Multilocus sequence data reveal extensive departures from equilibrium in domesticated tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.)

Heredity

Volumn 103, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 257-267

  Labate, J A ^a   Robertson, L D ^a   Baldo, A M ^a  

^a AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH SERVICE   (United States)

Author keywords

Haplotype network; Introgression; Linkage disequilibrium; Nuclear SNP; Population genetics; Selection

Indexed keywords

ALLELE; CROP IMPROVEMENT; DNA; DOMESTIC SPECIES; FRUIT; GENE EXPRESSION; GENETIC VARIATION; HYBRIDIZATION; INTROGRESSION; POLYMORPHISM; POPULATION BOTTLENECK; RECOMBINATION; SPECIES DIVERSITY; WILD POPULATION;

ARTICLE; DNA SEQUENCE; GENE LINKAGE DISEQUILIBRIUM; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GENETICS; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; MOLECULAR GENETICS; NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE; SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE POLYMORPHISM; TOMATO;

EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; GENETIC VARIATION; LINKAGE DISEQUILIBRIUM; LYCOPERSICON ESCULENTUM; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE DATA; POLYMORPHISM, SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, DNA;

LYCOPERSICON; LYCOPERSICON ESCULENTUM; LYCOPERSICON PIMPINELLIFOLIUM; SOLANUM;

EID: 69249203823     PISSN: 0018067X     EISSN: 13652540     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/hdy.2009.58     Document Type: Article

References (79)

1. Arunyawat U, Stephan W, Stadler T (2007). Using multilocus sequence data to assess population structure, natural selection, and linkage disequilibrium in wild tomatoes. Mol Biol Evol 24: 2310.
2. Bai Y, Lindhout P (2007). Domestication and breeding of tomatoes: what have we gained and what can we gain in the future? Ann Bot 100: 1085-1094.
3. Baudry E, Kerdelhué C, Innan H, StephanW(2001). Species and recombination effects on DNA variability in the tomato genus. Genetics 158: 1725-1735.
4. Burger JC, Chapman MA, Burke JM (2008). Molecular insights into the evolution of crop plants. Am J Bot 95: 113.
5. Burke JM, Knapp SJ, Rieseberg LH (2005). Genetic consequences of selection during the evolution of cultivated sunflower. Genetics 171: 1933-1940.
6. Caicedo AL, Williamson SH, Hernandez RD, Boyko A, Fledel-Alon A, York TL et al. (2007). Genome-wide patterns of nucleotide polymorphism in domesticated rice. PLoS Genet 3: 1745-1756.
7. Casa AM, Mitchell SE, Hamblin MT, Sun H, Bowers JE, Paterson AH et al. (2005). Diversity and selection in sorghum: simultaneous analyses using simple sequence repeats. Theor Appl Genet 111: 23-30.
8. Casa AM, Pressoir G, Brown PJ, Mitchell SE, Rooney WL, Tuinstra MR et al. (2008). Community resources and strategies for association mapping in sorghum. Crop Sci 48: 30-40.
9. Causse M, Caranta C, Saliba-Colombani V, Moretti A, Damidaux R, Rousselle P (2000). Enhancement of tomato genetic resources via molecular markers. Cah Agric 9: 197-210.
10. Clement M, Posada D, Crandall KA (2000). TCS: a computer program to estimate gene genealogies. Mol Ecol 9: 1657-1660.
11. Ewing B, Hillier L, Wendl MC, Green P (1998). Base-calling of automated sequencer traces using phred. I. Accuracy assessment. Genome Res 8: 175-185.
12. Fu YX, Li WH (1993). Statistical tests of neutrality of mutations. Genetics 133: 693-709.
13. Fulton TM, Nelson JC, Tanksley SD (1997). Introgression and DNA marker analysis of Lycopersicon peruvianum, a wild relative of the cultivated tomato, into Lycopersicon esculentum, followed through three successive backcross generations. Theor Appl Genet 95: 895-902.
14. Fusari CM, Lia VV, Hopp HE, Heinz RA, Paniego NB (2008). Identification of single nucleotide polymorphisms and analysis of linkage disequilibrium in sunflower elite inbred lines using the candidate gene approach. BMC Plant Biol 8: 7.
15. Ganal MW, Durstewitz G, Kulosa D, Luerssen H, Polley A, Wolf M (2007). Development of EST-Derived SNP Markers for Plant Breeding. W172. Plant and Animal Genome XV: San Diego, CA.
16. Hamblin MT, Casa AM, Sun H, Murray SC, Paterson AH, Aquadro CF et al. (2006). Challenges of detecting directional selection after a bottleneck: lessons from Sorghum bicolor. Genetics 173: 953-964.
17. Hamblin MT, Mitchell SE, White GM, Gallego J, Kukatla R, Wing RA et al. (2004). Comparative population genetics of the panicoid grasses: sequence polymorphism, linkage disequilibrium and selection in a diverse sample of Sorghum bicolor. Genetics 167: 471-483.
18. Hartl D, Clark A (1989). Principles of Population Genetics, 2nd edn. Sinauer Associates Inc.: Sunderland, MA.
19. He C, Poysa V, Yu K (2003). Development and characterization of simple sequence repeat (SSR) markers and their use in determining relationships among Lycopersicon esculentum cultivars. Theor Appl Genet 106: 363-373.
20. Hey J, Wakeley J (1997). A coalescent estimator of the population recombination rate. Genetics 145: 833-846.
21. Hudson RR, Kaplan NL (1985). Statistical properties of the number of recombination events in the history of a sample of DNA sequences. Genetics 111: 147-164.
22. Hyten DL, Choi IY, Song Q, Shoemaker RC, Nelson RL, Costa JM et al. (2007). Highly variable patterns of linkage disequilibrium in multiple soybean populations. Genetics 175: 1937-1944.
23. Labate JA, Baldo AM (2005). Tomato SNP discovery by EST mining and resequencing. Mol Breed 16: 343-349.
24. Labate JA, Grandillo S, Fulton T, Muños S, Caicedo AL, Peralta I et al. (2007). Tomato. In: Kole C (ed). Genome Mapping and Molecular Breeding in Plants: Vegetables. Springer: New York, Vol.5, pp 1-125.
25. Labate JA, Robertson LD, Wu F, Tanksley SD, Baldo AM (2009). EST, COSII, and arbitrary gene markers give similar estimates of nucleotide diversity in cultivated tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.). Theor Appl Genet 118: 1005-1014.
26. Malysheva-Otto LV, Ganal MW, Röder MS (2006). Analysis of molecular diversity, population structure and linkage disequilibrium in a worldwide survey of cultivated barley germplasm (Hordeum vulgare L.). BMC Genet 7: 6.
27. Mather KA, Caicedo AL, Polato NR, Olsen KM, McCouch S, Purugganan MD (2007). The extent of linkage disequilibrium in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Genetics 177: 2223-2232.
28. Mazzucato A, Papa R, Bitocchi E, Mosconi P, Nanni L, Negri V et al. (2008). Genetic diversity, structure and marker-trait associations in a collection of Italian tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) landraces. Theor Appl Genet 116: 657-669.
29. McCouch S (2004). Diversifying selection in plant breeding. PLoS Biol 2: e347.
30. McDonald JH, Kreitman M (1991). Adaptive protein evolution at the Adh locus in Drosophila. Nature 351: 652-654.
31. Miller JC, Tanksley SD (1990). RFLP analysis of phylogenetic relationships and genetic variation in the genus Lycopersicon. Theor Appl Genet 80: 437-448.
32. Morrell PL, Williams-Coplin TD, Lattu AL, Bowers JE, Chandler JM, Paterson AH (2005). Crop-to-weed introgression has impacted allelic composition of johnsongrass populations with and without recent exposure to cultivated sorghum. Mol Ecol 14: 2143-2154.
33. Mueller LA, Tanksley SD, Giovannoni JJ, Van Eck J, Stack S, Choi D et al. (2005). The Tomato Sequencing Project, the first cornerstone of the International Solanaceae Project (SOL). Comp Funct Genomics 6: 153-158.
34. Nei M (1987). Molecular Evolutionary Genetics. Columbia University Press: New York.
35. Nei M, Li WH (1979). Mathematical model for studying genetic variation in terms of restriction endonucleases. Proc Natl Acad Sci 76: 5269-5273.
36. Nesbitt TC, Tanksley SD (2002). Comparative sequencing in the genus Lycopersicon: implications for the evolution of fruit size in the domestication of cultivated tomatoes. Genetics 162: 365-379.
37. Nielsen R (2001). Statistical tests of selective neutrality in the age of genomics. Heredity 86: 641-647.
38. Nordborg M, Hu TT, Ishino Y, Jhaveri J, Toomajian C, Zheng HG et al. (2005). The pattern of polymorphism in Arabidopsis thaliana. PLoS Biol 3: e196.
39. Olsen KM, Caicedo AL, Polato N, McClung A, McCouch S, Purugganan MD (2006). Selection under domestication: evidence for a sweep in the rice Waxy genomic region. Genetics 173: 975-983.
40. Paterson AH (2006). Leafing through the genomes of our major crop plants: strategies for capturing unique information. Nat Rev Genet 7: 174-184.
41. Peralta IE, Knapp S, Spooner D (2008). The taxonomy of tomatoes: a revision of wild tomatoes (Solanum section Lycopersicon) and their outgroup relatives (Solanum sections Juglandifolium and Lycopersicoides). Syst Bot Monogr 84: 1-186.
42. Peralta IE, Spooner DM (2007). History, origin and early cultivation of tomato. In: Razdan MK, Mattoo AK (eds). Genetic Improvement of Solanaceous Crops. Science Publishers: Enfield, NH, Vol.2: Tomato, pp 1-24.
43. Raboin LM, Pauquet J, Butterfield M, D'Hont A, Glaszmann JC (2008). Analysis of genome-wide linkage disequilibrium in the highly polyploid sugarcane. Theor Appl Genet 116: 701-714.
44. Rafalski A (2002). Applications of single nucleotide polymorphisms in crop genetics. Curr Opin Plant Biol 5: 94-100.
45. Raymond M, Rousset F (1995). GENEPOP (version 1.2): population genetics software for exact tests and ecumenicism. J Hered 86: 248-249.
46. Rick C (1971). The tomato Ge locus: linkage relations and geographic distribution of alleles. Genetics 67: 75-85.
47. Rick CM (1950). Pollination relations of Lycopersicon esculentum in native and foreign regions. Evolution 4: 110-122.
48. Rick CM (1958). The role of natural hybridization in the derivation of cultivated tomatoes of western South America. Econ Bot 12: 346-367.
49. Rick CM, Fobes JF (1974). Association of an allozyme with nematode resistance. Tomato Genet Coop Rep 24: 25.
50. Rick CM, Fobes JF (1975). Allozyme variation in the cultivated tomato and closely related species. Bull Torrey Bot Club 102: 376-386.
51. Rick CM, Zobel RW, Fobes JF (1974). Four peroxidase loci in red-fruited tomato species: genetics and geographic distribution. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 71: 835-839.
52. Robertson LD, Labate JA (2007). Genetic resources of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) and wild relatives. In: Razdan MK,Mattoo AK (eds). Genetic Improvement of Solanaceous Crops. Science Publishers: Enfield, NH. Vol.2: Tomato, pp 25-75.
53. Roselius K, Stephan W, Stadler T (2005). The relationship of nucleotide polymorphism, recombination rate and selection in wild tomato species. Genetics 171: 753-763.
54. Ross-Ibarra J, Morrell PL, Gaut BS (2007). Plant domestication, a unique opportunity to identify the genetic basis of adaptation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104 (suppl 1): 8641-8648.
55. Rozas J, Sánchez-DelBarrio JC, Messeguer X, Rozas R (2003). DnaSP, DNA polymorphism analyses by the coalescent and other methods. Bioinformatics 19: 2496-2497.
56. Ruiz JJ, García-Martínez S, Picó B, Gao M, Quiros C (2005). Genetic variability and relationship of closely related Spanish traditional cultivars of tomato as detected by SRAP and SSR markers. J Am Soc Hortic Sci 130: 88-94.
57. Simko I, Haynes KG, Jones RW (2006). Assessment of linkage disequilibrium in potato genome with single nucleotide polymorphism markers. Genetics 173: 2237-2245.
58. Somers DJ, Banks T, DePauw R, Fox S, Clarke J, Pozniak C et al. (2007). Genome-wide linkage disequilibrium analysis in bread wheat and durum wheat. Genome 50: 557-567.
59. Städler T, Roselius K, Stephan W (2005). Genealogical footprints of speciation processes in wild tomatoes: demography and evidence for historical gene flow. Evolution 59: 1268-1279.
60. Stevens M, Rick C (1986). Genetics and breeding. In: Atherton J, Rudich J (eds). The Tomato Crop. Chapman and Hall: New York, NY, pp 35-109.
61. Tajima F (1989). Statistical method for testing the neutral mutation hypothesis by DNA polymorphism. Genetics 123: 585-596.
62. Tajima F (1993). Statistical analysis of DNA polymorphism. Jpn J Genet 68: 567-595.
63. Tanksley SD, Bernachi D, Beck-Bunn T, Emmatty D, Eshed Y, Inai S et al. (1998). Yield and quality evaluations on a pair of processing tomato lines nearly isogenic for the Tm-2a gene for resistance to the tobacco mosaic virus. Euphytica 99: 77-83.
64. Templeton AR, Crandall KA, Sing CF (1992). A cladistic analysis of phenotypic associations with haplotypes inferred from restriction endonuclease mapping and DNA sequence data. III. Cladogram estimation. Genetics 132: 619-633.
65. van Berloo R, Zhu A, Ursem R, Verbakel H, Gort G, van Eeuwijk FA (2008). Diversity and linkage disequilibrium analysis within a selected set of cultivated tomatoes. Theor Appl Genet 117: 89-101.
66. Van Deynze A, Stoffel K, Buell CR, Kozik A, Liu J, van der Knaap E et al. (2007). Diversity in conserved genes in tomato. BMC Genomics 8: 465.
67. Villand J, Skroch PW, Lai T, Hanson P, Kuo CG, Nienhuis J (1998). Genetic variation among tomato accessions from primary and secondary centers of diversity. Crop Sci 38: 1339-1347.
68. Watterson GA (1975). On the number of segregating sites in genetical models without recombination. Theor Popul Biol 7: 256-276.
69. Williams CE, St Clair DA (1993). Phenetic relationships and levels of variability detected by restriction fragment length polymorphism and random amplified polymorphic DNA analysis of cultivated and wild accessions of Lycopersicon esculentum. Genome 36: 619-630.
70. Wright SI, Bi IV, Schroeder SG, Yamasaki M, Doebley JF, McMullen MD et al. (2005). The effects of artificial selection on the maize genome. Science 308: 1310-1314.
71. Wright SI, Charlesworth B (2004). The HKA test revisited: a maximum-likelihood-ratio test of the standard neutral model. Genetics 168: 1071-1076.
72. Wright SI, Gaut BS (2005). Molecular population genetics and the search for adaptive evolution in plants. Mol Biol Evol 22: 506-519.
73. Wu F, Mueller LA, Crouzillat D, Petiard V, Tanksley SD (2006). Combining bioinformatics and phylogenetics to identify large sets of single-copy orthologous genes (COSII) for comparative, evolutionary and systematic studies: a test case in the Euasterid plant clade. Genetics 174: 1407-1420.
74. Yamasaki M, Wright SI, McMullen MD (2007). Genomic screening for artificial selection during domestication and improvement in maize. Ann Bot 100: 967-973.
75. Yang WC, Bai XD, Kabelka E, Eaton C, Kamoun S, van der Knaap E et al. (2004). Discovery of single nucleotide polymorphisms in Lycopersicon esculentum by computer aided analysis of expressed sequence tags. Mol Breed 14: 21-34.
76. Yates HE, Frary A, Doganlar S, Frampton A, Eannetta NT, Uhlig J et al. (2004). Comparative fine mapping of fruit quality QTLs on chromosome 4 introgressions derived from two wild tomato species. Euphytica 135: 283-296.
77. Yu J, Holland JB, McMullen MD, Buckler ES (2008). Genetic design and statistical power of nested association mapping in maize. Genetics 178: 539-551.
78. Zhu Q, Zheng X, Luo J, Gaut BS, Ge S (2007). Multilocus analysis of nucleotide variation of Oryza sativa and its wild relatives: severe bottleneck during domestication of rice. Mol Biol Evol 24: 875-888.
79. Zhu YL, Song QJ, Hyten DL, Tassell CPV, Matukumalli LK, Grimm DR et al. (2003). Single-nucleotide polymorphisms in soybean. Genetics 163: 1123-1134.