Conceptualizing, investigating, and enhancing adaptive expertise in elementary mathematics education

European Journal of Psychology of Education

Volumn 24, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 335-359

  Verschaffel, Lieven ^a   Luwel, Koen ^a   Torbeyns, Joke ^a   Van Dooren, Wim ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEUVEN   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Adaptivity; Arithmetic; Flexibility; Mathematics education; Strategies

Indexed keywords

EID: 70349630182     PISSN: 02562928     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/BF03174765     Document Type: Article

References (125)

1. Adelson, B. (1984). When novices surpass experts: The difficulty of a task may increase with expertise. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 10, 483-495.
2. Anghileri, J. (1999). Issues in teaching multiplication and division. In I. Thompson (Ed.), Issues in teaching numeracy in primary schools (pp. 184-194). Buckingham, U. K.: Open University Press.
3. Baroody, A. J. (1996). An investigative approach to the mathematics instruction of children classified as learning disabled. In D. K. Reid, W. P. Hresko, et al. (Eds.), Cognitive approaches to learning disabilities (3rd ed., pp. 545-615). Austin, TX: PRO-ED.
4. Baroody, A. J. (2003). The development of adaptive expertise and flexibility: The integration of conceptual and procedural knowledge. In A. J. Baroody & A. Dowker (Eds.), The development of arithmetic concepts and skills (pp. 1-34). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
5. Baroody, A. J., & Dowker, A. (Eds.). (2003). The development of arithmetic concepts and skills. Constructing adaptive expertise. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
6. Baroody, A. J., & Ginsburg, H. P. (1986). The relationship between initial meaningful learning and mechanical knowledge of arithmetic. In J. Hiebert (Ed.), Conceptual and procedural knowledge: The case of mathematics (pp. 75-112). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
7. Baroody, A. J., & Rosu, L. (2006). Adaptive expertise with basic addition and subtraction combinations - The number sense view. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association (April), San Fransisco, CA.
8. (Pubitemid 33743545) Baxter, J. A., Woodward, J., & Olson, D. (2001). Effects of reform-based mathematics instruction on low achievers in five third-grade classrooms. Elementary School Journal, 101, 529-547.
9. Beishuizen, M. (2001). Different approaches to mastering mental calculation strategies. In J. Anghileri (Ed.), Principles and practices of arithmetic teaching (pp. 119-130). Buckingham: Open University Press.
10. Berar, I. (2004). Flexibility of cognitive processes - Indicator of giftedness. (Unpublished manuscript). Available at http://www.history-cluj.ro/ SU/cercet/Berar/
11. Bereiter, C., & Scardamalia, M (1993). Surpassing ourselves: An inquiry into the nature and implications of expertise. Chicago: Open Court.
12. Bisanz, J. (2003). Arithmetical development. Commentary on chapters 1 through 8 and reflections on directions. In A. J. Baroody & A. Dowker (Eds.), The development of arithmetic concepts and skills (pp. 435-452). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
13. (Pubitemid 33333182) Blote, A. W., Van der Burg, E., & Klein, A. S. (2001). Students' flexibility in solving two-digit addition and subtraction problems: Instruction effects. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 627-638.
14. (Pubitemid 128020748) Boaler, J. (1998). Open and closed mathematics: Student experiences and understandings. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 29, 41-62.
15. Boaler, J. (2000). Exploring situated insights into research and learning. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 39, 113-119
16. Bottge, B. A. (1999). Effects of contextualized math instruction on problem solving of average and below-average achieving students. The Journal of Special Education, 33, 81-92.
17. (Pubitemid 33385950) Bottge, B. A., Heinrichs, M., Chan, S., & Serlin, R. C. (2001). Anchoring adolescents' understanding of math concepts in rich problem solving environments. Remedial and Special Education, 22, 299-314.
18. Bottge, B. A., Heinrichs, M., Mehta, Z., & Hung, Y. (2002). Weighing the benefits of anchored math instruction for students with disabilities in general education classes. The Journal of Special Education, 35, 186-200.
19. Bransford, J. (2001). Thoughts on adaptive expertise (unpublished manuscript). Available at http://www.vanth.org/docs/AdaptiveExpertise.pdf
20. Brousseau, G. (1997). Theory of didactical situations in mathematics. N. Balacheff, M. Cooper, R. Sutherland, & V. Warfield (Eds. and Trans.). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
21. Brownell, W. A. (1945). When is arithmetic meaningful? Journal of Educational Research, 38, 481-498.
22. Bruner, J. (1986). Actual minds, possible worlds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
23. Buys, K. (2001). Progressive mathematsation: Sketch of a learning strand. In J. Anghileri (Ed.), Principles and practices of arithmetic teaching (pp. 107-118). Buckingham: Open University Press.
24. Cajori, F. (1917). A history of elementary mathematics. New York: Macmillan.
25. (Pubitemid 36581960) CaSas, J. J., Quesada, J. F., Antoli, A., & Fajardo, I. (2003). Cognitive flexibility and adaptability to environmental changes in dynamic complex problem-solving tasks. Ergonomics, 46, 482-501.
26. (Pubitemid 127077936) Carr, M., & Jessup, D. L. (1997). Gender differences in first-grade mathematics strategy use: Social and metacognitive influences. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 318-328.
27. Cary, M., & Reder, L. M. (2002). Metacognition in strategy selection: Giving consciousness too much credit. In M. Izaute, P. Chambres, & P. J. Marescaux (Eds.), Metacognition: Process, function, and use (pp. 63-78). New York, NY: Kluwer.
28. Cattell, R. (1946). The riddle of perseveration. Journal of Personality, 14, 239-267.
29. Cichon, D., & Ellis, J. G. (2003). The effects of MATH Connections on student achievement, confidence, and perception. In S. L. Senk & D. R. Thompson (Eds.), Standards-based school mathematics curricula: What are they? What do students learn? (pp. 345-374). Mahwah, N. J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
30. Clarke, D. J. (1996). Assessment. In A. Bishop, K. Clements, C. Keitel, & C. Laborde (Eds.), International handbook of mathematics education (part I, pp. 327-370). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
31. Cobb, P., & Hodge, L. L. (2007). Culture, identity, and equity in the mathematics classroom. In N. S. Nasir & P. Cobb (Eds.), Diversity, equity, and access to mathematical ideas (pp. 159-171). New York: Teachers College Press.
32. Coulson, R. L., Feltovich, P. J., & Spiro, R. J. (1989). Foundations of a understanding of the ultrastructural basis of myocardial failure. A reciprocation network of oversimplifications. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 14, 109-146.
33. Crowley, K., & Siegler, R. S. (1993). Flexible strategy use in young children's tic-tac-toe. Cognitive Science, 17, 531-561.
34. Dai, D. Y., & Sternberg, R. J. (2004). Beyond cognitivism: Toward an integrated understanding of intellectual functioning and development. In D. Y. Dai & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), Motivation, emotion and cognition: Integrated perspectives on intellectual functioning and development (pp. 3-38). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
35. De Corte, E., & Verschaffel, L. (1987). The effect of semantic structure on first graders' solution strategies of elementary addition and subtraction word problems. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 73, 363-381.
36. Duncker, K. (1945). On problem solving. Psychological Monographs, 58 (5, Whole n° 270).
37. Dunn, J. A. (1975). Tests of creativity in mathematics. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 6, 327-332.
38. Elia, I., Gagatsis, A., & Deliyianni, E. (2005). A review of the effects of different modes of representation in mathematical problem solving, in A. Gagatsis, F. Spagnolo, Gr. Makrides, & V. Farmaki (Eds.), Proceedings of the 4th Mediterranean Conference on Mathematics Education: Vol. 1 (pp. 271-286). Palermo: University of Palermo, Cyprus Mathematical Society
39. (Pubitemid 127158157) Ellis, S. (1997). Strategy choice in sociocultural context. Developmental Review, 17, 490-524.
40. Engestrom, Y. (1987). Learning by expanding: An activity-theoretical approach to developmental research. Helsinki, Finland: Orienta-Konsultit Oy.
41. Engestrom, Y., & Miettinen, R. (1999). Introduction. In Y. Engestrom, R. Miettinen, & R.-J. Punamaki (Eds.), Perspectives on activity theory (pp. 1-18). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
42. Feltovich, P. J., Spiro, R. J., & Coulson, R. L. (1997). Issues of expert flexibility in contexts characterized by complexity and change. In P. J. Feltovich, K. M. Ford, & R. R. Hoffman (Eds.), Expertise in context: Human and machine (pp. 125-146). Menlo Park, CA: AAAI Press.
43. Frensch, P. A., & Sternberg, R. J. (1989). Expertise and intelligent thinking: When is it worse to know better? In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Advances in the psychology of human intelligence (vol. 5, pp. 157-188). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
44. Freudenthal, H. (1991). Revisiting mathematics education. Dordrecht: Reidel.
45. Frobisher, L., & Threlfall, J. (1998). Teaching mental maths strategies. Heinemann: Oxford.
46. Fuson, K., Carroll, W., & Drueck, J. (2000). Achievement results for second and third graders using the Standards-based curriculum. Everyday Mathematics. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 31, 277-295.
47. Geary, D. C. (2003). Arithmetical development: Commentary on Chapters 9 through 15 and future directions. In A. J. Baroody & A. Dowker (Eds.), The development of arithmetic concepts and stalls: Constructing adaptive expertise (pp. 453-464). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
48. Goldin, G. A. (2003). Representation in school mathematics: A unifying research perspective. In J. Kilpatrick, M. G. Martin, & S. Schifter (Eds.), A research companion to principles and standards for school mathematics (pp. 275-286). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
49. Gravemeijer, K. (1994). Developing realistic mathematics education. Utrecht, The Netherlands: Freudenthal Institute, University of Utrecht.
50. (Pubitemid 38629593) Gravemeijer, K. (2004). Local instruction theories as means of support for teachers in reform mathematics education. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 6, 105-128.
51. Greeno, J. G., Collins, A. M., & Resnick, L. B. (1996). Cognition and learning. In D. C. Berliner & R. C. Calfee (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 15-46). New York, NY: Macmillan.
52. (Pubitemid 127162802) Greer, B. (1997). Modelling reality in mathematics classrooms: The case of word problems. Learning and Instruction, 7, 293-307.
53. Groen, G. J., & Parkman, J. M. (1972). A chronometric analysis of simple addition. Psychological Review, 79, 329-343.
54. Guilford, J. P. (1967). The nature of human intelligence. New York: McGraw-Hill.
55. Hatano, G. (1982). Cognitive consequences of practice in culture specific procedural skills. The Quartely Newsletter of the Laboratory of Comparative Human Cognition, 4, 15-18.
56. Hatano, G. (2003). Foreword. In A. J. Baroody & A. Dowker (Eds.), The development of arithmetic concepts and skills (pp. xi-xiii). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
57. (Pubitemid 38065310) Hatano, G., & Oura, Y. (2003). Reconceptualizing school learning using insight from expertise research. Educational Researcher, 52 (8), 26-29.
58. Heavey, L. (2003). Arithmetical savants. In A. J. Baroody & A. Dowker (Eds.), The development of arithmetic concepts and skills (pp. 409-434). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
59. Hecht, S. A. (2002). Counting on working memory in simple arithmetic when counting is used for problem solving. Memory and Cognition, 30, 447-455.
60. Heirdsfield, A. M., & Cooper, T. J. (2002). Flexibility and inflexibility in accurate mental addition and subtraction: Two case studies. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 21, 57-74.
61. Hiebert, J. (Ed.). (1986). Conceptual and procedural knowledge: The case of mathematics. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
62. Ishida, J. (2002). Students' evaluation of their strategies when they find several solutions. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 21, 49-56.
63. Jausovec, N. (1994). Flexible thinking: An explanation for individual differences in ability. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
64. Kahneman, D., Slovic, P., & Tversky, A. (1982). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. New York: Cambridge University Press.
65. Kaput, J. (1992). Technology and mathematics education. In D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook for research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 515-556). New York: Macmillan.
66. Kilpatrick, J., Swafford, J., & Findell, B. (2001). Adding it up. Helping children leant mathematics. Washington, D. C.: National Academy Press.
67. Klayman, J. (1985). Children's decision strategies and their adaptation to task charecteristics. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 35, 179-201.
68. (Pubitemid 128105208) Klein, A. S., Beishuizen, M., & Treffers, A. (1998). The empty number line in Dutch second grades: Realistic versus gradual program design. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 29, 443-464.
69. Koriat, A. (2000). Control processes in remembering. In E. Tulving & F. I. M. Craik (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of memory (pp. 333-346). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
70. Krutetskii, V. A. (1976). The psychology of mathematical abilities in school children. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
71. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate, peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
72. (Pubitemid 33595086) Lemaire, P., & Lecacheur, M. (2001). Older and younger adults' strategy use and execution in currency conversion tasks: Insights from French franc to Euro and Euro to French franc conversions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 7, 195-206.
73. (Pubitemid 39659813) Lemaire, P., & Lecacheur, M. (2002). Children's strategies in computational estimation. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 82, 281-304.
74. (Pubitemid 29190653) Lemaire, P., & Reder, L. (1999). What effects strategy selection in arithmetic? The example of parity and five effects on product verification. Memory and Cognition, 27, 364-382.
75. (Pubitemid 127039814) Leron, U., & Hazzan, O. (1997). The world according to Johny: A coping perspective in mathematics education. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 32, 265-292.
76. Lesh, R., & Doerr, H. M. (Eds.). (2003). Beyond constructivism. Models and modeling perspectives on mathematical problem solving, learning and teaching. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
77. Luchins, A. S., & Luchins, E. H. (1959). Rigidity of behavior - A variational approach to the effect of einstellung. Eugene, OR: University of Oregon Books.
78. (Pubitemid 38613904) Luwel, K., & Verschaffel, L. (2003). Adapting strategy choices to situational factors: The effect of time pressure on children's numerosity judgement strategies. Psychologica Belgica, 43, 269-295.
79. (Pubitemid 41136157) Luwel, K., Verschaffel, L., & Lemaire, P. (2005). Children's strategies in numerosity judgment. Cognitive Development, 20, 448-471.
80. McClain, K., Cobb, P., & Bowers, J. (1998). A contextual investigation of three-digit addition and subtraction. In L. J. Morrow & M. J. Kenney (Eds.), The teaching and learning of algorithms in school mathematics (pp. 141-150). Reston: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
81. Milo, B., & Ruijssenaars, A. J. J. M. (2002). Strategiegebruik van leerlingen in het speciaal basisonderwijs: Begeleiden of sturen? [Strategy instruction in special education: Guided of direct instruction?] Pedagogische Studien, 79, 117-129.
82. Moser Opitz, E. (2001). Mathematical knowledge and progress in the mathematical learning of children with special needs in their first year of school. In MATHE 2000. Selected papers (pp. 85-88). Dortmund, Germany: University of Dortmund, Department of Mathematics.
83. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1989). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
84. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics, http://standards.nctm.org/document/index.htm
85. Nunes, T., Schliemann, A., & Carraher, D. (1993). Street mathematics and school mathematics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
86. Ontwikkelingsdoelen en eindtermen. Informatiemap voor de onderwijspraktijk. Gewoon basisonderwijs (1998). [Standards. Documentation for practitioners. Elementary education.] Brussel: Ministerie van de Vlaamse Gemeenschap, Departement Onderwijs, Afdeling Informatie en Documentatie.
87. Perkins, D. (1995). Outsmarting IQ: The emerging science cf leamable intelligence. New York: The Free Press.
88. Rittle-Johnson, B., & Siegler, R. S. (1998). The relation between conceptual and procedural knowledge in learning mathematics: A review. In C. Donlan (Ed.), The development of mathematical skills (pp. 75-110). East Sussex: UK: Psychology Press.
89. Rogoff, B. (1990). Apprenticeship in thinking. New York: Oxford University Press.
90. Schauble, L., & Glaser, R. (Eds.). (1996). Innovations in learning: New environments for education. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
91. Selter, C. (1998). Building on children's mathematics. A teaching experiment in grade three. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 36, 1-27.
92. (Pubitemid 128150592) Shrager, J., & Siegler, R. S. (1998). SCADS: A model of children's strategy choices and strategy discoveries. Psychological Science, 9, 405-410.
93. Siegler, R. S. (1996). Emerging minds: The process of change in children's thinking. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
94. Siegler, R. S. (1998). Children's thinking. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
95. Siegler, R. S. (2000). The rebirth of children's learning. Child Development, 71, 26-35.
96. Siegler, R. S., & Araya, R. (2005). A computational model of conscious and unconscious strategy discovery. In R. V. Kail (Ed.), Advances in child development and behavior (vol. 33, pp. 1-42). Oxford, UK: Elsevier.
97. Siegler, R. S., & Jenkins, E. (1989). How children discover new strategies. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
98. (Pubitemid 127458876) Siegler, R. S., & Lemaire, P. (1997). Older and younger adults' strategy choices in multiplication: Testing predictions of ASCM using the choice/no-choice method. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 126, 71-92.
99. Sowder, J., Philipp, R., Armstrong, B., & Schappelle, B. (1998). Middle-grade teachers' mathematical knowledge and its relationship to instruction. Albany, NY: SUNY.
100. Spearman, C. (1927). The abilities of man, their nature and measurement. London: Macmillan.
101. Spiro, R. J. (1980). Constructive processes in prose comprehension and recall. In R. J. Spiro, B. C. Bruce, & W. F. Brewer (Eds.), Theoretical issues in reading comprehension (pp. 245-278). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
102. Stanonich, K. E., & West, R. F. (2000). Individual differences in reasoning: Implications for the rationality debate. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 23, 645-726.
103. Straker, A. (1999). The National Numeracy project: 1996-99. In I. Thompson (Ed.), Issues in teaching numeracy in primary schools (pp. 39-48). Buckingham; UK: Open University Press.
104. (Pubitemid 41616866) Star, J. (2005). Reconceptualizing procedural knowledge. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 36, 404-411.
105. Thompson, I. (1999). Getting your head around mental calculation. In I. Thompson (Ed.), Issues in teaching numeracy in primary schools (pp. 145-156). Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
106. Threlfall, J. (2002). Flexible mental calculation. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 50, 29-47.
107. Torbeyns, J., Verschaffel, L., & Ghesquière, P. (2004). Strategy development in children with mathematical disabilities:
108. Insights from the choice/no-choice method and the chronological-age/ ability-level-match design. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 37, 119-131.
109. (Pubitemid 40273027) Torbeyns, J., Verschaffel, L., & Ghesquiere, P. (2005). Simple addition strategies in a first-grade class with multiple strategy instruction. Cognition and Instruction, 23, 1-21.
110. Torbeyns, J., Arnaud, L., Lemaire, P., & Verschaffel, L. (2004). Cognitive change as strategic change. In A. Demetriou & A. Raftopoulos (Eds.), Cognitive developmental change: Theories, models and measurement (pp. 186-216). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
111. Treffers, A. (1987). Three dimensions. A model of goal and theory description in mathematics education. The Wiskobas project. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Reidel.
112. Treffers, A., De Moor, E., & Feijs, E. (1990). Proeve van een national programma voor het reken/wiksundeonderwijs op de basisschool. Deel I. Overzicht einddoelen. [Towards a national curriculum for mathematics education in the elementary school, part 1. Overview of the goals.] Tilburg, The Netherlands: Zwijsen.
113. Van den Heuvel-Panhuizen, M. (Ed.). (2001). Children learn mathematics. A learning-teaching trajectory with intermediate attainment targets for calculation with whole numbers in primary school. Groningen, The Netherlands: Wolters Noordhoff.
114. Van der Heijden, M. K.. (1993). Consistentie van aanpakgedrag. [Consistency in solution behavior.] Lisse, The Netherlands: Swets & Zeitlinger.
115. Van Dooren, W., Verschaffel, L., Greer, B., & De Bock, D. (2006). Modelling for life: Developing adaptive expertise in mathematical modelling from an early age. In L. Verschaffel, F. Dochy, M. Boekaerts, & S. Vosniadou (Eds.), Instructional psychology: Past, present, and future trends. Sixteen essays in honour of Erik De Corte (pp. 91-112). Oxford, UK: Elsevier.
116. Verschaffel, L., Greer, B., & De Corte, E. (2007). Whole number concepts and operations. In F. K. Lester (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 557-628). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
117. Warner, L. B. (2005) Behaviors that indicate mathematical flexible thought (Doctoral dissertation, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, 2005). Dissertation Abstracts International, 66/01, 123.
118. Warner, L. B., Davis, G. E., Alcock, L. J., & Coppolo, J. (2002). Flexible mathematical thinking and multiple representations in middle school mathematics. Mediterranean Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 1 (2), 37-61.
119. Wertheimer, M. (1945). Productive thinking. London: Tavistock.
120. Wittmann, E. Ch. (1995). Mathematics education as a design science. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 29, 355-374.
121. Wittmann, E. Ch., & Müller, G. N. (1990-1992). Handbuch Produktiver Rechenubungen. Vols I & 2 [Handbook of productive arithmetic exercises. Volume 1 & 2]. Dusseldorf und Stuttgart, Germany: Klett Verlag.
122. Wittmann, E. Ch., & Muller, G. N. (2004). Das Zahlenbuch. Mathematik im 1. Schuljahr. [The book of numbers. Mathematics in grade 1.] Dusseldorf und Stuttgart, Germany: Klett Verlag.
123. (Pubitemid 127457895) Woodward, J., & Baxter, J. (1997). The effects of an innovative approach to mathematics on academically low achieving students in inclusive settings. Exceptional Children, 63, 373-388.
124. (Pubitemid 33240864) Woodward, J., Monroe, K., & Baxter, J. (2001). Enhancing student achievement on performance assessments in mathematics. Learning Disabilities Quarterly, 24 (Winter), 33-46.
125. (Pubitemid 126085225) Yackel, E., & Cobb, P. (1996). Classroom sociomathematical norms and intellectual autonomy. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 27, 458-477.