How low can you go? the effect of low resolutions on shot types in mobile TV

Multimedia Tools and Applications

Volumn 36, Issue 1-2, 2008, Pages 145-166

  Knoche, Hendrik ^a   McCarthy, John D ^a   Sasse, M Angela ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Low resolutions; Mobile TV; Shot types

Indexed keywords

IMAGE QUALITY; MOBILE DEVICES; MULTIMEDIA SERVICES; OBJECT RECOGNITION;

LOW RESOLUTIONS; MOBILE TV; SHOT TYPES;

TELEVISION BROADCASTING;

EID: 37249008671     PISSN: 13807501     EISSN: 15737721     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11042-006-0076-5     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Ankrum DR (1996) Viewing distance at computer workstations. Work Place Ergonomics 10-12
2. Avisynth (2005) http://www.avisynth.org/
3. Bachmann T (1991) Identification of spatially quantised tachistoscopic images of faces: how many pixels does it take to carry identity? Eur J Cogn Psychol 3:87-103
4. Barber PJ, Laws JV (1994) Image quality and video communication. In: Damper R, Hall W, Richards J (eds) Proceedings of IEEE international symposium on multimedia technologies & their future applications. Pentech, London, UK, pp 163-178
5. Bathia S, Lakshminarayanan V, Samal A, Welland GV (1995) Human face perception in degraded images. J Vis Commun Image Represent 6:280-295
6. Campbell FW, Green DG (1965) Optical and retinal factors affecting visual resolution. J Physiol 181:576-593
7. Dal Lago G (2006) Microdisplay emotions. http://www.srlabs.it/ articoli_uk/ics.htm
8. ETSI (2005) Digital video broadcasting (DVB); DVB-H implementation guidelines. http://webapp.etsi.org/action/PU/20050301/tr_102377v010101p.pdf
9. Guardian (2005) Romantic drama in China soap opera only for mobile phones. Guardian Newspapers Limited Available: http://www.buzzle.com/editorials/ 6-28-2005-72274.asp
10. Gwinn E, Hughlett M (2005) Mobile TV for your cell phone. Chicago Tribune Available: http://home.hamptonroads.com/stories/story.cfm?story=93423&ran= 38197
11. Holmstrom D (2003) Content based pre-encoding video filter for mobile TV. Thesis: Umea University, http://exjob.interaktion.nu/files/id_examensarbete_5. pdf
12. Horn DB (2002) The effects of spatial and temporal video distortion on lie detection performance. In Proceedings of CHI '02
13. Jesty LC (1958) The relation between picture size, viewing distance and picture quality. In Proceedings of IEE, pp 425-439
14. Jumisko-Pyykkö S, Kumar VMV, Liinasuo M, Hannuksela M (2006) Acceptance of audiovisual quality in erroneous television sequences over a DVB-H channel. In Proceedings of the second international workshop in video processing and quality metrics for consumer electronics
15. Kies JK, Williges RC, Rosson MB (1996) Controlled laboratory experimentation and field study evaluation of video conference for distance learning applications (Rep. No. HCIL 96-02). Virginia Tech
16. Knoche H, McCarthy J (2004) Mobile users' needs and expectations of future multimedia services. In Proceedings of the WWRF12
17. Knoche H, McCarthy J, Sasse MA (2005) Can small be beautiful? Assessing image resolution requirements for mobile TV. In ACM Multimedia ACM
18. Lombard M, Grabe ME, Reich RD, Campanella C, Ditton TB (1996) Screen size and viewer responses to television: a review of research. In annual conf. of the assoc. for education in journalism and mass communication
19. McCarthy J, Sasse MA, Miras D (2004) Sharp or smooth? Comparing the effects of quantization vs. frame rate for streamed video. In Proc. CHI, pp 535-542
20. Nemethova O, Zahumensky M, Rupp M (2004) Preprocessing of ball game video-sequences for robust transmission over mobile networks. In Proceedings of the CIC 2004 The 9th CDMA international conference
21. Odyssey Software Inc. CFCOM (2003) http://www.odysseysoftware.com/
22. Okada K-I, Maeda F, Ichikawaa Y, Matsushita Y (1994) Multiparty videoconferencing at virtual social distance: MAJIC design. In Proc. ACM conf. on computer supported cooperative work pp 385-393
23. Owens DA, Wolfe-Kelly K (1987) Near work, visual fatigue, and variations of oculomotor tonus. Investig Ophthalmol Vis Sci 28:743-749
24. Reeves B, Nass C (1998) The media equation: how people treat computers, television, and new media like real people and places. University of Chicago Press
25. Reeves B, Lang A, Kim E, Tartar D (1999) The effects of screen size and message content on attention and arousal. Media Psychol 1:49-68
26. Silbergleid M, Pescatore M (2000) The guide to digital television, 3rd edn. Miller Freeman PSN, New York
27. Södergård C (2003) Mobile television-technology and user experiences Report on the Mobile-TV project (Rep. No. P506). VTT Information Technology
28. Song S, Won Y, Song I (2004) Empirical study of user perception behavior for mobile streaming. In Proceedings of the tenth ACM international conference on multimedia. ACM, New York, NY, USA, pp 327-330
29. Steeedman WC, Baker Ca (1960) Target size and visual recignition. Human Factors 2(3):121-127
30. Thompson R (1998) Grammar of the shot. Elsevier Focal
31. Weiner R (1996) Webster's new world dictionary of media and communications. Macmillan, New York, NY (rev. and updated ed.)
32. Westerink JH, Roufs JA (1989) Subjective image quality as a function of viewing distance, resolution, and picture size. SMPTE Journal
33. Westheimer G (1992) Visual acuity. In: Hart WM (ed), Adler's physiology of the eye: clinical application, 9th edn. CV Mosby, St. Louis, MO