Simple addition strategies in a first-grade class with multiple strategy instruction

Cognition and Instruction

Volumn 23, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 1-21

  Torbeyns, Joke ^a,b   Verschaffel, Lieven ^a   Ghesquière, Pol ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEUVEN   (Belgium)

^b RESEARCH FOUNDATION FLANDERS FWO   (Belgium)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 13944267918     PISSN: 07370008     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1207/s1532690xci2301_1     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Baroody, A. J. (1987). Children's mathematical thinking: A developmental framework for preschool, primary, and special education teachers. New York: Teachers College Press.
2. Baroody, A. J. (1999). The roles of estimation and the commutativity principle in the development of third graders' mental multiplication. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 74, 157-193.
3. Baroody, A. J. (2003). The development of adaptive expertise and flexibility: The integration of conceptual and procedural knowledge. In A. J. Baroody & A. Dowker (Eds.), The development of arithmetic concepts and skills: Constructing adaptive expertise (pp. 1-33). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
4. Baroody, A. J., & Dowker, A. (2003). The development of arithmetic concepts and skills: Constructing adaptive expertise. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
5. Baroody, A. J., & Hume, J. (1991). Meaningful mathematics instruction: The case of fractions. Remedial and Special Education, 12(3), 54-68.
6. Baroody, A. J., & Tiilikainen, S. H. (2003). Two perspectives on addition development. In A. J. Baroody & A. Dowker (Eds.), The development of arithmetic concepts and skills: Constructing adaptive expertise (pp. 75-125). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
7. Baxter, J. A., Woodward, J., & Olson, D. (2001). Effects of reform-based mathematics instruction on low achievers in five third-grade classrooms. Elementary School Journal, 101, 529-547.
8. Boaler, J. (1998). Open and closed mathematics: Student experiences and understandings. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 29, 41-62.
9. Bottge, B. A. (1999). Effects of contextualized math instruction on problem solving of average and below-average achieving students. The Journal of Special Education, 33, 81-92.
10. Bottge, B. A., Heinrichs, M., Chan, S., & Serlin, R. C. (2001). Anchoring adolescents' understanding of math concepts in rich problem solving environments. Remedial and Special Education, 22(5), 299-314.
11. Bottge, B. A., Heinrichs, M., Mehta, Z., & Hung, Y. (2002). Weighing the benefits of anchored math instruction for students with disabilities in general education classes. The Journal of Special Education, 35, 186-200.
12. Bourdeaud'hui, G., Deboyser, G., Jacobs, H., Matthijs, L., Melis, J., & Wiecke, C. (1999). Nieuwe reken raak [Calculate correctly: New edition]. Deurne, Belgium: Wolters Plantyn.
13. Carpenter, T., Fennema, E., Franke, M., Levi, L., & Empson, S. (1999). Children's mathematics: Cognitively guided instruction. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
14. Cichon, D., & Ellis, J. G. (2003). The effects of MATH Connections on student achievement, confidence, and perception. In S. L. Senk & D. R. Thompson (Eds.), Standards-based school mathematics curricula: What are they? What do students learn? (pp. 345-374). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
15. Cowan, R. (2003). Does it all add up? Changes in children's knowledge of addition combinations, strategies and principles. In A. J. Baroody & A. Dowker (Eds.), The development of arithmetic concepts and skills: Constructing adaptive expertise (pp. 35-74). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
16. Cumming, J. J., & Elkins, J. (1999). Lack of automaticity in the basic addition facts as a characteristic of arithmetic learning problems and instructional needs. Mathematical Cognition, 5, 149-180.
17. Dudal, P. (2000). Leerlingvolgsysteem. Rekenen: Toetsen 1-2-3. Basisboek [System for following pupils. Arithmetic: Tests 1-2-3. Textbook]. Leuven, Belgium: Garant.
18. Fuson, K. C. (1992). Research on whole number addition and subtraction. In D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning: A project of the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (pp. 243-275). New York: MacMillan.
19. Fuson, K., Carroll, W., & Drueck, J. (2000). Achievement results for second and third graders using the standards-based curriculum everyday mathematics. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 31, 277-295.
20. Geary, D. C. (2003). Arithmetical development: Commentary on Chapters 9 through 15 and future directions. In A. J. Baroody & A. Dowker (Eds.), The development of arithmetic concepts and skills: Constructing adaptive expertise (pp. 453-464). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
21. Hatano, G. (1982). Cognitive consequences of practice in culture specific procedural skills. The Quarterly Newsletter of the Laboratory of Comparative Human Cognition, 4, 15-18.
22. Kilpatrick, J., Swafford, J., & Findell, B. (2001). Adding it up. Helping children learn mathematics. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
23. LeFevre, J., Smith-Chant, B., Hiscock, K., Daley, K., & Morris, J. (2003). Young adults' strategic choices in simple arithmetic: Implications for the development of mathematical representations. In A. J. Baroody & A. Dowker (Eds.), The development of arithmetic concepts and skills: Constructing adaptive expertise (pp. 203-228). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
24. Lemaire, P., & Siegler, R. S. (1995). Four aspects of strategic change: Contributions to children's learning of multiplication. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 124, 83-97.
25. Littell, R. C., Milliken, G. A., & Stroup, W. W. (1996). SAS system for mixed models [Computer software], Leuven, Belgium: SAS Institute.
26. Luwel, K., Verschaffel, L., Onghena, P., & De Corte, E. (2003). Analyzing the adaptiveness of strategy choices using the choice/no-choice method: The case of numerosity judgement. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 15, 511-537.
27. Siegler, R. S. (1996). Emerging minds. New York: Oxford University Press.
28. Siegler, R. S., & Lemaire, P. (1997). Older and younger adults' strategy choices in multiplication: Testing predictions of ASCM using the choice/no-choice method. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 126, 71-92.
29. Sowder, J., Philipp, R., Armstrong, B., & Schappelle, B. (1998). Middle-grade teachers' mathematical knowledge and its relationship to instruction. Albany: State University of New York.
30. TAL-team. (2001). Children learn mathematics. A learning-teaching trajectory with intermediate attainment targets for calculation with whole numbers in primary school. Groningen, The Netherlands: Wolters Noordhoff.
31. Torbeyns, J., Arnaud, L., Lemaire, P., & Verschaffel, L. (in press). Cognitive change as strategic change. In A. Demetriou & A. Raftopoulos (Eds.), Emergence and transformation in the mind: Modeling and measuring cognitive change. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
32. Torbeyns, J., Verschaffel, L., & Ghesquière, P. (2004a). Strategic aspects of simple addition and subtraction: The influence of mathematical ability. Learning and Instruction, 14, 177-195.
33. Torbeyns, J., Verschaffel, L., & Ghesquière, P. (2004b). Strategy development in children with mathematical disabilities: Insights from the choice/no-choice method and the chronological-age/ability-level-match design. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 37, 119-131.
34. Van Eerde, D., Van den Berg, W., & Lit, S. (1992). Kwantiwijzer voor leerkrachten. Werkboek 4: overbruggen van 10 (optellen) [Kwantiwijzer for teachers. Workbook 4: Sums over 10], Tilburg, The Netherlands: Zwijsen.
35. Verschaffel, L., & De Corte, E. (1996). Number and arithmetic. In A. Bishop, K. Clements, C. Keitel, & C. Laborde (Eds.), International handbook of mathematics education. Part I (pp. 99-138). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
36. Wittmann, E., C., & Müller, G. N. (1990-1992). Handbuch produktiver rechenübungen. Vols 1 & 2 [Handbook of productive arithmetic exercises. Volume 1 & 2]. D̈sseldorf, Germany: Klett Verlag.
37. Woodward, J. (2004). Mathematics education in the United States: Past to present. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 37, 16-31.
38. Woodward, J., & Baxter, J. (1997). The effects of an innovative approach to mathematics on academically low achieving students in inclusive settings. Exceptional Children, 63, 373-388.
39. Woodward, J., Monroe, K., & Baxter, J. (2001). Enhancing student achievement on performance assessments in mathematics. Learning Disabilities Quarterly, 24, 33-46.
40. Yackel, E., & Cobb, P. (1996). Sociomathematical norms, argumentation, and autonomy in mathematics. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 27, 458-477.