Are we on a learning curve or a treadmill? The benefits of participative group goal setting become apparent as tasks become increasingly challenging over time

European Journal of Social Psychology

Volumn 39, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 430-446

  Alexander Haslam, S ^a   Wegge, Jürgen ^b   Postmes, Tom ^a,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EXETER   (United Kingdom)

^b DRESDEN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Germany)

^c UNIVERSITY OF GRONINGEN   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 69749107109     PISSN: 00462772     EISSN: 10990992     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/ejsp.546     Document Type: Article

References (80)

1. Adarves-Yorno, I., Postmes, T., & Haslam, S. A. (2006). Social identity and the recognition of creativity in groups. British Journal of Social Psychology, 45, 479-497.
2. Adarves-Yorno, I., Postmes, T., & Haslam, S. A. (2007). Creative innovation or crazy irrelevance? The contribution of group norms and social identity to creative behavior. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43, 410-416.
3. Allen, N., & Hecht, T. D. (2004). The 'romance of teams': Toward an understanding of its psychological underpinnings and implications. Journal of Organizational and Occupational Psychology, 77, 439-461.
4. Alvesson, M., & Willmott, H. (2002). Identity regulation as organizational control: Producing the appropriate individual. Journal of Management Studies, 39, 619-644.
5. Aube, C., & Rousseau, V. (2005). Team goal commitment and team effectiveness: The role of task interdependence and supportive behaviors. Group Dynamics: Theory Research and Practice, 9, 189-204.
6. Campbell, D. T. (1958). Common fate, similarity, and other indices of the status of aggregates of persons as social entities. Behavioural Science, 3, 14-25.
7. Cohen, J. (1977). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. New York: John Wiley.
8. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York: Plenum Press.
9. Duck, J. M., & Fielding, K. S. (1999). Leaders and subgroups: One of us or one of them? Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 2, 203-230.
10. Duck, J. M., & Fielding, K. S. (2003). Leaders and their treatment of subgroups: Implications for evaluations of the leader and the superordinate group. European Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 387-401.
11. Durham, C. C., Locke, E. A., Poon, J. M. L., & McLeod, P. L. (2000). Effects of group goals and time pressure on group efficacy, information seeking, strategy and performance. Human Performance, 13, 115-138.
12. Earley, P. C., & Shally, C. E. (1991). New perspectives on goals and performance: Merging motivation and cognition. In G. R. Ferris, & K. M. Rowland (Eds.), Research in personnel and human resources management (Vol. 9, pp. 122-157). London: JAI Press.
13. Ellemers, N., de Gilder, D., & Haslam, S. A. (2004). Motivating individuals and groups at work: A social identity perspective on leadership and group performance. Academy of Management Review, 29, 459-478.
14. Erez, M., & Zidon, I. (1984). Effect of goal acceptance on the relationship of goal difficulty to performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69, 69-78.
15. Ghoshal, S., & Bartlett, C. A. (1997). The individualized corporation: A fundamentally new approach to management. New York: Harper Collins Business.
16. Harley, B. (1999). The myth of empowerment: Work organization, hierarchy and employee autonomy in contemporary Australian workplaces. Work, Employment and Society, 13, 41-66.
17. Haslam, S. A. (2001). Psychology in organizations: The social identity approach. London: Sage.
18. Haslam, S. A., Eggins, R. A., & Reynolds, K. J. (2003). The ASPIRe model: Actualizing social and personal identity resources to enhance organizational outcomes. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 76, 83-113.
19. Haslam, S. A., Platow, M. J., Turner, J. C., Reynolds, K. J., McGarty, C., Oakes, P. J., et al. (2001). Social identity and the romance of leadership: The importance of being seen to be 'doing it for us'. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 4, 191-205.
20. Haslam, S. A., & Reicher, S. D. (2006). Stressing the group: Social identity and the unfolding dynamics of responses to stress. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 1037-1052.
21. Haslam, S. A., Powell, C., & Turner, J. C. (2000). Social identity, self-categorization and work motivation: Rethinking the contribution of the group to positive and sustainable organizational outcomes. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 49, 319-339.
22. Haslam, S. A., Ryan, M. K., Postmes, T., Spears, R., Jetten, J.,&Webley, P. (2006). Sticking to our guns: Social identity as a basis for the maintenance of commitment to faltering organizational projects. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27, 607-628.
23. Hinsz, V. B. (1995). Goal setting by groups performing an additive task: A comparison with individual goal setting. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 25, 965-990.
24. Hinsz, V. B., & Nickell, G. S. (2004). Positive reactions to working in groups in a study of group and individual goal decision making. Group Dynamics: Theory Research and Practice, 8, 253-264.
25. Hogg, M. A., & van Knippenberg, D. (2004). Social identity and leadership processes in groups. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 35, 1-52.
26. Kelly, C. (1993). Group identification, intergroup perceptions and collective action. European Review of Social Psychology, 4, 59-83.
27. Kelly, C., & Kelly, J. (1991). 'Them and us': Social psychology and 'the new industrial relations'. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 29, 25-48.
28. Klein, H. J., Wesson, M. J., Hollenbeck, J. R., & Alge, B. J. (1999). Goal commitment and the goal setting process: Conceptual clarification and empirical synthesis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 64, 885-896.
29. Knight, D., Durham, C. C., & Locke, E. A. (2001). The relationship of team goals, incentives, and efficacy to strategic risk, tactical implication, and performance. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 326-338.
30. Latham, G. P., & Locke, E. A. (1979). Goal setting: A motivational technique that works. Organizatinal Dynamics, 8, 68-80.
31. Levine, R. M. (2003). Times, theories, and practices in social psychology. Theory and Psychology, 13, 53-72.
32. Locke, E. A. (1986). Generalizing from laboratory to field settings. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
33. Locke, E. A. (2000). Motivation, cognition and action: An analysis of studies on task goals and knowledge. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 49, 408-429.
34. Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (1990). A theory of goal setting and task performance. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
35. Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (2002). Building a practically useful theory of goal setting and task motivation. American Psychologist, 57, 705-717.
36. Locke, E. A., Roberson, B., Latham, M. E., & Weldon, E. (2001). The importance of the individual in an age of groupism. In M. E. Turner (Ed.), Groups at work: Advances in theory and research (pp. 501-528). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
37. Mayo, E. (1933). The human problems of an industrial civilization. Cambridge, MA: Macmillan.
38. Miner, J. B. (1984). The validity and usefulness of theories in an emerging organizational science. Academy of Management Review, 9, 296-306.
39. Moreland, R. L., Argote, L., & Krishnan, R. (1996). Socially shared cognition at work: Transactive memory and group performance. In J. Nye, & A. Brower (Eds.), What's social about social cognition? Research on socially shared cognition in small groups (pp. 57-84). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
40. O'Leary-Kelly, A. M., Martocchio, J. J.,&Frink, D. D. (1994). A review of the influence of group goals on group performance. Academy of Management Journal, 37, 1285-1301.
41. Oakes, P. J., Turner, J. C., & Haslam, S. A. (1991). Perceiving people as group members: The role of fit in the salience of social categorizations. British Journal of Social Psychology, 30, 125-144.
42. Oakes, P. J., Haslam, S. A., Morrison, B., & Grace, D. (1995). Becoming an ingroup: Re-examining the impact of familiarity on perceptions of group homogeneity. Social Psychology Quarterly, 58, 52-61.
43. Parker, M., & Slaughter, J. (1988). Choosing sides: Unions and the team concept. Boston: South End Press.
44. Paulus, P. B. (2000). Groups, teams and creativity: The creative potential of idea-generating groups. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 49, 237-262.
45. Paulus, P. B., Dugosh, K. L., Dzindolet, M. T., Coskun, H., & Putman, V. L. (2002). Social and cognitive influences in group brainstorming: Predicitng production gains and losses. European Review of Social Psychology, 12, 299-325.
46. Peterson, R. S. (1999). Can you have too much of a good thing? The limits of voice for improving satisfaction with leaders. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 313-324.
47. Platow, M. J., & van Knippenberg, D. (2001). A social identity analysis of leadership endorsement: The effects of leader ingroup prototypicality and distributive intergroup fairness. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 1508-1519.
48. Platow, M. J., Hoar, S., Reid, S., Harley, K., & Morrison, D. (1997). Endorsement of distributively fair or unfair leaders in interpersonal and intergroup situations. European Journal of Social Psychology, 27, 465-494.
49. Postmes, T., Haslam, S. A., & Swaab, R. (2005). Social influence in small groups: An interactive model of identity formation. European Review of Social Psychology, 16, 1-42.
50. Postmes, T., Spears, R., Lee, A. T., & Novak, R. J. (2005). Individuality and social influence in groups: Inductive and deductive routes to group identity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 747-763.
51. Reicher, S. D., & Haslam, S. A. (2006). Tyranny revisited: Groups, psychological well-being and the health of societies. The Psychologist, 19, 46-50.
52. Reicher, S. D., Haslam, S. A., & Hopkins, N. (2005). Social identity and the dynamics of leadership: Leaders and followers as collaborative agents in the transformation of social reality. Leadership Quarterly 16, 547-568.
53. Reynolds, K. J., Oakes, P. J., Haslam, S. A., Nolan, M., & Dolnik, L. (2000). Responses to powerlessness: Stereotypes as an instrument of social conflict. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research and Practice, 4, 275-290.
54. Roberson, Q. M., Moye, N. A., & Locke, E. A. (1999). Identifying a missing link between participation and satisfaction: The mediating role of procedural justice perceptions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84, 585-593.
55. Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. G. Austin, & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33-47). Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
56. Taylor, F. W. (1911). Principles of scientific management. New York: Harper. The Guardian (28 February D 2003 C). Fixation with targets 'damaging teacher morale'. Retrieved from http://education.guardian.co.uk/ofsted/story/0,7348,904448,00.html.
57. Turner, J. C. (1981). Some considerations in generalizing experimental social psychology. In G. M. Stephenson, & J. H. Davis (Eds.), Progress in applied social psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 3-34). Chichester: Wiley.
58. Turner, J. C. (1985). Social categorization and the self-concept: A social cognitive theory of group behaviour. In E. J. Lawler (Ed.), Advances in group processes (Vol. 2, pp. 77-122) Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
59. Turner, J. C. (1991). Social influence. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
60. Turner, J. C. (2005). Explaining the nature of power: A three-process theory. European Journal of Social Psychology, 35, 1-22.
61. Turner, J. C., & Haslam, S. A. (2001). Social identity, organizations and leadership. In M. E. Turner (Ed.), Groups at work: Advances in theory and research (pp. 25-65). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
62. Turner, J. C., Oakes, P. J., Haslam, S. A., & McGarty, C. A. (1994). Self and collective: Cognition and social context. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20, 454-463.
63. Van Dick, R. (2004). My job is my castle: Identification in organizational contexts. In C. L. Cooper, & I. T. Robertson (Eds.), International review of industrial and organizational psychology (Vol. 19, pp. 171-204). Chichester: Wiley.
64. Van Dick, R., Wagner, U., Stellmacher, J., & Christ, O. (2004). The utility of a broader conceptualization of organizational identification: Which aspects really matter? Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 77, 171-191.
65. Van Knippenberg, D. (2000). Work motivation and performance: A social identity perspective. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 49, 357-371.
66. Van Knippenberg, D., & Ellemers, N. (2003). Social identity and group performance: Identification as the key to group-oriented effort. In S. A. Haslam, D. van Knippenberg, M. J. Platow, & N. Ellemers (Eds.), Social identity at work: Developing theory for organizational practice (pp. 29-42). New York: Taylor and Francis.
67. Vance, R. J., & Colella, A. (1990). Effects of two types of feedback on goal acceptance and personal goals. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 68-76.
68. Veenstra, K., & Haslam, S. A. (2000). Willingness to participate in industrial protest: Exploring social identification in context. British Journal of Social Psychology, 39, 153-172.
69. Wegge, J. (2000). Participation in group goal setting: Some novel findings and a comprehensive model as a new ending to an old story. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 49, 498-516.
70. Wegge, J. (2001). Motivation, information processing and performance: Effects of goal setting on basic cognitive processes. In A. Efklides, J. Kuhl, & R. Sorrentino (Eds.), Trends and prospects in motivation research (pp. 269-296). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
71. Wegge, J., & Haslam, S. A. (2003). Group goal setting, social identity, and self-categorization: Engaging the collective self to enhance group performance and organizational outcomes. In S. A. Haslam, D. van Knippenberg, M. J. Platow, & N. Ellemers (Eds.), Social identity at work: Developing theory for organizational practice (pp. 43-60). New York: Taylor and Francis.
72. Wegge, J., & Haslam, S. A. (2005). Improving work motivation and performance in brainstorming groups: A comparison of three group goal-setting strategies. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 14, 400-430.
73. Wegge, J., & Haslam, S. A. (2006). When group goal setting fails: The impact of task complexity and unfair supervisors. Manuscript undergoing revision: Technical University of Dresden.
74. Weick, K. E., & Roberts, K. H. (1993). Collective mind in organizations: Heedful interrelating on flight decks. Administrative Science Quarterly, 38, 357-381.
75. Weldon, E., & Weingart, L. R. (1993). Group goals and group performance. British Journal of Social Psychology, 32, 307-334.
76. West, M. A., Borrill, C., & Unsworth, K. L. (1998). Team effectiveness in organizations. In C. L. Cooper, & I. T. Robertson (Eds.), International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology (Vol. 13, pp. 1-48). Chichester, England: Wiley.
77. West, M. A., Brodbeck, F. C., & Richter, A. W. (2004). Does the 'romance of teams' exist? The effectiveness of teans in experimental and field settings. Journal of Organizational and Occupational Psychology, 77, 439-461.
78. Widmeyer, W. N., & Ducharme, K. (1997). Team building through team goal setting. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 9, 97-113.
79. Worchel, S., Rothgerber, H., Day, E. A., Hart, D., & Butemeyer, J. (1998). Social identity and individual productivity within groups. British Journal of Social Psychology, 37, 389-413.
80. Wright, P. M., Hollenbeck, J. R.,Wolf, S., & McMahan, G. C. (1995). The effects of varying goal difficulty operationalizations on goal setting outcomes and processes. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 61, 28-43.