Nonlinear quantitative structure-property relationship modeling of skin permeation coefficient

Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences

Volumn 98, Issue 11, 2009, Pages 4069-4084

  Neely, Brian J ^a   Madihally, Sundararajan V ^a   Robinson Jr , Robert L ^a   Gasem, Khaled A M ^a  

^a Oklahoma State University   (United States)

Author keywords

Enhancer; Modeling; Neural network; Permeation; QSPR

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORK; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DATA BASE; GENETIC ALGORITHM; QUANTITATIVE STRUCTURE PROPERTY RELATION; SKIN PERMEABILITY;

EID: 70349638463     PISSN: 00223549     EISSN: 15206017     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jps.21678     Document Type: Article

References (85)

1. Chong S, Fung HL. 1989. Transdermal drug delivery systems: Pharmacokinetics, clinical efficacy, and tolerance development. In: Hadgraft J, Guy RH, editors. Transdermal drug delivery: Developmental issues and research initiatives. 1st edition. New York: Marcel Dekker. pp 135-154.
2. Whalberg JE. 1968. Transepidermal or transfollicular absorption? In vivo and in vitro studies in hairy and non-hairy guinea pig skin with sodium and mercuric chlorides. Acta Derm Venereol 48:336-344.
3. Barry BW. 2001. Novel mechanisms and devices to enable successful transdermal drug delivery. Eur J Pharm Sci 14:101-114.
4. Karande P, Jain A, Mitragotri S. 2004. Discovery of transdermal penetration enhancers by high-throughput screening. Nat Biotechnol 22:192-197. (Pubitemid 38160534)
5. Williams AC, Barry BW. 2004. Penetration enhancers. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 56:603-618.
6. Devillers J, Domine D, Guillon C, Bintein S, Karcher W. 1997. Prediction of partition coefficients using auto-correlation descriptors. SAR QSAR Environ Res 7:151-172.
7. Devillers J, Flatin J. 2000. A general QSAR model for predicting the acute toxicity of pesticides to oncorhynchus mykiss. SAR QSAR Environ Res 11:25-43.
8. Godavarthy SS, Robinson RL, Jr., Gasem KAM. 2006. An improved structure-property model for predicting melting-point temperatures. Ind Eng Chem Res 45:5117-5126.
9. Godavarthy SS, Robinson RL, Jr., Gasem KAM. 2006. SVCR-QSPR model for predicting saturated vapor pressures of pure fluids. Fluid Phase Equilib 246:39-51.
10. Neely BJ. 2007. Aqueous hydrocarbon systems: Experimental measurements and quantitative structure-property relationship modeling. School of Chemical Engineering. Stillwater, OK: Oklahoma State University.
11. Balaban AT. 1997. From chemical topology to 3D geometry. J Chem Inf Comput Sci 37:645-650.
12. Hansch C, Fujita T. 1964. R-s-p analysis. A method for the correlation of biological activity and chemical structure. J Am Chem Soc 86:1616-1626.
13. Katritzky AR, Lobanov VS, Karelson M. 1998. Normal boiling points for organic compounds: Correlation and prediction by a quantitative structure-property relationship. J Chem Inf Comput Sci 38:28-41. (Pubitemid 128565319)
14. Katritzky AR, Mu L, Karelson M. 1997. QSPR treatment of the unified nonspecific solvent polarity scale. J Chem Inf Comput Sci 37:756-761. (Pubitemid 127603589)
15. Stanton DT, Egolf LM, Jurs PC, Hicks MG. 1992. Computer-assisted prediction of normal boiling points of pyrans and pyrroles. J Chem Inf Comput Sci 32:306-316.
16. Wessel MD, Jurs PC. 1995. Prediction of normal boiling points for a diverse set of industrially important organic compounds from molecular structure. J Chem Inf Comput Sci 35:841-850.
17. Karelson M. 2000. Molecular descriptors in QSAR/QSPR. 1st edition. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
18. Roberts MS, Anderson RA, Swarbrick J. 1997. Permeability of human epidermis to phenolic compounds. J Pharm Pharmacol 29:677-683.
19. Flynn GL, editor. 1990. Physicochemical determinants of skin absorption. 1st edition. New York: Elsevier. pp 93-127.
20. Potts RO, Guy RH. 1995. A predictive algorithm for skin permeability: The effects of molecular size and hydrogen bond activity. Pharm Res 12:1628-1633.
21. Cronin MTD, Dearden JC, Moss GP, Murray-Dickson G. 1999. Investigation of the mechanism of flux across human skin in vitro by quantitative structure-activity relationships. Eur J Pharm Sci 7:325-330. (Pubitemid 29080745)
22. Lien EJ, Gao H. 1995. QSAR analysis of skin permeability of various drugs in man as compared to in vivo and in vitro studies in rodents. Pharm Res 4:583-587.
23. Pugh WJ, Degim IT, Hadgraft J. 2000. Epidermal permeability-penetrant structure relationships. 4. QSAR of permeate diffusion across human stratum corneum in terms of molecular weight, H-bonding and electronic charge. Int J Pharm 197:203-211. (Pubitemid 30125791)
24. Todeschini R, Gramatica P. 1997. 3D-modeling and prediction by WHIM descriptors. 5. Theory development and chemical meaning of WHIM descriptors. Quant Struct Act Relat 16:113-119.
25. Patel H, Cronin MTD. 2001. A novel index for the prediction of molecular shape. J Chem Inf Comput Sci 41:1228-1236. (Pubitemid 33663887)
26. Patel H, Schultz TW, Cronin MTD. 2002. Physicochemical interpretation and prediction of the dimyristoyl phosphatidyl choline-water partition coefficient. J Mol Struct Theochem 593:9-18.
27. Basketter DA, Roberts DW, Cronin M, Scholes EW. 1992. The value of the local lymph node assay in quantitative structure activity investigations. Contact Dermatitis 27:137-142.
28. Roberts DW, Basketter DA. 1990. A quantitative structure activity/dose response relationship for contact allergic potential of alkyl group transfer agents. Contact Dermatitis 23:331-335.
29. Cronin MTD, Basketter DA. 1994. Multivariate QSAR analysis of a skin sensitization database. SAR QSAR Environ Res 2:159-179.
30. Kandimalla K, Kanikkannan N, Andega S, Singh M. 1999. Effect of fatty acids on the permeation of melatonin across rat and pig skin in-vitro and on the transepidermal water loss in rats in vivo. J Pharm Pharmacol 51:783-790. (Pubitemid 29377949)
31. van de Sandt JJ, van Burgsteden JA, Cage S, Carmichael PL, Dick I, Kenyon S, Korinth G, Larese F, Limasset JC, Maas WJ. 2004. In vitro predictions of skin absorption of caffeine, testosterone, and benzoic acid: A multi-centre comparison study. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 39:271-281.
32. Akomeah FK, Martin GP, Brown MB. 2007. Variability in human skin permeability in vitro: Comparing penetrants with different physicochemical properties. J Pharm Sci 96:824-834.
33. Larsen RH, Nielsen F, Sorensen JA, Nielsen JB. 2003. Dermal penetration of fentanyl: Inter- and intraindividual variations. Pharmacol Toxicol 93:244-248. (Pubitemid 37521962)
34. Lee FW, Earl L, Williams FM. 2001. Interindividual variability in the percutaneous penetration of testosterone through human skin in vitro. Toxicology 168:63.
35. Wilkinson SC, Maas WJM, Nielsen JB, Greaves LC, van de Sandt JJM, Williams FM. 2006. Interactions of skin thickness and physicochemical properties of test compounds in percutaneous penetration studies. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 79:405-413.
36. Heuber F, Ouvrard-Baraton F, Biesse JP, Courtellemont P, Vincent CM, Marty JP. 1998. Pig ear skin as a model for in vitro percutaneous absorption studies: Preliminary results of an inter-laboratory validation. In: Brain KR, Walters KA, editors. Perspectives in percutaneous penetration, Vol.6a. Cardiff: STS Publishing Ltd.
37. Chilcott RP, Barai N, Beezer AE, Brain SI, Brown MB, Bunge AL, Burgess SE, Cross S, Dalton CH, Dias M. 2005. Inter- and intralaboratory variation of in vitro diffusion cell measurements: An international multicenter study using quasi-standardized methods and materials. J Pharm Sci 94:632-638. (Pubitemid 40476527)
38. Johnson ME, Blankschtein D, Langer R. 1997. Evaluation of solute permeation through the stratum corneum: Lateral bilayer diffusion as the primary transport mechanism. J Pharm Sci 86:1162-1172. (Pubitemid 27430923)
39. Xia X-R, Baynes RE, Monteiro-Riviere NA, Leidy RB, Shea D, Riviere JE. 2003. A novel in-vitro technique for studying percutaneous permeation with a membrane-coated fiber and gas chromatography/ mass spectrometry: Part I. Performances of the technique and determination of the permeation rates and partition coefficients of chemical mixtures. Pharm Res 20:275-282.
40. Degim IT, Pugh WJ, Hadgraft J. 1998. Skin permeability data: Anomalous results. Int J Pharm 170:129-133. (Pubitemid 28473253)
41. Moss GP, Cronin MTD. 2002. Quantitative structure-permeability relationships for percutaneous absorption: Re-analysis of steroid data. Int J Pharm 238:105-109. (Pubitemid 34457879)
42. Vecchia BE, Bunge AL, editors. 2003. Transdermal drug delivery. 2nd edition. New York: Marcel Dekker. pp 25-55.
43. Frasch HF, Landsittel DP. 2002. Regarding the sources of data analyzed with quantitative structure-skin permeability relationship methods (commentary on 'investigation of the mechanism of flux across human skin in vitro by quantitative structure-permeability relationships'). Eur J Pharm Sci 15:399-403.
44. Kirchner LA, Moody RP, Doyle E, Bose R, Jeffrey J, Chu I. 1997. The prediction of skin permeability by using physicochemical data. Altern Lab Anim 25:359-370. (Pubitemid 127518569)
45. Godavarthy SS. 2004. Design of improved solvents for extractive distillation. School of Chemical Engineering, Stillwater. Oklahoma: Oklahoma State University.
46. Chemdraw 11.0. 2008. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge Software.
47. Ampac, 6.0. 1998. Shawnee, KS: Semichem, Inc.
48. Codessa, 2.7.8. 1998. Shawnee, KS: Semichem, Inc.
49. Dragon, 5.4. 2006. Milano, Italy: Milano Chemometrics.
50. Malinowski ER, Howery DG. 1980. Factor analysis in chemistry. 1st edition. New York: Wiley-Interscience.
51. Zupan J, Gasteiger J. 1993. Neural networks for chemists. 1st edition. Weinheim: VCH Publishers.
52. Lucic B, Trinajstic N. 1999. Multivariate regression outperforms several robust architectures of neural networks in QSAR modeling. J Chem Inf Comput Sci 39:121-132. (Pubitemid 129676567)
53. Hagan MT. 2007. Lecture comments on neural networks. Stillwater, Oklahoma: Oklahoma State University.
54. Goldberg DE. 1988. Genetic algorithms in search, optimisation and machine learning. 1st edition. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
55. Baker JE. Proceedings of the second international conference on genetic algorithms and their application. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology. 1987.
56. Rhinehart RR, Mahesh S, Iyer MS. 1999. A method to determine the required number of neural-network training repetitions. IEEE Trans Neural Netw 10:427-432.
57. KatritzkyAR, LobanovVS, Karelson M. 1994. Codessa user's manual. Gainsville: University of Florida.
58. Ulmer CW, Smith DA, Sumpter BG, Noid DI. 1998. Computational neural networks and the rational design of polymeric materials: The next generation polycarbonates. Comput Theor Polym 8:311-321.
59. Degim T, Hadgraft J, Ilbasmis S, Ozkan Y. 2003. Prediction of skin penetration using artificial neural network (ANN) modeling. J Pharm Sci 92:656-664. (Pubitemid 36258980)
60. Potts RO, Guy RH. 1992. Predicting skin permeability. Pharm Res 9:663-669.
61. Pugh WJ, Hadgraft J. 1994. Ab initio prediction of human skin permeability coefficients. Int J Pharm 103:163-178. (Pubitemid 24037048)
62. Lien EJ, Gao H. 1995. QSAR analysis of skin permeability of various drugs in man as compared to in vitro and in vitro studies in rodents. Pharm Res 12:583-587.
63. Barratt MD. 1995. Quantitative structure-activity relationships for skin permeability. Toxicol In Vitro 9:27-37.
64. Abraham MH. 1994. New solute descriptors for linear free energy relationships and quantitative structure-activity relationships. In: Politzer P, Murray JS, editors. Quantitative treatments of solute/solvent interactions. 1st edition. Amsterdam: Elsevier. pp 83-133.
65. Hostynek JJ, Magee PS. 1997. Modeling in vivo human skin absorption. Quant Struct Act Relat 16:473-479. (Pubitemid 28055267)
66. Roy TA, Krueger AJ, Mackerer CR, Neil W, Arroyo AM, Yang JJ. 1998. SAR models for estimating the percutaneous absorption of polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons. SAR QSAR Environ Res 9:171-185.
67. Abraham MH, Chadha HS, Martins F, Mitchell RC, Bradbury MW, Gratton JA. 1999. Hydrogen bonding part 46: A review of the correlation and prediction of transport properties by an LFER method: Physicochemical properties, brain penetration and skin permeability. Pestic Sci 55:78-88. (Pubitemid 29090796)
68. Gute BD, Grunwald GD, Basak SC. 1999. Prediction of the dermal penetration of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHS): A hierarchical QSAR approach. SAR QSAR Environ Res 10:1-15.
69. Minghetti P, Casiraghi A, Cilurzo F, Montanari L, Monzani MV, Bertolini G, Zaliani A. 2000. Solvation enthalpies as descriptors of structure - In vitro percutaneous permeation relationship of benzoxazinones regioisomers. Farmaco 55:563-568. (Pubitemid 32007899)
70. Dearden JC, Cronin MTD, Patel H, Raevsky OA. 2000. The prediction of skin permeability by using physicochemical data. J Pharm Pharmacol 52:221.
71. Pugh WJ, Degim IT, Hadgraft J. 2000. Epidermal permeability-penetrant structure relationships: 4, QSAR of permeant diffusion across human stratum corneum in terms of molecular weight, h-bonding and electronic charge. Int J Pharm 197:203-211. (Pubitemid 30125791)
72. Poulin P, Krishnan K. 2001. Molecular structure-based prediction of human abdominal skin permeability coefficients for several organic compounds. J Toxicol Environ Health Part A 62:143-159. (Pubitemid 32127878)
73. Ghafourian T, Fooladi S. 2001. The effect of structural QSAR parameters on skin penetration. Int J Pharm 217:1-11. (Pubitemid 32268628)
74. Buchwald P, Bodor N. 2001. A simple, predictive, structure-based skin permeability model. J Pharm Pharmacol 53:1087-1098. (Pubitemid 32754939)
75. Patel H, ten Berge W, Cronin MTD. 2002. Quantitative structure-activity relationships (QSARs) for the prediction of skin permeation of exogenous chemicals. Chemosphere 48:603-613.
76. Lim CW, Fujiwara S-I, Yamashita F, Hashida M. 2002. Prediction of human skin permeability using a combination of molecular orbital calculations and artificial neural network. Biol Pharm Bull 25:361-366. (Pubitemid 39663290)
77. Fujiwara SI, Yamashita F, Hashida M. 2003. QSAR analysis of interstudy variable skin permeability based on the "latent membrane permeability" concept. J Pharm Sci 92:1939-1946.
78. González MP, Helguera AM. 2003. Tops-mode versus dragon descriptors to predict permeability coefficients through low-density polyethylene. J Comput Aided Mol Des 17:665-672.
79. Pannier AK, Brand RM, Jones DD. 2003. Fuzzy modeling of skin permeability coefficients. Pharm Res 20:143-148.
80. Moody RP, MacPherson H. 2003. Determination of dermal absorption QSAR/QSPRs by brute force regression: Multiparameter model development with Molsuite2000. J Toxicol Environ Health Part A 66:1927-1942. (Pubitemid 37352635)
81. Abraham MH, Martins F. 2004. Human skin permeation and partition: General linear free-energy relationship analyses. J Pharm Sci 93:1508-1523. (Pubitemid 38725023)
82. Riviere JE, Brooks JD. 2005. Predicting skin permeability from complex chemical mixtures. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 208:99-110.
83. Karande P, Jain A, Ergun K, Kispersky V, Mitragotri S. 2005. Design principles of chemical penetration enhancers for transdermal drug delivery. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102:4688-4693. (Pubitemid 40471515)
84. Majumdar S, Thomas J, Wasdo S, Sloan KB. 2007. The effect of water solubility of solutes on their flux through human skin in vitro. Int J Pharm 329:25-36. (Pubitemid 44937521)
85. Neumann D, Kohlbacher O, Merkwirth C, Lengauer T. 2006. A fully computational model for predicting percutaneous drug absorption. J Chem Inf Model 46:424-429. (Pubitemid 43282133)