Kinetochore geometry defined by cohesion within the centromere

Nature

Volumn 458, Issue 7240, 2009, Pages 852-858

  Sakuno, Takeshi ^a   Tada, Kenji ^a   Watanabe, Yoshinori ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TOKYO   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

FUNGAL DNA;

CELL ORGANELLE; CHROMOSOME; COHESION; YEAST;

ARTICLE; CELL ADHESION; CELL STRUCTURE; CENTROMERE; GEOMETRY; MEIOSIS; MICROTUBULE; MITOSIS; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCHIZOSACCHAROMYCES POMBE;

CENTROMERE; CHROMOSOME SEGREGATION; KINETOCHORES; MEIOSIS; MICROTUBULES; MITOSIS; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; SCHIZOSACCHAROMYCES;

SCHIZOSACCHAROMYCES POMBE; SCHIZOSACCHAROMYCETACEAE;

EID: 65249182240     PISSN: 00280836     EISSN: 14764687     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/nature07876     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Nicklas, R. B. How cells get the right chromosomes. Science 275, 632-637 (1997).
2. Tanaka, T. U. Bi-orienting chromosomes on the mitotic spindle. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 14, 365-371 (2002).
3. Moore, D. P. & Orr-Weaver, T. L. Chromosome segregation during meiosis: building an unambivalent bivalent. Curr. Top. Dev. Biol. 37, 263-299 (1998).
4. Petronczki, M., Siomos, M. F. & Nasmyth, K. Un menage a quatre: the molecular biology of chromosome segregation in meiosis. Cell 112, 423-440 (2003).
5. Östergren, G. The mechanism of co-orientation in bivalents and multivalents. Hereditas 37, 85-156 (1951).
6. Brenner, S., Pepper, D., Berns, M. W., Tan, E. & Brinkley, B. R. Kinetochore structure, duplication, and distribution in mammalian cells: analysis by human autoantibodies from scleroderma patients. J. Cell Biol. 91, 95-102 (1981).
7. Goldstein, L. S. Kinetochore structure and its role in chromosome orientation during the first melotlc division in male D. melanogaster. Cell 25, 591-602 (1981).
8. Parra, M. T. et al. Involvement of the cohesln Rad21 and SCP3 in monopolar attachment of sister klnetochores during mouse meiosis I. J. Cell Sci. 117, 1221-1234 (2004).
9. Lee, J. et al. Specific regulation of CENP-E and klnetochores during meiosis I/melosis II transition in pig oocytes. Mol. Reprod. Dev. 56, 51-62 (2000).
10. Hauf, S. & Watanabe, Y. Kinetochore orientation in mitosis and meiosis. Cell 119, 317-327 (2004).
11. Takahashi, K. et al. A low copy number central sequence with strict symmetry and unusual chromatin structure in fission yeast centromere. Mol. Biol. Cell 3, 819-835 (1992).
12. Pidoux, A. & Allshire, R. Kinetochore and heterochromatin domains of the fission yeast centromere. Chromosome Res. 12, 521-534 (2004).
13. Watanabe, Y., Yokobayashi, S., Yamamoto, M. & Nurse, P. Pre-meiotic S phase is linked to reductional chromosome segregation and recombination. Nature 409, 359-363 (2001).
14. Tomonaga, T. et al. Characterization of fission yeast cohesin: essential anaphase proteolysis of Rad21 phosphorylated in the S phase. Genes Dev. 14, 2757-2770 (2000).
15. Bernard, P. et al. Requirement of heterochromatin for cohesion at centromeres. Science 294, 2539-2542 (2001).
16. Nonaka, N. et al. Recruitment of cohesin to heterochromatic regions by Swi6/HP1 in fission yeast. Nature Cell Biol. 4, 89-93 (2002).
17. Yokobayashi, S. & Watanabe, Y. The kinetochore protein Moal enables cohesionmediated monopolar attachment at meiosis I. Cell 123, 803-817 (2005).
18. Toth, A. et al. Functional genomics Identifies monopolin: a kinetochore protein required for segregation of homologs during meiosis I. Cell 103, 1155-1168 (2000).
19. Monje-Casas, F., Prabhu, V. R., Lee, B. H., Boselli, M. & Amon, A. Kinetochore orientation during meiosis is controlled by Aurora B and the monopolin complex. Cell 128, 477-490 (2007).
20. Araki, H. et al. Site-specific recombinase, R. encoded by yeast plasmid pSR1. J. Mol. Biol. 225, 25-37 (1992).
21. Chang, C. R., Wu, C. S., Horn, Y. & Gartenberg, M. R. Targeting of cohesin by transcriptionally silent chromatin. Genes Dev. 19, 3031-3042 (2005).
22. Yokobayashi, S., Yamamoto, M. & Watanabe, Y. Cohesins determine the attachment manner of kinetochores to spindle microtubules at meiosis I in fission yeast. Mol. Cell. Biol. 23, 3965-3973 (2003).
23. Watanabe, Y. & Nurse, P. Cohesin Rec8 is required for reductional chromosome segregation at meiosis. Nature 400, 461-464 (1999).
24. Goshlma, G. & Yanagida, M. Establishing biorlentation occurs with precocious separation of sister klnetochores, but not the arms, in the early spindle of budding yeast. Cell 100, 619-633 (2000).
25. He, X., Asthana, S. & Sorger, P. K. Transient sister chromatid separation and elastic deformation of chromosomes during mitosis in budding yeast. Cell 101, 763-775 (2000).
26. Ocampo-Hafalla, M. T., Katou, Y., Shlrahlge, K. & Uhlmann, F. Displacement and re-accumulation of centromeric cohesin during transient pre-anaphase centromere splitting. Chromosoma 116, 531-544 (2007).
27. Rleder, C. L. & Salmon, E. D. Motile klnetochores and polar ejection forces dictate chromosome position on the vertebrate mitotic spindle. J. Cell Biol. 124, 223-233 (1994).
28. Kurzbauer, R. et al. Crystal structure of the p14/MP1 scaffolding complex: how a twin couple attaches mltogen-activated protein kinase signaling to late endosomes. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 101, 10984-10989 (2004).
29. Gruber, S. et al. Evidence that loading of cohesin onto chromosomes involves opening of its SMC hinge. Cell 127, 523-537 (2006).
30. Kltajlma, T. S., Kawashima, S. A. & Watanabe, Y. The conserved kinetochore protein shugoshln protects centromerlc cohesion during meiosis. Nature 427, 510-517 (2004).
31. Rabitsch, K. P. et al. Two fission yeast homologs of Drosophila Mei-S332 are required for chromosome segregation during meiosis I and II, Curr. Biol. 14, 287-301 (2004).
32. Yamamoto, A. et al. Spindle checkpoint activation at meiosis I advances anaphase II onset via meiosis-specific APC/C regulation. J. Cell Biol. 182, 277-288 (2008).
33. Tanaka, T., Fuchs, J., Loidl, J. & Nasmyth, K. Cohesin ensures bipolar attachment of microtubules to sister centromeres and resists their precocious separation. Nature Cell Biol. 2, 492-499 (2000).
34. Sullivan, B. A. & Karpen, G. H. Centromerlc chromatin exhibits a histone modification pattern that is distinct from both euchromatin and heterochromatin. Nature Struct. Mol. Biol. 11, 1076-1083 (2004).
35. Amor, D. J., Kalltsls, P., Sumer, H. & Choo, K. H. A. Building the centromere: from foundation proteins to 3D organization. Trends Cell Biol. 14, 359-368 (2004).
36. Dewar, H., Tanaka, K., Nasmyth, K. & Tanaka, T. U. Tension between two kinetochores suffices for their bi-orientation on the mitotic spindle. Nature 428, 93-97 (2004).
37. Eckert, C. A., Gravdahl, D. J. & Megee, P. C. The enhancement of perlcentromerlc cohesin association by conserved kinetochore components promotes highfidelity chromosome segregation and is sensitive to microtubule-based tension. Genes Dev. 21, 278-291 (2007).
38. Blower, M. D., Sullivan, B. A. & Karpen, G. H. Conserved organization of centromeric chromatin in flies and humans. Dev. Cell 2, 319-330 (2002).
39. Cleveland, D. W., Mao, Y. & Sullivan, K. F. Centromeres and kinetochores. From epigenetics to mitotic checkpoint signaling. Cell 112, 407-421 (2003).
40. Tanaka, T. U. et al. Evidence that the IpI1-SIi 15 (Aurora kinase-INCENP) complex promotes chromosome bi-orlentation by altering kinetochore-spindle pole connections. Ceil 108, 317-329 (2002).
41. Cimini, D., Wan, X., Hirel, C. B. & Salmon, E. D. Aurora kinase promotes turnover of kinetochore microtubules to reduce chromosome segregation errors. Curr. Biol. 16, 1711-1718 (2006).
42. Kawashima, S. A. et al. Shugoshin enab es tension-generating attachment of kinetochores by loading Aurora to centromeres. Genes Dev. 21, 420-435 (2007).
43. Wlney, M., Morgan, G. P., Straight, P. D., Giddings, T. H. Jr & Mastronarde, D. N. Three-dimensional ultrastructure of Saccharomyces cerevisiae meiotic spindles. Mol. Biol. Cell 16, 1178-1188 (2005).
44. Yu, H.-G. & Dawe, R. K. Functional redundancy in the maize melotic kinetochore. J. Cell Biol. 151, 131-141 (2000).
45. Chelysheva, L. et al. AtRECS and AtSCC3 are essential to the monopolar orientation of the kinetochores during meiosis, J. Cell Sci. 118, 4621-4632 (2005).
46. Yamamoto, A. & Hiraoka, Y. Monopolar spindle attachment of sister chromatids is ensured by two distinct mechanisms at the first melotic division in fission yeast. EMBO J. 22, 2284-2296 (2003).
47. Nabeshima, K. et al. Dynamics of centromeres during metaphase-anaphase transition in fission yeast: dis1 is implicated in force balance in metaphase bipolar spindle. Mol. Biol. Cell 9, 3211-3225 (1998).
48. + gene encodes a meiosisspecific transcription factor containing a forkhead DNA-binding domain. Mol. Cell. Biol. 18, 2118-2129 (1998).
49. Izawa, D., Goto, M., Yamashita, A., Yamano, H. & Yamamoto, M. Fission yeast Mes1p ensures the onset of meiosis II by blocking degradation of cyclin Cdc13p. Nature 434, 529-533 (2005).
50. Allshire, R. C. Nlrnrno, E. R., Ekwall, K., Javerzat, J. P. & Cranston, G. Mutations derepressing silent centromeric domains in fission yeast disrupt chromosome segregation. Genes Dev. 9, 218-233 (1995).