Analysis of TASSER-based CASP7 protein structure prediction results

Proteins: Structure, Function and Genetics

Volumn 69, Issue SUPPL. 8, 2007, Pages 90-97

  Zhou, Hongyi ^a   Pandit, Shashi B ^a   Seung, Yup Lee ^a   Borreguero, Jose ^a   Chen, Huiling ^a   Wroblewska, Liliana ^a   Skolnick, Jeffrey ^a  

^a GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

3D jury; Ab initio structure prediction; Fold recognition; MetaTASSER; PROSPECTOR_3; SP 3; SPARKS; TASSER; Template based modeling

Indexed keywords

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; CONFERENCE PAPER; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; PROTEIN ASSEMBLY; PROTEIN DOMAIN; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; STRUCTURE ANALYSIS;

COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; MODELS, MOLECULAR; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, TERTIARY; PROTEINS;

EID: 36749095600     PISSN: 08873585     EISSN: 10970134     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/prot.21649     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (33)

1. Baker D, Sali A. Protein structure prediction and structural genomics. Science 2001;294:93-96.
2. Jones DT. GenTHREADER: an efficient and reliable protein fold recognition method for genomic sequences. J Mol Biol 1999;287:797-815.
3. Skolnick J, Fetrow J, Kolinski A. Structural genomics and its importance for gene function analysis. Nat Biotechnol 2000;18:283-287.
4. Zhang Y, Skolnick J. Automated structure prediction of weakly homologous proteins on genomic scale. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2004;101:7594-7599.
5. Zhang Y, Hubner IA, Arakaki AK, Shakhnovich E, Skolnick J. On the origin and highly likely completeness of single-domain protein structures. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2006;103:2605-2610.
6. Jones DT, Taylor WR, Thornton JM. A new approach to protein fold recognition. Nature 1992;358:86-89.
7. Altschul SF, Gish W, Miller W, Myers E, Lipman D. Basic local alignment tool. J Mol Biol 1990;215:403-410.
8. Vingron M, Waterman MS. Sequence alignment and penalty choice. Review of concepts, case studies and implications. J Mol Biol 1994;235:1-12.
9. Altschul SF, Madden TL, Schffer AA, Zhang J, Zhang Z, Miller W, Lipman D-J. Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res 1997;25:3389-3402.
10. Godzik A. Fold recognition methods. Methods Biochem Anal 2003;44:525-546.
11. Jaroszewski L, Rychlewski L, Godzik A. Improving the quality of twilight-zone alignment. Protein Sci 2000;9:1487-1496.
12. Jaroszewski L, Rychlewski L, Li W, Godzik A. Comparison of sequence profiles. Strategies for structural predictions using sequence information. Protein Sci 2000;9:232-241.
13. David R, Korenberg MJ, Hunter IW. 3D-1D threading methods for protein fold recognition. Pharmacogenomics 2000;1:445-455.
14. Karplus K, Barrett C, Hughey R. Hidden Markov models for detecting remote protein homologies. Bioinformatics 1998;14:846-856.
15. Lundsröm J, Rychlewski L, Bunnicki J, Elofsson A. Pcons: a neural-network-based consensus predictor that improves fold recognition. Protein Sci 2001;10:2354-2362.
16. Wallner B, Fang H, Elosson A. Automatic consensus-based fold recognition using Peons, Pro Q, and Pmodeller. Proteins: Struct Funct Genet Suppl 2003;6:534-541.
17. Fischer D. 3D-SHOTGUN: a novel, cooperative, fold-recognition meta-predictor. Proteins 2003;51:434-441.
18. Ginalski K, Elofsson A, Fischer D, Rychlewski L. 3D-jury: a simple approach to improve protein structure predictions. Bioinformatics 2003;19:1015-1018.
19. Zhang Y, Skolnick J. Automated structure prediction of weakly homologous proteins on genomic scale. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2004;101:7594-7599.
20. Qian B, Ortiz AR, Baker D. Improvement of comparative model accuracy by free-energy optimization along principal components of natural structural variation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2004;101:15346-15351.
21. Misura KM, Chivian D, Rohl CA, Kim DE, Baker D. Physically realistic homology models built with ROSETTA can be more accurate than their templates. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2004;103:5361-6366.
22. Offman MN, Fitzjohn PW, Bates PA. Developing a move-set for protein model refinement. Bioinformatics 2006;22:1838-1845.
23. Valencia A. Protein refinement: a new challenge for CASP in its 10th anniversary. Bioinformatics 2005;21:277.
24. Pieper U, Eswar N, Braberg H, Madhusudhan MS, Davis FP, Stuart AC, Mirkovic N, Rossi A, Marti-Renom MA, Fiser A, Webb B, Greenblatt D, Huang CC, Ferrin TE, Sali A. MODBASE, a database of annotated comparative protein structure models, and associated resources. Nucleic Acids Res 2004;32:D217-D222.
25. Zhang Y, Arakaki A, Skolnick J. TASSER: an automated method for the prediction of protein tertiary structures in CASP6. Proteins 2005;61 (Suppl 7):91-98.
26. Skolnick J, Kihara D, Zhang Y. Development and large scale benchmark testing of the PROSPECTOR 3.0 threading algorithm. Proteins 2004;56:502-518.
27. Zhou H, Zhou Y. Single-body residue-level knowledge-based energy score combined with sequence-profile and secondary structure information for fold recognition. Proteins 2004;55:1005-1013.
28. Zhou H, Zhou Y. Fold recognition by combining sequence profiles derived from evolution and from depth-dependent structural alignment of fragments. Proteins 2005;58:321-328.
29. 3 servers in CASP 6. Proteins (Suppl CASP Issue) 2005; (Suppl 7):152-156.
30. Zhang Y, Skolnick J. TM-align: a protein structure alignment algorithm based on the TM-score. Nucleic Acids Res 2005;33:2302-2309.
31. Zhang Y, Skolnick J. A scoring function for the automated assessment of protein structure template quality. Proteins 2004;57:702-710.
32. Zhang Y, Kihara D, Skolnick J. Local energy landscape flattening: parallel hyperbolic Monte Carlo sampling of protein folding. Proteins 2002;48:192-201.
33. Zhang Y, Skolnick J. SPICKER: a clustering approach to identify near-native protein fold. J Comput Chem 2004;25:865-871.