An all-atom force field for tertiary structure prediction of helical proteins

Biophysical Journal

Volumn 87, Issue 5, 2004, Pages 3100-3109

  Herges, T ^a   Wenzel, Wolfgang ^a  

^a KARLSRUHE INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

PROTEIN; SOLVENT;

ARTICLE; ATOM; ENERGY; HYDROGEN BOND; MODEL; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEIN TERTIARY STRUCTURE; SOLVENT EFFECT; VALIDATION PROCESS; ALGORITHM; AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; CHEMICAL MODEL; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; CHEMISTRY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; EVALUATION; MECHANICAL STRESS; MOLECULAR GENETICS; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN SECONDARY STRUCTURE; STRUCTURE ACTIVITY RELATION;

ALGORITHMS; AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; MODELS, CHEMICAL; MODELS, MOLECULAR; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE DATA; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, SECONDARY; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, TERTIARY; PROTEINS; STRESS, MECHANICAL; STRUCTURE-ACTIVITY RELATIONSHIP;

EID: 11244302065     PISSN: 00063495     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1529/biophysj.104.040071     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Abagyan, R., and M. Totrov. 1994. Biased probability Monte Carlo conformation searches and electrostatic calculations for peptides and proteins. J. Mol. Biol. 235:983-1002.
2. Anfinsen, C. B. 1973. Principles that govern the folding of protein chains. Science. 181:223-230.
3. Avbelj, F., and J. Moult. 1995a. Determination of the conformation of folding initiation sites by computer simulations. Proteins Struct. Funct. Gen. 23:129-141.
4. Avbelj, F., and J. Moult. 1995b. Role of electrostatic screening in determining protein main chain conformational preferences. Biochemistry. 34:755-764.
5. Baker, D., and A. Sali. 2001. Protein structure prediction and structural genomics. Science. 294:93-96.
6. Becker, O. M., and M. Karplus. 1997. The topology of multidimensional potential energy surfaces: Theory and application to peptide structure and kinetics. J. Chem. Phys. 106:1495-1517.
7. Bonneau, R., J. Tsui, I. Ruczinski, D. Chivian, C. M. E. Strauss, and D. Baker. 2001. Rosetta in CASP4: progress in ab-initio protein structure prediction. Proteins. 45:119-126.
8. Brooks, C. L., J. N. Onuchic, and D. J. Wales. 2001. Taking a walk on a landscape. Science. 293:612-613.
9. Clarke, N. D., C. R. Kissinger, J. Desjarlais, G. L. Gilliland, and C. O. Pabo. 1994. Structural studies of the engrailed homeodomain. Protein Sci. 3:1779-1787.
10. Doye, J. P. K., and D. Wales. 1996. On potential energy surfaces and relaxation to the global minimum. J. Chem. Phys, 105:8428-8445.
11. Duan, Y., and P. A. Kollman. 1998. Pathways to a protein folding intermediate observed in a 1-μs simulation in aqueous solution. Science. 282:740-744.
12. Eisenberg, D., and A. D. McLachlan. 1986. Solvation energy in protein folding and binding. Nature. 319:199-203.
13. Fauchere, J. L., and V. Pliska. 1983. Hydrophobic parameters pi of amino-acid side chains from the partitioning of n-acetyl-amino-acid amides. Eur. J. Med. Chem. Chem. Ther. 18:369-375.
14. Garcia, A. E., and N. Onuchic. 2003. Folding a protein in a computer: An atomic description of the folding/unfolding of protein A. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 100:13898-13903.
15. Go, N., and H. A. Scheraga. 1976. On the use of classical statistical mechanics in the treatment of polymer chain conformation. Macromolecules. 9:535-542.
16. Gouda, H., H. Torigoe, A. Saito, M. Sato, Y. Arata, and I. Shimanda. 1992. Three-dimensional solution structure of the b domain of staphylococcal protein a: comparisons of the solution and crystal structures. Biochemistry. 40:9665-9672.
17. Hansmann, U. H. E. 2002. Global optimization by energy landscape paving. Phys. Rev. Lett. 88:068105.
18. Hansmann, U. H. E. 2004. Generalized ensemble simulations of the human parathyroid hormone fragment PTH(1-34). J. Chem. Phys. 120:417-422.
19. Herges, T., A. Schug, B. Burghardt, and W. Wenzel. 2004. Low energy conformations of a three helix peptide in an all-atom biomolecular force field. Intl. J. Quantum Chem. In press.
20. Herges, T., and W. Wenzel. Reproducible in-silico folding of a three-helix protein in a transferable all-atom force field. http://www.arXiv. org:physics/0310146, 2004.
21. Jorgensen, W. L., and N. A. McDonald. 1998. Development of an all-atom force field for heterocycles. J. Mol. Struct. 424:145-155.
22. Kirkpatrick, S., C. D. Gelatt, and M. P. Vecchi. 1983. Optimization by simulated annealing. Science. 220:671-680.
23. Lattman, E. E. 2001. CASP4. Proteins. 44:399.
24. Li, Z., and H. A. Scheraga. 1987. Monte Carlo minimization approach to the multiple minima problem in protein folding. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 84:6611-6615.
25. Lin, C. Y., C. K. Hu, and U. H. Hansmann. 2003. Parallel tempering simulations of HP-36. Proteins. 53:436-445.
26. Liwo, A., P. Arlukowicz, C. Czaplewski, S. Oldizeij, J. Pillardy, and H. A. Scheraga. 2002. A method for optimizing potential energy functions by a hierarchical design of the potential energy landscape. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 99:1937-1942.
27. Mayor, U., N. R. Guydosh, C. M. Johnson, J. G. Grossmann, S. Sato, G. S. Jas, S. M. V. Freund, D. O. V. Alonso, V. Daggett, and A. R. Fersht. 2003. The complete folding pathway of a protein from nanoseconds to microseconds. Nature. 421:863-867.
28. Metropolis, N., A. W. Rosenbluth, M. N. Rosenbluth, A. H. Teller, and E. Teller. 1953. Equation of state calculations by fast computing machines. J. Chem. Phys. 21:1087-1092.
29. Moult, J., K. Fidelis, A. Zemia, and T. Hubbard. 2001. Critical assessment of methods of protein structure (CASP): round IV. Proteins. 45:2-7.
30. Nanias, M., M. Chinchio, J. Pillardy, D. R. Ripoll, and H. A. Scheraga. 2003. Packing helices in proteins by global optimization of a potential energy function. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 100:1706-1710.
31. Neidigh, J. W., R. M. Fesinmeyer, and N. H. Anderson. 2002. Designing a 20-residue protein. Nat. Struct. Biol. 9:425-430.
32. Nemethy, G., K. D. Gibson, K. A. Palmer, C. N. Yoon, G. Paternali, A. Zagari, S. Rumsey, and H. A. Scheraga. 1992. Energy parameters in polypeptides. X. Improved geometrical parameters and nonbonded interactions for use in the ECEPP/3 algorithm. J. Phys. Chem. 96:6472-6484.
33. Onuchic, J. N., Z. Luthey-Schulten, and P. G. Wolynes. 1997. Theory of protein folding: the energy landscape perspective. Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 48:545-600.
34. Pillardy, J., C. Czaplewski, A. Liwo, J. Lee, D. R. Ripoll, R. Kamierkiewicz, S. Oldziej, W. J. Wedemeyer, K. D. Gibson, Y. A. Arnautova, J. Saunders, Y.J. Ye, and H. A. Scheraga. 2001. Recent improvements in prediction of protein structure by global optimization of a potential energy function. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 98:2329-2333.
35. Raibaud, S., I. Lebars, M. Guillier, C. Chiaruttini, F. Bontems, A. Rak, M. Garber, F. Allemand, M. Springer, and F. Dardel. 2002. NMR structure of bacterial ribosomal protein L20: implications for ribosome assembly and translational control. J. Mol. Biol. 323:143-151.
36. Schonbrunn, J., W. J. Wedemeyer, and D. Baker. 2002. Protein structure prediction in 2002. Curr. Op. Struct. Biol. 12:348-352.
37. Schug, A., T. Herges, and W. Wenzel. 2003. Reproducible protein folding with the stochastic tunneling method. Phys. Rev. Lett. 91:158102.
38. Schug, A., T. Herges, and W. Wenzel. 2004. All-atom folding of the three-helix HIV accessory protein with an adaptive parallel tempering method. Proteins. In press.
39. Sharke, A., and J. Rupley. 1973. Environment and exposure to solvent of protein atoms. Lysozyme and insulin. J. Mol. Biol. 79:351-364.
40. Sharp, K. A., A. Nicholls, R. Friedman, and B. Honig. 1991. Extracting hydrophobic free energies from experimental data: relationship to protein folding and theoretical models. Biochemistry. 30:9686-9697.
41. Shea, I. E., J. N. Onuchic, and C. I. Brooks, III. 1999. Exploring the origins of topological frustration: design of a minimally frustrated model of fragment B of protein A. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 96:12512-12517.
42. Simmerling, C., B. Strockbine, and A. Roitberg. 2002. All-atom structure prediction and folding simulations of a stable protein. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 124:11258-11259.
43. Simons, K. T., C. Kooperberg, E. Huang, and D. Baker. 1997. Assembly of protein tertiary structures from fragments with siilar local sequences using simulated annealing and Bayesian scoring functions. J. Mol. Biol. 286:209-225.
44. Simons, K. T., I. Ruczinski, C. Kooperberg, B. Fox, C. Bystroff, and D. Baker. 1999. Improved recognition of native-like protein structures using a combination of sequence-dependent and sequence-independent features of proteins. Proteins SF&G. 34:82-95.
45. Sippl, M. J., G. Nemethy, and H. A. Scheraga. 1984. Intermolecular potentials from crystal data. VI. Determination of empirical potentials for O-H⋯O=C hydrogen bonds from packing configurations. J. Phys. Chem. 88:6231-6233.
46. Snow, C. D., H. Nguyen, V. S. Panda, and M. Gruebele. 2002. Absolute comparison of simulated and experimental protein folding dynamics. Nature. 420:102-106.
47. Ulrich, P., W. Scott, W. F. van Gunsteren, and A. E. Torda. 1997. Protein structure prediction force fields: parameterization with quasi-Newtonian dynamics. Proteins. 27:367-384.
48. Vajda, S., M. Sippl, and J. Novotny. 1997. Empirical potentials and functions for protein folding and binding. Curr. Op. Struct. Biol. 222:222-228.
49. Vasquez, M., G. Nemethy, and H. A. Scheraga. 1994. Conformational energy calculations on polypeptides and proteins. Chem. Rev. 94:2138-2239.
50. Vila, J. A., D. R. Ripoll, and H. A. Scheraga. 2004. Atomically detailed folding simulation of the B domain of staphylococcal protein A from random structures. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 100:14812-14816.
51. Wales, D. J., and J. P. K. Doye. 1997. Global optimization by basin-hopping and the lowest energy structures of Lennard-Jones clusters containing up to 110 atoms. J. Phys. Chem. 101:5111-5116.
52. Wenzel, W., and K. Hamacher. 1999. Stochastic tunneling approach for global optimization of complex potential energy landscapes. Phys. Rev. Lett. 82:3003.
53. Zhou, Y., and M. Karplus. 1999. Folding a model three-helix bundle protein: thermodynamic and kinetic analysis. J. Mol. Biol. 293:917-951.