Institutionalization of university research centers: The case of the National Cooperative Program in Infertility Research

Technovation

Volumn 26, Issue 9, 2006, Pages 1055-1063

  Youtie, Jan ^a   Libaers, Dirk ^a   Bozeman, Barry ^a  

^a GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

Research center; Research management

Indexed keywords

INDUSTRIAL RESEARCH; OPTIMIZATION; PERSONNEL TRAINING; PUBLIC WORKS; STRATEGIC PLANNING;

INSTITUTIONALIZATION; NATIONAL COOPERATIVE PROGRAM IN INFERTILITY RESEARCH (NCPIR); RESEARCH CENTER; RESEARCH MANAGEMENT;

SOCIETIES AND INSTITUTIONS;

EID: 33745922064     PISSN: 01664972     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.technovation.2005.11.007     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. In: Bechtel W. (Ed). Integrating Scientific Disciplines (1986), Martinus Nijhoff, Dordrecht
2. Bozeman B., and Boardman C. Managing the New Multipurpose, Multidiscipline University Research Centers: Institutional Innovation and Academic Research (2003), IBM Endowment for the Business of Government, Washington, DC
3. Bozeman B., and Rogers J. A churn model of scientific knowledge value: internet researchers as a knowledge value collective. Research Policy 31 (2002) 769-794
4. Croisier B. The governance of external research: empirical test of some transaction-cost related factors. R & D Management 28 4 (1998) 289-298
5. DeSolla Price J. Little Science, Big Science (1963), Columbia University Press, New York
6. Frängsmyr, T. (Ed.), 1990. Solomon's House Revisited: The Organization and Institutionalization of Science, Nobel Symposium 75: Science History Publications & Nobel Foundation, Canton, MA.
7. Germain P. Some characteristics of scientific disciplines and scope of science. Etudes Philosophiques (2) (1978) 157-170
8. Gieryn T., and Merton R. The sociological study of scientific specialties. Social Studies of Science 8 2 (1978) 257-261
9. Gulati R. Does familiarity breed trust? The implications of repeated ties for contractual choice in alliances. Academy of Management Journal 38 1 (1995) 85-113
10. Hagedoorn J., Link A., and Vonortas N. Research partnerships. Research Policy 29 (2000) 567-586
11. Holmstrom B., and Milgrom P. Multi-task principal-agent analysis. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 7 (1991) 24-52
12. Hull D. The success of science and social norms. History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 23 34 (2001) 340-361
13. Kogut B. Joint ventures: theoretical and empirical perspectives. Strategic Management Journal 9 (1988) 319-332
14. Krige J. Some socio-historical aspects of multinational collaborations in high energy physics at CERN between 1975 and 1985. In: Crawford E. (Ed). Denationalizing Science: The Contexts of International Scientific Practice (1993), Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht 233-262
15. Lemaine, G., Macleod, R., Mulkay, M., Weingart, P., 1976. Perspectives on the Emergence of Scientific Disciplines. Mouton, The Hague and Paris, Aldine, Chicago.
16. Lenoir T. The Cultural Production of Scientific Disciplines Stanford (1997), Stanford University Press, California
17. Link A. Strategies for cooperation in R&D. In: Halil K., and Bayraktar T. (Eds). Management of Technology (1990), Institute of Industrial Engineering, Miami 335-343
18. Link A., Paton D., and Siegel D. An analysis of policy initiatives to promote strategic research partnerships. Research Policy 31 8-9 (2002) 1459-1466
19. Lodahl J., and Gordon G. Structure of scientific fields and functioning of university graduate departments. American Sociological Review 37 1 (1972) 57-81
20. Mason R. Role of management in science. Public Administration Review 39 2 (1979) 112-116
21. Mullins N. Development of scientific disciplines internal and external origins of change. Sociologie et Societies 7 1 (1975) 133-142
22. Olson G., and Olson J. Mitigating the effects of distance on collaborative intellectual work. Economics of Innovation and New Technology 12 1 (2002) 27-42
23. Polodny J., and Page K. Network forms of organization. Annual Review of Sociology 24 (1998) 57-76
24. Rogers J., and Bozeman B. Knowledge value alliances: an alternative to the R&D project focus in evaluation. Science, Technology and Human Values 26 1 (2001)
25. Santoro M., and Saparito P. The Firm's trust in its university partner as a key mediator in advancing knowledge and new technologies. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 50 3 (2003) 362-373
26. Shangraw R., and Crow M. Public administration as a design science. Public Administration Review 49 2 (1989) 153-158
27. Tosi H., Katz J., and Mejia L. Disaggregating the agency contract: the effects of monitoring, incentive alignment, and term in office on agent decision making. Academy of Management Journal 40 3 (1997) 584-602
28. Whitley, R., 1974. Cognitive and social institutionalization of scientific specialties and research areas. In: Whitley, R. (Ed.), Social Processes of Scientific Development, London. pp. 69-95.