Viewing angle matters - Screen type does not

Journal of Communication

Volumn 59, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 609-634

  Bellman, Steven ^a   Schweda, Anika ^a   Varan, Duane ^a  

^a MURDOCH UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMMUNICATION NETWORK; IMAGE ANALYSIS; MOBILE COMMUNICATION; TECHNOLOGY ADOPTION; TELEVISION;

EID: 70350412273     PISSN: 00219916     EISSN: 14602466     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2009.01441.x     Document Type: Article

References (61)

1. Balaji T S, Landers B, Kates J, Moritz B. A carrier's perspective on creating a mobile multimedia service. Communications of the ACM 2005, 48(7):49-53.
2. Barwise P. TV, PC, or mobile? Future media for consumer e-commerce. Business Strategy Review 2001, 12(1):35-42.
3. Baumgartner H, Sujan M, Padgett D. Patterns of affective reactions to advertisements: The integration of moment-to-moment responses into overall judgments. Journal of Marketing Research 1997, 34(2):219-232.
4. Bracken C C, Pettey G. It is REALLY a smaller (and smaller) world: Presence and small screens. Proceedings of the 10th Annual International Workshop on Presence (PRESENCE 2007) 2007, 283-290. (pp., Barcelona, Spain, PRESENCE
5. Bradley M M, Lang P J. Affective reactions to acoustic stimuli. Psychophysiology 2000, 37:204-215.
6. Bradley M M, Greenwald M K, Petry M C, Lang P J. Remembering pictures: Pleasure and arousal in memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 1992, 18(2):379-390.
7. Brown G. Tracking studies and sales effects: a U.K. perspective. Journal of Advertising Research 1985, 25(1):52-64.
8. Brown S P, Stayman D M. Antecedents and consequences of attitude toward the ad: A meta-analysis. Journal of Consumer Research 1992, 19(1):34-51.
9. Brown T J, Rothschild M L. Reassessing the impact of television advertising clutter. Journal of Consumer Research 1993, 20(1):138-146.
10. Chattopadhyay A, Nedungadi P. Does attitude toward the ad endure? The moderating effects of attention and delay. Journal of Consumer Research 1992, 19(1):26-33.
11. Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences 1988, (2nd ed.), Hillsdale, NJ, Erlbaum
12. Codispoti M, De Cesarei A. Arousal and attention: Picture size and emotional reactions. Psychophysiology 2007, 44:680-686.
13. De Cesarei A, Codispotti M. When does size not matter? Effects of stimulus size on affective modulation. Psychophysiology 2006, 43:207-215.
14. Detenber B H, Reeves B. A bio-informational theory of emotion: Motion and image size effects on viewers. Journal of Communication 1996, 46(3):66-84.
15. Eysenck M W. Arousal, learning, and memory. Psychological Bulletin 1976, 83(3):389-404.
16. Fleetwood C. Growth of online video content may inspire need for new gear. 2006 April 19
17. Gardner M P. Does attitude toward the ad affect brand attitude under a brand evaluation set?. Journal of Marketing Research 1985, 22(2):192-198.
18. Heppner C, Benkofske M, Moritz R. Mobile video: A study of quality perception. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 48th Annual Meeting (HFES 2004) 2004, 1865-1869. (pp., New Orleans, LA, HFES
19. Juster F T. Consumer buying intentions and purchase probability: An experiment in survey design. Journal of the American Statistical Association 1966, 61(315):658-696.
20. Kallinen K, Ravaja N. Comparing speakers versus headphones in listening to news from a computer-individual differences and psychophysiological responses. Computers in Human Behavior 2007, 23:303-317.
21. Kelley M. The effect of screen size and audio delivery system on memory for television news. Visual Communication Quarterly 2007, 14(3):176-188.
22. Kim T, Biocca F. Telepresence via television: Two dimensions of telepresence may have different connections to memory and persuasion. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 1997, 3(2). http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol3/issue2/kim.html, Retrieved August 18, 2006, from
23. Kleinsmith L J, Kaplan S, Tarte R D. The relationship of arousal to short- and long-term verbal recall. Canadian Journal of Psychology 1963, 17(4):393-397.
24. Knoche H O, McCarthy J D. 2005, Good news for mobile TV., , San Diego, CA, July 7-8
25. Knoche H, Sasse M A, Lekakos G, Chorianopoulos K, Doukidis G. Getting the big picture on small screens: Quality of experience in mobile TV. Interactive digital television: Technologies and applications 2008, 242-260. In, &, (Eds.), (pp., Hershey, PA, IGI Publishing
26. Knoche H, McCarthy J D, Sasse M A. Can small be beautiful?: Assessing image resolution requirements for mobile TV. Proceedings of the 13th Annual ACM International Conference on Multimedia (MM'05) 2005, 829-838. In, (pp., Singapore, ACM
27. Knoche H, McCarthy J D, Sasse M A. How low can you go? The effect of low resolutions on shot types in mobile TV. Multimedia Tools and Applications 2008, 36(1-2):145-166.
28. Lang A. The limited capacity model of mediated message processing. Journal of Communication 2000, 50(1):46-70.
29. Lang A. Using the limited capacity model of motivated mediated message processing to design effective cancer communication messages. Journal of Communication 2006, 56(S1):S57-S80.
30. Lang A, Bolls P, Potter R F, Kawahara K. The effects of production pacing and arousing content on the information processing of television messages. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media 1999, 43(4):451-475.
31. Lang A, Bradley S D, Park B, Shin M, Chung Y. Parsing the resource pie: Using STRTs to measure attention to mediated messages. Media Psychology 2006, 8(4):369-394.
32. Lang A, Park B, Sanders-Jackson A N, Wilson B D, Wang Z. Cognition and emotion in TV message processing: How valence, arousing content, structural complexity, and information density affect the availability of cognitive resources. Media Psychology 2007, 10(3):317-338.
33. Lang P J, Bradley M M, Cuthbert B N. Emotion, attention, and the startle reflex. Psychological Review 1990, 97(3):377-395.
34. Lin T, Imamiya A, Hu W, Omata M, Stephanidis C, Pieper M. Display characteristics affect users' emotional arousal in 3D games. Universal access in ambient intelligence environments: 9th ERCIM workshop on user interfaces for all 2007, 337-351. In, &, (Eds.), (Vol. 4397, pp., Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, Springer-Verlag
35. Loftus G R, Harley E M. Why is it easier to identify someone close than far away?. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 2005, 12(1):43-65.
36. Lombard M, Ditton T. At the heart of it all: The concept of presence. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 1997, 3(2). http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol3/issue2/lombard.html, Retrieved October 20, 2006, from
37. Lombard M, Ditton T B, Grabe M E, Reich R D. The role of screen size in viewer responses to television fare. Communication Reports 1997, 10(1):95-106.
38. Lombard M, Reich R D, Grabe M E, Bracken C C, Ditton T B. Presence and television: The role of screen size. Human Communication Research 2000, 26(1):75-98.
39. Maniar N, Bennett E, Hand S, Allan G. The effect of mobile phone screen size on video based learning. Journal of Software 2008, 3(4):51-61.
40. Mühlberger A, Neumann R, Wieser M J, Pauli P. The impact of changes in spatial distance on emotional responses. Emotion 2008, 8(2):192-198.
41. Nasco S A, Bruner G C. Perceptions and recall of advertising content presented on mobile handheld devices. Journal of Interactive Advertising 2007, 7(2). http://jiad.org/vol7/no2/nasco, Retrieved June 23, 2008 from
42. O'Hara K, Mitchell A S, Vorbau A. 2007, 857-866. Consuming video on mobile devices., , (pp., San Jose, CA, ACM
43. Perrien J, Dussart C, Paul F. Advertisers and the factual content of advertising. Journal of Advertising 1985, 14(1):30-35.
44. Petty R E, Schumann D W, Richman S A, Strathman A J. Positive mood and persuasion: Different roles for affect under high- and low-elaboration conditions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1993, 64(1):5-20.
45. Ravaja N. Effects of image motion on a small screen on emotion, attention, and memory: Moving-face versus static-face newscaster. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media 2004, 48(1):108-133.
46. Ravaja N, Saari T, Kallinen K, Laarni J. The role of mood in the processing of media messages from a small screen: Effects on subjective and physiological responses. Media Psychology 2006, 8(3):239-265.
47. Reeves B, Nass C. The media equation: How people treat computers, television, and new media like real people and places 1996, New York, Cambridge University Press/CSLI
48. Reeves B, Lang A, Kim E Y, Tatar D. The effects of screen size and message content on attention and arousal. Media Psychology 1999, 1:49-67.
49. Rondeau D B. For mobile applications, brand is experience. Communications of the ACM 2005, 48(7):61-66.
50. Roring R W, Hines F G, Charness N. Age-related identification of emotions at different image sizes. Human Factors 2006, 48(4):675-681.
51. Rossiter J R, Percy L. Advertising communications and promotion management 1997, (2nd ed.), New York, McGraw-Hill
52. Seibert W F, Kasten D F, Potter J R. A study of factors influencing the legibility of televised characters. Journal of the Society of Motion Picture and Television Engineers 1959, 68:467-472.
53. Skotko V, Langmeyer D. The effects of interaction distance and gender on self-disclosure in the dyad. Social Psychological Quarterly 1977, 40(2):178-182.
54. Tan D S, Gergle D, Scupelli P, Pausch R. Physically large displays improve performance on spatial tasks. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction 2006, 13(1):71-99.
55. Tavassoli N T, Shultz C J, Fitzsimons G J. Program involvement: Are moderate levels best for ad memory and attitude toward the ad?. Journal of Advertising Research 1995, 35(5):61-72.
56. Terry W S. Serial position effects in recall of television commercials. Journal of General Psychology 2005, 132(2):151-163.
57. Webb P H. Consumer initial processing in a difficult media environment. Journal of Consumer Research 1979, 6(3):225-236.
58. Westerfield L, Salmon D. eMerging video markets: The revolution will be televised 2006, Toronto, ON, BMO Capital Markets
59. Wingfield N, Smith E. Video comes to the iPod; in deal with Disney, Apple will sell hit ABC TV shows at its iTunes store for $1.99. Wall Street Journal 2005, October 13, B.1. p.
60. Yoon K, Bolls P D, Lang A. The effects of arousal on liking and believability of commercials. Journal of Marketing Communications 1998, 4(2):101-114.
61. Yoon K, Bolls P D, Muehling D D. The effect of involvement, arousal, and pace on claim and non-claim components of attitude toward the ad. Media Psychology 1999, 1(4):331-352.