorff, L. (eds.), Universities and the Global Knowledge Economy: A Triple Helix of University-Industry-Government Relations. Washington: Pinter Press, pp. 47-59.