Developing productive synergies between formative and summative assessment processes

Improving Teacher Education through Action Research

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 9-23

  Carless, David ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG   (Hong Kong)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 70350396957     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203895375     Document Type: Chapter

References (34)

1. Angelo, T., & Cross, K. P. (1993). Classroom assessment techniques: A handbook for college teachers (2nd ed.). San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
2. Biggs, J. (1999). Teaching for quality learning at university. London: Society for Research Into Higher Education & Open University Press.
3. Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education 5(1), 7-74.
4. Boud, D. (1995). Enhancing learning through self-assessment. London: Kogan Page.
5. Boud, D. (2000). Sustainable assessment: Rethinking assessment for the learning society. Studies in Continuing Education 22, 151-167.
6. Brown, S., & Knight, P. (1995). Assessing learners in higher education. London: Kogan Page.
7. Bryan, C. (2006). Developing group learning through assessment. In C. Bryan & K. Clegg (Eds.), Innovative assessment in higher education (pp. 150-157). London: Routledge.
8. Butler, R. (1988). Enhancing and undermining intrinsic motivation; the effects of task-involving and ego-involving evaluation on interest and performance. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 58, 1-14.
9. Carless, D. (2002). The "mini-viva" as a tool to enhance assessment for learning. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 27, 353-363.
10. Carless, D. (2006a). Differing perceptions in the feedback process. Studies in Higher Education, 31, 219-233.
11. Carless, D. (2006b, August). Trust, distrust and their impact on learning-oriented assessment practices. Paper presented at the European Association for Research on Learning and Instruction Assessment conference, Northumbria, England.
12. Carless, D., Joughin, G., & Liu, N.-F. (2006). How assessment supports learning: Learning-oriented assessment in action. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.
13. Ecclestone, K., & Swann, J. (1999). Litigation and learning: Tensions in improving university lecturers' assessment practice. Assessment in Education, 6, 377-389.
14. Elton, L., & Laurillard, D. (1979). Trends in student learning. Studies in Higher Education, 4, 87-102.
15. Falchikov, N., (2005). Improving assessment through student involvement. London: Routledge Falmer.
16. Gibbs, G. (2006). How assessment frames student learning. In C. Bryan & K. Clegg (Eds.), Innovative assessment in higher education (pp. 23-36). London: Routledge.
17. Gibbs, G., & Simpson, C. (2004). Conditions under which assessment supports students' learning. Learning and Teaching in Higher Education, 1,3-31. Retrieved June 5, 2005, from http://www.glos.ac.uk/departments/clt/lathe/issue1/index.cfm
18. Gipps, C., Mc Callum, B.,& Hargreaves, E. (2000). What makes a good primary school teacher. London: Routledge Falmer.
19. Glenwright, P. (2002). Language proficiency assessment for teachers: The effects of benchmarking on writing assessment in Hong Kong schools. Assessing Writing, 8, 84-109.
20. Greer, L. (2001). Does changing the method of assessment of a module improve the performance of a student? Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 26, 127-138.
21. Heathfield, M. (1999). Group-based assessment: An evaluation of the use of assessed tasks as a method of fostering high quality learning. In S. Brown & A. Glasner (Eds.), Assessment matters in higher education (pp. 132-145). Buckingham, England: Society for Research Into Higher Education & Open University Press.
22. James, D. (2000). Making the graduate: Perspectives on student experience of assessment in higher education. In A. Filer (Ed.), Assessment: Social practice and social product (pp. 151-167). London: Routledge/Falmer.
23. Knight, P., & Yorke, M. (2003). Assessment, learning and employability. Maidenhead, England: Society for Research Into Higher Education & Open University Press.
24. Liu, N.-F., & Carless, D. (2006). Peer feedback: The learning element of peer assessment. Teaching in Higher Education, 11, 279-290.
25. McDonald, B., & Boud, D. (2003). The impact of self-assessment on achievement: The effects of self-assessment training on performance in external examinations. Assessment in Education, 10, 209-220.
26. McDowell, L., & Sambell, K. (1999). The experience of innovative assessment: Student perspectives. In S. Brown & A. Glasner (Eds.), Assessment matters in higher education (pp. 71-82). Maidenhead, England: Society for Research Into Higher Education & Open University Press.
27. Pellegrino, J., Chudowsky, N., & Glaser, R. (Eds.). (2001). Knowing what students know: The science and design of educational assessment. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
28. Race, P. (2001). A briefing on self, peer and group assessment. Retrieved June 12, 2006, from http://www.heacademy.ac.uk/resources.asp?process=full_record§ion=generic&id=9
29. Ramsden, P. (2003). Learning to teach in higher education (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.
30. Shepard, L. (2000). The role of assessment in a learning culture. Educational Researcher, 29,(7), 4-14.
31. Smith, E., & Gorard, S. (2005). "They don't give us our marks": The role of formative feedback in student progress. Assessment in Education, 12, 21-38.
32. Stefani, L. (1998). Assessment in partnership with learners. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 23, 339-350.
33. Taras, M. (2005). Assessment-Summative and formative-Some theoretical reflections. British Journal of Educational Studies, 53, 466-478.
34. Taras, M. (2006). Do unto others or not: Equity in feedback for undergraduates. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 31, 365-377.