Genetic resources of tomato (lycopersiconesculentum mill.) and wild relatives

Genetic Improvement of Solanaceous Crops Volume 2: Tomato

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 25-75

  Robertson, Larry D ^a   Labate, Joanne A ^a  

^a AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH SERVICE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

FRUITS; PLANTS (BOTANY);

CHROMOSOME PAIRING; GENETIC RESOURCES; HOMOLOGOUS CHROMOSOMES; LYCOPERSICON; POLLEN FERTILITY;

CHROMOSOMES;

EID: 85057661343     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (141)

1. A.E., C.C.M. Van De Wiel, M.J.M. Smulders, and B. Vosman. 2001. Use of microsatellites to evalute genetic diversity and species relationships in the genus Lycopersicon. Theor Appl Genet 103: 1283–1292.
2. Anonymous. 2003. Tomato Crop Germplasm Committee (CGC) Report. http://www.arsgrin.gov/npgs/cgclist.html#Tomato.
3. Aquadro, C.F., D.J. Begun, and E.C. Kindahl. 1994. Selection, recombination, and DNA polymorphism in Drosophila: In: G.B. Golding. [ed.], Non-neutral evolution: Theories and molecular data. Chapman and Hall, New York.
4. Archak, S., J.L. Karihaloo, and A. Jain. 2002. RAPD markers reveal narrowing genetic base of Indian tomato Cultivars. Curr Sci 82: 1139–1143.
5. Bailey, L.H. 1896. The amelioration of the garden tomato 1896. The survival of the unlike: A Collection of evolution essays suggested by the study of domestic plants. The Macmillan Co., London, England.
6. Battencourt, E. and J. Konopka. 1990. Vegetables: Abelmoschus, Allium, Amaranthus, Brassicaceae, Capsicum, Cucurbitaceae, Lycopersicon, Solanum and other vegetables. Updated at http://www.ipgri.cgiar.org/germplasm/dbintro.htm. International Plant Genetic Resources Institute (IPGRI), Maccarese, Italy.
7. Behare, J., H. Laterrot, M. Sarfatti, and D. Zamir. 1991. Restriction fragment length polylmorphism mapping of the Stemphylium resistance gene in tomato. Mol Plant Microbe In 4:489–492.
8. Bernacchi, D., T. Beck-Bunn, D. Emmatty, Y. Eshed, S. Inai, J. Lopez, V. Petiard, H. Sayama, J. Uhlig, D. Zamir, and S. Tanksley. 1998b. Advanced backcross QTL analysis of tomato. II. Evaluation of near-isogenic lines Carrying single-donor introgressions for desirable wild QTL-alleles derived from Lycopersicon hirsutum and L pimpinellifolium. Theor Appl Genet 97:170–180.
9. Bernacchi, D., T. Beck-Bunn, Y. Eshed, J. Lopez, V. Petiard, J. Uhlig, D. Zamir, and S. Tanksley. 1998a. Advanced backcross QTL analysis in tomato. I. Identification of QTLs for traits of agronomic importance from Lycopersicon hirsutum. Theor Appl Genet 97:381–397.
10. Bohs, L., and R.G. Olmstead. 1997. Phylogenetic relationships in Solanum (Solanaceae) based on ndhF sequences. Syst Bot 22:5–17.
11. Bonierbale, M.W., R.L. Plaisted, and S.D. Tanksley. 1988. RFLP maps based on a Common set of Clones reveal modes of Chromosomal evolution in potato and tomato. Genetics 120:1095–1103.
12. Borner, A., S. Chebotar, and V. Korzun. 2000. Molecular Characterization of the genetic integrity of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) germplasm after long-term maintenance. Theor Appl Genet 100:494–497.
13. Cantliffe, D. J. 1997. Impression of west Mexican fresh market vegetable agriculture, Pre and post NAFTA (1982-1997) In: C. Vavrina, P. Gilreath and J. Noling [eds.], Citrus and Vegetable Magazine. University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, pp. 5–6.
14. Carvalho, L.J.C.B., and B.A. Schaal. 2000. Assessing genetic diversity in the Cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz) germplasm Collection in Brazil using PCR-based markers. Euphytica 120:133–142.
15. Causse, M., C. Caranta, V. Saliba-Colombani, A. Moretti, R. Damidaux, and P. Rousselle. 2000. Enhancement of tomato genetic resources via molecular markers. Cahiers d'études et de recherches francophones/Agricultures 9:197–210.
16. Chetelat, R. 2001. Plant exploration in northern Chile to Collect wild tomato species, with emphasis on Solanum lycopersicoides and S. sitiens. Final Report 6/28/2001, TGRC. http://tgrc.ucdavis.edu/chile.html.
17. Chunwongse, J., Chunwongse, C., Black, L., and P. Hanson. 1998. Mapping of the Ph-3 gene for late blight from L. pimpinellifolium L 3708. TGC Reports 48:13–16.
18. Chunwongse, J., T.B. Bunn, C. Crossman, J. Jiang, and S.D. Tanksley. 1994. Chromosomal localization and molecular-marker tagging of the powdery mildew resistance gene (Lv) in tomato. Theor Appl Genet 89:76–79.
19. Clayberg, C.D., L. Butler, C.M. Rick, and R.W. Robinson. 1965. List of tomato genes as of January, 1965. TGC Reports 15:7–21.
20. Clayberg, C.D., L. Butler, P.A. Young, and C.M. Rick. 1959. List of tomato genes as of January 1959. TGC Reports 9:6–18.
21. Crossa, J., and R. Vencovsky. 1997. Variance effective population size for two-stage sampling of monoecious species. Crop Sci 37:14–26.
22. Dahlberg, J., X. Zhang, G. Hart, and J. Mullet. 2002. Comparative assessment of variation among sorghum germplasm accessions using seed morphology and RAPD measurements. Crop Sci 42:291–296.
23. Dean, R.E., J.A. Dahlberg, M.S. Hopkins, S.E. Mitchell, and S. Kresovich. 1999. Genetic redundancy and diversity among 'Orange' accessions in the U.S. National Sorghum Collection as assessed with simple sequence repeat (SSR) markers. Crop Sci 39:1215–1221.
24. del Rio, A., J. Bamberg, and Z. Huaman. 1997. Assessing Changes in genetic diversity of potato gene banks. 1. Effects of seed increase. Theor Appl Genet 95.
25. Dhanaraj, A.L., E.V.V.B. Rao, K.R.M. Swamy, M.G. Bhat, D.T. Prasad, and S.N. Sondur. 2002. Using RAPDs to assess the diversity in Indian Cashew (Anacardium occidentale L.) germplasm. J Hort Sci Biotech 77:41–47.
26. Dickinson, M.J., D.A. Jones, and J.D.G. Jones. 1993. Close linkage between the Cf-2/Cf-5 and Mi resistance loci in tomato. Mol Plant Microbe In 6:341–347.
27. Dixon, M.S., K. Hatzixanthis, D.A. Jones, K. Harrison, and J.D.G. Jones. 1998. The tomato Cf-5 disease resistance gene and six homologs show pronounced allelic variation in leucinerich repeat Copy number. Plant Cell 10:1915–1925.
28. Doganlar, S., J. Dodson, B. Gabor, T. Beck-Bunn, C. Crossman, and S.D. Tanksley. 1998. Molecular mapping of the py-1 gene for resistance to Corky root rot (Pyrenochaeta lycopersici) in tomato. Theor Appl Genet 97:784–788.
29. Ellis, P.R. and J.W. Maxon-Smith. 1971. Inheritance of resistance to potato Cyst-eelworm (Heterodera rostochiensis Woll.) in the genus Lycopersicon. Euphytica 20:93–101.
30. Ellis, R.H., and E.H. Roberts. 1980. Improved equations for the prediction of seed longevity. Ann Bot 45:13–30.
31. Ellis, R.H., and E.H. Roberts. 1998. How to store seeds to Conserve biodiversity. Nature 395:758.
32. Ellis, R.H., T.D. Hong, and E.H. Roberts. 1991. Seed moisture Content, storage, viability and vigour. Seed Sci Res 1:275–277.
33. Ellis, R.H., T.D. Hong, D. Astley, and H.L. Kraak. 1994. Medium-term storage of dry and ultra-dry seeds of onion at ambient and sub-zero temperatures. Onion Newsletter for the Tropics 6:65–68.
34. Eshed, Y. and D. Zamir. 1995. An introgression line population of Lycopersicon pennellii in the Cultivated tomato enables the identification and fine mapping of yield-associated QTL. Genetics 141:1147–1162.
35. Eshed, Y., G. Gera and D. Zamir. 1996. A genome-wide search for wild-species alleles that increase horticultural yield of processing tomatoes. Theor Appl Genet 93:877–886.
36. FAOSTAT. 2002. Food and agriculture organization of the United Nations statistical databases. http://apps.fao.org/default.htm.
37. Frary, A., S. Doganlar, A. Frampton, T. Fulton, J. Uhlig, H. Yates, and S. Tanksley. 2003. Fine mapping of quantitative trait loci for improved fruit Characteristics from Lycopersicon Chmielewskii Chromosome 1. Genome 46:235–243.
38. Frazier, W.A. and R.K. Dennett. 1949. Tomato lines of Lycopersicon esculentum type resistant to tobacco mosaic virus. Proc Amer Soc Hort Sci 54:265–71.
39. Gallegly, M.E. and M.E. Marvel. 1955. Inheritance of resistance to tomato race 0 of Phytophthora infestans. Phytopathology 45:103–09.
40. Ghislain, M., D. Zhang, D. Fajardo, Z. Huaman, and R. Hijmans. 1999. Marker-assisted sampling of the Cultivated Andean potato Solanum phureja Collection using RAPD markers. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution 46:547–555.
41. Gower, J. C. 1972. Measures of taxamonic distances and their analysis: In J. S. Weiner and J. Huizinga [eds.], The Assessment Of Population Affinties In Man. Clarendon Press, Oxford, UK.
42. Grenier, C., M. Deu, S. Kresovich, P.J. Bramel-Cox, and P. Hamon. 2000. Assessment of genetic diversity in three subsets Constituted from the ICRISAT sorghum Collection using random vs. non-random sampling procedures B. Using molecular markers. Theor Appl Genet 101:197–202.
43. Grube, R., E. Radwanski, and M. Jahn. 2000. Comparative genetics of disease resistance within the Solanaceae. Genetics 155:873–887.
44. Haanstra, J.P.W., C.M. Thomas, J.D.G. Jones, and P. Lindhout. 2000. Dispersion of the Cf- 4 disease resistance gene in Lycopersicon germplasm. Heredity 85:266–270.
45. Haanstra, J.P.W., R. Lauge, F. Meijer-Dekens, G. Bonnema, P.J.G.M. de Wit, and P. Lindhout, 1999. The CF-ECP2 gene is linked to, but not part of, the Cf-4/Cf-9 Cluster on the short arm of Chromosome 1 in tomato. Mol Gen Genet 262:839–845.
46. Harrington, J.F. 1970. Seed pollen storage for Conservation of plant gene resources, In: O. Frankel and E. Bennett [eds.], Genetic Resources In Plants. Blackwell Scientific Publishers, Oxford, UK, pp. 501–520.
47. Hartl, D. and A. Clark. 1989. Principles of Population Genetics. Sinauer Associates, Inc., Sunderland, MA.
48. He, C., V. Poysa, and K. Yu. 2003. Development and Characterization of simple sequence repeat (SSR) markers and their use in determining relationships among Lycopersicon esculentum Cultivars. Theor Appl Genet 106:363–373.
49. Holmes, F.O. 1954. Inheritance of resistance to infection by tobacco-mosaic virus in tomato. Phytopathology 44:640–42.
50. Huaman, Z., C. Aguilar, and R. Ortiz. 1999. Selecting a Peruvian sweet potato Core Collection on the basis of morphological, eco-geographical, and disease and pest reaction data. Theor Appl Genet 98:840–844.
51. IBPGR. 1976. Report of IBPGR working group on engineering, design and Cost aspects of long-term seed storage facilities. International Board for Plant Genetic Resources, Rome, Italy.
52. IPGRI. 1996. Descriptors for tomato (Lycopersicon spp.): http://www.ipgri.cgiar.org/germplasm/dbintro.htm. International Plant Genetic Resources Institute, Maccarese, Italy.
53. Iriondo, J., C. Perez, and F.G. Perez. 1992. Effect of seed storage in liquid nitrogen on germination of several Crop and wild species. Seed Science and Technology 20:165–171.
54. Jenkins, J.A. 1948. The origin of Cultivated tomato. Eco Bot 2:379–392.
55. Jensen, M.H. 1997. Protected Agriculture: A Global Review. World Bank, Washington D.C, USA.
56. Johnson, R.C. 1998. Genetic structure of regeneration populations of annual ryegrass. Crop Sci 28:851–857.
57. Jones, D.A., Balint-Kurti, P.J., Dickinson, M.J., Dixon, M.X., and Jones, J.D.G. 1992. Locations of genes for resistance to Cladosporium fulvum on the Classical and RFLP maps of tomato. TGC Reports 42:19–22.
58. Kawchuk, L.M., J. Hachey, and D.R. Lynch. 1998. Development of sequence Characterized DNA markers linked to a dominant verticillium wilt resistance gene in tomato. Genome 41:91–95.
59. Kerr, E.A. and D.L. Bailey. 1964. Resistance to Cladosporium fulvum Cke. obtained from wild species of tomato. Can J Bot 42:1541–54.
60. Kerr, E.A. and F.I. Cook. 1983. Ontario 7710 - a tomato breeding line with resistance to bacterial speck, Pseudomonas syringae pv tomato (okabe). Can J Plant Sci 63:1107–1109.
61. Kerr, E.A., E. Kerr, Z.A. Patrick, and J.W. Potter. 1980. Linkage relation of resistance to Cladosporium leaf mold (Cf-2) and root-knot nematodes (Mi) in tomato and a new gene for leaf mold resistance (Cf-11). Can J Genet Cytol 22:183–186.
62. Kerr, E.A., Z.A. Patrick, and D.L. Bailey. 1971. Resistance in tomato species to new races of leaf mold (Cladosporium fulvum Cke). Hort Res 11:84–92.
63. Kikuta, K. and W.A. Frazier. 1947. Preliminary report on breeding tomatoes for resistance to tobacco mosaic virus. Proc Amer Soc Hort Sci 49:256–62.
64. Kimura, M. 1983. The neutral theory of molecular evolution. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
65. Langford, A.N. 1937. The parasitism of Cladosporium fulvum Cooke and the genetics of resistance to it. Can J Res 15:108–28.
66. Laterrot, H. 1983. La lutte genetique Contre la maladie des racines liegeuses de la tomate. Revue Horticole 238:23–25.
67. Laterrot, H. 1993. Revised list of near isogenic tomato lines in Moneymaker type with different genes for disease resistances. TGC Reports 43:79.
68. Levesque, H., F. Vedel, C. Mathieu, and A.G.L. de Courcel. 1990. Identification of a short rDNA spacer sequence highly specific of a tomato line Containing Tm-1 gene introgressed from Lycopersicon hirsutum. Theor Appl Genet 80:602–608.
69. Li, Z. H. Zhang, Y. Zeng, Z. Yang, S. Shen, C. Sun, and X. Wang. 2002. Studies on sampling schemes for the establishment of Core Collection of rice landraces in Yunnan, China. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution 49:67–74.
70. Liu, F., D. Charlesworth and M. Kreitman. 1990. The effect of mating system differences on nucleotide diversity at the phosphoglucose isomerase locus in the plant genus Leavenworthia. Genetics 151:343–357.
71. Livingstone, K.D., V.K. Lackney, J.R. Blauth, and R. van Wijk. 1999. Genome mapping in Capsicum and the evolution of genome structure in the Solanaceae. Genetics 152:1183–1202.
72. Logendara, L.S., H.W. Janes, and A.P. Papadopoulos. 1997. Hydroponic tomato production: growing media requirements. In: K. Wignarajah [ed.], Proceedings 18th Annual Conference on Hydroponics. Hydroponic Society of America, San Ramon, CA, USA, pp. 119–123.
73. Marshall, J.A., S. Knapp, M.R. Davey, J.B. Power, E.C. Cocking, M.D. Bennett, and A.V. Cox. 2001. Molecular systematics of Solanum section Lycopersicon (Lycopersicon) using the nuclear ITS rDNA region. Theor Appl Genet 103:1216–1222.
74. Martin, G.B., J.G.K. Williams, and S.D. Tanksley. 1991. Rapid identification of markers linked to a Pseudomonas resistance gene in tomato by using random primers and near- isogenic lines. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 88:2336–2340.
75. McClean, P.E. and M.R. Hanson. 1986. Mitochondrial DNA sequence divergence among Lycopersicon and related Solanum species. Genetics 112:649–667.
76. Miller, J.C. and S.D. Tanksley. 1990. RFLP analysis of phylogenetic relationships and genetic variation in the genus Lycopersicon. Theor Appl Genet 80:437–448.
77. Monforte, A.J., E. Friedman, D. Zamir, and S.D. Tanksley. 2001. Comparison of a set of allelic QTL-NILs for Chromosome 4 of tomato: Deductions about natural variation and implications for germplasm utilization. Theor Appl Genet 102: 572–590.
78. Moreau, P., P. Thoquet, J. Olivier, H. Laterrot, and N. Grimsley. 1998. Genetic mapping of Ph-2, a single locus Controlling partial resistance to Phytophthora infestans in tomato. Mol Plant Microbe In 11:259–269.
79. Muller, C.H. 1940. A revision of the genus Lycopersicon. USDA Misc. Publ. 328:29.
80. Nei, M. 1987. Molecular evolutionary genetics. Columbia Univ. Press, New York.
81. Nei, M. and W.H. Li. 1979. Mathematical model for studying genetic variation in terms of restriction endonucleases. Proc Natl Acad Sci 76:5269- 5273.
82. Nesbitt, T. C. and S.D. Tanksley. 2002. Comparative seqencing in the genus Lycopersicon: Implications for the evolution of fruit size in the domestication of Cultivaed tomatoes. Genetics 162:365–379.
83. Nuez, F. and J. Cuartero. 1984. Collections of Lycopersicon and Solanum pennellii in Peru. Plant-Genet-Resour-Newsl. Rome:42–45.
84. Olmstead, R.G. and J.D. Palmer. 1997. Implication for the phylogeny, Classifications and biogeography of Solanum from CpDNA restriction site variation. Syst Bot 22:19–29.
85. Palmer, J.D. and D. Zamir. 1982. Chloroplast DNA evolution and phylogenetic relationships in Lycopersicon. Proc Natl Acad Sci 79:5006–5010.
86. Pandey, D.K. 1995. Liquid preservatives to improve longevity of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum L.) seeds. Sci Hort 62:54–62.
87. Parzies, H., W. Spoor, and R. Ennos. 2000. Genetic diversity of barley landrace accessions (Hordeum vulgare ssp. vulgare) Conserved for different lengths of time in ex situ gene banks. Heredity 84:476–486.
88. Pelham, J. 1966. Resistance in tomato to tobacco mosaic virus. Euphytica 15:258–67.
89. Phippen, W.B., S. Kresovich, F.G. Candelas, and J.R. McFerson. 1997. Molecular Characterization Can quantify and partition variation among genebank holdings: a Case study with phenotypically similar accessions of Brassica oleracea var Capitata L (cabbage) 'Golden Acre'. Theor Appl Genet 94:227–234.
90. Pitblado, R.E. and E.A. Kerr. 1980. Resistance to bacterial speck (Pseudomonas tomato) in tomato. Acta Hortic 100:379–382.
91. Pitblado, R.E., B.H. MacNeill, and E.A. Kerr. 1984. Chromosomal identity and linkage relationships of Pto, a gene for resistance to Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato in tomato. Can J Plant Pathol 6:48–53.
92. Pollack, E. 1987. On the theory of partially inbreeding finite populations. I. Partial selfing. Genetics 117:353–360.
93. Rick, C.M. 1976. Tomato (family Solanaceae). In: N. W. Simmonds [ed.], Evolution of Crop Plants. Longman Publications, UK, pp. 268–273
94. Rick, C.M. 1979. Biosystematic studies in Lycopersicon and Closely related species of Solanum. In: J.G. Hawkes, R.N. Lester and A.D. Skelding [eds.], The Biology and Taxonomy of the Solanaceae. Academic Press, London, UK, pp. 667–677.
95. Rick, C.M. 1982. A new self-compatible wild population of L. peruvianum. Report of the Tomato Genetics Cooperative 32:43–44.
96. Rick, C.M. and J.F. Fobes. 1975. Allozyme variation in the Cultivated tomato and Closely related species. Bull Torrey Bot Club 102:376–386.
97. Rick, C.M. and R.T. Chetelat. 1995. Utilization of related wild species for tomato improvement. Acta Hort 412:21–38.
98. Rick, C.M., H. Laterrot, and J. Philouze. 1990. A revised key for the Lycopersicon species. Report of the Tomato Genetics Cooperative 40:31.
99. Roberts., E. 1975. Problems of long-term storage of seed and pollen for genetic resources Conservation, In: O.H. Frankel and J.G. Hawkes [eds.], Crop Genetic Resources for Today and Tomorrow. Cambridge University Press, New York, pp. 269–295.
100. Rosello, S., M.J. Diez, and F. Nuez. 1998. Genetics of tomato spotted wilt virus resistance Coming from Lycopersicon peruvianum. Eur J Plant Pathol 104:499–509.
101. Sacks, E. and D.S. Clair. 1996. Cryogenic storage of tomato pollen: effect on fecundity. HortScience 31:447–448.
102. Sarfatti, M., J. Katan, R. Fluhr, and D. Zamir. 1989. An RFLP marker in tomato linked to the Fusarium oxysporum resistance gene I2. Theor Appl Genet 78:755–759.
103. Savolainen, O., C.H. Langley, B.P. Lazzaro, and H. Freville. 2000. Contrasting patterns of nucleotide polymorphism at the alcohol dehydrogenase locus in the outcrossing Arabidopsis lyrata and the selfing Arabidopsis thalania. Mol Biol Evol 17:645–655.
104. Schaible, L., O.S. Cannon, and V. Waddoups. 1951. Inheritance of resistance to verticillium wilt in a tomato Cross. Phytopathology 41:986–90.
105. Scott, J.W. and J.D. Farley. 1983. 'Ohio CR-6' tomato. Hort Science 18:114–115.
106. Scott, J.W., H.A. Agrama, and J.P. Jones. 2004. RFLP-based analysis of recombination among resistance genes to fusarium wilt races 1, 2, and 3 in tomato. J Am Soc Hortic Sci 129:394–400.
107. Skroch, P.W., J. Nienhuis, S. Bebee, J. Tohme, and F. Pedraza. 1998. Comparison of Mexican Common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) Core and reserve germplasm Collections. Crop Sci 38:488–496.
108. Snyder, R.G. 1996. Greenhouse tomatoes - The basics of successful production. Greenhouse Tomato Seminar. ASHS Press, American Society of Horticultural Science, Alexandria, VA, USA, pp. 3–6.
109. Sobczak, M., A. Avrova, J. Jupowicz, M.S. Phillips, K. Ernst, and K. Amar. 2005. Characterization of susceptibility and resistance responses to potato Cyst nematode (Globodera spp.) infection of tomato lines in the absence and presence of the broad- spectrum nematode resistance Hero gene. Mol Plant Microbe In 18:158–168.
110. Soltis, E.D. and P.S. Soltis. 2000. Contributions of plant molecular systematics to studies of molecular evolution. Plant Mol Biol 42:45–75.
111. Spooner, D.M., G.J. Anderson, and R.K. Jansen. 1993. Chloroplast DNA evidence for the interrelationships of tomatoes, potatoes, and pepinos (Solanaceae). Am J Bot 80:676–688.
112. Stanwood, P.C. and S. Sowa. 1995. Evaluation of onion (Allium Cepa L.) seed after 10 years of storage at 5, -18, and -196 °C. Crop Sci 35:852–856.
113. Steiner, A.M., P. Ruckenbauer, and E. Goecke. 1997. Maintenance in genebanks, a Case study: Contaminations observed in the Nürnberg oats of 1831. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution 44:533–538.
114. Stephan, W. and C.H. Langley. 1998. DNA polymorphism in Lycopersicon and Crossing-over per physical length. Genetics 150:1585–1593.
115. Stevens, J.M. 1964. Tomato breeding. Acta Hortic 194:69–75.
116. Stevens, M.A., and C.M. Rick. 1986. Chapter 2. Genetics and breeding, In: J. Atherton and J. Rudich. [eds.], The Tomato Crop. Chapman and Hall, NY, USA, pp. 35–109.
117. Stevens, M.R., S.J. Scott, and. R.C. Gergerich. 1992. Inheritance of a gene for resistance to tomato spotted wilt virus (TSWV) from Lycopersicon peruvianum Mill. Euphytica 59:9–17.
118. Suliman-Pollatschek, S., K. Kashkush, H. Shats, J. Hillel, and U. Lavi. 2002. Generation and mapping of AFLP, SSRs, and SNPs in Lycopersicon esculentum. Cellular and Molecular Biology Letters 7:583–597.
119. Tanksley, S.D., M.W. Ganal, J.P. Prince, M.C. de Vicente, M.W. Bonierbale, P. Broun, T.M. Fulton, J.J. Giovannoni, S. Grandillo, and G.B. Martin. 1992. High density molecular linkage maps of the tomato and potato genomes. Genetics 132:1141–1160.
120. Tanksley, S.D., S. Grandillo, T.M. Fulton, D. Zamir, Y. Eshed, V. Petiard, J. Lopez, and T. Beck-Bunn. 1996. Advanced backcross QTL analysis in a Cross between an elite processing line of tomato and its wild relative L. pimpinellifolium. Theor Appl Genet 92:213–224.
121. Taylor, I.B. 1986. Chapter 1. Biosystematics of the tomato. In: J. Atherton and J. Rudich [eds.], The Tomato Crop. Chapman and Hall, NY, USA, pp. 1–34.
122. USDA-ERS. 2003. U.S. tomato statistics, 1960–2002. USDA-Economic Research Service. http://usda.mannlib.cornell.edu/reports/nassr/fruit/pvg-bban/vgan0195.txt
123. USDA-NASS. 1995. Vegetables 1994 summary. USDA-National Agricultural Statistics Service. http://usda.mannlib.cornell.edu/reports/nassr/fruit/pvg-bban. Vegetables Annual Summary, 1995.
124. USDA-NASS. 2003. Vegetables 2002 summary. USDA-National Agricultural Statistics Service. http://usda.mannlib.cornell.edu/reports/nassr/fruit/pvg-bban. Vegetables Annual Summary, 2003
125. Vakalounakis, D.J. 1988. The genetic analysis of resistance to fusarium Crown and root rot of tomato. Plant Pathol 37:71–73.
126. Vakalounakis, D.J., H. Laterrot, A. Moretti, E.K. Ligoxigakis, and K. Smardas. 1997. Linkage between Frl (Fusarium oxysporum F.SP. Radicislycopersici resistance) and Tm- 2 (tobacco mosaic virus resistance-2) loci in tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum). Ann Appl Biol 130:319–323.
127. van Hintum, T.J.L. 2000. Duplication within and between germplasm Collections quantitative mode. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution 47:65–68.
128. van Hintum, T.J.L., and D.L. Visser. 1995. Duplication within and between germplasm Collections. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution 42:1235–145.
129. van Hintum, T.J.L., I.W. Boukema, and D. Visser. 1996. Reduction of duplication in a Brassica oleracea germplasm Collection. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution 43:343349.
130. Vencovsky, R. and J. Crossa. 1999. Variance effective population size under mixed self and random mating with applications to genetic Conservation of species. Crop Sci 39:1282–1284.
131. Villand, J., P.W. Skroch, T. Lai, P. Hanson, C.G. Kuo, and J. Nienhuis. 1998. Genetic variation among tomato accessions from primary and secondary Centers of diversity. Crop Sci 38:1339–1347.
132. Villand, J.M. 1995. Comparison of molecular marker and morphological data to determine genetic distance among tomato Cultivars. M.S., Univ. of Wisconsin, Madison.
133. Walters, C., E.E. Roos, D.H. Touchnell, P. Stanwood, L. Towill, L. Wiesner, and S. Eberhart. 1998. Refrigeration Can save seeds economically. Nature 395:758.
134. Weir, B. 1996. Genetic Data Analysis II. Sinauer Associates, Inc., Sunderland, Massachusetts.
135. Williams, C.E. and D.A. St Clair. 1993. Phenetic relationships and levels of variability detected by restriction fragment length polymorphism and random amplified polymorphic DNA analysis of Cultivated and wild accessions of Lycopersicon esculentum. Genome 36:619–630.
136. Wu, X., N. Wu, X. Qian, R. Li, F. Huang, and L. Zhu. 1998. Phenotypic and genotypic Changes in rapeseed after 18 years of storage and regeneration. Seed Sci Res 8:55–64.
137. Xiang Hui, K., Z. Hai Ying, K. Kong, and H. Zhang. 1998. The effect of ultradry methods and storage on vegetable seeds. Seed Sci Res 8:41–45.
138. Yaghoobi, J., I. Kaloshian, Y. Wen, and V.M. Williamson. 1995. Mapping a new nematode resistance locus in Lycopersicon peruvianum. Theor Appl Genet 91:457–464.
139. Young, N.D., D. Zamir, M.W. Ganal, and S.D. Tanksley. 1988. Use of isogenic lines and simultaneous probing to identify DNA markers tightly linked to the Tm-2a gene in tomato. Genetics 120:579–585.
140. Zamir, D., I. Ekstein-Michelson, Y. Zakay, N. Navot, M. Zeidan, M. Sarfatti, Y. Eshed, E. Harel, T. Pleban, H. van Oss, N. Kedar, H.D. Rabinowitch, and H. Czosnek. 1994. Mapping and introgression of a tomato yellow leaf Curl virus tolerance gene, Ty-1. Theor Appl Genet 88:141-146
141. Zheng, G.M., X.M. Jing, and K.L. Tao. 1998. Ultradry seed storage Cuts Cost of gene bank. Nature 393:223–224.