Display characteristics affect users' emotional arousal in 3D games

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 4397 LNCS, Issue , 2007, Pages 337-351

  Lin, Tao ^a   Imamiya, Atsumi ^a   Hu, Wanhua ^a   Omata, Masaki ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF YAMANASHI   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AMBIENT INTELLIGENCE; ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY; HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION; SCREEN PRINTING; THREE DIMENSIONAL DISPLAYS;

DISPLAY CHARACTERISTICS; FIELD OF VIEWS; GALVANIC SKIN RESPONSE; HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION (HCI); LARGE COMPUTERS; LARGE DISPLAYS; PHYSIOLOGICAL MEASURES; SUBJECTIVE RATING;

USER INTERFACES;

EID: 38149070059     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-71025-7_22     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (52)

1. Hudlicka, E.: To feel or not to feel: The role of affect in human-computer interaction. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 59, (2003)1-32.
2. Norman, D.A.: Emotion and design: Attractive things work better. Interactions, 9(4) (2002).
3. Swaminathan, N. and Sato, S.: Interaction design for large displays. Interactions, 4(1), (1997) 15-24.
4. Robertson, G., Czerwinski, M., Baudisch, P., Meyers, B., Robbins, D., Smith, G. and Tan, D.S.: Large-display user experience. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, 25(4), (2005) 44-51.
5. Patrick, E., Cosgrove, D., Slavkovic, A., Rode, J., Verratti, T. and Chiselko, G.: Using a large projection screen as an alternative to head-mounted displays for virtual environments. Proc. CHI 2000, ACM Press (2000).
6. Tan, D. S., Stefanucci, J. K., Proffitt, D. R. and Pausch, R.: The infocockpit: Providing location and pace to aid human memory. Workshop on Perceptive User Interfaces (2001).
7. Tan, D.S., Gergle, D., Scupelli, P. and Pausch, R.: With similar visual angles, larger displays improve spatial performance. Proc. CHI 2003, ACM Press (2003).
8. Tan, D. S., Gergle, D., Scupelli, P. and Pausch, R.: Physically large displays improve path integration in 3D virtual navigation tasks . Proc. CHI 2004, ACM Press (2004) 439-446.
9. Czerwinski, M., Smith, G., Regan, T., Meyers, B., Robertson, G. and Starkweather, G.: Toward characterizing the productivity benefits of very large displays. Proc. Interact 2003, IOS Press (2003) 9-16.
10. Kimura, D.: Sex and cognition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, (1999) 1-66.
11. Cutmore, T.R.H., Hine, T.J., Maberly, K.J., Langford, N.M. and Hawgood, G.: Cognitive and gender factors influencing navigation in a virtual environment. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 53, (2000) 223-249.
12. Tan, D.S., Czerwinski, M. and Robertson, G.G.: Women go with the optical flow. Proc. CHI 2003, ACM Press (2003), 209-215.
13. Czerwinski, M., Tan, D.S. and Robertson, G.G.: Women take a wider view. Proc. CHI 2002, ACM Press (2002) 195-202.
14. Childs, I.: HDTV-putting you in the picture. IEE Review, 34(7), (1988) 261-265.
15. Lang, P.J.: The emotion probe. Studies of motivation and attention. American Psychologist, 50, (1995) 372-385.
16. Scherer, K.R.: Neuroscience projections to current debates in emotion psychology. Cognition and Emotion, 7, (1993) 1-41.
17. Larsen, R.J. and Diener, E.: Promises and problems with the circumplex model of emotion. In M. Clark (Ed.), Review of personality and social psychology, Vol. 13, Newbury Park, CA: Sage, (1992) 25-59.
18. Gray, J.A.: The neuropsychology of temperament. In J. Strelau and A. Angleitner (Eds.), Explorations in temperament: International perspectives on theory and measurement, New York: Plenum Press (1991) 105-128.
19. Levenson, R.W.: Autonomic nervous system differences among emotions. American Psychological Society, 3(1), (1992) 23-27.
20. Ekman, P.: Basic emotions. In Handbook of cognition and emotion, T. Dalgleish and M. Power (Eds.), Sussex: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. (1999).
21. Russell, J.A., Weiss, A., and Mendelsohn, G.A.: Affect grid: A single-item scale of pleasure and arousal. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(3), (1989) 493-502.
22. Seyle, H.: The stress of life. New York: McGraw-Hill, (1976).
23. Healey, J.A.: Wearable and automotive system for affect recognition from physiology. Doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, (2000).
24. Picard, R.W.: Affective computing. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, (1997).
25. Lang, P.J. Greenwald, M.K., Bradley, M.M., and Hamm, A.O.: Looking at pictures: Affective, facial, visceral, and behavioral reactions. Psychophysiology, 30, (1993)261-273.
26. Frijda, N.H.: The emotions. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press (1986).
27. Wilson, G.M. Psychophysiological indicators of the impact of media quality on users, Proc. CHI 2001 Doctoral Consortium, ACM Press (2001) 95-96.
28. Wilson, G.M. and Sasse, M.A.: Do users always know what's good for them? Utilizing physiological responses to assess media quality, Proc. CHI 2000, Sunderland, UK: Springer (2000) 327-339.
29. Wilson, G.M. and Sasse, M.A.: Investigating the impact of audio degradations on users: subjective vs. objective assessment methods. Proc. OZCHI (2000) 135-142.
30. Ward, R.D., Marsden, P.H., Cahill, B. and Johnson, C.: Physiological responses to welldesigned and poorly designed interfaces, Proc. CHI 2002 Workshop on Physiological Computing, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
31. Ward, R.D. and Marsden, P.H.: Physiological responses to different WEB page designs, International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, (2003)59(1/2), 199-212.
32. Meehan, M., Insko, B., Whitton, M. and Brooks, F.: Physiological measures of presence in stressful virtual environments. ACM Transactions on Graphics (2002) 21(3) 645-652.
33. Mandryk, R.L. and Inkpen, K.: Physiological indicators for the evaluation of co-located collaborative play. Proc. CSCW 2004.
34. Ravaja, N., Saari, T., Laarni, J., Kallinen, K. and Salminen, M.: The psychophysiology of video gaming: Phasic emotional responses to game events, Proc. DiGRA (2005).
35. Davidson, R.J., Ekman, P.: Afterward: is there emotion specific physiology. In:Ekman, P.,Davidson, R.J. (Eds.), The Nature of Emotion. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2004).
36. Picard, R.W., Vyzas, E., and Healey, J.: Toward machine emotional intelligence: analysis of affective physiological state. IEEE PAMI, 23 (10), (2001)1165-1174.
37. Scheirer, J., Fernandez, R., Klein, J. and Picard, R.: Frustrating the user on purpose: a step toward building an affective computer. Interacting with Computers, 14(2), (2002) 93-118.
38. Lin, T., Hu, W.H., Omata, M. and Imamiya, A.: Do physiological data relate to traditional usability indexes. Proc. OZCHI2005, ACM Press (2005).
39. Thought Technology: Cardiopro™, version 2.0 installation and user's manual (2001).
40. Lang, P.J.: Behavioral treatment and bio-behavioral assessment: Computer applications. In J.B. Sidowski, J.H. Johnson, and T.A. Williams (Eds.), Technology in mental health care delivery systems, Norwood, NJ: Ablex, (1980) 119-137.
41. Ravaja, N.: Contributions of psychophysiology to media research: Review and recommendations. Media Psychology, 6, (2004) 193-235.
42. Turpin, G.: Effects of stimulus intensity on autonomic responding: The problem of differentiating orienting and defense reflexes. Psychophysiology, 23, (1986) 1-14.
43. Dawson, M.E., Schell, A.M., and Filion, D.L.: The electrodermal system. In J.T. Cacioppo, L.G. Tassinary, and G.G. Berntson (Eds.), Handbook of psychophysiology (2nd ed). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, (2000) 200-223.
44. Wilson, F. and Descamps, P. T.: Should we accept anything less than TV quality: visual communication, Proc. International Broadcasting Convention, 1996.
45. Ravaja, N.: Contributions of psychophysiology to media research: Review and recommendations. Media Psychology, 6, (2004)193-235.
46. Ravaja, N., Saari, T., Kallinen, K. and Laarni, J.: The role of mood in the processing of media messages from a small screen: effects on subjective and physiological responses. Manuscript submitted for publication (2004).
47. Sirevaag, E. J., Kramer, A. E, Wickens, C. D., Reisweber, I., Strayer, D. L., and Grenell, J. F.: Assessment of pilot performance and mental workload in rotary wing aircraft. Ergonomics, 36, (1993)1121-1140.
48. Tattersall, A. and Hockey, G.: Level of operator Control and Changes in Heart Rate. Variability during Simulated Flight Maintenance. Human Factors 37(4), (1995) 682-698.
49. Kramer, A. F.: Physiological metrics of mental workload: A review of recent progress. In D. L. Damos (Ed.), Multiple-Task performance. London: Taylor and Francis (1991) 279-328.
50. Goldberg, J.H. and Kotval, X. P.: Computer interface evaluation using eye movements: methods and constructs. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics 24, (1999)631-645.
51. Hess, E.H.: Pupillometrics. In Greenfield, N.S., and Sternbach R.A. (Eds.), Handbook of psychophysiology, New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston (1972) 491-5310.
52. Partal, T., Maria, J. and Surakka, V.: Pupillary Responses to Emotionally Provocative Stimuli. In Proceedings of ETRA 2000, Eye Tracking Research and Applications Symposium 2000, Palm Beach Gardens, FL, ACM Press, November 2000, 123-129.