Pericentromeric sister chromatid cohesion promotes kinetochore biorientation

Molecular Biology of the Cell

Volumn 20, Issue 17, 2009, Pages 3818-3827

  Ng, Tessie M ^a,b   Waples, William G ^c   Lavoie, Brigitte D ^c   Biggins, Sue ^a  

^a Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COHESIN; MUTANT PROTEIN; PROTEIN MCM21; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ALLELE; ARTICLE; CENTROMERE; GENETIC ANALYSIS; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SISTER CHROMATID; YEAST CELL;

CELL CYCLE PROTEINS; CHROMATIDS; CHROMOSOME SEGREGATION; EPISTASIS, GENETIC; INTRACELLULAR SIGNALING PEPTIDES AND PROTEINS; KINETOCHORES; LAC REPRESSORS; MICROTUBULES; MITOTIC SPINDLE APPARATUS; PROTEIN-SERINE-THREONINE KINASES; RECOMBINANT FUSION PROTEINS; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEINS;

SACCHAROMYCETALES;

EID: 70349326634     PISSN: 10591524     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1091/mbc.E09-04-0330     Document Type: Article

References (76)

1. Allshire, R. C., Nimmo, E. R., Ekwall, K., Javerzat, J. P., and Cranston, G. (1995). Mutations derepressing silent centromeric domains in fission yeast disrupt chromosome segregation. Genes Dev. 9, 218-233.
2. Ben-Shahar, T. R., Heeger, S., Lehane, C., East, P., Flynn, H., Skehel, M., and Uhlmann, F. (2008). Eco1-dependent cohesin acetylation during establishment of sister chromatid cohesion. Science 321, 563-566.
3. Bernard, P., Maure, J. F., Partridge, J. F., Genier, S., Javerzat, J. P., and Allshire, R. C. (2001). Requirement of heterochromatin for cohesion at centromeres. Science 294, 2539-2542.
4. Biggins, S., Bhalla, N., Chang, A., Smith, D. L., and Murray, A. W. (2001). Genes involved in sister chromatid separation and segregation in the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 159, 453-470.
5. Biggins, S., Severin, F. F., Bhalla, N., Sassoon, I., Hyman, A. A., and Murray, A. W. (1999). The conserved protein kinase Ipl1 regulates microtubule binding to kinetochores in budding yeast. Genes Dev. 13, 532-544. (Pubitemid 29131878)
6. Blat, Y., and Kleckner, N. (1999). Cohesins bind to preferential sites along yeast chromosome III, with differential regulation along arms versus the centric region. Cell 98, 249-259. (Pubitemid 29344912)
7. Buvelot, S., Tatsutani, S. Y., Vermaak, D., and Biggins, S. (2003). The budding yeast Ipl1/Aurora protein kinase regulates mitotic spindle disassembly. J. Cell Biol. 160, 329-339. (Pubitemid 36182724)
8. Cheeseman, I. M., Anderson, S., Jwa, M., Green, E. M., Kang, J., Yates, J. R., Chan, C. S., Drubin, D. G., and Barnes, G. (2002). Phospho-regulation of kinetochore-microtubule attachments by the Aurora kinase Ipl1p. Cell 111, 163-172. (Pubitemid 35292437)
9. Cheeseman, I. M., and Desai, A. (2008). Molecular architecture of the kinetochore-microtubule interface. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 9, 33-46.
10. Ciosk, R., Shirayama, M., Shevchenko, A., Tanaka, T., Toth, A., and Nasmyth, K. (2000). Cohesin's binding to chromosomes depends on a separate complex consisting of Scc2 and Scc4 proteins. Mol. Cell 5, 243-254. (Pubitemid 30628083)
11. Collins, K. A., Castillo, A. R., Tatsutani, S. Y., and Biggins, S. (2005). De novo kinetochore assembly requires the centromeric histone H3 variant. Mol. Biol. Cell 16, 5649-5660.
12. Cormack, B. P., and Struhl, K. (1992). The TATA-binding protein is required for transcription by all three nuclear RNA polymerases in yeast cells. Cell 69, 685-696.
13. De Wulf, P., McAinsh, A. D., and Sorger, P. K. (2003). Hierarchical assembly of the budding yeast kinetochore from multiple subcomplexes. Genes Dev. 17, 2902-2921. (Pubitemid 37523155)
14. Dewar, H., Tanaka, K., Nasmyth, K., and Tanaka, T. U. (2004). Tension between two kinetochores suffices for their bi-orientation on the mitotic spindle. Nature 428, 93-97. (Pubitemid 38332364)
15. Eckert, C. A., Gravdahl, D. J., and Megee, P. C. (2007). The enhancement of pericentromeric cohesin association by conserved kinetochore components promotes high-fidelity chromosome segregation and is sensitive to microtubule-based tension. Genes Dev. 21, 278-291.
16. Goshima, G., and Yanagida, M. (2000). Establishing biorientation occurs with precocious separation of the sister kinetochores, but not the arms, in the early spindle of budding yeast. Cell 100, 619-633.
17. Grewal, S. I., and Jia, S. (2007). Heterochromatin revisited. Nat. Rev. Genet 8, 35-46.
18. Hauf, S., and Watanabe, Y. (2004). Kinetochore orientation in mitosis and meiosis. Cell 119, 317-327.
19. He, X., Asthana, S., and Sorger, P. K. (2000). Transient sister chromatid separation and elastic deformation of chromosomes during mitosis in budding yeast. Cell 101, 763-775.
20. He, X., Rines, D. R., Espelin, C. W., and Sorger, P. K. (2001). Molecular analysis of kinetochore-microtubule attachment in budding yeast. Cell 106, 195-206. (Pubitemid 32772630)
21. Hyland, K. M., Kingsbury, J., Koshland, D., and Hieter, P. (1999). Ctf19p: a novel kinetochore protein in Saccharomyces cerevisiae and a potential link between the kinetochore and mitotic spindle. J. Cell Biol. 145, 15-28.
22. Indjeian, V. B., and Murray, A. W. (2007). Budding yeast mitotic chromosomes have an intrinsic bias to biorient on the spindle. Curr. Biol. 17, 1837-1846.
23. Kellum, R., and Alberts, B. M. (1995). Heterochromatin protein 1 is required for correct chromosome segregation in Drosophila embryos. J. Cell Sci. 108(Pt 4), 1419-1431.
24. Kenna, M. A., and Skibbens, R. V. (2003). Mechanical link between cohesion establishment and DNA replication: Ctf7p/Eco1p, a cohesion establishment factor, associates with three different replication factor C complexes. Mol. Cell. Biol. 23, 2999-3007.
25. King, J. M., and Nicklas, R. B. (2000). Tension on chromosomes increases the number of kinetochore microtubules but only within limits. J. Cell Sci. 113(Pt 21), 3815-3823.
26. Kotwaliwale, C. V., Frei, S. B., Stern, B. M., and Biggins, S. (2007). A pathway containing the Ipl1/aurora protein kinase and the spindle midzone protein Ase1 regulates yeast spindle assembly. Dev. Cell 13, 433-445.
27. Lacefield, S., and Murray, A. W. (2007). The spindle checkpoint rescues the meiotic segregation of chromosomes whose crossovers are far from the centromere. Nat. Genet. 39, 1273-1277.
28. Laloraya, S., Guacci, V., and Koshland, D. (2000). Chromosomal addresses of the cohesin component Mcd1p. J. Cell Biol. 151, 1047-1056.
29. Lee, M. S., and Spencer, F. A. (2004). Bipolar orientation of chromosomes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae is monitored by Mad1 and Mad2, but not by Mad3. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 101, 10655-10660.
30. Lengronne, A., Katou, Y., Mori, S., Yokobayashi, S., Kelly, G. P., Itoh, T., Watanabe, Y., Shirahige, K., and Uhlmann, F. (2004). Cohesin relocation from sites of chromosomal loading to places of convergent transcription. Nature 430, 573-578. (Pubitemid 38998632)
31. Lengronne, A., McIntyre, J., Katou, Y., Kanoh, Y., Hopfner, K. P., Shirahige, K., and Uhlmann, F. (2006). Establishment of sister chromatid cohesion at the S. cerevisiae replication fork. Mol. Cell 23, 787-799.
32. Liu, D., Vader, G., Vromans, M. J., Lampson, M. A., and Lens, S. M. (2009). Sensing chromosome bi-orientation by spatial separation of Aurora B kinase from kinetochore substrates. Science 323, 1350-1353.
33. Loidl, J., Klein, F., and Engebrecht, J. (1998). Genetic and morphological approaches for the analysis of meiotic chromosomes in yeast. Methods Cell Biol. 53, 257-285. (Pubitemid 128787417)
34. Loncarek, J., Kisurina-Evgenieva, O., Vinogradova, T., Hergert, P., La Terra, S., Kapoor, T. M., and Khodjakov, A. (2007). The centromere geometry essential for keeping mitosis error free is controlled by spindle forces. Nature 450, 745-749. (Pubitemid 350207690)
35. Maresca, T. J., and Salmon, E. D. (2009). Intrakinetochore stretch is associated with changes in kinetochore phosphorylation and spindle assembly checkpoint activity. J. Cell Biol. 184, 373-381.
36. Mayer, M. L., Gygi, S. P., Aebersold, R., and Hieter, P. (2001). Identification of RFC(Ctf18p, Ctf8p, Dcc1p): an alternative RFC complex required for sister chromatid cohesion in S. cerevisiae. Mol. Cell 7, 959-970. (Pubitemid 32525743)
37. Mayer, M. L., et al. (2004). Identification of protein complexes required for efficient sister chromatid cohesion. Mol. Biol. Cell 15, 1736-1745.
38. McAinsh, A. D., Meraldi, P., Draviam, V. M., Toso, A., and Sorger, P. K. (2006). The human kinetochore proteins Nnf1R and Mcm21R are required for accurate chromosome segregation. EMBO J. 25, 4033-4049. (Pubitemid 44338745)
39. McClelland, S. E., Borusu, S., Amaro, A. C., Winter, J. R., Belwal, M., McAinsh, A. D., and Meraldi, P. (2007). The CENP-A NAC/CAD kinetochore complex controls chromosome congression and spindle bipolarity. EMBO J. 26, 5033-5047. (Pubitemid 350261290)
40. Megee, P. C., Mistrot, C., Guacci, V., and Koshland, D. (1999). The centromeric sister chromatid cohesion site directs Mcd1p binding to adjacent sequences. Mol. Cell 4, 445-450. (Pubitemid 29499798)
41. Michaelis, C., Ciosk, R., and Nasmyth, K. (1997). Cohesins: chromosomal proteins that prevent premature separation of sister chromatids. Cell 91, 35-45. (Pubitemid 27431311)
42. Minshull, J., Straight, A., Rudner, A., Dernburg, A., Belmont, A., and Murray, A. W. (1996). Protein phosphatase 2A regulates MPF activity and sister chromatid cohesion in budding yeast. Curr. Biol. 6, 1609-1620.
43. Nicklas, R. B., and Ward, S. C. (1994). Elements of error correction in mitosis: microtubule capture, release, and tension. J. Cell Biol. 126, 1241-1253.
44. Ocampo-Hafalla, M. T., Katou, Y., Shirahige, K., and Uhlmann, F. (2007). Displacement and re-accumulation of centromeric cohesin during transient pre-anaphase centromere splitting. Chromosoma 116, 531-544. (Pubitemid 350120989)
45. Ortiz, J., Stemmann, O., Rank, S., and Lechner, J. (1999). A putative protein complex consisting of Ctf19, Mcm21, and Okp1 represents a missing link in the budding yeast kinetochore. Genes Dev. 13, 1140-1155. (Pubitemid 29233145)
46. Pearson, C. G., Maddox, P. S., Salmon, E. D., and Bloom, K. (2001). Budding yeast chromosome structure and dynamics during mitosis. J. Cell Biol. 152, 1255-1266. (Pubitemid 34280182)
47. Peters, A. H., et al. (2001). Loss of the Suv39h histone methyltransferases impairs mammalian heterochromatin and genome stability. Cell 107, 323-337.
48. Peters, J. M., Tedeschi, A., and Schmitz, J. (2008). The cohesin complex and its roles in chromosome biology. Genes Dev. 22, 3089-3114.
49. Pinsky, B. A., and Biggins, S. (2005). The spindle checkpoint: tension vs. attachment. Trends Cell Biol. 15(9), 486-493.
50. Pinsky, B. A., Kung, C., Shokat, K. M., and Biggins, S. (2006). The Ipl1-Aurora protein kinase activates the spindle checkpoint by creating unattached kinetochores. Nat. Cell Biol. 8, 78-83.
51. Pinsky, B. A., Tatsutani, S. Y., Collins, K. A., and Biggins, S. (2003). An Mtw1 complex promotes kinetochore biorientation that is monitored by the Ipl1/Aurora protein kinase. Dev. Cell 5, 735-745.
52. Poddar, A., Roy, N., and Sinha, P. (1999). MCM21 and MCM22, two novel genes of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae are required for chromosome transmission. Mol. Microbiol. 31, 349-360.
53. Pot, I., Knockleby, J., Aneliunas, V., Nguyen, T., Ah-Kye, S., Liszt, G., Snyder, M., Hieter, P., and Vogel, J. (2005). Spindle checkpoint maintenance requires Ame1 and Okp1. Cell Cycle 4, 1448-1456. (Pubitemid 41437137)
54. Rose, M. D., Winston, F., and Heiter, P. (1990). Methods in Yeast Genetics, Cold Spring Harbor, NY: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press.
55. Ruchaud, S., Carmena, M., and Earnshaw, W. C. (2007). Chromosomal passengers: conducting cell division. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 8, 798-812.
56. Sakuno, T., Tada, K., and Watanabe, Y. (2009). Kinetochore geometry defined by cohesion within the centromere. Nature 458, 852-858.
57. Sherman, F., Fink, G., and Lawrence, C. (1974). Methods in Yeast Genetics, Cold Spring Harbor, NY: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press.
58. Shimogawa, M. M., Widlund, P. O., Riffle, M., Ess, M., and Davis, T. N. (2009). Bir1 is required for the tension checkpoint. Mol. Biol. Cell 20, 915-923.
59. Skibbens, R. V., Corson, L. B., Koshland, D., and Hieter, P. (1999). Ctf7p is essential for sister chromatid cohesion and links mitotic chromosome structure to the DNA replication machinery. Genes Dev. 13, 307-319. (Pubitemid 29095802)
60. Straight, A. F., Belmont, A. S., Robinett, C. C., and Murray, A. W. (1996). GFP tagging of budding yeast chromosomes reveals that protein-protein interactions can mediate sister chromatid cohesion. Curr. Biol. 6, 1599-1608.
61. Strom, L., Lindroos, H. B., Shirahige, K., and Sjogren, C. (2004). Postreplicative recruitment of cohesin to double-strand breaks is required for DNA repair. Mol. Cell 16, 1003-1015. (Pubitemid 40018409)
62. Tanaka, K., Mukae, N., Dewar, H., van Breugel, M., James, E. K., Prescott, A. R., Antony, C., and Tanaka, T. U. (2005). Molecular mechanisms of kinetochore capture by spindle microtubules. Nature 434, 987-994. (Pubitemid 40586041)
63. Tanaka, T., Cosma, M. P., Wirth, K., and Nasmyth, K. (1999). Identification of cohesin association sites at centromeres and along chromosome arms. Cell 98, 847-858. (Pubitemid 29446901)
64. Tanaka, T., Fuchs, J., Loidl, J., and Nasmyth, K. (2000). Cohesin ensures bipolar attachment of microtubules to sister centromeres and resists their precocious separation. Nat. Cell Biol 2, 492-499. (Pubitemid 30707167)
65. Tanaka, T. U., Rachidi, N., Janke, C., Pereira, G., Galova, M., Schiebel, E., Stark, M. J., and Nasmyth, K. (2002). Evidence that the Ipl1-Sli15 (Aurora kinase-INCENP) complex promotes chromosome bi-orientation by altering kinetochore-spindle pole connections. Cell 108, 317-329. (Pubitemid 34178397)
66. Tong, A. H., et al. (2001). Systematic genetic analysis with ordered arrays of yeast deletion mutants. Science 294, 2364-2368.
67. Toth, A., Ciosk, R., Uhlmann, F., Galova, M., Schleiffer, A., and Nasmyth, K. (1999). Yeast cohesin complex requires a conserved protein, Eco1p(Ctf7), to establish cohesion between sister chromatids during DNA replication. Genes Dev. 13, 320-333. (Pubitemid 29095803)
68. Uchida, K. S., Takagaki, K., Kumada, K., Hirayama, Y., Noda, T., and Hirota, T. (2009). Kinetochore stretching inactivates the spindle assembly checkpoint. J. Cell Biol. 184, 383-390.
69. Uhlmann, F., Lottspeich, F., and Nasmyth, K. (1999). Sister-chromatid separation at anaphase onset is promoted by cleavage of the cohesin subunit Scc1. Nature 400, 37-42. (Pubitemid 29315102)
70. Unal, E., Arbel-Eden, A., Sattler, U., Shroff, R., Lichten, M., Haber, J. E., and Koshland, D. (2004). DNA damage response pathway uses histone modification to assemble a double-strand break-specific cohesin domain. Mol. Cell 16, 991-1002. (Pubitemid 40018408)
71. Unal, E., Heidinger-Pauli, J. M., Kim, W., Guacci, V., Onn, I., Gygi, S. P., and Koshland, D. E. (2008). A molecular determinant for the establishment of sister chromatid cohesion. Science 321, 566-569. (Pubitemid 46168841)
72. Waples, W. G., Chahwan, C., Ciechonska, M., and Lavoie, B. D. (2008). Putting the brake on FEAR: Tof2 promotes the biphasic release of Cdc14 phosphatase during mitotic exit. Mol. Biol. Cell 20, 245-255.
73. Weber, S. A., Gerton, J. L., Polancic, J. E., DeRisi, J. L., Koshland, D., and Megee, P. C. (2004). The kinetochore is an enhancer of pericentric cohesin binding. PLoS Biol. 2, E260. (Pubitemid 39245244)
74. Yamagishi, Y., Sakuno, T., Shimura, M., and Watanabe, Y. (2008). Heterochromatin links to centromeric protection by recruiting shugoshin. Nature 455, 251-255.
75. Yeh, E., Haase, J., Paliulis, L. V., Joglekar, A., Bond, L., Bouck, D., Salmon, E. D., and Bloom, K. S. (2008). Pericentric chromatin is organized into an intramolecular loop in mitosis. Curr. Biol. 18, 81-90.
76. Zhang, J., et al. (2008). Acetylation of Smc3 by Eco1 is required for S phase sister chromatid cohesion in both human and yeast. Mol. Cell 31, 143-151. (Pubitemid 351905926)