Cognition and emotion in TV message processing: How valence, arousing content, structural complexity, and information density affect the availability of cognitive resources

Media Psychology

Volumn 10, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 317-338

  Lang, Annie ^a   Park, Byungho ^b   Sanders Jackson, Ashley N ^c   Wilson, Brian D ^a   Wang, Zheng ^d  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF SINGAPORE   (Singapore)

^c UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

^d OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 35348930398     PISSN: 15213269     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/15213260701532880     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Alwitt, L. F., Anderson, D. R., & Lorch, E. P. (1980). Preschool children's visual attention to attributes of television. Human Communication Research, 7, 52-66.
2. Anderson, D. R., Levin, S. R., & Lorch, E. P. (1977). The effects of TV program pacing on the behavior of preschool children. Audio Visual Communication Review, 25, 159-166.
3. Basil, M. (1994). Multiple resource theory I: Application to television viewing. Communication Research, 2, 177-207.
4. Biocca, F., David, P., & West, M. (1994). Continuous response measurement (CRM): A computerized tool for research on the cognitive processing of communication messages. In A. Lang (Ed.), Measuring Psychological Responses to Media Messages (pp. 15-64). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
5. Bolls, P., Muehling, D. D., & Yoon, K. (2003). The effects of television commercial pacing on viewers' attention and memory. Journal of Marketing Communication, 9, 17-28.
6. Bolls, P., Potter, R. F., & Lang, A. (2001). The use of facial EMG to measure emotional responses to radio. Communication Research, 28, 627-651.
7. Britton, B. K., & Tesser, A. (1982). Effects of prior knowledge on use of cognitive capacity in three complex cognitive tasks. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 21, 421-436.
8. Britton, B. K., Westbrook, R. D., & Holgredge, T. S. (1978). Reading and cognitive capacity usage: Effects of text difficulty. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 4, 582-591.
9. Cacioppo, J. T., & Berntson, G. G. (1999). The affect system: Architecture and operating characteristics. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 8, 133-137.
10. Cacioppo, J. T., & Gardner, W. L. (1999). Emotion. Annual Review of Psychology, 50, 191-214.
11. Cacioppo, J. T., Gardner, W. L., & Berntson, G. G. (1999). The affect system has parallel and integrative processing components: Form follows function. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 839-855.
12. Chaffee, S. H., & Schleuder, J. (1986). Measurement and effects of attention to media news. Human Communication Research, 13, 76-107.
13. Deutsch, J. A., & Deutsch, D. (1963). Attention: Some theoretical considerations. Psychological Review, 70, 80-90.
14. Fox, J. R., Lang, A., & Park, B. (2006). Using signal detection measures to track motivated cognition: The interaction of valence, arousing content, information load, and structural complexity on recognition sensitivity and criterion bias. Human Communication Research, paper under review.
15. Fox, J. R., Park, B., & Lang, A. (2007). When available resources become negative resources: The effects of cognitive overload on memory sensitivity and criterion bias. Communication Research, 34, 277-296.
16. Grimes, T. (1990). Encoding TV news messages into memory. Journalism Quarterly, 67, 757-766.
17. Grimes, T. (1991). Mild auditory-visual dissonance in television news may exceed viewer attentional capacity. Human Communication Research, 18, 268-298.
18. Grimes, T., & Meadowcroft, J. (1995). Attention to television and some methods for its measurement. Communication Yearbook, 18, 133-161.
19. Ito, T. A., Larsen, J. T., Smith, N. K., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1998). Negative information weighs more heavily on the brain: The negativity bias in evaluative categorizations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 887-900.
20. Lang, A. (1990). Involuntary attention and physiological arousal evoked by structural features and emotional content in TV commercials. Communication Research, 17, 275-299.
21. Lang, A. (2000). The limited capacity model of mediated message processing. Journal of Communication, 50, 46-70.
22. Lang, A. (2006a). Motivated cognition (LC4MP): The influence of appetitive and aversive activation on the processing of video games. In P. Messarsis & L. Humphries (Eds.), Digital media: Transformation in human communication (pp. 237-256). New York: Peter Lang Publishing.
23. Lang, A. (2006b). Using the limited capacity model of motivated mediated message processing (LC4MP) to design effective cancer communication messages. Journal of Communication, 56(Supp), s57-s80.
24. Lang, A., & Basil, M. (1998). What do secondary task reaction times measure anyway? In M. Roloff (Ed.), Communication Yearbook (Vol. 21, pp. 443-470). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
25. Lang, A., Bolls, P., Potter, R. F., & Kawahara, K. (1999). The effects of production pacing and arousing content on the information processing of television messages. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 43, 451-475.
26. Lang, A., Bradley, S. D., Park, B., Shin, M., & Chung, Y. (2006). Parsing the resource pie: Using STRTs to measure attention to mediated messages. Media Psychology, 8, 369-394.
27. Lang, A., Dhillon, K., & Dong, Q. (1995). The effects of emotional arousal and valence on television viewers' cognitive capacity and memory. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 39, 313-327.
28. Lang, A., Geiger, S., Strickwerda, M., & Sumner, J. (1993). The effects of related and unrelated cuts on television viewers' attention, processing capacity, and memory. Communication Research, 20, 4-29.
29. Lang, A., Newhagen, J., & Reeves, B. (1996). Negative video as structure: Emotion, attention, capacity, and memory. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 40, 460-477.
30. Lang, A., Schwartz, N., Chung, Y., & Lee, S. W. (2004). Processing substance abuse messages: Production pacing, arousing content, and age. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 48, 61-88.
31. Lang, A., Shin, M., & Lee, S. (2005). Sensation seeking, motivation, and substance use: A dual system approach. Media Psychology, 7, 1-29.
32. Lang, P. J., Bradley, M. M., & Cuthbert, B. N. (1997). Motivated attention: Affect, activation, and action. In P. J. Lang, R. F. Simons, & M. T. Balaban (Eds.), Attention and orienting: Sensory and motivational processes. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
33. Meadowcroft, J., & Watt, J.H. (1990). A multi-component theory of children's attention spans. Unpublished manuscript, University of Wisconsin-Madison.
34. Newhagen, J., & Reeves, B. (1991). Responses for negative political advertising: A study of the of the 1988 presidential election. In F. Biocca, (Ed.), Television and political advertising (Vol. 1, pp. 197-220). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
35. Newhagen, J. E., & Reeves, B. (1992). The evening's bad news: Effects of compelling negative television news images on memory. Journal of Communication, 42, 25-41.
36. Potter, R., F., & Lang, A. (1996). Arousing messages: Reaction time, capacity, encoding. Paper presented to the Association for Education in Journalism & Mass Communication, Anaheim, CA.
37. Ravaja, N. (2004). Contributions of psychophysiology to media research: Review and recommendations. Media Psychology, 6, 193-235.
38. Reeves, B., Thorson, E., & Schleuder, J. (1986). Attention to television: Psychological theories and Chronometric measures. In J. Bryant & D. Zillmann (Eds.), Perspectives on media effects (pp. 251-279). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
39. Thorson, E., Reeves, B., & Schleuder, J. (1986). Attention to local and global complexity in television messages. In M. L. McLaughlin (Ed.), Communication Yearbook 10 (pp. 366-383). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.