The Effects of an Innovative Approach to Mathematics on Academically Low-Achieving Students in Inclusive Settings

Exceptional Children

Volumn 63, Issue 3, 1997, Pages 373-388

  Woodward, John ^a   Baxter, Juliet ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PUGET SOUND   (United States)

^b Educational Inquiries   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0000336392     PISSN: 00144029     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/001440299706300306     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Baker, J., & Zigmond, N. (1990). Are general classrooms equipped to accommodate students with learning disabilities? Exceptional Children, 56(6), 515-526.
2. Baxter, J., & Woodward, J. (1995). Problems of academic diversity in innovative mathematics classrooms: Can the teacher teach everyone? (Technical Report No. 95-2). Tacoma, WA: University of Puget Sound.
3. Baxter, J., Woodward, J., Olson, D., & Kline, C. (1996). Action-based research on innovative mathematics instruction and students with special needs. (Technical Report No. 96-1). Tacoma, WA: University of Puget Sound.
4. Bell, M., Bell, J., & Hartfield, R. (1993). Everyday Mathematics. Evanston, Il.: Everyday Learning Corporation.
5. Bishop, A. (1990). Marhematical power to the people. Harvard Educational Review, 60(3), 357-369.
6. Bos, C. S., & Anders, P. L. (1990). Interactive teaching and learning: Instructional practices for teaching content and strategic knowledge. In T. Scruggs & B. Wong (Eds.), Intervention research in learning disabilities (pp. 166-185). New York: Springer-Verlag.
7. Carnine, D., Jones, E., & Dixon, R. (1994). Mathematics: Educational tools for diverse learners. School Psychology Review, 23(3), 406-427.
8. Carpenter, T. (1985). Learning to add and subtract: An exercise in problem solving. In E. A. Silver (Ed.), Teaching and learning mathematical problem solving: Multiple research perspectives (pp. 17-40). Hillsdale, NJ: LEA.
9. Carpenter, T., Fennema, E., & Romberg, T. (1993). Rational numbers: An integration of research. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
10. Darch, C., Carnine, D., & Gersten, R. (1984). Explicit instruction in mathematics problem solving. Journal of Educational Research, 77(66), 350-359.
11. Englert, C., Raphael, T., & Anderson, L. (1992). Socially mediated instruction: Improving students' knowledge and talk about writing. Elementary School Journal, 92(4), 411-49.
12. Fennema, E., Carpenter, T., & Loef, M. (1990). Mathematics belief scale. Madison: University of Wisconsin, Wisconsin Center for Educational Research.
13. Flanders, J. (1987). How much of the content in mathematics textbooks is new? Arithmetic Teacher, 35(1), 18-23.
14. Fuchs, D., & Fuchs, L. (1994). Inclusive schools movement and the radicalization of special education reform. Exceptional Children, 60, 294-309.
15. Gelman, R., & Gallistel, C. (1978). The child's understanding of numbers. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
16. Gersten, R., Keating, T., & Irvin, L. (1995). The burden of proof: Validity as improvement of instructional practice. Exceptional Children, 61(6), 510-519.
17. Gleason, M., Carnine, D., & Boriero, D. (1990). Improving CAI effectiveness with attention to instructional design in teaching story problems to mildly handicapped students. Journal of Special Education Technology, 10(3), 129-136.
18. Good, T., & Grouws, D. (1979). The Missouri Mathematics Effectiveness Project: An experimental study of fourth-grade classrooms. Journal of Educational Psychology, 71(3), 355-362.
19. Good, T., Grouws, D., & Ebmeier, H. (1983). Active mathematics teaching. New York: Longman.
20. Grouws, D. (1992). Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning. New York: Maxwell Macmillan.
21. Hegarty, M. & Mayer, R. (1993, June). Comprehension of arithmetic word problems: A comparison of successful and unsuccessful problem solvers. Paper presented at the annual convention of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans.
22. Hiebert, J. (1986). Conceptual and procedural knowledge: The case of mathematics. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
23. Hiebert, J., & Behr, M. (1988). Number concepts and operations in the middle grades. Reston, VA: The National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 295 835)
24. Hieronymus, A., Hoover, H., & Lyndquist, E. (1986). The Iowa Test of Basic Skills, Form H. Chicago, IL: Riverside .
25. Hofmeister, A. (1993). Elitism and reform in school mathematics. Remedial and Special Education, 14(6), 8-13.
26. Kelly, B., Gersten, R., & Carnine, D. (1990). Student error patterns as a function of curriculum design: Teaching fractions to remedial high school students and high school students with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 23, 23-29.
27. Leinhardt, G., Putnam, R., & Hattrup, R. (1992). Analysis of arithmetic for mathematics teaching. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
28. Lesh, R., & Lamon, R. (1992). Assessment of authentic performance in school mathematics. Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 352 262)
29. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (1980). An agenda for action. Reston, VA: Author.)
30. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (1989). Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: NCTM. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 304 336
31. National Research Council. (1989). Everybody counts: A report to the nation on the future of mathematics education. Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 309 938)
32. Palincsar, A., & Klenk, L. (1992). Fostering literacy learning in supportive contexts. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 25(4), 211-25.
33. Patton, M. (1980). Qualitative research methods. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
34. Peterson, P., Fennema, E., Carpenter, T., & Loef, M. (1989). Teachers' pedagogical content beliefs in mathematics. Cognition and Instruction, 6(1), 1-40.
35. Putnam, R., Lampert, M., & Peterson, P. (1990). Alternative perspectives on knowing mathematics in elementary schools. In C. Cazden (Ed.), Review of research in education (pp. 57-149). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
36. Resnick, L. (1987). Education and learning to think. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.
37. Romberg, T. (1995). Reform in school mathematics and authentic assessment. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
38. Rucker, W., Dilley, C., & Lowry, D. (1988). Heath Mathematics. Lexington, MA: D.C. Heath and Company.
39. Schumm, J., Vaughn, S., Haager, D., McDowell, J., Rothlein, L., & Saumell, L. (1995). General education teacher planning: What can students with learning disabilities expect? Exceptional Children, 61, 335-352.
40. Siegler, R. (1995, June). Current understanding of children's learning. Paper presented at the Invitational Conference on Learning Disabilities and the Teaching of Science and Mathematics, American Association for the Advancement of Science, Arlington, VA.
41. Silbert, J., Carnine, D., & Stein, M. (1989). Direct instruction in mathematics. Columbus, OH: Charles Merrill.
42. Slavin, R., Madden, N., Karweit, N., Livermon, B., & Donlan, L. (1990). Success for all: First-year outcomes of a comprehensive plan for reforming urban education. American Educational Research Journal, 27(2), 255-278.
43. Stevenson, H., & Stigler, J. (1992). The learning gap. New York: Simon & Schuster.
44. Stigler, J., & Baranes, R. (1988). Culture and mathematics learning. Review of Research in Education, 15, 253-306.
45. Usiskin, Z. (1993). Lessons from the Chicago mathematics project. Educational Leadership, 50(8), 14-18.
46. Van Lehn, K. (1990). Mind bugs. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
47. Woodward, J., Baxter, J., & Howard, L. (1993). Informal Mathematics Assessment. Unpublished test, University of Puget Sound, Tacoma, WA.
48. Woodward, J., & Baxter, J. (1996). Meeting the needs of academically low achieving students in innovative mathematics classrooms. (Technical Report No. 96-2). Tacoma, WA: University of Puget Sound.
49. Woodward, J., Baxter, J., & Scheel, C. (in press). It's what you take for granted when you take nothing for granted: The problems with general principles of instructional design. In T. Scruggs & M. Mastropieri (Eds.), Advances in learning and behavioral disorders (In press). New York: JAI Press.
50. Woodward, J., & Howard, L. (1994). The misconceptions of youth: Errors and their mathematical meaning. Exceptional Children, 61, 126-136.